Conversation acts in task-oriented spoken dialogue:
Abstract: "A linguistics form's compositional, timeless meaning can be surrounded or even contradicted by various social, aesthetic, or analogistic companion meanings. This paper addresses a series of problems in the structure of spoken language discourse, including turn-taking and groundi...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Rochester, NY
1992
|
Schriftenreihe: | University of Rochester <Rochester, NY> / Department of Computer Science: Technical report
425 |
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract: "A linguistics form's compositional, timeless meaning can be surrounded or even contradicted by various social, aesthetic, or analogistic companion meanings. This paper addresses a series of problems in the structure of spoken language discourse, including turn-taking and grounding. It views these processes as composed of fine-grained actions, which resemble speech acts both in resulting from a computational mechanism of planning and in having a rich relationship to the specific linguistic features which serve to indicate their presence. The resulting notion of Conversation Acts is more general than speech act theory, encompassing not only the traditional speech acts but turn-taking, grounding, and higher- level argumentation acts as well Furthermore, the traditional speech acts in this scheme become fully joint actions, whose successful performance requires full listener participation. This paper presents a detailed analysis of spoken language dialogue. It shows the role of each class of conversation acts discourse structure, and discusses how members of each class can be recognized in conversation. Conversation acts, it will be seen, better account for the success of conversation than speech act theory alone. |
Beschreibung: | 28 S. |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV009015688 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 940206s1992 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)27652905 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV009015688 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-29T | ||
100 | 1 | |a Traum, David R. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Conversation acts in task-oriented spoken dialogue |c David R. Traum ; Elizabeth A. Hinkelman |
264 | 1 | |a Rochester, NY |c 1992 | |
300 | |a 28 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a University of Rochester <Rochester, NY> / Department of Computer Science: Technical report |v 425 | |
520 | 3 | |a Abstract: "A linguistics form's compositional, timeless meaning can be surrounded or even contradicted by various social, aesthetic, or analogistic companion meanings. This paper addresses a series of problems in the structure of spoken language discourse, including turn-taking and grounding. It views these processes as composed of fine-grained actions, which resemble speech acts both in resulting from a computational mechanism of planning and in having a rich relationship to the specific linguistic features which serve to indicate their presence. The resulting notion of Conversation Acts is more general than speech act theory, encompassing not only the traditional speech acts but turn-taking, grounding, and higher- level argumentation acts as well | |
520 | 3 | |a Furthermore, the traditional speech acts in this scheme become fully joint actions, whose successful performance requires full listener participation. This paper presents a detailed analysis of spoken language dialogue. It shows the role of each class of conversation acts discourse structure, and discusses how members of each class can be recognized in conversation. Conversation acts, it will be seen, better account for the success of conversation than speech act theory alone. | |
650 | 4 | |a Computational linguistics | |
700 | 1 | |a Hinkelman, Elizabeth A. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
810 | 2 | |a Department of Computer Science: Technical report |t University of Rochester <Rochester, NY> |v 425 |w (DE-604)BV008902697 |9 425 | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005961235 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804123365012668416 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Traum, David R. Hinkelman, Elizabeth A. |
author_facet | Traum, David R. Hinkelman, Elizabeth A. |
author_role | aut aut |
author_sort | Traum, David R. |
author_variant | d r t dr drt e a h ea eah |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV009015688 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)27652905 (DE-599)BVBBV009015688 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02293nam a2200313 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV009015688</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">940206s1992 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)27652905</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV009015688</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29T</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Traum, David R.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Conversation acts in task-oriented spoken dialogue</subfield><subfield code="c">David R. Traum ; Elizabeth A. Hinkelman</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Rochester, NY</subfield><subfield code="c">1992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">28 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">University of Rochester <Rochester, NY> / Department of Computer Science: Technical report</subfield><subfield code="v">425</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract: "A linguistics form's compositional, timeless meaning can be surrounded or even contradicted by various social, aesthetic, or analogistic companion meanings. This paper addresses a series of problems in the structure of spoken language discourse, including turn-taking and grounding. It views these processes as composed of fine-grained actions, which resemble speech acts both in resulting from a computational mechanism of planning and in having a rich relationship to the specific linguistic features which serve to indicate their presence. The resulting notion of Conversation Acts is more general than speech act theory, encompassing not only the traditional speech acts but turn-taking, grounding, and higher- level argumentation acts as well</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Furthermore, the traditional speech acts in this scheme become fully joint actions, whose successful performance requires full listener participation. This paper presents a detailed analysis of spoken language dialogue. It shows the role of each class of conversation acts discourse structure, and discusses how members of each class can be recognized in conversation. Conversation acts, it will be seen, better account for the success of conversation than speech act theory alone.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Computational linguistics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hinkelman, Elizabeth A.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="810" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Department of Computer Science: Technical report</subfield><subfield code="t">University of Rochester <Rochester, NY></subfield><subfield code="v">425</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV008902697</subfield><subfield code="9">425</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005961235</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV009015688 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T17:28:36Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005961235 |
oclc_num | 27652905 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-29T |
owner_facet | DE-29T |
physical | 28 S. |
publishDate | 1992 |
publishDateSearch | 1992 |
publishDateSort | 1992 |
record_format | marc |
series2 | University of Rochester <Rochester, NY> / Department of Computer Science: Technical report |
spelling | Traum, David R. Verfasser aut Conversation acts in task-oriented spoken dialogue David R. Traum ; Elizabeth A. Hinkelman Rochester, NY 1992 28 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier University of Rochester <Rochester, NY> / Department of Computer Science: Technical report 425 Abstract: "A linguistics form's compositional, timeless meaning can be surrounded or even contradicted by various social, aesthetic, or analogistic companion meanings. This paper addresses a series of problems in the structure of spoken language discourse, including turn-taking and grounding. It views these processes as composed of fine-grained actions, which resemble speech acts both in resulting from a computational mechanism of planning and in having a rich relationship to the specific linguistic features which serve to indicate their presence. The resulting notion of Conversation Acts is more general than speech act theory, encompassing not only the traditional speech acts but turn-taking, grounding, and higher- level argumentation acts as well Furthermore, the traditional speech acts in this scheme become fully joint actions, whose successful performance requires full listener participation. This paper presents a detailed analysis of spoken language dialogue. It shows the role of each class of conversation acts discourse structure, and discusses how members of each class can be recognized in conversation. Conversation acts, it will be seen, better account for the success of conversation than speech act theory alone. Computational linguistics Hinkelman, Elizabeth A. Verfasser aut Department of Computer Science: Technical report University of Rochester <Rochester, NY> 425 (DE-604)BV008902697 425 |
spellingShingle | Traum, David R. Hinkelman, Elizabeth A. Conversation acts in task-oriented spoken dialogue Computational linguistics |
title | Conversation acts in task-oriented spoken dialogue |
title_auth | Conversation acts in task-oriented spoken dialogue |
title_exact_search | Conversation acts in task-oriented spoken dialogue |
title_full | Conversation acts in task-oriented spoken dialogue David R. Traum ; Elizabeth A. Hinkelman |
title_fullStr | Conversation acts in task-oriented spoken dialogue David R. Traum ; Elizabeth A. Hinkelman |
title_full_unstemmed | Conversation acts in task-oriented spoken dialogue David R. Traum ; Elizabeth A. Hinkelman |
title_short | Conversation acts in task-oriented spoken dialogue |
title_sort | conversation acts in task oriented spoken dialogue |
topic | Computational linguistics |
topic_facet | Computational linguistics |
volume_link | (DE-604)BV008902697 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT traumdavidr conversationactsintaskorientedspokendialogue AT hinkelmanelizabetha conversationactsintaskorientedspokendialogue |