Naturalistic inquiry: paradigm and method ; a paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association [67th], Montreal, April [11 - 15], 1983
Despite the rhetoric acclaiming it as a new paradigm, educational researchers have tended to treat naturalistic inquiry as a new or alternative method employed within the dominant, rationalistic paradigm. Spokespersons for naturalistic inquiry tend to concentrate on what one does differently rather...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Mikrofilm Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
[Washington, DC]
Educational Resources Information Center
1983
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | Despite the rhetoric acclaiming it as a new paradigm, educational researchers have tended to treat naturalistic inquiry as a new or alternative method employed within the dominant, rationalistic paradigm. Spokespersons for naturalistic inquiry tend to concentrate on what one does differently rather than how one perceives what one is doing differently. If naturalistic inquiry is to become an accepted paradigm of inquiry in education, it must be clearly distinguished from rationalistic methods. A case comparison approach is presented to highlight the differing beliefs and attitudes about research held by researchers in two case examples. Beliefs about the nature of scientific knowledge, ways of knowing, and the role of the inquirer in inquiry exemplified in the published reports are examined. Despite similarities in method, the examples display different attitudes toward inquiry. These are used as a basis for drawing conclusions about the diffusion of naturalistic inquiry into the mainstream of educational research: (1) it is important to distinguish naturalistic paradigms from naturalistic methods; (2) naturalistic inquiry may be as useful to educational research as a paradigmatic set, and (3) educational research needs naturalistic inquiry both as a paradigm and a method, but to be effectively utilized the two must be distinguished. (CM) |
| Beschreibung: | Mikroreprod. e. Veröff. von 1983. 12 S. |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Mikrofiche 24x |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV008970581 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20200310 | ||
| 007 | he|uuuuuuuuuu | ||
| 008 | 940206s1983 |||| b|||| 10||| eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)632646851 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV008970581 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-N2 | ||
| 084 | |a DF 2502 |0 (DE-625)19541:763 |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lotto, Linda S. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Naturalistic inquiry |b paradigm and method ; a paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association [67th], Montreal, April [11 - 15], 1983 |c Linda S. Lotto |
| 264 | 1 | |a [Washington, DC] |b Educational Resources Information Center |c 1983 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Mikrofiche |b 24x | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b h |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b he |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Mikroreprod. e. Veröff. von 1983. 12 S. | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Despite the rhetoric acclaiming it as a new paradigm, educational researchers have tended to treat naturalistic inquiry as a new or alternative method employed within the dominant, rationalistic paradigm. Spokespersons for naturalistic inquiry tend to concentrate on what one does differently rather than how one perceives what one is doing differently. If naturalistic inquiry is to become an accepted paradigm of inquiry in education, it must be clearly distinguished from rationalistic methods. A case comparison approach is presented to highlight the differing beliefs and attitudes about research held by researchers in two case examples. Beliefs about the nature of scientific knowledge, ways of knowing, and the role of the inquirer in inquiry exemplified in the published reports are examined. Despite similarities in method, the examples display different attitudes toward inquiry. These are used as a basis for drawing conclusions about the diffusion of naturalistic inquiry into the mainstream of educational research: (1) it is important to distinguish naturalistic paradigms from naturalistic methods; (2) naturalistic inquiry may be as useful to educational research as a paradigmatic set, and (3) educational research needs naturalistic inquiry both as a paradigm and a method, but to be effectively utilized the two must be distinguished. (CM) | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Comparative Analysis | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Educational Research | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Inquiry | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Research Methodology | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Scientific Attitudes | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)1071861417 |a Konferenzschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005922675 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804123307650318336 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Lotto, Linda S. |
| author_facet | Lotto, Linda S. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Lotto, Linda S. |
| author_variant | l s l ls lsl |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV008970581 |
| classification_rvk | DF 2502 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)632646851 (DE-599)BVBBV008970581 |
| discipline | Pädagogik |
| format | Microfilm Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02558nam a2200349 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV008970581</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20200310 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">he|uuuuuuuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">940206s1983 |||| b|||| 10||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)632646851</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV008970581</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-N2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DF 2502</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)19541:763</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lotto, Linda S.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Naturalistic inquiry</subfield><subfield code="b">paradigm and method ; a paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association [67th], Montreal, April [11 - 15], 1983</subfield><subfield code="c">Linda S. Lotto</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">[Washington, DC]</subfield><subfield code="b">Educational Resources Information Center</subfield><subfield code="c">1983</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Mikrofiche</subfield><subfield code="b">24x</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">h</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">he</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mikroreprod. e. Veröff. von 1983. 12 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Despite the rhetoric acclaiming it as a new paradigm, educational researchers have tended to treat naturalistic inquiry as a new or alternative method employed within the dominant, rationalistic paradigm. Spokespersons for naturalistic inquiry tend to concentrate on what one does differently rather than how one perceives what one is doing differently. If naturalistic inquiry is to become an accepted paradigm of inquiry in education, it must be clearly distinguished from rationalistic methods. A case comparison approach is presented to highlight the differing beliefs and attitudes about research held by researchers in two case examples. Beliefs about the nature of scientific knowledge, ways of knowing, and the role of the inquirer in inquiry exemplified in the published reports are examined. Despite similarities in method, the examples display different attitudes toward inquiry. These are used as a basis for drawing conclusions about the diffusion of naturalistic inquiry into the mainstream of educational research: (1) it is important to distinguish naturalistic paradigms from naturalistic methods; (2) naturalistic inquiry may be as useful to educational research as a paradigmatic set, and (3) educational research needs naturalistic inquiry both as a paradigm and a method, but to be effectively utilized the two must be distinguished. (CM)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparative Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Educational Research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Inquiry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Research Methodology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Scientific Attitudes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1071861417</subfield><subfield code="a">Konferenzschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005922675</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)1071861417 Konferenzschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Konferenzschrift |
| id | DE-604.BV008970581 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T17:27:42Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005922675 |
| oclc_num | 632646851 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-N2 |
| owner_facet | DE-N2 |
| physical | 1 Mikrofiche 24x |
| publishDate | 1983 |
| publishDateSearch | 1983 |
| publishDateSort | 1983 |
| publisher | Educational Resources Information Center |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Lotto, Linda S. Verfasser aut Naturalistic inquiry paradigm and method ; a paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association [67th], Montreal, April [11 - 15], 1983 Linda S. Lotto [Washington, DC] Educational Resources Information Center 1983 1 Mikrofiche 24x txt rdacontent h rdamedia he rdacarrier Mikroreprod. e. Veröff. von 1983. 12 S. Despite the rhetoric acclaiming it as a new paradigm, educational researchers have tended to treat naturalistic inquiry as a new or alternative method employed within the dominant, rationalistic paradigm. Spokespersons for naturalistic inquiry tend to concentrate on what one does differently rather than how one perceives what one is doing differently. If naturalistic inquiry is to become an accepted paradigm of inquiry in education, it must be clearly distinguished from rationalistic methods. A case comparison approach is presented to highlight the differing beliefs and attitudes about research held by researchers in two case examples. Beliefs about the nature of scientific knowledge, ways of knowing, and the role of the inquirer in inquiry exemplified in the published reports are examined. Despite similarities in method, the examples display different attitudes toward inquiry. These are used as a basis for drawing conclusions about the diffusion of naturalistic inquiry into the mainstream of educational research: (1) it is important to distinguish naturalistic paradigms from naturalistic methods; (2) naturalistic inquiry may be as useful to educational research as a paradigmatic set, and (3) educational research needs naturalistic inquiry both as a paradigm and a method, but to be effectively utilized the two must be distinguished. (CM) Comparative Analysis Educational Research Inquiry Research Methodology Scientific Attitudes (DE-588)1071861417 Konferenzschrift gnd-content |
| spellingShingle | Lotto, Linda S. Naturalistic inquiry paradigm and method ; a paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association [67th], Montreal, April [11 - 15], 1983 |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)1071861417 |
| title | Naturalistic inquiry paradigm and method ; a paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association [67th], Montreal, April [11 - 15], 1983 |
| title_auth | Naturalistic inquiry paradigm and method ; a paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association [67th], Montreal, April [11 - 15], 1983 |
| title_exact_search | Naturalistic inquiry paradigm and method ; a paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association [67th], Montreal, April [11 - 15], 1983 |
| title_full | Naturalistic inquiry paradigm and method ; a paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association [67th], Montreal, April [11 - 15], 1983 Linda S. Lotto |
| title_fullStr | Naturalistic inquiry paradigm and method ; a paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association [67th], Montreal, April [11 - 15], 1983 Linda S. Lotto |
| title_full_unstemmed | Naturalistic inquiry paradigm and method ; a paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association [67th], Montreal, April [11 - 15], 1983 Linda S. Lotto |
| title_short | Naturalistic inquiry |
| title_sort | naturalistic inquiry paradigm and method a paper presented at the annual meeting of the american educational research association 67th montreal april 11 15 1983 |
| title_sub | paradigm and method ; a paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association [67th], Montreal, April [11 - 15], 1983 |
| topic_facet | Konferenzschrift |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lottolindas naturalisticinquiryparadigmandmethodapaperpresentedattheannualmeetingoftheamericaneducationalresearchassociation67thmontrealapril11151983 |