Two constraints on speech act ambiguity:
Abstract: "Existing plan-based theories of speech act interpretation do not account for the conventional aspect of speech acts. We use patterns of linguistic features (e.g. mood, verb form, sentence adverbials, thematic roles) to suggest a range of speech act interpretations for the utterance....
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Rochester, NY
1989
|
| Schriftenreihe: | University of Rochester <Rochester, NY> / Department of Computer Science: Technical report
271 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | Abstract: "Existing plan-based theories of speech act interpretation do not account for the conventional aspect of speech acts. We use patterns of linguistic features (e.g. mood, verb form, sentence adverbials, thematic roles) to suggest a range of speech act interpretations for the utterance. These are filtered using plan-based conversational implicatures to eliminate inappropriate ones. Extended plan reasoning is available but not necessary for familiar forms. Taking speech act ambiguity seriously, with these two constraints, explains how 'Can you pass the salt?' is a typical indirect request while 'Are you able to pass the salt' is not." |
| Beschreibung: | I, 29 S. |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV008948969 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 940206s1989 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)21913879 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV008948969 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-29T | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hinkelman, Elizabeth A. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Two constraints on speech act ambiguity |
| 264 | 1 | |a Rochester, NY |c 1989 | |
| 300 | |a I, 29 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a University of Rochester <Rochester, NY> / Department of Computer Science: Technical report |v 271 | |
| 520 | 3 | |a Abstract: "Existing plan-based theories of speech act interpretation do not account for the conventional aspect of speech acts. We use patterns of linguistic features (e.g. mood, verb form, sentence adverbials, thematic roles) to suggest a range of speech act interpretations for the utterance. These are filtered using plan-based conversational implicatures to eliminate inappropriate ones. Extended plan reasoning is available but not necessary for familiar forms. Taking speech act ambiguity seriously, with these two constraints, explains how 'Can you pass the salt?' is a typical indirect request while 'Are you able to pass the salt' is not." | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Automatic speech recognition | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Speech acts (Linguistics) | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Allen, James F. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 810 | 2 | |a Department of Computer Science: Technical report |t University of Rochester <Rochester, NY> |v 271 |w (DE-604)BV008902697 |9 271 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005904689 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804123281976983552 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Hinkelman, Elizabeth A. Allen, James F. |
| author_facet | Hinkelman, Elizabeth A. Allen, James F. |
| author_role | aut aut |
| author_sort | Hinkelman, Elizabeth A. |
| author_variant | e a h ea eah j f a jf jfa |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV008948969 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)21913879 (DE-599)BVBBV008948969 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01681nam a2200313 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV008948969</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">940206s1989 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)21913879</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV008948969</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29T</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hinkelman, Elizabeth A.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Two constraints on speech act ambiguity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Rochester, NY</subfield><subfield code="c">1989</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">I, 29 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">University of Rochester <Rochester, NY> / Department of Computer Science: Technical report</subfield><subfield code="v">271</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract: "Existing plan-based theories of speech act interpretation do not account for the conventional aspect of speech acts. We use patterns of linguistic features (e.g. mood, verb form, sentence adverbials, thematic roles) to suggest a range of speech act interpretations for the utterance. These are filtered using plan-based conversational implicatures to eliminate inappropriate ones. Extended plan reasoning is available but not necessary for familiar forms. Taking speech act ambiguity seriously, with these two constraints, explains how 'Can you pass the salt?' is a typical indirect request while 'Are you able to pass the salt' is not."</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Automatic speech recognition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Speech acts (Linguistics)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Allen, James F.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="810" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Department of Computer Science: Technical report</subfield><subfield code="t">University of Rochester <Rochester, NY></subfield><subfield code="v">271</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV008902697</subfield><subfield code="9">271</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005904689</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV008948969 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T17:27:17Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005904689 |
| oclc_num | 21913879 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-29T |
| owner_facet | DE-29T |
| physical | I, 29 S. |
| publishDate | 1989 |
| publishDateSearch | 1989 |
| publishDateSort | 1989 |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | University of Rochester <Rochester, NY> / Department of Computer Science: Technical report |
| spelling | Hinkelman, Elizabeth A. Verfasser aut Two constraints on speech act ambiguity Rochester, NY 1989 I, 29 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier University of Rochester <Rochester, NY> / Department of Computer Science: Technical report 271 Abstract: "Existing plan-based theories of speech act interpretation do not account for the conventional aspect of speech acts. We use patterns of linguistic features (e.g. mood, verb form, sentence adverbials, thematic roles) to suggest a range of speech act interpretations for the utterance. These are filtered using plan-based conversational implicatures to eliminate inappropriate ones. Extended plan reasoning is available but not necessary for familiar forms. Taking speech act ambiguity seriously, with these two constraints, explains how 'Can you pass the salt?' is a typical indirect request while 'Are you able to pass the salt' is not." Automatic speech recognition Speech acts (Linguistics) Allen, James F. Verfasser aut Department of Computer Science: Technical report University of Rochester <Rochester, NY> 271 (DE-604)BV008902697 271 |
| spellingShingle | Hinkelman, Elizabeth A. Allen, James F. Two constraints on speech act ambiguity Automatic speech recognition Speech acts (Linguistics) |
| title | Two constraints on speech act ambiguity |
| title_auth | Two constraints on speech act ambiguity |
| title_exact_search | Two constraints on speech act ambiguity |
| title_full | Two constraints on speech act ambiguity |
| title_fullStr | Two constraints on speech act ambiguity |
| title_full_unstemmed | Two constraints on speech act ambiguity |
| title_short | Two constraints on speech act ambiguity |
| title_sort | two constraints on speech act ambiguity |
| topic | Automatic speech recognition Speech acts (Linguistics) |
| topic_facet | Automatic speech recognition Speech acts (Linguistics) |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV008902697 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hinkelmanelizabetha twoconstraintsonspeechactambiguity AT allenjamesf twoconstraintsonspeechactambiguity |