The completeness of Kant's table of judgments:
This classic of Kant scholarship, whose first edition appeared in 1932, deals with one of the most controversial and difficult topics in the Critique of Pure Reason: Kant's table of judgments and their connection to the table of categories. Kant's attempt to derive the latter from the form...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English German |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Stanford, Calif.
Stanford Univ. Press
1992
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Stanford series in philosophy
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | This classic of Kant scholarship, whose first edition appeared in 1932, deals with one of the most controversial and difficult topics in the Critique of Pure Reason: Kant's table of judgments and their connection to the table of categories. Kant's attempt to derive the latter from the former is called the "Metaphysical Deduction," and it paves the way for the Transcendental Deduction that is universally recognized as the heart of the Critique. Many commentators have passed over the Metaphysical Deduction in silence, as if embarrassed by Kant's fatuity, and his critics are almost unanimous in finding its premise ungrounded, its argument incorrect, and its conclusion false. At the heart of the failure of the Metaphysical Deduction, it is alleged, is Kant's inability to justify the table of the forms of judgment. Critics argue that Kant simply took these forms of judgment from the logic textbooks of his day and doctored them so as to yield the required categories. Such objections were current even in Kant's time; they were repeated by Hegel, and are commonplaces of Kant criticism today. This book is the fullest and most systematic evaluation ever made of the Metaphysical Deduction. Reich argues that its principal conclusion is correct even though Kant failed to establish it in the Metaphysical Deduction proper, and he defends the conclusion by using Kant material far removed from the text of the Metaphysical Deduction, notes by Kant that only became available in the 1920's and that remain even now untranslated into English. With the publication of this translation for English-speaking Kant scholars, a neglected and impugned part of the Critique of Pure Reason can finally receive the attention it deserves. |
| Beschreibung: | 132 S. |
| ISBN: | 0804719349 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV008357171 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20250204 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 931129s1992 xx m||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 0804719349 |9 0-8047-1934-9 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)24628816 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV008357171 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
| 041 | 1 | |a eng |h ger | |
| 049 | |a DE-384 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a B2799.J8 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 121 |2 20 | |
| 084 | |a CF 5017 |0 (DE-625)18105:11616 |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Reich, Klaus |d 1906-1996 |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)116394641 |4 aut | |
| 240 | 1 | 0 | |a Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The completeness of Kant's table of judgments |c Klaus Reich |
| 264 | 1 | |a Stanford, Calif. |b Stanford Univ. Press |c 1992 | |
| 300 | |a 132 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Stanford series in philosophy | |
| 520 | 3 | |a This classic of Kant scholarship, whose first edition appeared in 1932, deals with one of the most controversial and difficult topics in the Critique of Pure Reason: Kant's table of judgments and their connection to the table of categories. Kant's attempt to derive the latter from the former is called the "Metaphysical Deduction," and it paves the way for the Transcendental Deduction that is universally recognized as the heart of the Critique. Many commentators have passed over the Metaphysical Deduction in silence, as if embarrassed by Kant's fatuity, and his critics are almost unanimous in finding its premise ungrounded, its argument incorrect, and its conclusion false. At the heart of the failure of the Metaphysical Deduction, it is alleged, is Kant's inability to justify the table of the forms of judgment. Critics argue that Kant simply took these forms of judgment from the logic textbooks of his day and doctored them so as to yield the required categories. Such objections were current even in Kant's time; they were repeated by Hegel, and are commonplaces of Kant criticism today. This book is the fullest and most systematic evaluation ever made of the Metaphysical Deduction. Reich argues that its principal conclusion is correct even though Kant failed to establish it in the Metaphysical Deduction proper, and he defends the conclusion by using Kant material far removed from the text of the Metaphysical Deduction, notes by Kant that only became available in the 1920's and that remain even now untranslated into English. With the publication of this translation for English-speaking Kant scholars, a neglected and impugned part of the Critique of Pure Reason can finally receive the attention it deserves. | |
| 600 | 1 | 4 | |a Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> - Et la logique transcendantale |
| 600 | 1 | 4 | |a Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> / Kritik der reinen Vernunft |
| 600 | 1 | 4 | |a Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> |t Kritik der reinen Vernunft |
| 600 | 1 | 7 | |a Kant, Immanuel |d 1724-1804 |0 (DE-588)118559796 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 600 | 1 | 7 | |a Kant, Immanuel |d 1724-1804 |t Kritik der reinen Vernunft |0 (DE-588)4099256-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 648 | 4 | |a Geschichte 1700-1800 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Catégories (Philosophie) - Histoire - 18e siècle | |
| 650 | 7 | |a FILOSOFIA MODERNA - ALEMANHA |2 larpcal | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Jugement (Logique) | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Logica |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Logique transcendantale | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Oordeel |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Geschichte | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Logik | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Categories (Philosophy) |x History |y 18th century | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judgment (Logic) | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Transzendentalphilosophie |0 (DE-588)4060719-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Logik |0 (DE-588)4036202-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kategorienlehre |0 (DE-588)4235866-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Erkenntnistheorie |0 (DE-588)4070914-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Urteil |g Logik |0 (DE-588)4270765-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 655 | 7 | |8 1\p |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Kant, Immanuel |d 1724-1804 |t Kritik der reinen Vernunft |0 (DE-588)4099256-1 |D u |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Urteil |g Logik |0 (DE-588)4270765-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |a Erkenntnistheorie |0 (DE-588)4070914-0 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | |8 2\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 2 | 0 | |a Transzendentalphilosophie |0 (DE-588)4060719-7 |D s |
| 689 | 2 | |8 3\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 3 | 0 | |a Kategorienlehre |0 (DE-588)4235866-8 |D s |
| 689 | 3 | |8 4\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 4 | 0 | |a Logik |0 (DE-588)4036202-4 |D s |
| 689 | 4 | |8 5\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 5 | 0 | |a Kant, Immanuel |d 1724-1804 |0 (DE-588)118559796 |D p |
| 689 | 5 | |8 6\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 883 | 1 | |8 2\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 883 | 1 | |8 3\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 883 | 1 | |8 4\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 883 | 1 | |8 5\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 883 | 1 | |8 6\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005518343 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1823139430959939584 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Reich, Klaus 1906-1996 |
| author_GND | (DE-588)116394641 |
| author_facet | Reich, Klaus 1906-1996 |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Reich, Klaus 1906-1996 |
| author_variant | k r kr |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV008357171 |
| callnumber-first | B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
| callnumber-label | B2799 |
| callnumber-raw | B2799.J8 |
| callnumber-search | B2799.J8 |
| callnumber-sort | B 42799 J8 |
| callnumber-subject | B - Philosophy |
| classification_rvk | CF 5017 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)24628816 (DE-599)BVBBV008357171 |
| dewey-full | 121 |
| dewey-hundreds | 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
| dewey-ones | 121 - Epistemology (Theory of knowledge) |
| dewey-raw | 121 |
| dewey-search | 121 |
| dewey-sort | 3121 |
| dewey-tens | 120 - Epistemology, causation, humankind |
| discipline | Philosophie |
| era | Geschichte 1700-1800 |
| era_facet | Geschichte 1700-1800 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV008357171</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20250204</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">931129s1992 xx m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0804719349</subfield><subfield code="9">0-8047-1934-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)24628816</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV008357171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="h">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">B2799.J8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">121</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CF 5017</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)18105:11616</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Reich, Klaus</subfield><subfield code="d">1906-1996</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)116394641</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="240" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The completeness of Kant's table of judgments</subfield><subfield code="c">Klaus Reich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Stanford, Calif.</subfield><subfield code="b">Stanford Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">132 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stanford series in philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This classic of Kant scholarship, whose first edition appeared in 1932, deals with one of the most controversial and difficult topics in the Critique of Pure Reason: Kant's table of judgments and their connection to the table of categories. Kant's attempt to derive the latter from the former is called the "Metaphysical Deduction," and it paves the way for the Transcendental Deduction that is universally recognized as the heart of the Critique. Many commentators have passed over the Metaphysical Deduction in silence, as if embarrassed by Kant's fatuity, and his critics are almost unanimous in finding its premise ungrounded, its argument incorrect, and its conclusion false. At the heart of the failure of the Metaphysical Deduction, it is alleged, is Kant's inability to justify the table of the forms of judgment. Critics argue that Kant simply took these forms of judgment from the logic textbooks of his day and doctored them so as to yield the required categories. Such objections were current even in Kant's time; they were repeated by Hegel, and are commonplaces of Kant criticism today. This book is the fullest and most systematic evaluation ever made of the Metaphysical Deduction. Reich argues that its principal conclusion is correct even though Kant failed to establish it in the Metaphysical Deduction proper, and he defends the conclusion by using Kant material far removed from the text of the Metaphysical Deduction, notes by Kant that only became available in the 1920's and that remain even now untranslated into English. With the publication of this translation for English-speaking Kant scholars, a neglected and impugned part of the Critique of Pure Reason can finally receive the attention it deserves.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> - Et la logique transcendantale</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> / Kritik der reinen Vernunft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804></subfield><subfield code="t">Kritik der reinen Vernunft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kant, Immanuel</subfield><subfield code="d">1724-1804</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)118559796</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kant, Immanuel</subfield><subfield code="d">1724-1804</subfield><subfield code="t">Kritik der reinen Vernunft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4099256-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1700-1800</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Catégories (Philosophie) - Histoire - 18e siècle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">FILOSOFIA MODERNA - ALEMANHA</subfield><subfield code="2">larpcal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Jugement (Logique)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Logica</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Logique transcendantale</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Oordeel</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Logik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Categories (Philosophy)</subfield><subfield code="x">History</subfield><subfield code="y">18th century</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judgment (Logic)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Transzendentalphilosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4060719-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Logik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4036202-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kategorienlehre</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4235866-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Erkenntnistheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4070914-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Urteil</subfield><subfield code="g">Logik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4270765-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kant, Immanuel</subfield><subfield code="d">1724-1804</subfield><subfield code="t">Kritik der reinen Vernunft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4099256-1</subfield><subfield code="D">u</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Urteil</subfield><subfield code="g">Logik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4270765-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Erkenntnistheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4070914-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Transzendentalphilosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4060719-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">3\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="3" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kategorienlehre</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4235866-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">4\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Logik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4036202-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="4" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">5\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="5" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kant, Immanuel</subfield><subfield code="d">1724-1804</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)118559796</subfield><subfield code="D">p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="5" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">6\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">3\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">4\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">5\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">6\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005518343</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | 1\p (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
| id | DE-604.BV008357171 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2025-02-04T15:00:50Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 0804719349 |
| language | English German |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005518343 |
| oclc_num | 24628816 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-384 |
| owner_facet | DE-384 |
| physical | 132 S. |
| publishDate | 1992 |
| publishDateSearch | 1992 |
| publishDateSort | 1992 |
| publisher | Stanford Univ. Press |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Stanford series in philosophy |
| spelling | Reich, Klaus 1906-1996 Verfasser (DE-588)116394641 aut Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel The completeness of Kant's table of judgments Klaus Reich Stanford, Calif. Stanford Univ. Press 1992 132 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Stanford series in philosophy This classic of Kant scholarship, whose first edition appeared in 1932, deals with one of the most controversial and difficult topics in the Critique of Pure Reason: Kant's table of judgments and their connection to the table of categories. Kant's attempt to derive the latter from the former is called the "Metaphysical Deduction," and it paves the way for the Transcendental Deduction that is universally recognized as the heart of the Critique. Many commentators have passed over the Metaphysical Deduction in silence, as if embarrassed by Kant's fatuity, and his critics are almost unanimous in finding its premise ungrounded, its argument incorrect, and its conclusion false. At the heart of the failure of the Metaphysical Deduction, it is alleged, is Kant's inability to justify the table of the forms of judgment. Critics argue that Kant simply took these forms of judgment from the logic textbooks of his day and doctored them so as to yield the required categories. Such objections were current even in Kant's time; they were repeated by Hegel, and are commonplaces of Kant criticism today. This book is the fullest and most systematic evaluation ever made of the Metaphysical Deduction. Reich argues that its principal conclusion is correct even though Kant failed to establish it in the Metaphysical Deduction proper, and he defends the conclusion by using Kant material far removed from the text of the Metaphysical Deduction, notes by Kant that only became available in the 1920's and that remain even now untranslated into English. With the publication of this translation for English-speaking Kant scholars, a neglected and impugned part of the Critique of Pure Reason can finally receive the attention it deserves. Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> - Et la logique transcendantale Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> / Kritik der reinen Vernunft Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> Kritik der reinen Vernunft Kant, Immanuel 1724-1804 (DE-588)118559796 gnd rswk-swf Kant, Immanuel 1724-1804 Kritik der reinen Vernunft (DE-588)4099256-1 gnd rswk-swf Geschichte 1700-1800 Catégories (Philosophie) - Histoire - 18e siècle FILOSOFIA MODERNA - ALEMANHA larpcal Jugement (Logique) Logica gtt Logique transcendantale Oordeel gtt Geschichte Logik Categories (Philosophy) History 18th century Judgment (Logic) Transzendentalphilosophie (DE-588)4060719-7 gnd rswk-swf Logik (DE-588)4036202-4 gnd rswk-swf Kategorienlehre (DE-588)4235866-8 gnd rswk-swf Erkenntnistheorie (DE-588)4070914-0 gnd rswk-swf Urteil Logik (DE-588)4270765-1 gnd rswk-swf 1\p (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Kant, Immanuel 1724-1804 Kritik der reinen Vernunft (DE-588)4099256-1 u Urteil Logik (DE-588)4270765-1 s DE-604 Erkenntnistheorie (DE-588)4070914-0 s 2\p DE-604 Transzendentalphilosophie (DE-588)4060719-7 s 3\p DE-604 Kategorienlehre (DE-588)4235866-8 s 4\p DE-604 Logik (DE-588)4036202-4 s 5\p DE-604 Kant, Immanuel 1724-1804 (DE-588)118559796 p 6\p DE-604 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 2\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 3\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 4\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 5\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 6\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Reich, Klaus 1906-1996 The completeness of Kant's table of judgments Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> - Et la logique transcendantale Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> / Kritik der reinen Vernunft Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> Kritik der reinen Vernunft Kant, Immanuel 1724-1804 (DE-588)118559796 gnd Kant, Immanuel 1724-1804 Kritik der reinen Vernunft (DE-588)4099256-1 gnd Catégories (Philosophie) - Histoire - 18e siècle FILOSOFIA MODERNA - ALEMANHA larpcal Jugement (Logique) Logica gtt Logique transcendantale Oordeel gtt Geschichte Logik Categories (Philosophy) History 18th century Judgment (Logic) Transzendentalphilosophie (DE-588)4060719-7 gnd Logik (DE-588)4036202-4 gnd Kategorienlehre (DE-588)4235866-8 gnd Erkenntnistheorie (DE-588)4070914-0 gnd Urteil Logik (DE-588)4270765-1 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)118559796 (DE-588)4099256-1 (DE-588)4060719-7 (DE-588)4036202-4 (DE-588)4235866-8 (DE-588)4070914-0 (DE-588)4270765-1 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
| title | The completeness of Kant's table of judgments |
| title_alt | Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel |
| title_auth | The completeness of Kant's table of judgments |
| title_exact_search | The completeness of Kant's table of judgments |
| title_full | The completeness of Kant's table of judgments Klaus Reich |
| title_fullStr | The completeness of Kant's table of judgments Klaus Reich |
| title_full_unstemmed | The completeness of Kant's table of judgments Klaus Reich |
| title_short | The completeness of Kant's table of judgments |
| title_sort | the completeness of kant s table of judgments |
| topic | Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> - Et la logique transcendantale Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> / Kritik der reinen Vernunft Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> Kritik der reinen Vernunft Kant, Immanuel 1724-1804 (DE-588)118559796 gnd Kant, Immanuel 1724-1804 Kritik der reinen Vernunft (DE-588)4099256-1 gnd Catégories (Philosophie) - Histoire - 18e siècle FILOSOFIA MODERNA - ALEMANHA larpcal Jugement (Logique) Logica gtt Logique transcendantale Oordeel gtt Geschichte Logik Categories (Philosophy) History 18th century Judgment (Logic) Transzendentalphilosophie (DE-588)4060719-7 gnd Logik (DE-588)4036202-4 gnd Kategorienlehre (DE-588)4235866-8 gnd Erkenntnistheorie (DE-588)4070914-0 gnd Urteil Logik (DE-588)4270765-1 gnd |
| topic_facet | Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> - Et la logique transcendantale Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> / Kritik der reinen Vernunft Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> Kritik der reinen Vernunft Kant, Immanuel 1724-1804 Kant, Immanuel 1724-1804 Kritik der reinen Vernunft Catégories (Philosophie) - Histoire - 18e siècle FILOSOFIA MODERNA - ALEMANHA Jugement (Logique) Logica Logique transcendantale Oordeel Geschichte Logik Categories (Philosophy) History 18th century Judgment (Logic) Transzendentalphilosophie Kategorienlehre Erkenntnistheorie Urteil Logik Hochschulschrift |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT reichklaus dievollstandigkeitderkantischenurteilstafel AT reichklaus thecompletenessofkantstableofjudgments |