The art of love: amatory fiction from Ovid to the "Romance of the Rose"
Two major French medieval literary works that claim to teach their readers the art of love are virtually torn apart by the contradictions and conflicts they contain. In Andreas Capellanus's late twelfth-century Latin De amore, the author instructs his friend Walter in the amatory art in the fir...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Philadelphia
Univ. of Pennsylvania Press
1992
|
Schriftenreihe: | Middle Ages series
|
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | Two major French medieval literary works that claim to teach their readers the art of love are virtually torn apart by the contradictions and conflicts they contain. In Andreas Capellanus's late twelfth-century Latin De amore, the author instructs his friend Walter in the amatory art in the first two books, but then harshly repudiates his own teachings and love itself in a third and final book. In Jean de Meun's encyclopedic continuation of the Romance of the Rose, written in French in the 1270s, a succession of allegorical figures alternately promote and excoriate the lover's amatory pursuits. Jean's romance, moreover, virtually rewrites the dream vision of Guillaume de Lorris, which it claims simply to extend, and ends with the depiction of a sexual act that seems to throw the book's whole structure into confusion The more closely one reads these works, Peter Allen contends, the harder it is to understand them: "Didactic, heavy-handed, and problematic, they teach would-be lovers how to behave in order to have others accomplish their desires, yet they also contain vociferous passages that dissuade their protagonists from the practice of this art, which, they claim, leads not only to earthly destruction but also to eternal damnation." Readers from the Middle Ages to the present have been troubled by the fact that these texts are both radically self-contradictory and fundamentally at odds with the accepted morality of medieval Christian Europe. And for decades, scholars have tried to determine how these two works are related to what is often referred to as "courtly love." In The Art of Love, Allen persuasively argues that the De amore and the Romance of the Rose are central to the courtly tradition Allen contends that their conflicts and contradictions are not signs of confusion or artistic failure, but are instead essential clues which show that the medieval works follow the disruptive structural model of Ovid's first-century elegiac Ars amatoria (Art of Love) and Remedia amoris (Cures for Love). Andreas's and Jean's works, no less than Ovid's, teach not the art of love for practicing lovers, but the literary art of love poetry and fiction. Based squarely on Ovid's poems, which were among the most widely read classical texts in medieval Europe, the De amore and the Romance of the Rose use the classical tradition in a particularly assertive fashion - and suggest a way for fantasies of love to exist even against a background of ecclesiastical prohibition |
Beschreibung: | 178 S. |
ISBN: | 0812231880 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV008247129 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20200420 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 931004s1992 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 0812231880 |9 0-8122-3188-0 | ||
035 | |a (gbd)0212832 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)26054322 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV008247129 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-19 |a DE-824 |a DE-473 |a DE-188 | ||
050 | 0 | |a PN682.L68 | |
082 | 0 | |a 809/.93354 |2 20 | |
084 | |a FX 191105 |0 (DE-625)35166:11784 |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a 6,12 |2 ssgn | ||
084 | |a 6,11 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Allen, Peter L. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The art of love |b amatory fiction from Ovid to the "Romance of the Rose" |c Peter L. Allen |
264 | 1 | |a Philadelphia |b Univ. of Pennsylvania Press |c 1992 | |
300 | |a 178 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Middle Ages series | |
520 | 3 | |a Two major French medieval literary works that claim to teach their readers the art of love are virtually torn apart by the contradictions and conflicts they contain. In Andreas Capellanus's late twelfth-century Latin De amore, the author instructs his friend Walter in the amatory art in the first two books, but then harshly repudiates his own teachings and love itself in a third and final book. In Jean de Meun's encyclopedic continuation of the Romance of the Rose, written in French in the 1270s, a succession of allegorical figures alternately promote and excoriate the lover's amatory pursuits. Jean's romance, moreover, virtually rewrites the dream vision of Guillaume de Lorris, which it claims simply to extend, and ends with the depiction of a sexual act that seems to throw the book's whole structure into confusion | |
520 | 3 | |a The more closely one reads these works, Peter Allen contends, the harder it is to understand them: "Didactic, heavy-handed, and problematic, they teach would-be lovers how to behave in order to have others accomplish their desires, yet they also contain vociferous passages that dissuade their protagonists from the practice of this art, which, they claim, leads not only to earthly destruction but also to eternal damnation." Readers from the Middle Ages to the present have been troubled by the fact that these texts are both radically self-contradictory and fundamentally at odds with the accepted morality of medieval Christian Europe. And for decades, scholars have tried to determine how these two works are related to what is often referred to as "courtly love." In The Art of Love, Allen persuasively argues that the De amore and the Romance of the Rose are central to the courtly tradition | |
520 | 3 | |a Allen contends that their conflicts and contradictions are not signs of confusion or artistic failure, but are instead essential clues which show that the medieval works follow the disruptive structural model of Ovid's first-century elegiac Ars amatoria (Art of Love) and Remedia amoris (Cures for Love). Andreas's and Jean's works, no less than Ovid's, teach not the art of love for practicing lovers, but the literary art of love poetry and fiction. Based squarely on Ovid's poems, which were among the most widely read classical texts in medieval Europe, the De amore and the Romance of the Rose use the classical tradition in a particularly assertive fashion - and suggest a way for fantasies of love to exist even against a background of ecclesiastical prohibition | |
600 | 1 | 4 | |a André <le chapelain> |x Criticism and interpretation |
600 | 1 | 4 | |a Guillaume <de Lorris, fl. 1230> |x Criticism and interpretation |
600 | 1 | 4 | |a Jean <de Meun, d. 1305?> |x Criticism and interpretation |
600 | 1 | 4 | |a Ovid <43 B.C.-17 or 18 A.D> |x Criticism and interpretation |
600 | 0 | 7 | |a Andreas |c Capellanus |d 1150-1220 |t De amore et de amoris remedio |0 (DE-588)4204577-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
600 | 1 | 7 | |a Ovidius Naso, Publius |d v43-17 |t Ars amatoria |0 (DE-588)4139610-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
600 | 0 | 7 | |a Jean |c de Meung |d -1305 |t Roman de la rose |0 (DE-588)4128615-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 43 v. Chr.-1400 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
650 | 4 | |a Courtly love in literature | |
650 | 4 | |a Love poetry, Latin (Medieval and modern) |x History and criticism | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Liebe |g Motiv |0 (DE-588)4123655-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rezeption |0 (DE-588)4049716-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Literatur |0 (DE-588)4035964-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
688 | 7 | |a Ovidius Naso, P. |0 (DE-2581)TH000002129 |2 gbd | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Ovidius Naso, Publius |d v43-17 |t Ars amatoria |0 (DE-588)4139610-8 |D u |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Rezeption |0 (DE-588)4049716-1 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Andreas |c Capellanus |d 1150-1220 |t De amore et de amoris remedio |0 (DE-588)4204577-0 |D u |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
689 | 1 | 0 | |a Ovidius Naso, Publius |d v43-17 |t Ars amatoria |0 (DE-588)4139610-8 |D u |
689 | 1 | 1 | |a Rezeption |0 (DE-588)4049716-1 |D s |
689 | 1 | 2 | |a Jean |c de Meung |d -1305 |t Roman de la rose |0 (DE-588)4128615-7 |D u |
689 | 1 | |5 DE-604 | |
689 | 2 | 0 | |a Liebe |g Motiv |0 (DE-588)4123655-5 |D s |
689 | 2 | 1 | |a Literatur |0 (DE-588)4035964-5 |D s |
689 | 2 | 2 | |a Geschichte 43 v. Chr.-1400 |A z |
689 | 2 | |5 DE-188 | |
940 | 1 | |n gbd | |
940 | 1 | |q gbd_4 | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005445771 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804122638667218944 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Allen, Peter L. |
author_facet | Allen, Peter L. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Allen, Peter L. |
author_variant | p l a pl pla |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV008247129 |
callnumber-first | P - Language and Literature |
callnumber-label | PN682 |
callnumber-raw | PN682.L68 |
callnumber-search | PN682.L68 |
callnumber-sort | PN 3682 L68 |
callnumber-subject | PN - General Literature |
classification_rvk | FX 191105 |
ctrlnum | (gbd)0212832 (OCoLC)26054322 (DE-599)BVBBV008247129 |
dewey-full | 809/.93354 |
dewey-hundreds | 800 - Literature (Belles-lettres) and rhetoric |
dewey-ones | 809 - History, description & criticism |
dewey-raw | 809/.93354 |
dewey-search | 809/.93354 |
dewey-sort | 3809 593354 |
dewey-tens | 800 - Literature (Belles-lettres) and rhetoric |
discipline | Literaturwissenschaft Philologie / Byzantinistik / Neulatein |
era | Geschichte 43 v. Chr.-1400 gnd |
era_facet | Geschichte 43 v. Chr.-1400 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05250nam a2200709 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV008247129</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20200420 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">931004s1992 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0812231880</subfield><subfield code="9">0-8122-3188-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(gbd)0212832</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)26054322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV008247129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">PN682.L68</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">809/.93354</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FX 191105</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)35166:11784</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6,12</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6,11</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Allen, Peter L.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The art of love</subfield><subfield code="b">amatory fiction from Ovid to the "Romance of the Rose"</subfield><subfield code="c">Peter L. Allen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Philadelphia</subfield><subfield code="b">Univ. of Pennsylvania Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">178 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Middle Ages series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Two major French medieval literary works that claim to teach their readers the art of love are virtually torn apart by the contradictions and conflicts they contain. In Andreas Capellanus's late twelfth-century Latin De amore, the author instructs his friend Walter in the amatory art in the first two books, but then harshly repudiates his own teachings and love itself in a third and final book. In Jean de Meun's encyclopedic continuation of the Romance of the Rose, written in French in the 1270s, a succession of allegorical figures alternately promote and excoriate the lover's amatory pursuits. Jean's romance, moreover, virtually rewrites the dream vision of Guillaume de Lorris, which it claims simply to extend, and ends with the depiction of a sexual act that seems to throw the book's whole structure into confusion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The more closely one reads these works, Peter Allen contends, the harder it is to understand them: "Didactic, heavy-handed, and problematic, they teach would-be lovers how to behave in order to have others accomplish their desires, yet they also contain vociferous passages that dissuade their protagonists from the practice of this art, which, they claim, leads not only to earthly destruction but also to eternal damnation." Readers from the Middle Ages to the present have been troubled by the fact that these texts are both radically self-contradictory and fundamentally at odds with the accepted morality of medieval Christian Europe. And for decades, scholars have tried to determine how these two works are related to what is often referred to as "courtly love." In The Art of Love, Allen persuasively argues that the De amore and the Romance of the Rose are central to the courtly tradition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Allen contends that their conflicts and contradictions are not signs of confusion or artistic failure, but are instead essential clues which show that the medieval works follow the disruptive structural model of Ovid's first-century elegiac Ars amatoria (Art of Love) and Remedia amoris (Cures for Love). Andreas's and Jean's works, no less than Ovid's, teach not the art of love for practicing lovers, but the literary art of love poetry and fiction. Based squarely on Ovid's poems, which were among the most widely read classical texts in medieval Europe, the De amore and the Romance of the Rose use the classical tradition in a particularly assertive fashion - and suggest a way for fantasies of love to exist even against a background of ecclesiastical prohibition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">André <le chapelain></subfield><subfield code="x">Criticism and interpretation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Guillaume <de Lorris, fl. 1230></subfield><subfield code="x">Criticism and interpretation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Jean <de Meun, d. 1305?></subfield><subfield code="x">Criticism and interpretation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ovid <43 B.C.-17 or 18 A.D></subfield><subfield code="x">Criticism and interpretation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Andreas</subfield><subfield code="c">Capellanus</subfield><subfield code="d">1150-1220</subfield><subfield code="t">De amore et de amoris remedio</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4204577-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ovidius Naso, Publius</subfield><subfield code="d">v43-17</subfield><subfield code="t">Ars amatoria</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139610-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Jean</subfield><subfield code="c">de Meung</subfield><subfield code="d">-1305</subfield><subfield code="t">Roman de la rose</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4128615-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 43 v. Chr.-1400</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Courtly love in literature</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Love poetry, Latin (Medieval and modern)</subfield><subfield code="x">History and criticism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Liebe</subfield><subfield code="g">Motiv</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4123655-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rezeption</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4049716-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Literatur</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4035964-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="688" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ovidius Naso, P.</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-2581)TH000002129</subfield><subfield code="2">gbd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ovidius Naso, Publius</subfield><subfield code="d">v43-17</subfield><subfield code="t">Ars amatoria</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139610-8</subfield><subfield code="D">u</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Rezeption</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4049716-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Andreas</subfield><subfield code="c">Capellanus</subfield><subfield code="d">1150-1220</subfield><subfield code="t">De amore et de amoris remedio</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4204577-0</subfield><subfield code="D">u</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ovidius Naso, Publius</subfield><subfield code="d">v43-17</subfield><subfield code="t">Ars amatoria</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139610-8</subfield><subfield code="D">u</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Rezeption</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4049716-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Jean</subfield><subfield code="c">de Meung</subfield><subfield code="d">-1305</subfield><subfield code="t">Roman de la rose</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4128615-7</subfield><subfield code="D">u</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Liebe</subfield><subfield code="g">Motiv</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4123655-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Literatur</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4035964-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 43 v. Chr.-1400</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">gbd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">gbd_4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005445771</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV008247129 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T17:17:04Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 0812231880 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005445771 |
oclc_num | 26054322 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-824 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-188 |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-824 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-188 |
physical | 178 S. |
psigel | gbd_4 |
publishDate | 1992 |
publishDateSearch | 1992 |
publishDateSort | 1992 |
publisher | Univ. of Pennsylvania Press |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Middle Ages series |
spelling | Allen, Peter L. Verfasser aut The art of love amatory fiction from Ovid to the "Romance of the Rose" Peter L. Allen Philadelphia Univ. of Pennsylvania Press 1992 178 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Middle Ages series Two major French medieval literary works that claim to teach their readers the art of love are virtually torn apart by the contradictions and conflicts they contain. In Andreas Capellanus's late twelfth-century Latin De amore, the author instructs his friend Walter in the amatory art in the first two books, but then harshly repudiates his own teachings and love itself in a third and final book. In Jean de Meun's encyclopedic continuation of the Romance of the Rose, written in French in the 1270s, a succession of allegorical figures alternately promote and excoriate the lover's amatory pursuits. Jean's romance, moreover, virtually rewrites the dream vision of Guillaume de Lorris, which it claims simply to extend, and ends with the depiction of a sexual act that seems to throw the book's whole structure into confusion The more closely one reads these works, Peter Allen contends, the harder it is to understand them: "Didactic, heavy-handed, and problematic, they teach would-be lovers how to behave in order to have others accomplish their desires, yet they also contain vociferous passages that dissuade their protagonists from the practice of this art, which, they claim, leads not only to earthly destruction but also to eternal damnation." Readers from the Middle Ages to the present have been troubled by the fact that these texts are both radically self-contradictory and fundamentally at odds with the accepted morality of medieval Christian Europe. And for decades, scholars have tried to determine how these two works are related to what is often referred to as "courtly love." In The Art of Love, Allen persuasively argues that the De amore and the Romance of the Rose are central to the courtly tradition Allen contends that their conflicts and contradictions are not signs of confusion or artistic failure, but are instead essential clues which show that the medieval works follow the disruptive structural model of Ovid's first-century elegiac Ars amatoria (Art of Love) and Remedia amoris (Cures for Love). Andreas's and Jean's works, no less than Ovid's, teach not the art of love for practicing lovers, but the literary art of love poetry and fiction. Based squarely on Ovid's poems, which were among the most widely read classical texts in medieval Europe, the De amore and the Romance of the Rose use the classical tradition in a particularly assertive fashion - and suggest a way for fantasies of love to exist even against a background of ecclesiastical prohibition André <le chapelain> Criticism and interpretation Guillaume <de Lorris, fl. 1230> Criticism and interpretation Jean <de Meun, d. 1305?> Criticism and interpretation Ovid <43 B.C.-17 or 18 A.D> Criticism and interpretation Andreas Capellanus 1150-1220 De amore et de amoris remedio (DE-588)4204577-0 gnd rswk-swf Ovidius Naso, Publius v43-17 Ars amatoria (DE-588)4139610-8 gnd rswk-swf Jean de Meung -1305 Roman de la rose (DE-588)4128615-7 gnd rswk-swf Geschichte 43 v. Chr.-1400 gnd rswk-swf Courtly love in literature Love poetry, Latin (Medieval and modern) History and criticism Liebe Motiv (DE-588)4123655-5 gnd rswk-swf Rezeption (DE-588)4049716-1 gnd rswk-swf Literatur (DE-588)4035964-5 gnd rswk-swf Ovidius Naso, P. (DE-2581)TH000002129 gbd Ovidius Naso, Publius v43-17 Ars amatoria (DE-588)4139610-8 u Rezeption (DE-588)4049716-1 s Andreas Capellanus 1150-1220 De amore et de amoris remedio (DE-588)4204577-0 u DE-604 Jean de Meung -1305 Roman de la rose (DE-588)4128615-7 u Liebe Motiv (DE-588)4123655-5 s Literatur (DE-588)4035964-5 s Geschichte 43 v. Chr.-1400 z DE-188 |
spellingShingle | Allen, Peter L. The art of love amatory fiction from Ovid to the "Romance of the Rose" André <le chapelain> Criticism and interpretation Guillaume <de Lorris, fl. 1230> Criticism and interpretation Jean <de Meun, d. 1305?> Criticism and interpretation Ovid <43 B.C.-17 or 18 A.D> Criticism and interpretation Andreas Capellanus 1150-1220 De amore et de amoris remedio (DE-588)4204577-0 gnd Ovidius Naso, Publius v43-17 Ars amatoria (DE-588)4139610-8 gnd Jean de Meung -1305 Roman de la rose (DE-588)4128615-7 gnd Courtly love in literature Love poetry, Latin (Medieval and modern) History and criticism Liebe Motiv (DE-588)4123655-5 gnd Rezeption (DE-588)4049716-1 gnd Literatur (DE-588)4035964-5 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4204577-0 (DE-588)4139610-8 (DE-588)4128615-7 (DE-588)4123655-5 (DE-588)4049716-1 (DE-588)4035964-5 |
title | The art of love amatory fiction from Ovid to the "Romance of the Rose" |
title_auth | The art of love amatory fiction from Ovid to the "Romance of the Rose" |
title_exact_search | The art of love amatory fiction from Ovid to the "Romance of the Rose" |
title_full | The art of love amatory fiction from Ovid to the "Romance of the Rose" Peter L. Allen |
title_fullStr | The art of love amatory fiction from Ovid to the "Romance of the Rose" Peter L. Allen |
title_full_unstemmed | The art of love amatory fiction from Ovid to the "Romance of the Rose" Peter L. Allen |
title_short | The art of love |
title_sort | the art of love amatory fiction from ovid to the romance of the rose |
title_sub | amatory fiction from Ovid to the "Romance of the Rose" |
topic | André <le chapelain> Criticism and interpretation Guillaume <de Lorris, fl. 1230> Criticism and interpretation Jean <de Meun, d. 1305?> Criticism and interpretation Ovid <43 B.C.-17 or 18 A.D> Criticism and interpretation Andreas Capellanus 1150-1220 De amore et de amoris remedio (DE-588)4204577-0 gnd Ovidius Naso, Publius v43-17 Ars amatoria (DE-588)4139610-8 gnd Jean de Meung -1305 Roman de la rose (DE-588)4128615-7 gnd Courtly love in literature Love poetry, Latin (Medieval and modern) History and criticism Liebe Motiv (DE-588)4123655-5 gnd Rezeption (DE-588)4049716-1 gnd Literatur (DE-588)4035964-5 gnd |
topic_facet | André <le chapelain> Criticism and interpretation Guillaume <de Lorris, fl. 1230> Criticism and interpretation Jean <de Meun, d. 1305?> Criticism and interpretation Ovid <43 B.C.-17 or 18 A.D> Criticism and interpretation Andreas Capellanus 1150-1220 De amore et de amoris remedio Ovidius Naso, Publius v43-17 Ars amatoria Jean de Meung -1305 Roman de la rose Courtly love in literature Love poetry, Latin (Medieval and modern) History and criticism Liebe Motiv Rezeption Literatur |
work_keys_str_mv | AT allenpeterl theartofloveamatoryfictionfromovidtotheromanceoftherose |