Art & otherness: crisis in cultural identity
Directly following the internationally acclaimed Art & Discontent, Thomas McEvilley argues in Art & Otherness for an advanced anthropological perspective that contravenes conventional thinking in the visual arts, and leads to a concept of artistic globalization. The description of Western cu...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Kingston, NY
McPherson
1992
|
Schriftenreihe: | Documentext
|
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | Directly following the internationally acclaimed Art & Discontent, Thomas McEvilley argues in Art & Otherness for an advanced anthropological perspective that contravenes conventional thinking in the visual arts, and leads to a concept of artistic globalization. The description of Western culture as superior and in opposition to other cultures of the world preoccupied our aesthetic philosophy for at least 200 years, whether or not explicitly stated. That argument was undertaken in various guises, especially as the historical determinism of Hegel which proposed to quantify human "progress." Recently, however, the term "multiculturalism" has come to signify a post-Modern understanding of how visual arts transgress artificial boundaries, and of how there may now exist, perhaps for the first time in history, a post-colonial globalism in the arts freed of ethnocentric value judgements. In these ten crucial essays, McEvilley clarifies how the presentation of art can determine its reception, how "influence" can be bi-directional, how "otherness" serves to define "self," and how art need not necessarily lose its meaningfulness when stripped of badges of universality. Once again illustrating his argument by drawing upon an array of sources and cultures, Thomas McEvilley demonstrates that the post-Modern crisis in cultural identity demands an imaginative, integrating response. |
Beschreibung: | 174 S. |
ISBN: | 0929701216 0929701488 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV008171321 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20121112 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 930816s1992 |||| 00||| engod | ||
020 | |a 0929701216 |9 0-929701-21-6 | ||
020 | |a 0929701488 |9 0-929701-48-8 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)25367957 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV008171321 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-Y7 |a DE-703 | ||
050 | 0 | |a BH39 | |
082 | 0 | |a 701/.1 |2 20 | |
084 | |a MR 7100 |0 (DE-625)123539: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a McEvilley, Thomas |d 1939-2013 |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)124351123 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Art & otherness |b crisis in cultural identity |c Thomas McEvilley |
246 | 1 | 3 | |a Art and otherness |
264 | 1 | |a Kingston, NY |b McPherson |c 1992 | |
300 | |a 174 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Documentext | |
520 | 3 | |a Directly following the internationally acclaimed Art & Discontent, Thomas McEvilley argues in Art & Otherness for an advanced anthropological perspective that contravenes conventional thinking in the visual arts, and leads to a concept of artistic globalization. The description of Western culture as superior and in opposition to other cultures of the world preoccupied our aesthetic philosophy for at least 200 years, whether or not explicitly stated. That argument was undertaken in various guises, especially as the historical determinism of Hegel which proposed to quantify human "progress." Recently, however, the term "multiculturalism" has come to signify a post-Modern understanding of how visual arts transgress artificial boundaries, and of how there may now exist, perhaps for the first time in history, a post-colonial globalism in the arts freed of ethnocentric value judgements. In these ten crucial essays, McEvilley clarifies how the presentation of art can determine its reception, how "influence" can be bi-directional, how "otherness" serves to define "self," and how art need not necessarily lose its meaningfulness when stripped of badges of universality. Once again illustrating his argument by drawing upon an array of sources and cultures, Thomas McEvilley demonstrates that the post-Modern crisis in cultural identity demands an imaginative, integrating response. | |
648 | 4 | |a Geschichte 1900-2000 | |
650 | 7 | |a Culturele identiteit |2 gtt | |
650 | 7 | |a Esthetica |2 gtt | |
650 | 7 | |a Kunstkritiek |2 gtt | |
650 | 4 | |a Ästhetik | |
650 | 4 | |a Aesthetics, Modern |y 20th century | |
650 | 4 | |a Difference (Philosophy) | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Ästhetik |0 (DE-588)4000626-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Multikulturelle Gesellschaft |0 (DE-588)4214151-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
653 | 0 | |a Ästhetik | |
653 | 0 | |a Multikulturelle Gesellschaft | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Ästhetik |0 (DE-588)4000626-8 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Multikulturelle Gesellschaft |0 (DE-588)4214151-5 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005391850 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804122554862927872 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | McEvilley, Thomas 1939-2013 |
author_GND | (DE-588)124351123 |
author_facet | McEvilley, Thomas 1939-2013 |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | McEvilley, Thomas 1939-2013 |
author_variant | t m tm |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV008171321 |
callnumber-first | B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
callnumber-label | BH39 |
callnumber-raw | BH39 |
callnumber-search | BH39 |
callnumber-sort | BH 239 |
callnumber-subject | BH - Aesthetics |
classification_rvk | MR 7100 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)25367957 (DE-599)BVBBV008171321 |
dewey-full | 701/.1 |
dewey-hundreds | 700 - The arts |
dewey-ones | 701 - Philosophy of fine & decorative arts |
dewey-raw | 701/.1 |
dewey-search | 701/.1 |
dewey-sort | 3701 11 |
dewey-tens | 700 - The arts |
discipline | Kunstgeschichte Soziologie |
era | Geschichte 1900-2000 |
era_facet | Geschichte 1900-2000 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02954nam a2200505 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV008171321</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20121112 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">930816s1992 |||| 00||| engod</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0929701216</subfield><subfield code="9">0-929701-21-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0929701488</subfield><subfield code="9">0-929701-48-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)25367957</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV008171321</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Y7</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BH39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">701/.1</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MR 7100</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)123539:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">McEvilley, Thomas</subfield><subfield code="d">1939-2013</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)124351123</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Art & otherness</subfield><subfield code="b">crisis in cultural identity</subfield><subfield code="c">Thomas McEvilley</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Art and otherness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Kingston, NY</subfield><subfield code="b">McPherson</subfield><subfield code="c">1992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">174 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Documentext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Directly following the internationally acclaimed Art & Discontent, Thomas McEvilley argues in Art & Otherness for an advanced anthropological perspective that contravenes conventional thinking in the visual arts, and leads to a concept of artistic globalization. The description of Western culture as superior and in opposition to other cultures of the world preoccupied our aesthetic philosophy for at least 200 years, whether or not explicitly stated. That argument was undertaken in various guises, especially as the historical determinism of Hegel which proposed to quantify human "progress." Recently, however, the term "multiculturalism" has come to signify a post-Modern understanding of how visual arts transgress artificial boundaries, and of how there may now exist, perhaps for the first time in history, a post-colonial globalism in the arts freed of ethnocentric value judgements. In these ten crucial essays, McEvilley clarifies how the presentation of art can determine its reception, how "influence" can be bi-directional, how "otherness" serves to define "self," and how art need not necessarily lose its meaningfulness when stripped of badges of universality. Once again illustrating his argument by drawing upon an array of sources and cultures, Thomas McEvilley demonstrates that the post-Modern crisis in cultural identity demands an imaginative, integrating response.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1900-2000</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Culturele identiteit</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Esthetica</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kunstkritiek</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ästhetik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Aesthetics, Modern</subfield><subfield code="y">20th century</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Difference (Philosophy)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ästhetik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4000626-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Multikulturelle Gesellschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4214151-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ästhetik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Multikulturelle Gesellschaft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ästhetik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4000626-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Multikulturelle Gesellschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4214151-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005391850</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV008171321 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T17:15:44Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 0929701216 0929701488 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005391850 |
oclc_num | 25367957 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-Y7 DE-703 |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-Y7 DE-703 |
physical | 174 S. |
publishDate | 1992 |
publishDateSearch | 1992 |
publishDateSort | 1992 |
publisher | McPherson |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Documentext |
spelling | McEvilley, Thomas 1939-2013 Verfasser (DE-588)124351123 aut Art & otherness crisis in cultural identity Thomas McEvilley Art and otherness Kingston, NY McPherson 1992 174 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Documentext Directly following the internationally acclaimed Art & Discontent, Thomas McEvilley argues in Art & Otherness for an advanced anthropological perspective that contravenes conventional thinking in the visual arts, and leads to a concept of artistic globalization. The description of Western culture as superior and in opposition to other cultures of the world preoccupied our aesthetic philosophy for at least 200 years, whether or not explicitly stated. That argument was undertaken in various guises, especially as the historical determinism of Hegel which proposed to quantify human "progress." Recently, however, the term "multiculturalism" has come to signify a post-Modern understanding of how visual arts transgress artificial boundaries, and of how there may now exist, perhaps for the first time in history, a post-colonial globalism in the arts freed of ethnocentric value judgements. In these ten crucial essays, McEvilley clarifies how the presentation of art can determine its reception, how "influence" can be bi-directional, how "otherness" serves to define "self," and how art need not necessarily lose its meaningfulness when stripped of badges of universality. Once again illustrating his argument by drawing upon an array of sources and cultures, Thomas McEvilley demonstrates that the post-Modern crisis in cultural identity demands an imaginative, integrating response. Geschichte 1900-2000 Culturele identiteit gtt Esthetica gtt Kunstkritiek gtt Ästhetik Aesthetics, Modern 20th century Difference (Philosophy) Ästhetik (DE-588)4000626-8 gnd rswk-swf Multikulturelle Gesellschaft (DE-588)4214151-5 gnd rswk-swf Multikulturelle Gesellschaft Ästhetik (DE-588)4000626-8 s Multikulturelle Gesellschaft (DE-588)4214151-5 s DE-604 |
spellingShingle | McEvilley, Thomas 1939-2013 Art & otherness crisis in cultural identity Culturele identiteit gtt Esthetica gtt Kunstkritiek gtt Ästhetik Aesthetics, Modern 20th century Difference (Philosophy) Ästhetik (DE-588)4000626-8 gnd Multikulturelle Gesellschaft (DE-588)4214151-5 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4000626-8 (DE-588)4214151-5 |
title | Art & otherness crisis in cultural identity |
title_alt | Art and otherness |
title_auth | Art & otherness crisis in cultural identity |
title_exact_search | Art & otherness crisis in cultural identity |
title_full | Art & otherness crisis in cultural identity Thomas McEvilley |
title_fullStr | Art & otherness crisis in cultural identity Thomas McEvilley |
title_full_unstemmed | Art & otherness crisis in cultural identity Thomas McEvilley |
title_short | Art & otherness |
title_sort | art otherness crisis in cultural identity |
title_sub | crisis in cultural identity |
topic | Culturele identiteit gtt Esthetica gtt Kunstkritiek gtt Ästhetik Aesthetics, Modern 20th century Difference (Philosophy) Ästhetik (DE-588)4000626-8 gnd Multikulturelle Gesellschaft (DE-588)4214151-5 gnd |
topic_facet | Culturele identiteit Esthetica Kunstkritiek Ästhetik Aesthetics, Modern 20th century Difference (Philosophy) Multikulturelle Gesellschaft |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcevilleythomas artothernesscrisisinculturalidentity AT mcevilleythomas artandotherness |