The burdensharing debate: a reassessment
Burdensharing is an attempt to reallocate defense expenditure within the framework of an alliance. This attempt has become known in NATO as the "burdensharing" debate. Much of the popularity of the burdensharing debate lies in its presentation of various statistics which, allegedly, proved...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
New York
St. Martin's Press
1993
|
Ausgabe: | 1. publ. in the USA |
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | Burdensharing is an attempt to reallocate defense expenditure within the framework of an alliance. This attempt has become known in NATO as the "burdensharing" debate. Much of the popularity of the burdensharing debate lies in its presentation of various statistics which, allegedly, proved that one partner (the United States) was assuming a disproportionate share of the common defense burden. This book does not aim to prove, or disprove, that one country carries an unfair burden but it does aim to examine critically the methodologies employed in the debate since the early 1950s. Important lessons for alliance management have been identified and these lessons are more often than not applicable to other geographical areas where the United States and her allies are involved. At a time of transition in Atlantic/European relations it is important that the lessons of the burdensharing debate are understood. Whatever revised, or new, security organization emerges as a result of the monumental changes in Europe and elsewhere, the question of who should pay, and how much, will return. The Burdensharing Debate: A Reassessment also provides an important contribution to the history of NATO and presents to the reader, in a clear and lucid fashion, the complexities of a highly divisive debate. |
Beschreibung: | XXII, 277 S. |
ISBN: | 0312074956 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV008152119 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 930802s1993 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 0312074956 |9 0-312-07495-6 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)24372802 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV008152119 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-188 | ||
050 | 0 | |a UA646.3 | |
082 | 0 | |a 355/.031/091821 |2 20 | |
100 | 1 | |a Duke, Simon |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The burdensharing debate |b a reassessment |c Simon Duke |
250 | |a 1. publ. in the USA | ||
264 | 1 | |a New York |b St. Martin's Press |c 1993 | |
300 | |a XXII, 277 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | 3 | |a Burdensharing is an attempt to reallocate defense expenditure within the framework of an alliance. This attempt has become known in NATO as the "burdensharing" debate. Much of the popularity of the burdensharing debate lies in its presentation of various statistics which, allegedly, proved that one partner (the United States) was assuming a disproportionate share of the common defense burden. This book does not aim to prove, or disprove, that one country carries an unfair burden but it does aim to examine critically the methodologies employed in the debate since the early 1950s. Important lessons for alliance management have been identified and these lessons are more often than not applicable to other geographical areas where the United States and her allies are involved. At a time of transition in Atlantic/European relations it is important that the lessons of the burdensharing debate are understood. Whatever revised, or new, security organization emerges as a result of the monumental changes in Europe and elsewhere, the question of who should pay, and how much, will return. The Burdensharing Debate: A Reassessment also provides an important contribution to the history of NATO and presents to the reader, in a clear and lucid fashion, the complexities of a highly divisive debate. | |
610 | 1 | 4 | |a NATO |
610 | 2 | 4 | |a North Atlantic Treaty Organization |x Armed Forces |x Finance |
610 | 2 | 7 | |a NATO |0 (DE-588)377-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 1950-1992 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kostenverteilung |0 (DE-588)4258137-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Finanzierung |0 (DE-588)4017182-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Debatte |0 (DE-588)4148952-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 4 | |a Europa | |
651 | 4 | |a USA | |
651 | 4 | |a Europe |x Armed Forces |x Appropriations and expenditures | |
651 | 4 | |a Europe |x Military relations |z United States | |
651 | 4 | |a United States |x Armed Forces |x Appropriations and expenditures | |
651 | 4 | |a United States |x Military relations |z Europe | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a NATO |0 (DE-588)377-3 |D b |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Kostenverteilung |0 (DE-588)4258137-0 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Debatte |0 (DE-588)4148952-4 |D s |
689 | 0 | 3 | |a Geschichte 1950-1992 |A z |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
689 | 1 | 0 | |a NATO |0 (DE-588)377-3 |D b |
689 | 1 | 1 | |a Finanzierung |0 (DE-588)4017182-6 |D s |
689 | 1 | |5 DE-188 | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005379470 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804122535623655424 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Duke, Simon |
author_facet | Duke, Simon |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Duke, Simon |
author_variant | s d sd |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV008152119 |
callnumber-first | U - Military Science |
callnumber-label | UA646 |
callnumber-raw | UA646.3 |
callnumber-search | UA646.3 |
callnumber-sort | UA 3646.3 |
callnumber-subject | UA - Armies |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)24372802 (DE-599)BVBBV008152119 |
dewey-full | 355/.031/091821 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 355 - Military science |
dewey-raw | 355/.031/091821 |
dewey-search | 355/.031/091821 |
dewey-sort | 3355 231 591821 |
dewey-tens | 350 - Public administration and military science |
discipline | Militärwissenschaft |
edition | 1. publ. in the USA |
era | Geschichte 1950-1992 gnd |
era_facet | Geschichte 1950-1992 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03126nam a2200553 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV008152119</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">930802s1993 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0312074956</subfield><subfield code="9">0-312-07495-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)24372802</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV008152119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">UA646.3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">355/.031/091821</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Duke, Simon</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The burdensharing debate</subfield><subfield code="b">a reassessment</subfield><subfield code="c">Simon Duke</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. publ. in the USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York</subfield><subfield code="b">St. Martin's Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1993</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXII, 277 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Burdensharing is an attempt to reallocate defense expenditure within the framework of an alliance. This attempt has become known in NATO as the "burdensharing" debate. Much of the popularity of the burdensharing debate lies in its presentation of various statistics which, allegedly, proved that one partner (the United States) was assuming a disproportionate share of the common defense burden. This book does not aim to prove, or disprove, that one country carries an unfair burden but it does aim to examine critically the methodologies employed in the debate since the early 1950s. Important lessons for alliance management have been identified and these lessons are more often than not applicable to other geographical areas where the United States and her allies are involved. At a time of transition in Atlantic/European relations it is important that the lessons of the burdensharing debate are understood. Whatever revised, or new, security organization emerges as a result of the monumental changes in Europe and elsewhere, the question of who should pay, and how much, will return. The Burdensharing Debate: A Reassessment also provides an important contribution to the history of NATO and presents to the reader, in a clear and lucid fashion, the complexities of a highly divisive debate.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">NATO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">North Atlantic Treaty Organization</subfield><subfield code="x">Armed Forces</subfield><subfield code="x">Finance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">NATO</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)377-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1950-1992</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kostenverteilung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4258137-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Finanzierung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4017182-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Debatte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4148952-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europe</subfield><subfield code="x">Armed Forces</subfield><subfield code="x">Appropriations and expenditures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europe</subfield><subfield code="x">Military relations</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Armed Forces</subfield><subfield code="x">Appropriations and expenditures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Military relations</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">NATO</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)377-3</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Kostenverteilung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4258137-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Debatte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4148952-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1950-1992</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">NATO</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)377-3</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Finanzierung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4017182-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005379470</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | Europa USA Europe Armed Forces Appropriations and expenditures Europe Military relations United States United States Armed Forces Appropriations and expenditures United States Military relations Europe |
geographic_facet | Europa USA Europe Armed Forces Appropriations and expenditures Europe Military relations United States United States Armed Forces Appropriations and expenditures United States Military relations Europe |
id | DE-604.BV008152119 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T17:15:25Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 0312074956 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005379470 |
oclc_num | 24372802 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-188 |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-188 |
physical | XXII, 277 S. |
publishDate | 1993 |
publishDateSearch | 1993 |
publishDateSort | 1993 |
publisher | St. Martin's Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Duke, Simon Verfasser aut The burdensharing debate a reassessment Simon Duke 1. publ. in the USA New York St. Martin's Press 1993 XXII, 277 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Burdensharing is an attempt to reallocate defense expenditure within the framework of an alliance. This attempt has become known in NATO as the "burdensharing" debate. Much of the popularity of the burdensharing debate lies in its presentation of various statistics which, allegedly, proved that one partner (the United States) was assuming a disproportionate share of the common defense burden. This book does not aim to prove, or disprove, that one country carries an unfair burden but it does aim to examine critically the methodologies employed in the debate since the early 1950s. Important lessons for alliance management have been identified and these lessons are more often than not applicable to other geographical areas where the United States and her allies are involved. At a time of transition in Atlantic/European relations it is important that the lessons of the burdensharing debate are understood. Whatever revised, or new, security organization emerges as a result of the monumental changes in Europe and elsewhere, the question of who should pay, and how much, will return. The Burdensharing Debate: A Reassessment also provides an important contribution to the history of NATO and presents to the reader, in a clear and lucid fashion, the complexities of a highly divisive debate. NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization Armed Forces Finance NATO (DE-588)377-3 gnd rswk-swf Geschichte 1950-1992 gnd rswk-swf Kostenverteilung (DE-588)4258137-0 gnd rswk-swf Finanzierung (DE-588)4017182-6 gnd rswk-swf Debatte (DE-588)4148952-4 gnd rswk-swf Europa USA Europe Armed Forces Appropriations and expenditures Europe Military relations United States United States Armed Forces Appropriations and expenditures United States Military relations Europe NATO (DE-588)377-3 b Kostenverteilung (DE-588)4258137-0 s Debatte (DE-588)4148952-4 s Geschichte 1950-1992 z DE-604 Finanzierung (DE-588)4017182-6 s DE-188 |
spellingShingle | Duke, Simon The burdensharing debate a reassessment NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization Armed Forces Finance NATO (DE-588)377-3 gnd Kostenverteilung (DE-588)4258137-0 gnd Finanzierung (DE-588)4017182-6 gnd Debatte (DE-588)4148952-4 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)377-3 (DE-588)4258137-0 (DE-588)4017182-6 (DE-588)4148952-4 |
title | The burdensharing debate a reassessment |
title_auth | The burdensharing debate a reassessment |
title_exact_search | The burdensharing debate a reassessment |
title_full | The burdensharing debate a reassessment Simon Duke |
title_fullStr | The burdensharing debate a reassessment Simon Duke |
title_full_unstemmed | The burdensharing debate a reassessment Simon Duke |
title_short | The burdensharing debate |
title_sort | the burdensharing debate a reassessment |
title_sub | a reassessment |
topic | NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization Armed Forces Finance NATO (DE-588)377-3 gnd Kostenverteilung (DE-588)4258137-0 gnd Finanzierung (DE-588)4017182-6 gnd Debatte (DE-588)4148952-4 gnd |
topic_facet | NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization Armed Forces Finance Kostenverteilung Finanzierung Debatte Europa USA Europe Armed Forces Appropriations and expenditures Europe Military relations United States United States Armed Forces Appropriations and expenditures United States Military relations Europe |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dukesimon theburdensharingdebateareassessment |