Biology & feminism: a dynamic interaction
"The link between biology and feminism is well established in history. Even as recently as the nineteenth century, preeminent men of science employed skewed biological theorizing to explain the disadvantaged position of women in our society. These male scientists argued that women are mentally...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
New York
Twayne u.a.
1992
|
Schriftenreihe: | The impact of feminism on the arts & sciences
|
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | "The link between biology and feminism is well established in history. Even as recently as the nineteenth century, preeminent men of science employed skewed biological theorizing to explain the disadvantaged position of women in our society. These male scientists argued that women are mentally inferior to men by design of evolution. They erroneously "proved" that the female of the human species has a relatively smaller brain than the male, attributing this "difference" to the fact that the energy that women use to reproduce is drawn off at the expense of their intellectual development. At odds with nineteenth-century feminist critics, men such as Freud, Darwin, Broca, and Spencer did not assign the supposed inferiority of women to such factors as their decreased access to education, believing instead that tangible biological differences subjugated women to men. In the latter part of the twentieth century we again see a link between biology and feminism that expresses itself through women's health issues, reproductive rights, and ecofeminism." "In Biology and Feminism: A Dynamic Interaction, Sue V. Rosser offers an intriguing explanation of the possible bias of biological theories. Rosser maintains that the modern scientific method, accepted as objective and factual, may instead be colored by the values and assumptions of the traditional, male scientist. Her study offers critiques of the traditional scientific research method from the viewpoint of a number of different feminist theories. Rosser also details the contribution of several eminent women of science, past and present, to illustrate the impact of feminism on biological theories, and points out that ironically, biology has had a much greater impact on feminism than feminism has had on biology. Finding that the standard methods of teaching biology have changed little, Rosser presents models for transforming curricula. Her proposed changes aim to identify and correct unconscious biases and teach student store spect differences. Embracing a wide range of studies, this innovative and thoughtful commentary will be of use to biology, health sciences, women's studies, anthropology, sociology, psychology, and history students alike."--BOOK JACKET |
Beschreibung: | XVII, 191 S. |
ISBN: | 080579770X 0805797556 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV007566812 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 19930624 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 930527s1992 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 080579770X |9 0-8057-9770-X | ||
020 | |a 0805797556 |9 0-8057-9755-6 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)26809970 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV007566812 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-739 | ||
050 | 0 | |a HQ1154 | |
082 | 0 | |a 305.42 |2 20 | |
084 | |a MS 3150 |0 (DE-625)123671: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Rosser, Sue Vilhauer |d 1947- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)111009340 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Biology & feminism |b a dynamic interaction |c Sue V. Rosser |
246 | 1 | 3 | |a Biology and feminism |
264 | 1 | |a New York |b Twayne u.a. |c 1992 | |
300 | |a XVII, 191 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a The impact of feminism on the arts & sciences | |
520 | 1 | |a "The link between biology and feminism is well established in history. Even as recently as the nineteenth century, preeminent men of science employed skewed biological theorizing to explain the disadvantaged position of women in our society. These male scientists argued that women are mentally inferior to men by design of evolution. They erroneously "proved" that the female of the human species has a relatively smaller brain than the male, attributing this "difference" to the fact that the energy that women use to reproduce is drawn off at the expense of their intellectual development. At odds with nineteenth-century feminist critics, men such as Freud, Darwin, Broca, and Spencer did not assign the supposed inferiority of women to such factors as their decreased access to education, believing instead that tangible biological differences subjugated women to men. In the latter part of the twentieth century we again see a link between biology and feminism that expresses itself through women's health issues, reproductive rights, and ecofeminism." | |
520 | |a "In Biology and Feminism: A Dynamic Interaction, Sue V. Rosser offers an intriguing explanation of the possible bias of biological theories. Rosser maintains that the modern scientific method, accepted as objective and factual, may instead be colored by the values and assumptions of the traditional, male scientist. Her study offers critiques of the traditional scientific research method from the viewpoint of a number of different feminist theories. Rosser also details the contribution of several eminent women of science, past and present, to illustrate the impact of feminism on biological theories, and points out that ironically, biology has had a much greater impact on feminism than feminism has had on biology. Finding that the standard methods of teaching biology have changed little, Rosser presents models for transforming curricula. Her proposed changes aim to identify and correct unconscious biases and teach student store spect differences. Embracing a wide range of studies, this innovative and thoughtful commentary will be of use to biology, health sciences, women's studies, anthropology, sociology, psychology, and history students alike."--BOOK JACKET | ||
650 | 7 | |a Biologie |2 gtt | |
650 | 7 | |a Feminisme |2 gtt | |
650 | 7 | |a Sociobiologie |2 gtt | |
650 | 4 | |a Feminismus | |
650 | 4 | |a Gesellschaft | |
650 | 4 | |a Feminism | |
650 | 4 | |a Human biology |x Social aspects | |
650 | 4 | |a Sexism in sociobiology | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Cisaprid |0 (DE-588)4225640-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Feminismus |0 (DE-588)4222126-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Biologie |0 (DE-588)4006851-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 7 | |a Altenburg |g Thüringen |0 (DE-588)4001409-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Biologie |0 (DE-588)4006851-1 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Feminismus |0 (DE-588)4222126-2 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
689 | 1 | 0 | |a Altenburg |g Thüringen |0 (DE-588)4001409-5 |D g |
689 | 1 | 1 | |a Cisaprid |0 (DE-588)4225640-9 |D s |
689 | 1 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-004937120 | ||
883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804121870131265536 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Rosser, Sue Vilhauer 1947- |
author_GND | (DE-588)111009340 |
author_facet | Rosser, Sue Vilhauer 1947- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Rosser, Sue Vilhauer 1947- |
author_variant | s v r sv svr |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV007566812 |
callnumber-first | H - Social Science |
callnumber-label | HQ1154 |
callnumber-raw | HQ1154 |
callnumber-search | HQ1154 |
callnumber-sort | HQ 41154 |
callnumber-subject | HQ - Family, Marriage, Women |
classification_rvk | MS 3150 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)26809970 (DE-599)BVBBV007566812 |
dewey-full | 305.42 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 305 - Groups of people |
dewey-raw | 305.42 |
dewey-search | 305.42 |
dewey-sort | 3305.42 |
dewey-tens | 300 - Social sciences |
discipline | Soziologie |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04094nam a2200577 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV007566812</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">19930624 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">930527s1992 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">080579770X</subfield><subfield code="9">0-8057-9770-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0805797556</subfield><subfield code="9">0-8057-9755-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)26809970</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV007566812</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HQ1154</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">305.42</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MS 3150</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)123671:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rosser, Sue Vilhauer</subfield><subfield code="d">1947-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)111009340</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Biology & feminism</subfield><subfield code="b">a dynamic interaction</subfield><subfield code="c">Sue V. Rosser</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Biology and feminism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York</subfield><subfield code="b">Twayne u.a.</subfield><subfield code="c">1992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XVII, 191 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The impact of feminism on the arts & sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"The link between biology and feminism is well established in history. Even as recently as the nineteenth century, preeminent men of science employed skewed biological theorizing to explain the disadvantaged position of women in our society. These male scientists argued that women are mentally inferior to men by design of evolution. They erroneously "proved" that the female of the human species has a relatively smaller brain than the male, attributing this "difference" to the fact that the energy that women use to reproduce is drawn off at the expense of their intellectual development. At odds with nineteenth-century feminist critics, men such as Freud, Darwin, Broca, and Spencer did not assign the supposed inferiority of women to such factors as their decreased access to education, believing instead that tangible biological differences subjugated women to men. In the latter part of the twentieth century we again see a link between biology and feminism that expresses itself through women's health issues, reproductive rights, and ecofeminism."</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"In Biology and Feminism: A Dynamic Interaction, Sue V. Rosser offers an intriguing explanation of the possible bias of biological theories. Rosser maintains that the modern scientific method, accepted as objective and factual, may instead be colored by the values and assumptions of the traditional, male scientist. Her study offers critiques of the traditional scientific research method from the viewpoint of a number of different feminist theories. Rosser also details the contribution of several eminent women of science, past and present, to illustrate the impact of feminism on biological theories, and points out that ironically, biology has had a much greater impact on feminism than feminism has had on biology. Finding that the standard methods of teaching biology have changed little, Rosser presents models for transforming curricula. Her proposed changes aim to identify and correct unconscious biases and teach student store spect differences. Embracing a wide range of studies, this innovative and thoughtful commentary will be of use to biology, health sciences, women's studies, anthropology, sociology, psychology, and history students alike."--BOOK JACKET</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Biologie</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Feminisme</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sociobiologie</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Feminismus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gesellschaft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Feminism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Human biology</subfield><subfield code="x">Social aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sexism in sociobiology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Cisaprid</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4225640-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Feminismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4222126-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Biologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4006851-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Altenburg</subfield><subfield code="g">Thüringen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4001409-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Biologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4006851-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Feminismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4222126-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Altenburg</subfield><subfield code="g">Thüringen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4001409-5</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cisaprid</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4225640-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-004937120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | Altenburg Thüringen (DE-588)4001409-5 gnd |
geographic_facet | Altenburg Thüringen |
id | DE-604.BV007566812 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T17:04:51Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 080579770X 0805797556 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-004937120 |
oclc_num | 26809970 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-739 |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-739 |
physical | XVII, 191 S. |
publishDate | 1992 |
publishDateSearch | 1992 |
publishDateSort | 1992 |
publisher | Twayne u.a. |
record_format | marc |
series2 | The impact of feminism on the arts & sciences |
spelling | Rosser, Sue Vilhauer 1947- Verfasser (DE-588)111009340 aut Biology & feminism a dynamic interaction Sue V. Rosser Biology and feminism New York Twayne u.a. 1992 XVII, 191 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier The impact of feminism on the arts & sciences "The link between biology and feminism is well established in history. Even as recently as the nineteenth century, preeminent men of science employed skewed biological theorizing to explain the disadvantaged position of women in our society. These male scientists argued that women are mentally inferior to men by design of evolution. They erroneously "proved" that the female of the human species has a relatively smaller brain than the male, attributing this "difference" to the fact that the energy that women use to reproduce is drawn off at the expense of their intellectual development. At odds with nineteenth-century feminist critics, men such as Freud, Darwin, Broca, and Spencer did not assign the supposed inferiority of women to such factors as their decreased access to education, believing instead that tangible biological differences subjugated women to men. In the latter part of the twentieth century we again see a link between biology and feminism that expresses itself through women's health issues, reproductive rights, and ecofeminism." "In Biology and Feminism: A Dynamic Interaction, Sue V. Rosser offers an intriguing explanation of the possible bias of biological theories. Rosser maintains that the modern scientific method, accepted as objective and factual, may instead be colored by the values and assumptions of the traditional, male scientist. Her study offers critiques of the traditional scientific research method from the viewpoint of a number of different feminist theories. Rosser also details the contribution of several eminent women of science, past and present, to illustrate the impact of feminism on biological theories, and points out that ironically, biology has had a much greater impact on feminism than feminism has had on biology. Finding that the standard methods of teaching biology have changed little, Rosser presents models for transforming curricula. Her proposed changes aim to identify and correct unconscious biases and teach student store spect differences. Embracing a wide range of studies, this innovative and thoughtful commentary will be of use to biology, health sciences, women's studies, anthropology, sociology, psychology, and history students alike."--BOOK JACKET Biologie gtt Feminisme gtt Sociobiologie gtt Feminismus Gesellschaft Feminism Human biology Social aspects Sexism in sociobiology Cisaprid (DE-588)4225640-9 gnd rswk-swf Feminismus (DE-588)4222126-2 gnd rswk-swf Biologie (DE-588)4006851-1 gnd rswk-swf Altenburg Thüringen (DE-588)4001409-5 gnd rswk-swf Biologie (DE-588)4006851-1 s Feminismus (DE-588)4222126-2 s DE-604 Altenburg Thüringen (DE-588)4001409-5 g Cisaprid (DE-588)4225640-9 s 1\p DE-604 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
spellingShingle | Rosser, Sue Vilhauer 1947- Biology & feminism a dynamic interaction Biologie gtt Feminisme gtt Sociobiologie gtt Feminismus Gesellschaft Feminism Human biology Social aspects Sexism in sociobiology Cisaprid (DE-588)4225640-9 gnd Feminismus (DE-588)4222126-2 gnd Biologie (DE-588)4006851-1 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4225640-9 (DE-588)4222126-2 (DE-588)4006851-1 (DE-588)4001409-5 |
title | Biology & feminism a dynamic interaction |
title_alt | Biology and feminism |
title_auth | Biology & feminism a dynamic interaction |
title_exact_search | Biology & feminism a dynamic interaction |
title_full | Biology & feminism a dynamic interaction Sue V. Rosser |
title_fullStr | Biology & feminism a dynamic interaction Sue V. Rosser |
title_full_unstemmed | Biology & feminism a dynamic interaction Sue V. Rosser |
title_short | Biology & feminism |
title_sort | biology feminism a dynamic interaction |
title_sub | a dynamic interaction |
topic | Biologie gtt Feminisme gtt Sociobiologie gtt Feminismus Gesellschaft Feminism Human biology Social aspects Sexism in sociobiology Cisaprid (DE-588)4225640-9 gnd Feminismus (DE-588)4222126-2 gnd Biologie (DE-588)4006851-1 gnd |
topic_facet | Biologie Feminisme Sociobiologie Feminismus Gesellschaft Feminism Human biology Social aspects Sexism in sociobiology Cisaprid Altenburg Thüringen |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rossersuevilhauer biologyfeminismadynamicinteraction AT rossersuevilhauer biologyandfeminism |