Ethics of an artificial person: lost responsibility in professions and organizations
Artificial persons, as conceived by Hobbes, speak and act in the name of others, so that their actions become the actions of someone else, such as the lawyer who represents and acts for his or her client. In modern institutions we can find many other examples: among them politicians, brokers, real e...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Stanford, Calif.
Stanford Univ. Press
1992
|
Schriftenreihe: | Stanford series in philosophy
|
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | Artificial persons, as conceived by Hobbes, speak and act in the name of others, so that their actions become the actions of someone else, such as the lawyer who represents and acts for his or her client. In modern institutions we can find many other examples: among them politicians, brokers, real estate agents, bureaucrats, corporate executives, and military personnel. This book focuses on the moral issue of how we can and should locate responsibility for the actions of artificial persons. The author argues that conceiving this question in terms of roles, which may have their own moralities, blocks the kind of moral criticism we want to make, for there is a deep and intractable dissonance between role moralities and moral theory. This dissonance shows that we cannot deal with the moral issues piecemeal, profession by profession, as a role interpretation encourages us to do. Reverting to Hobbes's abstract idea of artificial persons vitiates the compartmentalization of problems We can freely cross disciplinary boundaries, as well as the line between theory and practice, and allow practices to cast their light back on the theory and show us its deficiencies. In short, this approach reorients some much-discussed issues of professional, business, and military ethics and reveals them as variations on one deeply rooted theme. The author does not treat current institutions as final and unalterable. If these arrangements frustrate moral evaluation, she finds that an argument for change. To make intelligent changes, however, we need a clear view of the reasoning that makes them seem natural and inevitable. That is what this book attempts to do. In the process, the author also reexamines the concept of "person." Not all cultures put so much stress on the idea as Western - and particularly American - cultures do. If we wish to keep this emphasis, then here is another argument for change If we want to keep our institutions as they are, then this is the price; it is a fairly clear choice |
Beschreibung: | X, 161 S. |
ISBN: | 0804721033 0804720347 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV006629306 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20080115 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 930329s1992 |||| 00||| engod | ||
020 | |a 0804721033 |9 0-8047-2103-3 | ||
020 | |a 0804720347 |9 0-8047-2034-7 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)24911780 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV006629306 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-739 |a DE-29 | ||
050 | 0 | |a K650 | |
082 | 0 | |a 342.613 |2 20 | |
082 | 0 | |a 346.01/3 |2 20 | |
084 | |a PI 3580 |0 (DE-625)136613: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Wolgast, Elizabeth Hankins |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ethics of an artificial person |b lost responsibility in professions and organizations |c Elizabeth Wolgast |
264 | 1 | |a Stanford, Calif. |b Stanford Univ. Press |c 1992 | |
300 | |a X, 161 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Stanford series in philosophy | |
520 | 3 | |a Artificial persons, as conceived by Hobbes, speak and act in the name of others, so that their actions become the actions of someone else, such as the lawyer who represents and acts for his or her client. In modern institutions we can find many other examples: among them politicians, brokers, real estate agents, bureaucrats, corporate executives, and military personnel. This book focuses on the moral issue of how we can and should locate responsibility for the actions of artificial persons. The author argues that conceiving this question in terms of roles, which may have their own moralities, blocks the kind of moral criticism we want to make, for there is a deep and intractable dissonance between role moralities and moral theory. This dissonance shows that we cannot deal with the moral issues piecemeal, profession by profession, as a role interpretation encourages us to do. Reverting to Hobbes's abstract idea of artificial persons vitiates the compartmentalization of problems | |
520 | 3 | |a We can freely cross disciplinary boundaries, as well as the line between theory and practice, and allow practices to cast their light back on the theory and show us its deficiencies. In short, this approach reorients some much-discussed issues of professional, business, and military ethics and reveals them as variations on one deeply rooted theme. The author does not treat current institutions as final and unalterable. If these arrangements frustrate moral evaluation, she finds that an argument for change. To make intelligent changes, however, we need a clear view of the reasoning that makes them seem natural and inevitable. That is what this book attempts to do. In the process, the author also reexamines the concept of "person." Not all cultures put so much stress on the idea as Western - and particularly American - cultures do. If we wish to keep this emphasis, then here is another argument for change | |
520 | 3 | |a If we want to keep our institutions as they are, then this is the price; it is a fairly clear choice | |
650 | 4 | |a Déontologie professionnelle | |
650 | 4 | |a Déontologie professionnelle - États-Unis | |
650 | 7 | |a Ethische aspecten |2 gtt | |
650 | 4 | |a Personnes morales - Aspect moral | |
650 | 4 | |a Personnes morales - Aspect moral - États-Unis | |
650 | 7 | |a Vertegenwoordiging (recht) |2 gtt | |
650 | 4 | |a Ethik | |
650 | 4 | |a Juristic persons |x Moral and ethical aspects | |
650 | 4 | |a Juristic persons |x Moral and ethical aspects |z United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Professional ethics | |
650 | 4 | |a Professional ethics |z United States | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Berufsethik |0 (DE-588)4253135-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Ethik |0 (DE-588)4015602-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Politische Ethik |0 (DE-588)4129503-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Juristische Person |0 (DE-588)4029063-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsethik |0 (DE-588)4177216-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 4 | |a USA | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Juristische Person |0 (DE-588)4029063-3 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Ethik |0 (DE-588)4015602-3 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
689 | 1 | 0 | |a Berufsethik |0 (DE-588)4253135-4 |D s |
689 | 1 | |5 DE-604 | |
689 | 2 | 0 | |a Rechtsethik |0 (DE-588)4177216-7 |D s |
689 | 2 | 1 | |a Politische Ethik |0 (DE-588)4129503-1 |D s |
689 | 2 | |5 DE-604 | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-004237556 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804120907262722048 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Wolgast, Elizabeth Hankins |
author_facet | Wolgast, Elizabeth Hankins |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Wolgast, Elizabeth Hankins |
author_variant | e h w eh ehw |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV006629306 |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | K650 |
callnumber-raw | K650 |
callnumber-search | K650 |
callnumber-sort | K 3650 |
callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
classification_rvk | PI 3580 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)24911780 (DE-599)BVBBV006629306 |
dewey-full | 342.613 346.01/3 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law 346 - Private law |
dewey-raw | 342.613 346.01/3 |
dewey-search | 342.613 346.01/3 |
dewey-sort | 3342.613 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04259nam a2200661 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV006629306</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20080115 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">930329s1992 |||| 00||| engod</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0804721033</subfield><subfield code="9">0-8047-2103-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0804720347</subfield><subfield code="9">0-8047-2034-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)24911780</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV006629306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K650</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.613</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">346.01/3</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PI 3580</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)136613:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wolgast, Elizabeth Hankins</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ethics of an artificial person</subfield><subfield code="b">lost responsibility in professions and organizations</subfield><subfield code="c">Elizabeth Wolgast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Stanford, Calif.</subfield><subfield code="b">Stanford Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">X, 161 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stanford series in philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Artificial persons, as conceived by Hobbes, speak and act in the name of others, so that their actions become the actions of someone else, such as the lawyer who represents and acts for his or her client. In modern institutions we can find many other examples: among them politicians, brokers, real estate agents, bureaucrats, corporate executives, and military personnel. This book focuses on the moral issue of how we can and should locate responsibility for the actions of artificial persons. The author argues that conceiving this question in terms of roles, which may have their own moralities, blocks the kind of moral criticism we want to make, for there is a deep and intractable dissonance between role moralities and moral theory. This dissonance shows that we cannot deal with the moral issues piecemeal, profession by profession, as a role interpretation encourages us to do. Reverting to Hobbes's abstract idea of artificial persons vitiates the compartmentalization of problems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">We can freely cross disciplinary boundaries, as well as the line between theory and practice, and allow practices to cast their light back on the theory and show us its deficiencies. In short, this approach reorients some much-discussed issues of professional, business, and military ethics and reveals them as variations on one deeply rooted theme. The author does not treat current institutions as final and unalterable. If these arrangements frustrate moral evaluation, she finds that an argument for change. To make intelligent changes, however, we need a clear view of the reasoning that makes them seem natural and inevitable. That is what this book attempts to do. In the process, the author also reexamines the concept of "person." Not all cultures put so much stress on the idea as Western - and particularly American - cultures do. If we wish to keep this emphasis, then here is another argument for change</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">If we want to keep our institutions as they are, then this is the price; it is a fairly clear choice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Déontologie professionnelle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Déontologie professionnelle - États-Unis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ethische aspecten</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Personnes morales - Aspect moral</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Personnes morales - Aspect moral - États-Unis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Vertegenwoordiging (recht)</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Juristic persons</subfield><subfield code="x">Moral and ethical aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Juristic persons</subfield><subfield code="x">Moral and ethical aspects</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Professional ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Professional ethics</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Berufsethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4253135-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015602-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Politische Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4129503-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Juristische Person</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4029063-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4177216-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Juristische Person</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4029063-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015602-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Berufsethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4253135-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rechtsethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4177216-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Politische Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4129503-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-004237556</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | USA |
geographic_facet | USA |
id | DE-604.BV006629306 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T16:49:32Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 0804721033 0804720347 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-004237556 |
oclc_num | 24911780 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-739 DE-29 |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-739 DE-29 |
physical | X, 161 S. |
publishDate | 1992 |
publishDateSearch | 1992 |
publishDateSort | 1992 |
publisher | Stanford Univ. Press |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Stanford series in philosophy |
spelling | Wolgast, Elizabeth Hankins Verfasser aut Ethics of an artificial person lost responsibility in professions and organizations Elizabeth Wolgast Stanford, Calif. Stanford Univ. Press 1992 X, 161 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Stanford series in philosophy Artificial persons, as conceived by Hobbes, speak and act in the name of others, so that their actions become the actions of someone else, such as the lawyer who represents and acts for his or her client. In modern institutions we can find many other examples: among them politicians, brokers, real estate agents, bureaucrats, corporate executives, and military personnel. This book focuses on the moral issue of how we can and should locate responsibility for the actions of artificial persons. The author argues that conceiving this question in terms of roles, which may have their own moralities, blocks the kind of moral criticism we want to make, for there is a deep and intractable dissonance between role moralities and moral theory. This dissonance shows that we cannot deal with the moral issues piecemeal, profession by profession, as a role interpretation encourages us to do. Reverting to Hobbes's abstract idea of artificial persons vitiates the compartmentalization of problems We can freely cross disciplinary boundaries, as well as the line between theory and practice, and allow practices to cast their light back on the theory and show us its deficiencies. In short, this approach reorients some much-discussed issues of professional, business, and military ethics and reveals them as variations on one deeply rooted theme. The author does not treat current institutions as final and unalterable. If these arrangements frustrate moral evaluation, she finds that an argument for change. To make intelligent changes, however, we need a clear view of the reasoning that makes them seem natural and inevitable. That is what this book attempts to do. In the process, the author also reexamines the concept of "person." Not all cultures put so much stress on the idea as Western - and particularly American - cultures do. If we wish to keep this emphasis, then here is another argument for change If we want to keep our institutions as they are, then this is the price; it is a fairly clear choice Déontologie professionnelle Déontologie professionnelle - États-Unis Ethische aspecten gtt Personnes morales - Aspect moral Personnes morales - Aspect moral - États-Unis Vertegenwoordiging (recht) gtt Ethik Juristic persons Moral and ethical aspects Juristic persons Moral and ethical aspects United States Professional ethics Professional ethics United States Berufsethik (DE-588)4253135-4 gnd rswk-swf Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 gnd rswk-swf Politische Ethik (DE-588)4129503-1 gnd rswk-swf Juristische Person (DE-588)4029063-3 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsethik (DE-588)4177216-7 gnd rswk-swf USA Juristische Person (DE-588)4029063-3 s Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 s DE-604 Berufsethik (DE-588)4253135-4 s Rechtsethik (DE-588)4177216-7 s Politische Ethik (DE-588)4129503-1 s |
spellingShingle | Wolgast, Elizabeth Hankins Ethics of an artificial person lost responsibility in professions and organizations Déontologie professionnelle Déontologie professionnelle - États-Unis Ethische aspecten gtt Personnes morales - Aspect moral Personnes morales - Aspect moral - États-Unis Vertegenwoordiging (recht) gtt Ethik Juristic persons Moral and ethical aspects Juristic persons Moral and ethical aspects United States Professional ethics Professional ethics United States Berufsethik (DE-588)4253135-4 gnd Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 gnd Politische Ethik (DE-588)4129503-1 gnd Juristische Person (DE-588)4029063-3 gnd Rechtsethik (DE-588)4177216-7 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4253135-4 (DE-588)4015602-3 (DE-588)4129503-1 (DE-588)4029063-3 (DE-588)4177216-7 |
title | Ethics of an artificial person lost responsibility in professions and organizations |
title_auth | Ethics of an artificial person lost responsibility in professions and organizations |
title_exact_search | Ethics of an artificial person lost responsibility in professions and organizations |
title_full | Ethics of an artificial person lost responsibility in professions and organizations Elizabeth Wolgast |
title_fullStr | Ethics of an artificial person lost responsibility in professions and organizations Elizabeth Wolgast |
title_full_unstemmed | Ethics of an artificial person lost responsibility in professions and organizations Elizabeth Wolgast |
title_short | Ethics of an artificial person |
title_sort | ethics of an artificial person lost responsibility in professions and organizations |
title_sub | lost responsibility in professions and organizations |
topic | Déontologie professionnelle Déontologie professionnelle - États-Unis Ethische aspecten gtt Personnes morales - Aspect moral Personnes morales - Aspect moral - États-Unis Vertegenwoordiging (recht) gtt Ethik Juristic persons Moral and ethical aspects Juristic persons Moral and ethical aspects United States Professional ethics Professional ethics United States Berufsethik (DE-588)4253135-4 gnd Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 gnd Politische Ethik (DE-588)4129503-1 gnd Juristische Person (DE-588)4029063-3 gnd Rechtsethik (DE-588)4177216-7 gnd |
topic_facet | Déontologie professionnelle Déontologie professionnelle - États-Unis Ethische aspecten Personnes morales - Aspect moral Personnes morales - Aspect moral - États-Unis Vertegenwoordiging (recht) Ethik Juristic persons Moral and ethical aspects Juristic persons Moral and ethical aspects United States Professional ethics Professional ethics United States Berufsethik Politische Ethik Juristische Person Rechtsethik USA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wolgastelizabethhankins ethicsofanartificialpersonlostresponsibilityinprofessionsandorganizations |