Differences in the city :: postmetropolitan heterotopias as liberal utopian dreams /
"Although it is one of the most vague and ambiguous concepts proposed by Foucault, the term "heterotopia" has been, and continues to be, one of the most widely used in technical as well as in human and social disciplines. Coinciding with the rise of postmodernism and the supposed cris...
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere Verfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
New York :
Nova Science Publishers,
[2020]
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Political science and history.
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | "Although it is one of the most vague and ambiguous concepts proposed by Foucault, the term "heterotopia" has been, and continues to be, one of the most widely used in technical as well as in human and social disciplines. Coinciding with the rise of postmodernism and the supposed crisis of the great unitary stories of the West, the great heterogeneity of urban and spatial phenomena and typologies referred to in the Foucauldian notion was further expanded, with the explicit intention of using it as part of the new urban ideology that neoliberal theorists of architecture and urbanism were beginning to implement under the leitmotif of the city by fragments. In this way, neoliberal urban ideology appropriated the concept of heterotopia, making it pass for libertarian and endowing it with the ability to exert political resistance to economic and urban planning by public administrations. This is why the concept of heterotopia has been used simultaneously and repeatedly as a tool to praise the beatitudes of neoliberal urbanism as well as to defend its emancipatory character by social movements and activists In this sense, the emancipatory potential that heterotopias could have had in the disciplinary arrangement of space has ended up transforming into a magic formula with which to transform the impositions of the neoliberal (de)arrangement of the territory into a hymn to freedom of movement, to a socio-cultural diversity without class conflict. The aim of this collective and interdisciplinary reflection is to prove that heterotopias are spaces that cannot be considered a priori as directly emancipatory but apart from an effective political project. As we live in a postmetropolitan word, we should ask: Are these post-metropolitan heterotopias capable of shaping themselves as the new nerve centers of anti-capitalist resistance or are they only capable of subverting the disciplinary power of public administrations already brought to crisis-point decades ago by neoliberal capitalism? Can they function as the spatial tools of an antagonistic politics for the common or, on the contrary, is their operation intrinsically neoliberal? This book brings together various analyses and investigations that maintain conflicting positions on the emancipatory or ideological-alienating character of heterotopias with the dual objective of avoiding their Western-centric bias and preserving any possible trait of emancipatory potential that may be rearticulated from an epistemological diversity viewpoint. With these objectives in mind, we have organized the twenty-two articles that make up this book into five major thematic sections, coinciding with some of the main topics around which socio-spatial debates dedicated to heterotopias have taken place in the last twenty-five years: the postmetropolis, public space, the right to the city, gender relations and their symbolic condition. Although these five categories should not be understood as unrelated compartments -but quite the opposite- we have chosen to use this classification as an analytical tool to illuminate some of the focal points around which to exercise effective critique of one of the most frustratingly incomplete, inconsistent [and] incoherent concepts of socio-spatial theory"-- |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource |
| Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
| ISBN: | 1536185329 9781536185324 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000008i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-4-EBA-on1195817606 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr ||||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 200904s2020 nyu ob 001 0 eng | ||
| 010 | |a 2020035207 | ||
| 040 | |a DLC |b eng |e rda |e pn |c DLC |d OCLCO |d OCLCF |d N$T |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d VYF |d YDX |d OCLCO |d TMA |d OCLCQ | ||
| 019 | |a 1334857543 | ||
| 020 | |a 1536185329 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781536185324 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |z 9781536184969 |q (hardcover) | ||
| 020 | |z 1536184969 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1195817606 |z (OCoLC)1334857543 | ||
| 042 | |a pcc | ||
| 050 | 0 | 0 | |a HT153 |
| 082 | 7 | |a 307.7601 |2 23 | |
| 049 | |a MAIN | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Differences in the city : |b postmetropolitan heterotopias as liberal utopian dreams / |c Jorge León Casero (editor), Julia Urabayen (editor). |
| 263 | |a 2011 | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a New York : |b Nova Science Publishers, |c [2020] | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Political science and history | |
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 520 | |a "Although it is one of the most vague and ambiguous concepts proposed by Foucault, the term "heterotopia" has been, and continues to be, one of the most widely used in technical as well as in human and social disciplines. Coinciding with the rise of postmodernism and the supposed crisis of the great unitary stories of the West, the great heterogeneity of urban and spatial phenomena and typologies referred to in the Foucauldian notion was further expanded, with the explicit intention of using it as part of the new urban ideology that neoliberal theorists of architecture and urbanism were beginning to implement under the leitmotif of the city by fragments. In this way, neoliberal urban ideology appropriated the concept of heterotopia, making it pass for libertarian and endowing it with the ability to exert political resistance to economic and urban planning by public administrations. This is why the concept of heterotopia has been used simultaneously and repeatedly as a tool to praise the beatitudes of neoliberal urbanism as well as to defend its emancipatory character by social movements and activists In this sense, the emancipatory potential that heterotopias could have had in the disciplinary arrangement of space has ended up transforming into a magic formula with which to transform the impositions of the neoliberal (de)arrangement of the territory into a hymn to freedom of movement, to a socio-cultural diversity without class conflict. The aim of this collective and interdisciplinary reflection is to prove that heterotopias are spaces that cannot be considered a priori as directly emancipatory but apart from an effective political project. As we live in a postmetropolitan word, we should ask: Are these post-metropolitan heterotopias capable of shaping themselves as the new nerve centers of anti-capitalist resistance or are they only capable of subverting the disciplinary power of public administrations already brought to crisis-point decades ago by neoliberal capitalism? Can they function as the spatial tools of an antagonistic politics for the common or, on the contrary, is their operation intrinsically neoliberal? This book brings together various analyses and investigations that maintain conflicting positions on the emancipatory or ideological-alienating character of heterotopias with the dual objective of avoiding their Western-centric bias and preserving any possible trait of emancipatory potential that may be rearticulated from an epistemological diversity viewpoint. With these objectives in mind, we have organized the twenty-two articles that make up this book into five major thematic sections, coinciding with some of the main topics around which socio-spatial debates dedicated to heterotopias have taken place in the last twenty-five years: the postmetropolis, public space, the right to the city, gender relations and their symbolic condition. Although these five categories should not be understood as unrelated compartments -but quite the opposite- we have chosen to use this classification as an analytical tool to illuminate some of the focal points around which to exercise effective critique of one of the most frustratingly incomplete, inconsistent [and] incoherent concepts of socio-spatial theory"-- |c Provided by publisher | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Urbanization |x Philosophy. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Sociology, Urban |x Philosophy. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Space |x Social aspects. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2023001104 | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Utopias |x Social aspects. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Urbanisation |x Philosophie. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Sociologie urbaine |x Philosophie. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Espace |x Aspect social. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Utopies |x Aspect social. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Sociology, Urban |x Philosophy |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Urbanization |x Philosophy |2 fast | |
| 700 | 1 | |a León Casero, Jorge, |d 1982- |e editor. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2019004079 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Urabayen Pérez, Julia, |d 1972- |e editor. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/nr2001048645 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |t Differences in the city: |d New York : Nova Science Publishers, [2020] |z 9781536184969 |w (DLC) 2020035206 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Political science and history. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2018174920 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=2579871 |3 Volltext |
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 2579871 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 17005680 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-on1195817606 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816882528798113792 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author2 | León Casero, Jorge, 1982- Urabayen Pérez, Julia, 1972- |
| author2_role | edt edt |
| author2_variant | c j l cj cjl p j u pj pju |
| author_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2019004079 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/nr2001048645 |
| author_facet | León Casero, Jorge, 1982- Urabayen Pérez, Julia, 1972- |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| callnumber-first | H - Social Science |
| callnumber-label | HT153 |
| callnumber-raw | HT153 |
| callnumber-search | HT153 |
| callnumber-sort | HT 3153 |
| callnumber-subject | HT - Communities, Classes, Races |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1195817606 |
| dewey-full | 307.7601 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 307 - Communities |
| dewey-raw | 307.7601 |
| dewey-search | 307.7601 |
| dewey-sort | 3307.7601 |
| dewey-tens | 300 - Social sciences |
| discipline | Soziologie |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05722cam a22005898i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-on1195817606</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200904s2020 nyu ob 001 0 eng </controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a"> 2020035207</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DLC</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">DLC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">VYF</subfield><subfield code="d">YDX</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">TMA</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1334857543</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1536185329</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781536185324</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781536184969</subfield><subfield code="q">(hardcover)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">1536184969</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1195817606</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1334857543</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="042" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">pcc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HT153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">307.7601</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Differences in the city :</subfield><subfield code="b">postmetropolitan heterotopias as liberal utopian dreams /</subfield><subfield code="c">Jorge León Casero (editor), Julia Urabayen (editor).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="263" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York :</subfield><subfield code="b">Nova Science Publishers,</subfield><subfield code="c">[2020]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Political science and history</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Although it is one of the most vague and ambiguous concepts proposed by Foucault, the term "heterotopia" has been, and continues to be, one of the most widely used in technical as well as in human and social disciplines. Coinciding with the rise of postmodernism and the supposed crisis of the great unitary stories of the West, the great heterogeneity of urban and spatial phenomena and typologies referred to in the Foucauldian notion was further expanded, with the explicit intention of using it as part of the new urban ideology that neoliberal theorists of architecture and urbanism were beginning to implement under the leitmotif of the city by fragments. In this way, neoliberal urban ideology appropriated the concept of heterotopia, making it pass for libertarian and endowing it with the ability to exert political resistance to economic and urban planning by public administrations. This is why the concept of heterotopia has been used simultaneously and repeatedly as a tool to praise the beatitudes of neoliberal urbanism as well as to defend its emancipatory character by social movements and activists In this sense, the emancipatory potential that heterotopias could have had in the disciplinary arrangement of space has ended up transforming into a magic formula with which to transform the impositions of the neoliberal (de)arrangement of the territory into a hymn to freedom of movement, to a socio-cultural diversity without class conflict. The aim of this collective and interdisciplinary reflection is to prove that heterotopias are spaces that cannot be considered a priori as directly emancipatory but apart from an effective political project. As we live in a postmetropolitan word, we should ask: Are these post-metropolitan heterotopias capable of shaping themselves as the new nerve centers of anti-capitalist resistance or are they only capable of subverting the disciplinary power of public administrations already brought to crisis-point decades ago by neoliberal capitalism? Can they function as the spatial tools of an antagonistic politics for the common or, on the contrary, is their operation intrinsically neoliberal? This book brings together various analyses and investigations that maintain conflicting positions on the emancipatory or ideological-alienating character of heterotopias with the dual objective of avoiding their Western-centric bias and preserving any possible trait of emancipatory potential that may be rearticulated from an epistemological diversity viewpoint. With these objectives in mind, we have organized the twenty-two articles that make up this book into five major thematic sections, coinciding with some of the main topics around which socio-spatial debates dedicated to heterotopias have taken place in the last twenty-five years: the postmetropolis, public space, the right to the city, gender relations and their symbolic condition. Although these five categories should not be understood as unrelated compartments -but quite the opposite- we have chosen to use this classification as an analytical tool to illuminate some of the focal points around which to exercise effective critique of one of the most frustratingly incomplete, inconsistent [and] incoherent concepts of socio-spatial theory"--</subfield><subfield code="c">Provided by publisher</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Urbanization</subfield><subfield code="x">Philosophy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sociology, Urban</subfield><subfield code="x">Philosophy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Space</subfield><subfield code="x">Social aspects.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2023001104</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Utopias</subfield><subfield code="x">Social aspects.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Urbanisation</subfield><subfield code="x">Philosophie.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Sociologie urbaine</subfield><subfield code="x">Philosophie.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Espace</subfield><subfield code="x">Aspect social.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Utopies</subfield><subfield code="x">Aspect social.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sociology, Urban</subfield><subfield code="x">Philosophy</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Urbanization</subfield><subfield code="x">Philosophy</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">León Casero, Jorge,</subfield><subfield code="d">1982-</subfield><subfield code="e">editor.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2019004079</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Urabayen Pérez, Julia,</subfield><subfield code="d">1972-</subfield><subfield code="e">editor.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/nr2001048645</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="t">Differences in the city:</subfield><subfield code="d">New York : Nova Science Publishers, [2020]</subfield><subfield code="z">9781536184969</subfield><subfield code="w">(DLC) 2020035206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political science and history.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2018174920</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=2579871</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">2579871</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">17005680</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | ZDB-4-EBA-on1195817606 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:30:03Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 1536185329 9781536185324 |
| language | English |
| lccn | 2020035207 |
| oclc_num | 1195817606 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 online resource |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSearch | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Nova Science Publishers, |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Political science and history. |
| series2 | Political science and history |
| spelling | Differences in the city : postmetropolitan heterotopias as liberal utopian dreams / Jorge León Casero (editor), Julia Urabayen (editor). 2011 New York : Nova Science Publishers, [2020] 1 online resource text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Political science and history Includes bibliographical references and index. "Although it is one of the most vague and ambiguous concepts proposed by Foucault, the term "heterotopia" has been, and continues to be, one of the most widely used in technical as well as in human and social disciplines. Coinciding with the rise of postmodernism and the supposed crisis of the great unitary stories of the West, the great heterogeneity of urban and spatial phenomena and typologies referred to in the Foucauldian notion was further expanded, with the explicit intention of using it as part of the new urban ideology that neoliberal theorists of architecture and urbanism were beginning to implement under the leitmotif of the city by fragments. In this way, neoliberal urban ideology appropriated the concept of heterotopia, making it pass for libertarian and endowing it with the ability to exert political resistance to economic and urban planning by public administrations. This is why the concept of heterotopia has been used simultaneously and repeatedly as a tool to praise the beatitudes of neoliberal urbanism as well as to defend its emancipatory character by social movements and activists In this sense, the emancipatory potential that heterotopias could have had in the disciplinary arrangement of space has ended up transforming into a magic formula with which to transform the impositions of the neoliberal (de)arrangement of the territory into a hymn to freedom of movement, to a socio-cultural diversity without class conflict. The aim of this collective and interdisciplinary reflection is to prove that heterotopias are spaces that cannot be considered a priori as directly emancipatory but apart from an effective political project. As we live in a postmetropolitan word, we should ask: Are these post-metropolitan heterotopias capable of shaping themselves as the new nerve centers of anti-capitalist resistance or are they only capable of subverting the disciplinary power of public administrations already brought to crisis-point decades ago by neoliberal capitalism? Can they function as the spatial tools of an antagonistic politics for the common or, on the contrary, is their operation intrinsically neoliberal? This book brings together various analyses and investigations that maintain conflicting positions on the emancipatory or ideological-alienating character of heterotopias with the dual objective of avoiding their Western-centric bias and preserving any possible trait of emancipatory potential that may be rearticulated from an epistemological diversity viewpoint. With these objectives in mind, we have organized the twenty-two articles that make up this book into five major thematic sections, coinciding with some of the main topics around which socio-spatial debates dedicated to heterotopias have taken place in the last twenty-five years: the postmetropolis, public space, the right to the city, gender relations and their symbolic condition. Although these five categories should not be understood as unrelated compartments -but quite the opposite- we have chosen to use this classification as an analytical tool to illuminate some of the focal points around which to exercise effective critique of one of the most frustratingly incomplete, inconsistent [and] incoherent concepts of socio-spatial theory"-- Provided by publisher Print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed. Urbanization Philosophy. Sociology, Urban Philosophy. Space Social aspects. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2023001104 Utopias Social aspects. Urbanisation Philosophie. Sociologie urbaine Philosophie. Espace Aspect social. Utopies Aspect social. Sociology, Urban Philosophy fast Urbanization Philosophy fast León Casero, Jorge, 1982- editor. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2019004079 Urabayen Pérez, Julia, 1972- editor. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/nr2001048645 Print version: Differences in the city: New York : Nova Science Publishers, [2020] 9781536184969 (DLC) 2020035206 Political science and history. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2018174920 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=2579871 Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Differences in the city : postmetropolitan heterotopias as liberal utopian dreams / Political science and history. Urbanization Philosophy. Sociology, Urban Philosophy. Space Social aspects. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2023001104 Utopias Social aspects. Urbanisation Philosophie. Sociologie urbaine Philosophie. Espace Aspect social. Utopies Aspect social. Sociology, Urban Philosophy fast Urbanization Philosophy fast |
| subject_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2023001104 |
| title | Differences in the city : postmetropolitan heterotopias as liberal utopian dreams / |
| title_auth | Differences in the city : postmetropolitan heterotopias as liberal utopian dreams / |
| title_exact_search | Differences in the city : postmetropolitan heterotopias as liberal utopian dreams / |
| title_full | Differences in the city : postmetropolitan heterotopias as liberal utopian dreams / Jorge León Casero (editor), Julia Urabayen (editor). |
| title_fullStr | Differences in the city : postmetropolitan heterotopias as liberal utopian dreams / Jorge León Casero (editor), Julia Urabayen (editor). |
| title_full_unstemmed | Differences in the city : postmetropolitan heterotopias as liberal utopian dreams / Jorge León Casero (editor), Julia Urabayen (editor). |
| title_short | Differences in the city : |
| title_sort | differences in the city postmetropolitan heterotopias as liberal utopian dreams |
| title_sub | postmetropolitan heterotopias as liberal utopian dreams / |
| topic | Urbanization Philosophy. Sociology, Urban Philosophy. Space Social aspects. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2023001104 Utopias Social aspects. Urbanisation Philosophie. Sociologie urbaine Philosophie. Espace Aspect social. Utopies Aspect social. Sociology, Urban Philosophy fast Urbanization Philosophy fast |
| topic_facet | Urbanization Philosophy. Sociology, Urban Philosophy. Space Social aspects. Utopias Social aspects. Urbanisation Philosophie. Sociologie urbaine Philosophie. Espace Aspect social. Utopies Aspect social. Sociology, Urban Philosophy Urbanization Philosophy |
| url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=2579871 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT leoncaserojorge differencesinthecitypostmetropolitanheterotopiasasliberalutopiandreams AT urabayenperezjulia differencesinthecitypostmetropolitanheterotopiasasliberalutopiandreams |