Modern legal interpretation :: legalism or beyond /
Legalism or legal formalism usually depicts judges as resolving cases by allegedly merely applying pre-existing legal rules. They do not seem to legislate, exercise discretion, balance or pursue policies, and they definitely do not look outside of conventional legal texts for guidance in deciding ne...
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere Verfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Newcastle upon Tyne :
Cambridge Scholars Publishing,
2018.
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | Legalism or legal formalism usually depicts judges as resolving cases by allegedly merely applying pre-existing legal rules. They do not seem to legislate, exercise discretion, balance or pursue policies, and they definitely do not look outside of conventional legal texts for guidance in deciding new cases. For them, the law is an autonomous domain of knowledge and technique. What they follow are the maxims of clarity, determinacy, and coherence of law. This perception of law and adjudication is sometimes designated as an orthodox lawyering. However, at least in certain cases, it is very difficult to say that legalism is not an inappropriate theory or a method of legal interpretation. Different theories have attested that legal interpretation is much more than just legalism, which appears to be far too naïve. In the framework of modern legal interpretation, the following questions can be raised. Is it possible to integrate legalism in a coherent theory of legal interpretation? Is legalism as a distinctive theory of legal interpretation still a feasible theory of interpretation? How can such a formalist approach withstand a critique from Dworkinian moral interpretivism or accusations of being a myth, masking political preferences from legal realists? These and many other issues about legal interpretation are discussed in this book by prominent legal philosophers and legal theorists. |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (vi, 195 pages) |
| Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references. |
| ISBN: | 9781527527041 1527527042 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-4-EBA-on1083544575 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr cnu---unuuu | ||
| 008 | 190129s2018 enk ob 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a N$T |b eng |e rda |e pn |c N$T |d YDX |d EBLCP |d UKMGB |d UKAHL |d OCLCQ |d ELBRO |d OCLCQ |d NLW |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL | ||
| 015 | |a GBB928345 |2 bnb | ||
| 016 | 7 | |a 019233049 |2 Uk | |
| 020 | |a 9781527527041 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 1527527042 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |z 9781527511644 | ||
| 020 | |z 1527511642 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1083544575 | ||
| 037 | |a 9781527527041 |b Cambridge Scholars Publishing | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a K296 |b .M63 2018eb | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 101000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 044000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 052000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 071000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 098000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 079000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 7 | |a 340/.1 |2 23 | |
| 049 | |a MAIN | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Modern legal interpretation : |b legalism or beyond / |c edited by Marko Novak and Vojko Strahovnik. |
| 264 | 1 | |a Newcastle upon Tyne : |b Cambridge Scholars Publishing, |c 2018. | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (vi, 195 pages) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references. | ||
| 505 | 0 | 0 | |t Identifying "purely" interpretative issues and activities / |r Bruce Anderson, |r Michael Shute -- |t Beyond the four corners : the fate of formalism in contract interpretation / |r Seppo Sajama -- |t The role of theory in legal theory : Weinrib's formalism and Wittgenstein / |r Maija Aalto-Heinilä -- |t Interpreting defeasible principles and rules / |r Vojko Strahovnik -- |t Rhetorical legal argumentation through a multimodal dimension / |r Marko Novak -- |t Reinventing systematic interpretation : criteria and uses of the tripartition into public, private and social law / |r Ivan Padjen -- |t Realism, truth and Meinongianism : a metaphysical conception of law and legal discourses / |r Federico Puppo -- |t Are there 'non-Euclidean geometries' for judicial reasoning? : epistemological pluralism facing the crisis of legal formalism / |r Maurizio Manzin -- |t Hohfeld's analytical scheme and constitutional economic and social rights / |r Ivana Tucak. |
| 520 | |a Legalism or legal formalism usually depicts judges as resolving cases by allegedly merely applying pre-existing legal rules. They do not seem to legislate, exercise discretion, balance or pursue policies, and they definitely do not look outside of conventional legal texts for guidance in deciding new cases. For them, the law is an autonomous domain of knowledge and technique. What they follow are the maxims of clarity, determinacy, and coherence of law. This perception of law and adjudication is sometimes designated as an orthodox lawyering. However, at least in certain cases, it is very difficult to say that legalism is not an inappropriate theory or a method of legal interpretation. Different theories have attested that legal interpretation is much more than just legalism, which appears to be far too naïve. In the framework of modern legal interpretation, the following questions can be raised. Is it possible to integrate legalism in a coherent theory of legal interpretation? Is legalism as a distinctive theory of legal interpretation still a feasible theory of interpretation? How can such a formalist approach withstand a critique from Dworkinian moral interpretivism or accusations of being a myth, masking political preferences from legal realists? These and many other issues about legal interpretation are discussed in this book by prominent legal philosophers and legal theorists. | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Law |x Interpretation and construction. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85075135 | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Droit |x Interprétation. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Essays. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x General Practice. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Jurisprudence. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Paralegals & Paralegalism. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Practical Guides. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Reference. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Law |x Interpretation and construction |2 fast | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Novak, Marko, |e editor. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Strahovnik, Vojko, |e editor. | |
| 758 | |i has work: |a Modern legal interpretation (Text) |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFB8WYx8wbxqtqBHdfckjC |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork | ||
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |t Modern legal interpretation. |d Newcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2018 |z 9781527511644 |w (OCoLC)1040615997 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=2012275 |3 Volltext |
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH35894092 | ||
| 938 | |a ProQuest Ebook Central |b EBLB |n EBL5651695 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 2012275 | ||
| 938 | |a eLibro |b ELBO |n ELB124629 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 16004871 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-on1083544575 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816882483003654144 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author2 | Novak, Marko Strahovnik, Vojko |
| author2_role | edt edt |
| author2_variant | m n mn v s vs |
| author_additional | Bruce Anderson, Michael Shute -- Seppo Sajama -- Maija Aalto-Heinilä -- Vojko Strahovnik -- Marko Novak -- Ivan Padjen -- Federico Puppo -- Maurizio Manzin -- Ivana Tucak. |
| author_facet | Novak, Marko Strahovnik, Vojko |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | K296 |
| callnumber-raw | K296 .M63 2018eb |
| callnumber-search | K296 .M63 2018eb |
| callnumber-sort | K 3296 M63 42018EB |
| callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | Identifying "purely" interpretative issues and activities / Beyond the four corners : the fate of formalism in contract interpretation / The role of theory in legal theory : Weinrib's formalism and Wittgenstein / Interpreting defeasible principles and rules / Rhetorical legal argumentation through a multimodal dimension / Reinventing systematic interpretation : criteria and uses of the tripartition into public, private and social law / Realism, truth and Meinongianism : a metaphysical conception of law and legal discourses / Are there 'non-Euclidean geometries' for judicial reasoning? : epistemological pluralism facing the crisis of legal formalism / Hohfeld's analytical scheme and constitutional economic and social rights / |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1083544575 |
| dewey-full | 340/.1 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 340 - Law |
| dewey-raw | 340/.1 |
| dewey-search | 340/.1 |
| dewey-sort | 3340 11 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05035cam a2200673 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-on1083544575</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr cnu---unuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">190129s2018 enk ob 000 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">N$T</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">YDX</subfield><subfield code="d">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">UKMGB</subfield><subfield code="d">UKAHL</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">ELBRO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">NLW</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="015" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBB928345</subfield><subfield code="2">bnb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="016" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">019233049</subfield><subfield code="2">Uk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781527527041</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1527527042</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781527511644</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">1527511642</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1083544575</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781527527041</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge Scholars Publishing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">K296</subfield><subfield code="b">.M63 2018eb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">101000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">044000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">052000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">071000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">098000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">079000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">340/.1</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Modern legal interpretation :</subfield><subfield code="b">legalism or beyond /</subfield><subfield code="c">edited by Marko Novak and Vojko Strahovnik.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Newcastle upon Tyne :</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge Scholars Publishing,</subfield><subfield code="c">2018.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (vi, 195 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="t">Identifying "purely" interpretative issues and activities /</subfield><subfield code="r">Bruce Anderson,</subfield><subfield code="r">Michael Shute --</subfield><subfield code="t">Beyond the four corners : the fate of formalism in contract interpretation /</subfield><subfield code="r">Seppo Sajama --</subfield><subfield code="t">The role of theory in legal theory : Weinrib's formalism and Wittgenstein /</subfield><subfield code="r">Maija Aalto-Heinilä --</subfield><subfield code="t">Interpreting defeasible principles and rules /</subfield><subfield code="r">Vojko Strahovnik --</subfield><subfield code="t">Rhetorical legal argumentation through a multimodal dimension /</subfield><subfield code="r">Marko Novak --</subfield><subfield code="t">Reinventing systematic interpretation : criteria and uses of the tripartition into public, private and social law /</subfield><subfield code="r">Ivan Padjen --</subfield><subfield code="t">Realism, truth and Meinongianism : a metaphysical conception of law and legal discourses /</subfield><subfield code="r">Federico Puppo --</subfield><subfield code="t">Are there 'non-Euclidean geometries' for judicial reasoning? : epistemological pluralism facing the crisis of legal formalism /</subfield><subfield code="r">Maurizio Manzin --</subfield><subfield code="t">Hohfeld's analytical scheme and constitutional economic and social rights /</subfield><subfield code="r">Ivana Tucak.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Legalism or legal formalism usually depicts judges as resolving cases by allegedly merely applying pre-existing legal rules. They do not seem to legislate, exercise discretion, balance or pursue policies, and they definitely do not look outside of conventional legal texts for guidance in deciding new cases. For them, the law is an autonomous domain of knowledge and technique. What they follow are the maxims of clarity, determinacy, and coherence of law. This perception of law and adjudication is sometimes designated as an orthodox lawyering. However, at least in certain cases, it is very difficult to say that legalism is not an inappropriate theory or a method of legal interpretation. Different theories have attested that legal interpretation is much more than just legalism, which appears to be far too naïve. In the framework of modern legal interpretation, the following questions can be raised. Is it possible to integrate legalism in a coherent theory of legal interpretation? Is legalism as a distinctive theory of legal interpretation still a feasible theory of interpretation? How can such a formalist approach withstand a critique from Dworkinian moral interpretivism or accusations of being a myth, masking political preferences from legal realists? These and many other issues about legal interpretation are discussed in this book by prominent legal philosophers and legal theorists.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield><subfield code="x">Interpretation and construction.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85075135</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Droit</subfield><subfield code="x">Interprétation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Essays.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">General Practice.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Jurisprudence.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Paralegals & Paralegalism.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Practical Guides.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Reference.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield><subfield code="x">Interpretation and construction</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Novak, Marko,</subfield><subfield code="e">editor.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Strahovnik, Vojko,</subfield><subfield code="e">editor.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="758" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">has work:</subfield><subfield code="a">Modern legal interpretation (Text)</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFB8WYx8wbxqtqBHdfckjC</subfield><subfield code="4">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="t">Modern legal interpretation.</subfield><subfield code="d">Newcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2018</subfield><subfield code="z">9781527511644</subfield><subfield code="w">(OCoLC)1040615997</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=2012275</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askews and Holts Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">ASKH</subfield><subfield code="n">AH35894092</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest Ebook Central</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL5651695</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">2012275</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eLibro</subfield><subfield code="b">ELBO</subfield><subfield code="n">ELB124629</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">16004871</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | ZDB-4-EBA-on1083544575 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:29:19Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781527527041 1527527042 |
| language | English |
| oclc_num | 1083544575 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 online resource (vi, 195 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Cambridge Scholars Publishing, |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Modern legal interpretation : legalism or beyond / edited by Marko Novak and Vojko Strahovnik. Newcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2018. 1 online resource (vi, 195 pages) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Includes bibliographical references. Identifying "purely" interpretative issues and activities / Bruce Anderson, Michael Shute -- Beyond the four corners : the fate of formalism in contract interpretation / Seppo Sajama -- The role of theory in legal theory : Weinrib's formalism and Wittgenstein / Maija Aalto-Heinilä -- Interpreting defeasible principles and rules / Vojko Strahovnik -- Rhetorical legal argumentation through a multimodal dimension / Marko Novak -- Reinventing systematic interpretation : criteria and uses of the tripartition into public, private and social law / Ivan Padjen -- Realism, truth and Meinongianism : a metaphysical conception of law and legal discourses / Federico Puppo -- Are there 'non-Euclidean geometries' for judicial reasoning? : epistemological pluralism facing the crisis of legal formalism / Maurizio Manzin -- Hohfeld's analytical scheme and constitutional economic and social rights / Ivana Tucak. Legalism or legal formalism usually depicts judges as resolving cases by allegedly merely applying pre-existing legal rules. They do not seem to legislate, exercise discretion, balance or pursue policies, and they definitely do not look outside of conventional legal texts for guidance in deciding new cases. For them, the law is an autonomous domain of knowledge and technique. What they follow are the maxims of clarity, determinacy, and coherence of law. This perception of law and adjudication is sometimes designated as an orthodox lawyering. However, at least in certain cases, it is very difficult to say that legalism is not an inappropriate theory or a method of legal interpretation. Different theories have attested that legal interpretation is much more than just legalism, which appears to be far too naïve. In the framework of modern legal interpretation, the following questions can be raised. Is it possible to integrate legalism in a coherent theory of legal interpretation? Is legalism as a distinctive theory of legal interpretation still a feasible theory of interpretation? How can such a formalist approach withstand a critique from Dworkinian moral interpretivism or accusations of being a myth, masking political preferences from legal realists? These and many other issues about legal interpretation are discussed in this book by prominent legal philosophers and legal theorists. Print version record. Law Interpretation and construction. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85075135 Droit Interprétation. LAW Essays. bisacsh LAW General Practice. bisacsh LAW Jurisprudence. bisacsh LAW Paralegals & Paralegalism. bisacsh LAW Practical Guides. bisacsh LAW Reference. bisacsh Law Interpretation and construction fast Novak, Marko, editor. Strahovnik, Vojko, editor. has work: Modern legal interpretation (Text) https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFB8WYx8wbxqtqBHdfckjC https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork Print version: Modern legal interpretation. Newcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2018 9781527511644 (OCoLC)1040615997 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=2012275 Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Modern legal interpretation : legalism or beyond / Identifying "purely" interpretative issues and activities / Beyond the four corners : the fate of formalism in contract interpretation / The role of theory in legal theory : Weinrib's formalism and Wittgenstein / Interpreting defeasible principles and rules / Rhetorical legal argumentation through a multimodal dimension / Reinventing systematic interpretation : criteria and uses of the tripartition into public, private and social law / Realism, truth and Meinongianism : a metaphysical conception of law and legal discourses / Are there 'non-Euclidean geometries' for judicial reasoning? : epistemological pluralism facing the crisis of legal formalism / Hohfeld's analytical scheme and constitutional economic and social rights / Law Interpretation and construction. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85075135 Droit Interprétation. LAW Essays. bisacsh LAW General Practice. bisacsh LAW Jurisprudence. bisacsh LAW Paralegals & Paralegalism. bisacsh LAW Practical Guides. bisacsh LAW Reference. bisacsh Law Interpretation and construction fast |
| subject_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85075135 |
| title | Modern legal interpretation : legalism or beyond / |
| title_alt | Identifying "purely" interpretative issues and activities / Beyond the four corners : the fate of formalism in contract interpretation / The role of theory in legal theory : Weinrib's formalism and Wittgenstein / Interpreting defeasible principles and rules / Rhetorical legal argumentation through a multimodal dimension / Reinventing systematic interpretation : criteria and uses of the tripartition into public, private and social law / Realism, truth and Meinongianism : a metaphysical conception of law and legal discourses / Are there 'non-Euclidean geometries' for judicial reasoning? : epistemological pluralism facing the crisis of legal formalism / Hohfeld's analytical scheme and constitutional economic and social rights / |
| title_auth | Modern legal interpretation : legalism or beyond / |
| title_exact_search | Modern legal interpretation : legalism or beyond / |
| title_full | Modern legal interpretation : legalism or beyond / edited by Marko Novak and Vojko Strahovnik. |
| title_fullStr | Modern legal interpretation : legalism or beyond / edited by Marko Novak and Vojko Strahovnik. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Modern legal interpretation : legalism or beyond / edited by Marko Novak and Vojko Strahovnik. |
| title_short | Modern legal interpretation : |
| title_sort | modern legal interpretation legalism or beyond |
| title_sub | legalism or beyond / |
| topic | Law Interpretation and construction. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85075135 Droit Interprétation. LAW Essays. bisacsh LAW General Practice. bisacsh LAW Jurisprudence. bisacsh LAW Paralegals & Paralegalism. bisacsh LAW Practical Guides. bisacsh LAW Reference. bisacsh Law Interpretation and construction fast |
| topic_facet | Law Interpretation and construction. Droit Interprétation. LAW Essays. LAW General Practice. LAW Jurisprudence. LAW Paralegals & Paralegalism. LAW Practical Guides. LAW Reference. Law Interpretation and construction |
| url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=2012275 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT novakmarko modernlegalinterpretationlegalismorbeyond AT strahovnikvojko modernlegalinterpretationlegalismorbeyond |