Vigilance and restraint in the common law of judicial review /:
"The mediation of the balance between vigilance and restraint is a fundamental feature of judicial review of administrative action in the anglocommonwealth. This balance is realised through the modulation of the depth of scrutiny when reviewing the decisions of ministers, public bodies and offi...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
New York :
Cambridge University Press,
2018.
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Cambridge studies in constitutional law ;
19. |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | "The mediation of the balance between vigilance and restraint is a fundamental feature of judicial review of administrative action in the anglocommonwealth. This balance is realised through the modulation of the depth of scrutiny when reviewing the decisions of ministers, public bodies and officials. while variability is ubiquitous, it takes different shapes and forms. Dean R. Knight explores the main shapes and forms employed in judicial review in England, Canada, Australia and New Zealand over the last fifty years. Four schemata are drawn from the case law and taken back to conceptual foundations, exposing their commonality and differences, and each approach is evaluated. This detailed methodology provides a sound basis for decisions and debates about how variability should be brought to individual cases and will be of great value to legal scholars, judges and practitioners interested in judicial review. Dean R. Knight is Senior Lecturer in the Faculty of Law and Co-Director of the New Zealand Centre for Public Law at Victoria University of Wellington. His scholarly interests include a wide range of topics in constitutional and administrative law, including judicial review and local democracy"-- |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource |
| Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
| ISBN: | 9781108100007 1108100007 9781108119108 1108119107 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-4-EBA-on1031337376 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20240705115654.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr |n||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 180418s2018 nyu ob 001 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a YDX |b eng |e rda |e pn |c YDX |d N$T |d OCLCQ |d YDX |d EBLCP |d UAB |d OCLCQ |d FIE |d U3W |d OTZ |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL |d TMA |d OCLCQ |d SFB |d OCLCQ | ||
| 019 | |a 1031305938 |a 1031362455 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781108100007 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 1108100007 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9781108119108 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 1108119107 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |z 9781107190245 | ||
| 020 | |z 110719024X | ||
| 020 | |z 9781316640340 |q (paperback) | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1031337376 |z (OCoLC)1031305938 |z (OCoLC)1031362455 | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a K3175 |b .K65 2018eb | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 012000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 062000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a POL |x 040030 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 7 | |a 347/.012 |2 23 | |
| 049 | |a MAIN | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Knight, Dean R. |q (Dean Robert), |e author. |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjyg7tQ8WwRRbyB68vHP8K |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2008174420 | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Vigilance and restraint in the common law of judicial review / |c Dean R. Knight. |
| 264 | 1 | |a New York : |b Cambridge University Press, |c 2018. | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Cambridge studies in constitutional law ; |v 19 | |
| 588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 520 | |a "The mediation of the balance between vigilance and restraint is a fundamental feature of judicial review of administrative action in the anglocommonwealth. This balance is realised through the modulation of the depth of scrutiny when reviewing the decisions of ministers, public bodies and officials. while variability is ubiquitous, it takes different shapes and forms. Dean R. Knight explores the main shapes and forms employed in judicial review in England, Canada, Australia and New Zealand over the last fifty years. Four schemata are drawn from the case law and taken back to conceptual foundations, exposing their commonality and differences, and each approach is evaluated. This detailed methodology provides a sound basis for decisions and debates about how variability should be brought to individual cases and will be of great value to legal scholars, judges and practitioners interested in judicial review. Dean R. Knight is Senior Lecturer in the Faculty of Law and Co-Director of the New Zealand Centre for Public Law at Victoria University of Wellington. His scholarly interests include a wide range of topics in constitutional and administrative law, including judicial review and local democracy"-- |c Provided by publisher | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a 1. Introduction -- 2. Scope of review -- 3. Grounds of review -- 4. Intensity of review -- 5. Contextual review -- 6. Conclusion. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Judicial review. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85070963 | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Common law. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85028993 | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Contrôle juridictionnel des lois. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Common law. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a review (function) |2 aat | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Civil Procedure. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Legal Services. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE |x Government |x Judicial Branch. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Common law |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Judicial review |2 fast | |
| 758 | |i has work: |a Vigilance and restraint in the common law of judicial review (Text) |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGyCPCBXbFPPPcgkP69RXb |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork | ||
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |z 9781107190245 |z 110719024X |w (DLC) 2017058817 |w (OCoLC)1004045925 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Cambridge studies in constitutional law ; |v 19. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2010149168 | |
| 856 | 1 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1694306 |3 Volltext | |
| 856 | 1 | |l CBO01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1694306 |3 Volltext | |
| 938 | |a ProQuest Ebook Central |b EBLB |n EBL5355484 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 1694306 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 15325003 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 15266337 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-on1031337376 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1813903788170280960 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Knight, Dean R. (Dean Robert) |
| author_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2008174420 |
| author_facet | Knight, Dean R. (Dean Robert) |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Knight, Dean R. |
| author_variant | d r k dr drk |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | K3175 |
| callnumber-raw | K3175 .K65 2018eb |
| callnumber-search | K3175 .K65 2018eb |
| callnumber-sort | K 43175 K65 42018EB |
| callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | 1. Introduction -- 2. Scope of review -- 3. Grounds of review -- 4. Intensity of review -- 5. Contextual review -- 6. Conclusion. |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1031337376 |
| dewey-full | 347/.012 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
| dewey-raw | 347/.012 |
| dewey-search | 347/.012 |
| dewey-sort | 3347 212 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04281cam a2200661 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-on1031337376</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240705115654.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr |n|||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180418s2018 nyu ob 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YDX</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">YDX</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">YDX</subfield><subfield code="d">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">UAB</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">FIE</subfield><subfield code="d">U3W</subfield><subfield code="d">OTZ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield><subfield code="d">TMA</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">SFB</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1031305938</subfield><subfield code="a">1031362455</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781108100007</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1108100007</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781108119108</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1108119107</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781107190245</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">110719024X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781316640340</subfield><subfield code="q">(paperback)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1031337376</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1031305938</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1031362455</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">K3175</subfield><subfield code="b">.K65 2018eb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">012000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">062000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POL</subfield><subfield code="x">040030</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347/.012</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Knight, Dean R.</subfield><subfield code="q">(Dean Robert),</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjyg7tQ8WwRRbyB68vHP8K</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2008174420</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Vigilance and restraint in the common law of judicial review /</subfield><subfield code="c">Dean R. Knight.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York :</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press,</subfield><subfield code="c">2018.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cambridge studies in constitutional law ;</subfield><subfield code="v">19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"The mediation of the balance between vigilance and restraint is a fundamental feature of judicial review of administrative action in the anglocommonwealth. This balance is realised through the modulation of the depth of scrutiny when reviewing the decisions of ministers, public bodies and officials. while variability is ubiquitous, it takes different shapes and forms. Dean R. Knight explores the main shapes and forms employed in judicial review in England, Canada, Australia and New Zealand over the last fifty years. Four schemata are drawn from the case law and taken back to conceptual foundations, exposing their commonality and differences, and each approach is evaluated. This detailed methodology provides a sound basis for decisions and debates about how variability should be brought to individual cases and will be of great value to legal scholars, judges and practitioners interested in judicial review. Dean R. Knight is Senior Lecturer in the Faculty of Law and Co-Director of the New Zealand Centre for Public Law at Victoria University of Wellington. His scholarly interests include a wide range of topics in constitutional and administrative law, including judicial review and local democracy"--</subfield><subfield code="c">Provided by publisher</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. Introduction -- 2. Scope of review -- 3. Grounds of review -- 4. Intensity of review -- 5. Contextual review -- 6. Conclusion.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicial review.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85070963</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Common law.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85028993</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Contrôle juridictionnel des lois.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Common law.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">review (function)</subfield><subfield code="2">aat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Civil Procedure.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Legal Services.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE</subfield><subfield code="x">Government</subfield><subfield code="x">Judicial Branch.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Common law</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Judicial review</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="758" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">has work:</subfield><subfield code="a">Vigilance and restraint in the common law of judicial review (Text)</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGyCPCBXbFPPPcgkP69RXb</subfield><subfield code="4">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="z">9781107190245</subfield><subfield code="z">110719024X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DLC) 2017058817</subfield><subfield code="w">(OCoLC)1004045925</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cambridge studies in constitutional law ;</subfield><subfield code="v">19.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2010149168</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1694306</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="l">CBO01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1694306</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest Ebook Central</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL5355484</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">1694306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">15325003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">15266337</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | ZDB-4-EBA-on1031337376 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-10-25T16:24:15Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781108100007 1108100007 9781108119108 1108119107 |
| language | English |
| oclc_num | 1031337376 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | MAIN |
| owner_facet | MAIN |
| physical | 1 online resource |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press, |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Cambridge studies in constitutional law ; |
| series2 | Cambridge studies in constitutional law ; |
| spelling | Knight, Dean R. (Dean Robert), author. https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjyg7tQ8WwRRbyB68vHP8K http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2008174420 Vigilance and restraint in the common law of judicial review / Dean R. Knight. New York : Cambridge University Press, 2018. 1 online resource text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Cambridge studies in constitutional law ; 19 Print version record. Includes bibliographical references and index. "The mediation of the balance between vigilance and restraint is a fundamental feature of judicial review of administrative action in the anglocommonwealth. This balance is realised through the modulation of the depth of scrutiny when reviewing the decisions of ministers, public bodies and officials. while variability is ubiquitous, it takes different shapes and forms. Dean R. Knight explores the main shapes and forms employed in judicial review in England, Canada, Australia and New Zealand over the last fifty years. Four schemata are drawn from the case law and taken back to conceptual foundations, exposing their commonality and differences, and each approach is evaluated. This detailed methodology provides a sound basis for decisions and debates about how variability should be brought to individual cases and will be of great value to legal scholars, judges and practitioners interested in judicial review. Dean R. Knight is Senior Lecturer in the Faculty of Law and Co-Director of the New Zealand Centre for Public Law at Victoria University of Wellington. His scholarly interests include a wide range of topics in constitutional and administrative law, including judicial review and local democracy"-- Provided by publisher 1. Introduction -- 2. Scope of review -- 3. Grounds of review -- 4. Intensity of review -- 5. Contextual review -- 6. Conclusion. Judicial review. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85070963 Common law. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85028993 Contrôle juridictionnel des lois. Common law. review (function) aat LAW Civil Procedure. bisacsh LAW Legal Services. bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE Government Judicial Branch. bisacsh Common law fast Judicial review fast has work: Vigilance and restraint in the common law of judicial review (Text) https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGyCPCBXbFPPPcgkP69RXb https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork Print version: 9781107190245 110719024X (DLC) 2017058817 (OCoLC)1004045925 Cambridge studies in constitutional law ; 19. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2010149168 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1694306 Volltext CBO01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1694306 Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Knight, Dean R. (Dean Robert) Vigilance and restraint in the common law of judicial review / Cambridge studies in constitutional law ; 1. Introduction -- 2. Scope of review -- 3. Grounds of review -- 4. Intensity of review -- 5. Contextual review -- 6. Conclusion. Judicial review. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85070963 Common law. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85028993 Contrôle juridictionnel des lois. Common law. review (function) aat LAW Civil Procedure. bisacsh LAW Legal Services. bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE Government Judicial Branch. bisacsh Common law fast Judicial review fast |
| subject_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85070963 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85028993 |
| title | Vigilance and restraint in the common law of judicial review / |
| title_auth | Vigilance and restraint in the common law of judicial review / |
| title_exact_search | Vigilance and restraint in the common law of judicial review / |
| title_full | Vigilance and restraint in the common law of judicial review / Dean R. Knight. |
| title_fullStr | Vigilance and restraint in the common law of judicial review / Dean R. Knight. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Vigilance and restraint in the common law of judicial review / Dean R. Knight. |
| title_short | Vigilance and restraint in the common law of judicial review / |
| title_sort | vigilance and restraint in the common law of judicial review |
| topic | Judicial review. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85070963 Common law. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85028993 Contrôle juridictionnel des lois. Common law. review (function) aat LAW Civil Procedure. bisacsh LAW Legal Services. bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE Government Judicial Branch. bisacsh Common law fast Judicial review fast |
| topic_facet | Judicial review. Common law. Contrôle juridictionnel des lois. review (function) LAW Civil Procedure. LAW Legal Services. POLITICAL SCIENCE Government Judicial Branch. Common law Judicial review |
| url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1694306 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT knightdeanr vigilanceandrestraintinthecommonlawofjudicialreview |