Human rights and judicial review in Australia and Canada :: the newest despotism? /
It is commonly asserted that bills of rights have had a 'righting' effect on the principles of judicial review of administrative action and have been a key driver of the modern expansion in judicial oversight of the executive arm of government. A number of commentators have pointed to Aust...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford [UK] ; Portland, Oregon :
Hart Publishing,
2017.
|
Schriftenreihe: | Hart studies in comparative public law ;
v. 16. |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | It is commonly asserted that bills of rights have had a 'righting' effect on the principles of judicial review of administrative action and have been a key driver of the modern expansion in judicial oversight of the executive arm of government. A number of commentators have pointed to Australian administrative law as evidence for this 'righting' hypothesis. They have suggested that the fact that Australia is an outlier among common law jurisdictions in having neither a statutory nor a constitutional framework to expressly protect human rights explains why Australia alone continues to take an apparently 'formalist', 'legalist' and 'conservative' approach to administrative law. Other commentators and judges, including a number in Canada, have argued the opposite: that bills of rights have the effect of stifling the development of the common law. However, for the most part, all these claims remain just that - there has been limited detailed analysis of the issue, and no detailed comparative analysis of the veracity of the claims. This book analyses in detail the interaction between administrative and human rights law in Australia and Canada, arguing that both jurisdictions have reached remarkably similar positions regarding the balance between judicial and executive power, and between broader fundamental principles including the rule of law, parliamentary sovereignty and the separation of powers. It will provide valuable reading for all those researching judicial review and human rights. |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (xxxii, 288 pages) |
Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
ISBN: | 9781509907885 1509907882 9781509907892 1509907890 1509907866 9781509907861 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn969973768 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr ||||||||||| | ||
008 | 170123s2017 enk ob 001 0 eng | ||
010 | |a 2017003151 | ||
040 | |a DLC |b eng |e rda |e pn |c DLC |d OCLCO |d OCLCF |d OCLCQ |d N$T |d YDX |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d UAB |d BLOOM |d FIE |d OTZ |d OCLCQ |d U3W |d BRX |d UKAHL |d OCLCQ |d NLW |d LUN |d BRF |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d LA0 |d K6U |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL | ||
019 | |a 987427561 |a 990434251 |a 991541580 |a 992738253 |a 1002828530 |a 1005197363 |a 1167174634 | ||
020 | |a 9781509907885 |q (electronic book) | ||
020 | |a 1509907882 |q (electronic book) | ||
020 | |a 9781509907892 | ||
020 | |a 1509907890 | ||
020 | |a 1509907866 | ||
020 | |a 9781509907861 | ||
020 | |z 9781509907878 | ||
020 | |z 1509907874 | ||
020 | |z 9781509907861 |q (hardcover ; |q alkaline paper) | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)969973768 |z (OCoLC)987427561 |z (OCoLC)990434251 |z (OCoLC)991541580 |z (OCoLC)992738253 |z (OCoLC)1002828530 |z (OCoLC)1005197363 |z (OCoLC)1167174634 | ||
042 | |a pcc | ||
043 | |a u-at--- |a n-cn--- | ||
050 | 1 | 4 | |a K3412 |b .B68 2017 |
072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 012000 |2 bisacsh | |
072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 062000 |2 bisacsh | |
072 | 7 | |a POL |x 040030 |2 bisacsh | |
082 | 7 | |a 347.71/012 |2 23 | |
049 | |a MAIN | ||
100 | 1 | |a Boughey, Janina, |e author. | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Human rights and judicial review in Australia and Canada : |b the newest despotism? / |c Janina Boughey. |
264 | 1 | |a Oxford [UK] ; |a Portland, Oregon : |b Hart Publishing, |c 2017. | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (xxxii, 288 pages) | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Hart studies in comparative public law ; |v volume 16 | |
504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
505 | 0 | |a The framework for judicial review of administrative action in Australia -- The framework for judicial review of administrative action in Canada -- Procedural fairness -- Controlling discretion -- Intensity of review. | |
588 | 0 | |a Online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on May 17, 2017). | |
520 | 8 | |a It is commonly asserted that bills of rights have had a 'righting' effect on the principles of judicial review of administrative action and have been a key driver of the modern expansion in judicial oversight of the executive arm of government. A number of commentators have pointed to Australian administrative law as evidence for this 'righting' hypothesis. They have suggested that the fact that Australia is an outlier among common law jurisdictions in having neither a statutory nor a constitutional framework to expressly protect human rights explains why Australia alone continues to take an apparently 'formalist', 'legalist' and 'conservative' approach to administrative law. Other commentators and judges, including a number in Canada, have argued the opposite: that bills of rights have the effect of stifling the development of the common law. However, for the most part, all these claims remain just that - there has been limited detailed analysis of the issue, and no detailed comparative analysis of the veracity of the claims. This book analyses in detail the interaction between administrative and human rights law in Australia and Canada, arguing that both jurisdictions have reached remarkably similar positions regarding the balance between judicial and executive power, and between broader fundamental principles including the rule of law, parliamentary sovereignty and the separation of powers. It will provide valuable reading for all those researching judicial review and human rights. | |
650 | 0 | |a Judicial review of administrative acts |z Australia. | |
650 | 0 | |a Administrative law |z Australia. | |
650 | 0 | |a Civil rights |z Australia. | |
650 | 0 | |a Judicial discretion |z Australia. | |
650 | 0 | |a Judicial review of administrative acts |z Canada. | |
650 | 0 | |a Civil rights |z Canada. | |
650 | 0 | |a Judicial discretion |z Canada. | |
650 | 0 | |a Civil rights. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85026371 | |
650 | 2 | |a Civil Rights |0 https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D002961 | |
650 | 6 | |a Contrôle juridictionnel de l'administration |z Australie. | |
650 | 6 | |a Pouvoir discrétionnaire des juges |z Australie. | |
650 | 6 | |a Contrôle juridictionnel de l'administration |z Canada. | |
650 | 6 | |a Pouvoir discrétionnaire des juges |z Canada. | |
650 | 6 | |a Droits de l'homme. | |
650 | 7 | |a civil rights. |2 aat | |
650 | 7 | |a Human rights & civil liberties law. |2 bicssc | |
650 | 7 | |a International law. |2 bicssc | |
650 | 7 | |a Comparative law. |2 bicssc | |
650 | 7 | |a Constitutional & administrative law. |2 bicssc | |
650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Civil Procedure. |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Legal Services. |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE |x Government |x Judicial Branch. |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a CANADA. |2 eclas | |
650 | 7 | |a Administrative law |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Civil rights |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Judicial discretion |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Judicial review of administrative acts |2 fast | |
651 | 7 | |a Australia |2 fast | |
651 | 7 | |a Canada |2 fast | |
758 | |i has work: |a Human rights and judicial review in Australia and Canada (Text) |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCH7gfTKVH7mTFt9cM6CPHy |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork | ||
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Boughey, Janina. |t Human rights and judicial review in Australia and Canada. |d Oxford [UK] ; Portland, Oregon : Hart Publishing, 2017 |z 9781509907861 |w (DLC) 2017002142 |
830 | 0 | |a Hart studies in comparative public law ; |v v. 16. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2013062952 | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1510265 |3 Volltext |
938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH32756377 | ||
938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH32756378 | ||
938 | |a Bloomsbury Publishing |b BLOO |n bpp09260782 | ||
938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 1510265 | ||
938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 14578905 | ||
938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 14270354 | ||
994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
049 | |a DE-863 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn969973768 |
---|---|
_version_ | 1816882376676999168 |
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Boughey, Janina |
author_facet | Boughey, Janina |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Boughey, Janina |
author_variant | j b jb |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | localFWS |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | K3412 |
callnumber-raw | K3412 .B68 2017 |
callnumber-search | K3412 .B68 2017 |
callnumber-sort | K 43412 B68 42017 |
callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
contents | The framework for judicial review of administrative action in Australia -- The framework for judicial review of administrative action in Canada -- Procedural fairness -- Controlling discretion -- Intensity of review. |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)969973768 |
dewey-full | 347.71/012 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
dewey-raw | 347.71/012 |
dewey-search | 347.71/012 |
dewey-sort | 3347.71 212 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>06117cam a2200973 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn969973768</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170123s2017 enk ob 001 0 eng </controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a"> 2017003151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DLC</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">DLC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">YDX</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">UAB</subfield><subfield code="d">BLOOM</subfield><subfield code="d">FIE</subfield><subfield code="d">OTZ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">U3W</subfield><subfield code="d">BRX</subfield><subfield code="d">UKAHL</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">NLW</subfield><subfield code="d">LUN</subfield><subfield code="d">BRF</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">LA0</subfield><subfield code="d">K6U</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">987427561</subfield><subfield code="a">990434251</subfield><subfield code="a">991541580</subfield><subfield code="a">992738253</subfield><subfield code="a">1002828530</subfield><subfield code="a">1005197363</subfield><subfield code="a">1167174634</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781509907885</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic book)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1509907882</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic book)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781509907892</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1509907890</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1509907866</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781509907861</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781509907878</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">1509907874</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781509907861</subfield><subfield code="q">(hardcover ;</subfield><subfield code="q">alkaline paper)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)969973768</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)987427561</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)990434251</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)991541580</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)992738253</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1002828530</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1005197363</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1167174634</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="042" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">pcc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">u-at---</subfield><subfield code="a">n-cn---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">K3412</subfield><subfield code="b">.B68 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">012000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">062000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POL</subfield><subfield code="x">040030</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.71/012</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Boughey, Janina,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Human rights and judicial review in Australia and Canada :</subfield><subfield code="b">the newest despotism? /</subfield><subfield code="c">Janina Boughey.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford [UK] ;</subfield><subfield code="a">Portland, Oregon :</subfield><subfield code="b">Hart Publishing,</subfield><subfield code="c">2017.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (xxxii, 288 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hart studies in comparative public law ;</subfield><subfield code="v">volume 16</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The framework for judicial review of administrative action in Australia -- The framework for judicial review of administrative action in Canada -- Procedural fairness -- Controlling discretion -- Intensity of review.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on May 17, 2017).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">It is commonly asserted that bills of rights have had a 'righting' effect on the principles of judicial review of administrative action and have been a key driver of the modern expansion in judicial oversight of the executive arm of government. A number of commentators have pointed to Australian administrative law as evidence for this 'righting' hypothesis. They have suggested that the fact that Australia is an outlier among common law jurisdictions in having neither a statutory nor a constitutional framework to expressly protect human rights explains why Australia alone continues to take an apparently 'formalist', 'legalist' and 'conservative' approach to administrative law. Other commentators and judges, including a number in Canada, have argued the opposite: that bills of rights have the effect of stifling the development of the common law. However, for the most part, all these claims remain just that - there has been limited detailed analysis of the issue, and no detailed comparative analysis of the veracity of the claims. This book analyses in detail the interaction between administrative and human rights law in Australia and Canada, arguing that both jurisdictions have reached remarkably similar positions regarding the balance between judicial and executive power, and between broader fundamental principles including the rule of law, parliamentary sovereignty and the separation of powers. It will provide valuable reading for all those researching judicial review and human rights.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicial review of administrative acts</subfield><subfield code="z">Australia.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Administrative law</subfield><subfield code="z">Australia.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Civil rights</subfield><subfield code="z">Australia.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicial discretion</subfield><subfield code="z">Australia.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicial review of administrative acts</subfield><subfield code="z">Canada.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Civil rights</subfield><subfield code="z">Canada.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicial discretion</subfield><subfield code="z">Canada.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Civil rights.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85026371</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Civil Rights</subfield><subfield code="0">https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D002961</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Contrôle juridictionnel de l'administration</subfield><subfield code="z">Australie.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Pouvoir discrétionnaire des juges</subfield><subfield code="z">Australie.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Contrôle juridictionnel de l'administration</subfield><subfield code="z">Canada.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Pouvoir discrétionnaire des juges</subfield><subfield code="z">Canada.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Droits de l'homme.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">civil rights.</subfield><subfield code="2">aat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Human rights & civil liberties law.</subfield><subfield code="2">bicssc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">International law.</subfield><subfield code="2">bicssc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Comparative law.</subfield><subfield code="2">bicssc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Constitutional & administrative law.</subfield><subfield code="2">bicssc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Civil Procedure.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Legal Services.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE</subfield><subfield code="x">Government</subfield><subfield code="x">Judicial Branch.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">CANADA.</subfield><subfield code="2">eclas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Administrative law</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Civil rights</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Judicial discretion</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Judicial review of administrative acts</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Australia</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Canada</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="758" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">has work:</subfield><subfield code="a">Human rights and judicial review in Australia and Canada (Text)</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCH7gfTKVH7mTFt9cM6CPHy</subfield><subfield code="4">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="a">Boughey, Janina.</subfield><subfield code="t">Human rights and judicial review in Australia and Canada.</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [UK] ; Portland, Oregon : Hart Publishing, 2017</subfield><subfield code="z">9781509907861</subfield><subfield code="w">(DLC) 2017002142</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Hart studies in comparative public law ;</subfield><subfield code="v">v. 16.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2013062952</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1510265</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askews and Holts Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">ASKH</subfield><subfield code="n">AH32756377</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askews and Holts Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">ASKH</subfield><subfield code="n">AH32756378</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bloomsbury Publishing</subfield><subfield code="b">BLOO</subfield><subfield code="n">bpp09260782</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">1510265</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">14578905</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">14270354</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | Australia fast Canada fast |
geographic_facet | Australia Canada |
id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn969973768 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:27:38Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781509907885 1509907882 9781509907892 1509907890 1509907866 9781509907861 |
language | English |
lccn | 2017003151 |
oclc_num | 969973768 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 online resource (xxxii, 288 pages) |
psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
publishDate | 2017 |
publishDateSearch | 2017 |
publishDateSort | 2017 |
publisher | Hart Publishing, |
record_format | marc |
series | Hart studies in comparative public law ; |
series2 | Hart studies in comparative public law ; |
spelling | Boughey, Janina, author. Human rights and judicial review in Australia and Canada : the newest despotism? / Janina Boughey. Oxford [UK] ; Portland, Oregon : Hart Publishing, 2017. 1 online resource (xxxii, 288 pages) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Hart studies in comparative public law ; volume 16 Includes bibliographical references and index. The framework for judicial review of administrative action in Australia -- The framework for judicial review of administrative action in Canada -- Procedural fairness -- Controlling discretion -- Intensity of review. Online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on May 17, 2017). It is commonly asserted that bills of rights have had a 'righting' effect on the principles of judicial review of administrative action and have been a key driver of the modern expansion in judicial oversight of the executive arm of government. A number of commentators have pointed to Australian administrative law as evidence for this 'righting' hypothesis. They have suggested that the fact that Australia is an outlier among common law jurisdictions in having neither a statutory nor a constitutional framework to expressly protect human rights explains why Australia alone continues to take an apparently 'formalist', 'legalist' and 'conservative' approach to administrative law. Other commentators and judges, including a number in Canada, have argued the opposite: that bills of rights have the effect of stifling the development of the common law. However, for the most part, all these claims remain just that - there has been limited detailed analysis of the issue, and no detailed comparative analysis of the veracity of the claims. This book analyses in detail the interaction between administrative and human rights law in Australia and Canada, arguing that both jurisdictions have reached remarkably similar positions regarding the balance between judicial and executive power, and between broader fundamental principles including the rule of law, parliamentary sovereignty and the separation of powers. It will provide valuable reading for all those researching judicial review and human rights. Judicial review of administrative acts Australia. Administrative law Australia. Civil rights Australia. Judicial discretion Australia. Judicial review of administrative acts Canada. Civil rights Canada. Judicial discretion Canada. Civil rights. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85026371 Civil Rights https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D002961 Contrôle juridictionnel de l'administration Australie. Pouvoir discrétionnaire des juges Australie. Contrôle juridictionnel de l'administration Canada. Pouvoir discrétionnaire des juges Canada. Droits de l'homme. civil rights. aat Human rights & civil liberties law. bicssc International law. bicssc Comparative law. bicssc Constitutional & administrative law. bicssc LAW Civil Procedure. bisacsh LAW Legal Services. bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE Government Judicial Branch. bisacsh CANADA. eclas Administrative law fast Civil rights fast Judicial discretion fast Judicial review of administrative acts fast Australia fast Canada fast has work: Human rights and judicial review in Australia and Canada (Text) https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCH7gfTKVH7mTFt9cM6CPHy https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork Print version: Boughey, Janina. Human rights and judicial review in Australia and Canada. Oxford [UK] ; Portland, Oregon : Hart Publishing, 2017 9781509907861 (DLC) 2017002142 Hart studies in comparative public law ; v. 16. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2013062952 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1510265 Volltext |
spellingShingle | Boughey, Janina Human rights and judicial review in Australia and Canada : the newest despotism? / Hart studies in comparative public law ; The framework for judicial review of administrative action in Australia -- The framework for judicial review of administrative action in Canada -- Procedural fairness -- Controlling discretion -- Intensity of review. Judicial review of administrative acts Australia. Administrative law Australia. Civil rights Australia. Judicial discretion Australia. Judicial review of administrative acts Canada. Civil rights Canada. Judicial discretion Canada. Civil rights. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85026371 Civil Rights https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D002961 Contrôle juridictionnel de l'administration Australie. Pouvoir discrétionnaire des juges Australie. Contrôle juridictionnel de l'administration Canada. Pouvoir discrétionnaire des juges Canada. Droits de l'homme. civil rights. aat Human rights & civil liberties law. bicssc International law. bicssc Comparative law. bicssc Constitutional & administrative law. bicssc LAW Civil Procedure. bisacsh LAW Legal Services. bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE Government Judicial Branch. bisacsh CANADA. eclas Administrative law fast Civil rights fast Judicial discretion fast Judicial review of administrative acts fast |
subject_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85026371 https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D002961 |
title | Human rights and judicial review in Australia and Canada : the newest despotism? / |
title_auth | Human rights and judicial review in Australia and Canada : the newest despotism? / |
title_exact_search | Human rights and judicial review in Australia and Canada : the newest despotism? / |
title_full | Human rights and judicial review in Australia and Canada : the newest despotism? / Janina Boughey. |
title_fullStr | Human rights and judicial review in Australia and Canada : the newest despotism? / Janina Boughey. |
title_full_unstemmed | Human rights and judicial review in Australia and Canada : the newest despotism? / Janina Boughey. |
title_short | Human rights and judicial review in Australia and Canada : |
title_sort | human rights and judicial review in australia and canada the newest despotism |
title_sub | the newest despotism? / |
topic | Judicial review of administrative acts Australia. Administrative law Australia. Civil rights Australia. Judicial discretion Australia. Judicial review of administrative acts Canada. Civil rights Canada. Judicial discretion Canada. Civil rights. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85026371 Civil Rights https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D002961 Contrôle juridictionnel de l'administration Australie. Pouvoir discrétionnaire des juges Australie. Contrôle juridictionnel de l'administration Canada. Pouvoir discrétionnaire des juges Canada. Droits de l'homme. civil rights. aat Human rights & civil liberties law. bicssc International law. bicssc Comparative law. bicssc Constitutional & administrative law. bicssc LAW Civil Procedure. bisacsh LAW Legal Services. bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE Government Judicial Branch. bisacsh CANADA. eclas Administrative law fast Civil rights fast Judicial discretion fast Judicial review of administrative acts fast |
topic_facet | Judicial review of administrative acts Australia. Administrative law Australia. Civil rights Australia. Judicial discretion Australia. Judicial review of administrative acts Canada. Civil rights Canada. Judicial discretion Canada. Civil rights. Civil Rights Contrôle juridictionnel de l'administration Australie. Pouvoir discrétionnaire des juges Australie. Contrôle juridictionnel de l'administration Canada. Pouvoir discrétionnaire des juges Canada. Droits de l'homme. civil rights. Human rights & civil liberties law. International law. Comparative law. Constitutional & administrative law. LAW Civil Procedure. LAW Legal Services. POLITICAL SCIENCE Government Judicial Branch. CANADA. Administrative law Civil rights Judicial discretion Judicial review of administrative acts Australia Canada |
url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1510265 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bougheyjanina humanrightsandjudicialreviewinaustraliaandcanadathenewestdespotism |