Revisiting the concept of defence in the Jus ad Bellum :: the dual face of defence /
The purpose of the jus ad bellum is to draw a line in the sand: thus far, but no further. In the light of modern warfare, a state should today have an explicitly recognised and undisputed right of delimited unilateral defence not only in response to an occurring armed attack, but also in interceptio...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford ; Portland, Oregon :
Hart Publishing,
2017.
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Studies in international law ;
Volume 66 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | The purpose of the jus ad bellum is to draw a line in the sand: thus far, but no further. In the light of modern warfare, a state should today have an explicitly recognised and undisputed right of delimited unilateral defence not only in response to an occurring armed attack, but also in interception of an inevitable or imminent armed attack. This book, however, makes it evident that unilateral interception is not incontestably compatible with the modern right of self-defence in Article 51 of the UN Charter. Then again, unilateral defence need not forever be confined to self-defence only, wherefore the book proposes that the concept of defence may best be modernised by a clear legal division into responsive and interceptive defence. Since both threat and use of force are explicitly prohibited in Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, this book further recommends that both responsive and interceptive defence should be explicitly excepted from this prohibition in Article 51 of the UN Charter. The modern jus ad bellum should thus legally recognise a dual face of defence: responsive self-defence if an armed attack occurs, and interceptive necessity-defence if a grave and urgent threat of an armed attack occurs. For without a clarifying and modernising revision, the concept of defence will become irreparably blurred until it is completely dissolved into the ever-shifting sands of war. |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource. |
| Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
| ISBN: | 9781509906963 1509906967 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn960642082 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr ||||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 161011s2017 enk ob 001 0 eng | ||
| 010 | |a 2016046776 | ||
| 040 | |a DLC |b eng |e rda |c DLC |d DXU | ||
| 019 | |a 1167145500 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781509906963 |q (Epub) | ||
| 020 | |a 1509906967 | ||
| 020 | |z 9781509906970 (hardback : alk. paper) | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)960642082 |z (OCoLC)1167145500 | ||
| 042 | |a pcc | ||
| 050 | 0 | 0 | |a KZ6396 |
| 082 | 7 | |a 341.6/3 |2 23 | |
| 049 | |a MAIN | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Friman, Johanna, |e author. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Revisiting the concept of defence in the Jus ad Bellum : |b the dual face of defence / |c Johanna Friman. |
| 246 | 3 | |a Revisiting the concept of defense in the Jus ad Bellum | |
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford ; |a Portland, Oregon : |b Hart Publishing, |c 2017. | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource. | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Studies in international law ; |v Volume 66 | |
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a The faces of war -- The first face of defence : self-defence -- The second face of defence : necessity-defence -- Whitherward warfare? | |
| 588 | |a Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher. | ||
| 520 | 8 | |a The purpose of the jus ad bellum is to draw a line in the sand: thus far, but no further. In the light of modern warfare, a state should today have an explicitly recognised and undisputed right of delimited unilateral defence not only in response to an occurring armed attack, but also in interception of an inevitable or imminent armed attack. This book, however, makes it evident that unilateral interception is not incontestably compatible with the modern right of self-defence in Article 51 of the UN Charter. Then again, unilateral defence need not forever be confined to self-defence only, wherefore the book proposes that the concept of defence may best be modernised by a clear legal division into responsive and interceptive defence. Since both threat and use of force are explicitly prohibited in Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, this book further recommends that both responsive and interceptive defence should be explicitly excepted from this prohibition in Article 51 of the UN Charter. The modern jus ad bellum should thus legally recognise a dual face of defence: responsive self-defence if an armed attack occurs, and interceptive necessity-defence if a grave and urgent threat of an armed attack occurs. For without a clarifying and modernising revision, the concept of defence will become irreparably blurred until it is completely dissolved into the ever-shifting sands of war. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Just war doctrine. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a War (International law) | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Self-defense (Law) | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Friman, Johanna. |t Revisiting the concept of defence in the Jus ad Bellum |d Oxford ; Portland, Oregon : Hart Publishing, 2017 |z 9781509906970 |w (DLC) 2016046246 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1466593 |3 Volltext |
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH32442275 | ||
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH32442274 | ||
| 938 | |a Bloomsbury Publishing |b BLOO |n bpp09260647 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 1466593 | ||
| 938 | |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection |b IDEB |n cis36115979 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 13503003 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn960642082 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816882365255909376 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Friman, Johanna |
| author_facet | Friman, Johanna |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Friman, Johanna |
| author_variant | j f jf |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KZ6396 |
| callnumber-raw | KZ6396 |
| callnumber-search | KZ6396 |
| callnumber-sort | KZ 46396 |
| callnumber-subject | KZ - Law of Nations |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | The faces of war -- The first face of defence : self-defence -- The second face of defence : necessity-defence -- Whitherward warfare? |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)960642082 |
| dewey-full | 341.6/3 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 341 - Law of nations |
| dewey-raw | 341.6/3 |
| dewey-search | 341.6/3 |
| dewey-sort | 3341.6 13 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03598cam a2200529 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn960642082</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161011s2017 enk ob 001 0 eng </controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a"> 2016046776</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DLC</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="c">DLC</subfield><subfield code="d">DXU</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1167145500</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781509906963</subfield><subfield code="q">(Epub)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1509906967</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781509906970 (hardback : alk. paper)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)960642082</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1167145500</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="042" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">pcc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KZ6396</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">341.6/3</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Friman, Johanna,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Revisiting the concept of defence in the Jus ad Bellum :</subfield><subfield code="b">the dual face of defence /</subfield><subfield code="c">Johanna Friman.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Revisiting the concept of defense in the Jus ad Bellum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford ;</subfield><subfield code="a">Portland, Oregon :</subfield><subfield code="b">Hart Publishing,</subfield><subfield code="c">2017.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Studies in international law ;</subfield><subfield code="v">Volume 66</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The faces of war -- The first face of defence : self-defence -- The second face of defence : necessity-defence -- Whitherward warfare?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The purpose of the jus ad bellum is to draw a line in the sand: thus far, but no further. In the light of modern warfare, a state should today have an explicitly recognised and undisputed right of delimited unilateral defence not only in response to an occurring armed attack, but also in interception of an inevitable or imminent armed attack. This book, however, makes it evident that unilateral interception is not incontestably compatible with the modern right of self-defence in Article 51 of the UN Charter. Then again, unilateral defence need not forever be confined to self-defence only, wherefore the book proposes that the concept of defence may best be modernised by a clear legal division into responsive and interceptive defence. Since both threat and use of force are explicitly prohibited in Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, this book further recommends that both responsive and interceptive defence should be explicitly excepted from this prohibition in Article 51 of the UN Charter. The modern jus ad bellum should thus legally recognise a dual face of defence: responsive self-defence if an armed attack occurs, and interceptive necessity-defence if a grave and urgent threat of an armed attack occurs. For without a clarifying and modernising revision, the concept of defence will become irreparably blurred until it is completely dissolved into the ever-shifting sands of war.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Just war doctrine.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">War (International law)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Self-defense (Law)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="a">Friman, Johanna.</subfield><subfield code="t">Revisiting the concept of defence in the Jus ad Bellum</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford ; Portland, Oregon : Hart Publishing, 2017</subfield><subfield code="z">9781509906970</subfield><subfield code="w">(DLC) 2016046246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1466593</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askews and Holts Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">ASKH</subfield><subfield code="n">AH32442275</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askews and Holts Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">ASKH</subfield><subfield code="n">AH32442274</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bloomsbury Publishing</subfield><subfield code="b">BLOO</subfield><subfield code="n">bpp09260647</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">1466593</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection</subfield><subfield code="b">IDEB</subfield><subfield code="n">cis36115979</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">13503003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn960642082 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:27:27Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781509906963 1509906967 |
| language | English |
| lccn | 2016046776 |
| oclc_num | 960642082 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 online resource. |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateSearch | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| publisher | Hart Publishing, |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Studies in international law ; |
| spelling | Friman, Johanna, author. Revisiting the concept of defence in the Jus ad Bellum : the dual face of defence / Johanna Friman. Revisiting the concept of defense in the Jus ad Bellum Oxford ; Portland, Oregon : Hart Publishing, 2017. 1 online resource. text txt rdacontent computer n rdamedia online resource nc rdacarrier Studies in international law ; Volume 66 Includes bibliographical references and index. The faces of war -- The first face of defence : self-defence -- The second face of defence : necessity-defence -- Whitherward warfare? Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher. The purpose of the jus ad bellum is to draw a line in the sand: thus far, but no further. In the light of modern warfare, a state should today have an explicitly recognised and undisputed right of delimited unilateral defence not only in response to an occurring armed attack, but also in interception of an inevitable or imminent armed attack. This book, however, makes it evident that unilateral interception is not incontestably compatible with the modern right of self-defence in Article 51 of the UN Charter. Then again, unilateral defence need not forever be confined to self-defence only, wherefore the book proposes that the concept of defence may best be modernised by a clear legal division into responsive and interceptive defence. Since both threat and use of force are explicitly prohibited in Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, this book further recommends that both responsive and interceptive defence should be explicitly excepted from this prohibition in Article 51 of the UN Charter. The modern jus ad bellum should thus legally recognise a dual face of defence: responsive self-defence if an armed attack occurs, and interceptive necessity-defence if a grave and urgent threat of an armed attack occurs. For without a clarifying and modernising revision, the concept of defence will become irreparably blurred until it is completely dissolved into the ever-shifting sands of war. Just war doctrine. War (International law) Self-defense (Law) Print version: Friman, Johanna. Revisiting the concept of defence in the Jus ad Bellum Oxford ; Portland, Oregon : Hart Publishing, 2017 9781509906970 (DLC) 2016046246 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1466593 Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Friman, Johanna Revisiting the concept of defence in the Jus ad Bellum : the dual face of defence / The faces of war -- The first face of defence : self-defence -- The second face of defence : necessity-defence -- Whitherward warfare? Just war doctrine. War (International law) Self-defense (Law) |
| title | Revisiting the concept of defence in the Jus ad Bellum : the dual face of defence / |
| title_alt | Revisiting the concept of defense in the Jus ad Bellum |
| title_auth | Revisiting the concept of defence in the Jus ad Bellum : the dual face of defence / |
| title_exact_search | Revisiting the concept of defence in the Jus ad Bellum : the dual face of defence / |
| title_full | Revisiting the concept of defence in the Jus ad Bellum : the dual face of defence / Johanna Friman. |
| title_fullStr | Revisiting the concept of defence in the Jus ad Bellum : the dual face of defence / Johanna Friman. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Revisiting the concept of defence in the Jus ad Bellum : the dual face of defence / Johanna Friman. |
| title_short | Revisiting the concept of defence in the Jus ad Bellum : |
| title_sort | revisiting the concept of defence in the jus ad bellum the dual face of defence |
| title_sub | the dual face of defence / |
| topic | Just war doctrine. War (International law) Self-defense (Law) |
| topic_facet | Just war doctrine. War (International law) Self-defense (Law) |
| url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1466593 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT frimanjohanna revisitingtheconceptofdefenceinthejusadbellumthedualfaceofdefence AT frimanjohanna revisitingtheconceptofdefenseinthejusadbellum |