U.S. military forces in FY 2017 :: stable plans, disruptive threats, and strategic inflection points /
The three themes emerge about forces this year: stable plans, disruptive threats, and strategic inflection points. Stable plans refers to the fact that the Obama administration in its last year in office is playing out the strategic approach that it established in the 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Washington, DC :
Center for Strategic and International Studies,
2016.
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | The three themes emerge about forces this year: stable plans, disruptive threats, and strategic inflection points. Stable plans refers to the fact that the Obama administration in its last year in office is playing out the strategic approach that it established in the 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR). Disruptive threats refers to events that have occurred since the 2014 QDR, that were not fully foreseen and that, as a result, upset its strategic vision, in particular, the rise of an aggressive and irredentist Russia, an increasingly assertive China, and ISIS attacks both in the Middle East and globally. Strategic inflection points refer to the installation of a new administration in January 2017 and its charting of a new direction. Outside advice already abounds about what the new administration should do. One thing is clear: the days of speculating about how low forces might be cut are over. A consensus has developed that threats are growing and forces need to grow to meet them. Structure is at its low point, and any changes will be on the up side (assuming continuing budget deals to avoid sequestration). |
| Beschreibung: | "May 2016"--Cover |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (58 pages) |
| Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references. |
| ISBN: | 9781442259584 1442259582 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn948818020 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr ||||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 160506t20162016dcu ob 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a DID |b eng |e rda |e pn |c DID |d N$T |d YDXCP |d BTCTA |d EBLCP |d IDEBK |d N$T |d OCLCQ |d OCLCF |d UKAHL |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL |d TMA |d OCLCQ | ||
| 019 | |a 951103022 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781442259584 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 1442259582 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |z 9781442259577 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)948818020 |z (OCoLC)951103022 | ||
| 043 | |a n-us--- | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a UA23 | |
| 072 | 7 | |a HIS |x 027130 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a TEC |x 025000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 7 | |a 355/.0330973 |2 23 | |
| 049 | |a MAIN | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Cancian, Mark F., |e author. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a U.S. military forces in FY 2017 : |b stable plans, disruptive threats, and strategic inflection points / |c Mark F. Cancian. |
| 246 | 3 | |a United States military forces in FY 2017 | |
| 246 | 3 | |a US military forces in FY 2017 | |
| 264 | 1 | |a Washington, DC : |b Center for Strategic and International Studies, |c 2016. | |
| 264 | 4 | |c ©2016 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (58 pages) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 347 | |a text file | ||
| 347 | |b PDF | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Online resource; title from PDF cover page (CSIS, viewed May 6, 2016). | |
| 500 | |a "May 2016"--Cover | ||
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references. | ||
| 520 | |a The three themes emerge about forces this year: stable plans, disruptive threats, and strategic inflection points. Stable plans refers to the fact that the Obama administration in its last year in office is playing out the strategic approach that it established in the 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR). Disruptive threats refers to events that have occurred since the 2014 QDR, that were not fully foreseen and that, as a result, upset its strategic vision, in particular, the rise of an aggressive and irredentist Russia, an increasingly assertive China, and ISIS attacks both in the Middle East and globally. Strategic inflection points refer to the installation of a new administration in January 2017 and its charting of a new direction. Outside advice already abounds about what the new administration should do. One thing is clear: the days of speculating about how low forces might be cut are over. A consensus has developed that threats are growing and forces need to grow to meet them. Structure is at its low point, and any changes will be on the up side (assuming continuing budget deals to avoid sequestration). | ||
| 651 | 0 | |a United States |x Armed Forces |x Operational readiness |x Evaluation. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Military planning |z United States. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Planification militaire |z États-Unis. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a HISTORY |x Military |x Other. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING |x Military Science. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Military planning |2 fast | |
| 651 | 7 | |a United States |2 fast |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Center for Strategic and International Studies (Washington, D.C.), |e publisher. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n86119921 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1243731 |3 Volltext |
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH30749129 | ||
| 938 | |a Baker and Taylor |b BTCP |n BK0018924768 | ||
| 938 | |a ProQuest Ebook Central |b EBLB |n EBL4537277 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 1243731 | ||
| 938 | |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection |b IDEB |n cis34727571 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 13017007 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn948818020 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816882348084428800 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Cancian, Mark F. |
| author_facet | Cancian, Mark F. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Cancian, Mark F. |
| author_variant | m f c mf mfc |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| callnumber-first | U - Military Science |
| callnumber-label | UA23 |
| callnumber-raw | UA23 |
| callnumber-search | UA23 |
| callnumber-sort | UA 223 |
| callnumber-subject | UA - Armies |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)948818020 |
| dewey-full | 355/.0330973 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 355 - Military science |
| dewey-raw | 355/.0330973 |
| dewey-search | 355/.0330973 |
| dewey-sort | 3355 6330973 |
| dewey-tens | 350 - Public administration and military science |
| discipline | Militärwissenschaft |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03720cam a2200625 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn948818020</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160506t20162016dcu ob 000 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DID</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">DID</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">YDXCP</subfield><subfield code="d">BTCTA</subfield><subfield code="d">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">IDEBK</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">UKAHL</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield><subfield code="d">TMA</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">951103022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781442259584</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1442259582</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781442259577</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)948818020</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)951103022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">n-us---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">UA23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">HIS</subfield><subfield code="x">027130</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">TEC</subfield><subfield code="x">025000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">355/.0330973</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cancian, Mark F.,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">U.S. military forces in FY 2017 :</subfield><subfield code="b">stable plans, disruptive threats, and strategic inflection points /</subfield><subfield code="c">Mark F. Cancian.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">United States military forces in FY 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">US military forces in FY 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Washington, DC :</subfield><subfield code="b">Center for Strategic and International Studies,</subfield><subfield code="c">2016.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (58 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="347" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text file</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="347" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">PDF</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online resource; title from PDF cover page (CSIS, viewed May 6, 2016).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"May 2016"--Cover</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The three themes emerge about forces this year: stable plans, disruptive threats, and strategic inflection points. Stable plans refers to the fact that the Obama administration in its last year in office is playing out the strategic approach that it established in the 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR). Disruptive threats refers to events that have occurred since the 2014 QDR, that were not fully foreseen and that, as a result, upset its strategic vision, in particular, the rise of an aggressive and irredentist Russia, an increasingly assertive China, and ISIS attacks both in the Middle East and globally. Strategic inflection points refer to the installation of a new administration in January 2017 and its charting of a new direction. Outside advice already abounds about what the new administration should do. One thing is clear: the days of speculating about how low forces might be cut are over. A consensus has developed that threats are growing and forces need to grow to meet them. Structure is at its low point, and any changes will be on the up side (assuming continuing budget deals to avoid sequestration).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Armed Forces</subfield><subfield code="x">Operational readiness</subfield><subfield code="x">Evaluation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Military planning</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Planification militaire</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">HISTORY</subfield><subfield code="x">Military</subfield><subfield code="x">Other.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING</subfield><subfield code="x">Military Science.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Military planning</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Center for Strategic and International Studies (Washington, D.C.),</subfield><subfield code="e">publisher.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n86119921</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1243731</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askews and Holts Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">ASKH</subfield><subfield code="n">AH30749129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Baker and Taylor</subfield><subfield code="b">BTCP</subfield><subfield code="n">BK0018924768</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest Ebook Central</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL4537277</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">1243731</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection</subfield><subfield code="b">IDEB</subfield><subfield code="n">cis34727571</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">13017007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | United States Armed Forces Operational readiness Evaluation. United States fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq |
| geographic_facet | United States Armed Forces Operational readiness Evaluation. United States |
| id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn948818020 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:27:11Z |
| institution | BVB |
| institution_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n86119921 |
| isbn | 9781442259584 1442259582 |
| language | English |
| oclc_num | 948818020 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 online resource (58 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publishDateSearch | 2016 |
| publishDateSort | 2016 |
| publisher | Center for Strategic and International Studies, |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Cancian, Mark F., author. U.S. military forces in FY 2017 : stable plans, disruptive threats, and strategic inflection points / Mark F. Cancian. United States military forces in FY 2017 US military forces in FY 2017 Washington, DC : Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2016. ©2016 1 online resource (58 pages) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier text file Online resource; title from PDF cover page (CSIS, viewed May 6, 2016). "May 2016"--Cover Includes bibliographical references. The three themes emerge about forces this year: stable plans, disruptive threats, and strategic inflection points. Stable plans refers to the fact that the Obama administration in its last year in office is playing out the strategic approach that it established in the 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR). Disruptive threats refers to events that have occurred since the 2014 QDR, that were not fully foreseen and that, as a result, upset its strategic vision, in particular, the rise of an aggressive and irredentist Russia, an increasingly assertive China, and ISIS attacks both in the Middle East and globally. Strategic inflection points refer to the installation of a new administration in January 2017 and its charting of a new direction. Outside advice already abounds about what the new administration should do. One thing is clear: the days of speculating about how low forces might be cut are over. A consensus has developed that threats are growing and forces need to grow to meet them. Structure is at its low point, and any changes will be on the up side (assuming continuing budget deals to avoid sequestration). United States Armed Forces Operational readiness Evaluation. Military planning United States. Planification militaire États-Unis. HISTORY Military Other. bisacsh TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING Military Science. bisacsh Military planning fast United States fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq Center for Strategic and International Studies (Washington, D.C.), publisher. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n86119921 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1243731 Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Cancian, Mark F. U.S. military forces in FY 2017 : stable plans, disruptive threats, and strategic inflection points / Military planning United States. Planification militaire États-Unis. HISTORY Military Other. bisacsh TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING Military Science. bisacsh Military planning fast |
| title | U.S. military forces in FY 2017 : stable plans, disruptive threats, and strategic inflection points / |
| title_alt | United States military forces in FY 2017 US military forces in FY 2017 |
| title_auth | U.S. military forces in FY 2017 : stable plans, disruptive threats, and strategic inflection points / |
| title_exact_search | U.S. military forces in FY 2017 : stable plans, disruptive threats, and strategic inflection points / |
| title_full | U.S. military forces in FY 2017 : stable plans, disruptive threats, and strategic inflection points / Mark F. Cancian. |
| title_fullStr | U.S. military forces in FY 2017 : stable plans, disruptive threats, and strategic inflection points / Mark F. Cancian. |
| title_full_unstemmed | U.S. military forces in FY 2017 : stable plans, disruptive threats, and strategic inflection points / Mark F. Cancian. |
| title_short | U.S. military forces in FY 2017 : |
| title_sort | u s military forces in fy 2017 stable plans disruptive threats and strategic inflection points |
| title_sub | stable plans, disruptive threats, and strategic inflection points / |
| topic | Military planning United States. Planification militaire États-Unis. HISTORY Military Other. bisacsh TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING Military Science. bisacsh Military planning fast |
| topic_facet | United States Armed Forces Operational readiness Evaluation. Military planning United States. Planification militaire États-Unis. HISTORY Military Other. TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING Military Science. Military planning United States |
| url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1243731 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT cancianmarkf usmilitaryforcesinfy2017stableplansdisruptivethreatsandstrategicinflectionpoints AT centerforstrategicandinternationalstudieswashingtondc usmilitaryforcesinfy2017stableplansdisruptivethreatsandstrategicinflectionpoints AT cancianmarkf unitedstatesmilitaryforcesinfy2017 AT centerforstrategicandinternationalstudieswashingtondc unitedstatesmilitaryforcesinfy2017 AT cancianmarkf usmilitaryforcesinfy2017 AT centerforstrategicandinternationalstudieswashingtondc usmilitaryforcesinfy2017 |