Lis pendens in international litigation /:
What legal principles apply when courts in different jurisdictions are simultaneously seised with the same dispute ? This question - of international lis pendens - has long been controversial. But it has taken on new and urgent importance in our age. Globalization has driven an unprecedented rise in...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Körperschaft: | |
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Leiden ; Boston :
Martinus Nijhoff,
2009.
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Pocketbooks of the Hague Academy of International Law.
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | What legal principles apply when courts in different jurisdictions are simultaneously seised with the same dispute ? This question - of international lis pendens - has long been controversial. But it has taken on new and urgent importance in our age. Globalization has driven an unprecedented rise in forum shopping between national courts and a proliferation of new international tribunals. Problems of litispendence have spawned some of the most dramatic litigation of modern times - from anti-suit injunction battles in commercial disputes, to the appeals of prisoners on death row to internationa. |
| Beschreibung: | "Full text of the lecture published in August 2009 in the Recueil des cours, Vol. 338 (2008)"--T.p.verso. |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (485 pages). |
| Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references (pages 468-480). |
| ISBN: | 9789047441441 9047441443 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn825067692 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr cnu---unuuu | ||
| 008 | 130124s2009 ne ob 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a N$T |b eng |e pn |c N$T |d E7B |d YDXCP |d OCLCF |d OCLCQ |d AZK |d COCUF |d MOR |d PIFAG |d OCLCQ |d U3W |d STF |d WRM |d VTS |d NRAMU |d VT2 |d OCLCQ |d WYU |d TKN |d M8D |d HS0 |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCL | ||
| 019 | |a 961675347 |a 962600280 | ||
| 020 | |a 9789047441441 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9047441443 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |z 9789004179097 | ||
| 020 | |z 9004179097 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)825067692 |z (OCoLC)961675347 |z (OCoLC)962600280 | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a K7041 |b .M36 2009eb | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 051000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 7 | |a 341 |2 22 | |
| 049 | |a MAIN | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a McLachlan, Campbell. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Lis pendens in international litigation / |c Campbell McLachlan. |
| 260 | |a Leiden ; |a Boston : |b Martinus Nijhoff, |c 2009. | ||
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (485 pages). | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Pocketbooks of the Hague Academy of International Law | |
| 500 | |a "Full text of the lecture published in August 2009 in the Recueil des cours, Vol. 338 (2008)"--T.p.verso. | ||
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 468-480). | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
| 505 | 0 | |a Copyright; HAGUE ACADEMY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW; Lis Pendens in International Litigation; TABLE OF CONTENTS; CHAPTER I* INTRODUCTION; A. Of the Conflict of Litigation; B. The litispendence phenomenon; 1. Forum shopping in parallel litigation; 2. Horizontality; 3. Overlapping jurisdiction-conferring rules; 4. Kompetenz-Kompetenz : who determines jurisdiction ?; C. Intellectual origins of the idea of lis pendens; 1. Civil Law: in the image of Roman Law?; 2. Common Law: the legacy of Equity's struggle for supremacy in England; D. Legal techniques for the control of competingjurisdictions | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 1. Tolerance of parallel proceedings and res judicata2. Rules of priority; 3. Consolidation of related proceedings; 4. Party autonomy, election and waiver; 5. Discretions to decline jurisdiction or control parallel litigation; E. The Rule of Law and the Function of Adjudication in International Cases; Chapter II. Private international litigation; A. Deference, indifference or control ?; 1. A world of two hemispheres ?; 2. Two contrasting approaches in Civil Law systems; 3. Two contrasting approaches in a Common Law system; B. Strict lis pendens : pursuing the res judicataparallel | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 1. Translation of an internal into an international rule2. The search for identity of action; (a) Same parties; (b) Same subject-matter and same cause; 3. Assessment of effects; (a) The negative declaration; (b) The reflexive effect of a convention; C. Jurisdiction-declining discretions; 1. Litispendence within the forum non conveniens enquiry; (a) Double litigation by the same plaintiff; (b) A forum contest between plaintiff and defendant; 2. Declining jurisdiction in favour of related proceedings; D. The rise and fall of the anti-suit injunction | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 1. Commonwealth use of anti-suit injunctions to control foreign parallel litigation2. A division of principle in the United States; 3. Contraction of the anti-suit injunction in the face of comity concerns; (a) Conflict of laws cedes where no true litispendence; (b) Requirement of jurisdictional nexus; (c) European law constraints; E. Interim conclusions; Chapter III. International arbitration; A. The place of parallel proceedings in international arbitration; 1. The use of party autonomy as an escape from multiple fora; 2. Instances of overlapping jurisdiction. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a B. International commercial arbitration1. Kompetenz-Kompetenz or who decides on arbitral jurisdiction; (a) The arbitral tribunal or the courts; (b) The courts of the seat and other courts; 2. Parallel and related arbitral proceedings; 3. The anti-suit injunction in arbitration; (a) Issue of anti-suit injunctions by arbitrators; (b) The Front Comor and anti-suit injunctions in aid of arbitration; (c) Anti-arbitration injunctions; C. Investment treaty arbitration; 1. The particular potential for conflicts of jurisdictionin investment treaty arbitration | |
| 520 | |a What legal principles apply when courts in different jurisdictions are simultaneously seised with the same dispute ? This question - of international lis pendens - has long been controversial. But it has taken on new and urgent importance in our age. Globalization has driven an unprecedented rise in forum shopping between national courts and a proliferation of new international tribunals. Problems of litispendence have spawned some of the most dramatic litigation of modern times - from anti-suit injunction battles in commercial disputes, to the appeals of prisoners on death row to internationa. | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Lis pendens. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85077434 | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Conflict of laws |x Arbitration and award. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85030973 | |
| 650 | 0 | |a International commercial arbitration. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85006457 | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Conflict of laws. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85030965 | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Litispendance. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Droit international privé. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x International. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Conflict of laws |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Conflict of laws |x Arbitration and award |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a International commercial arbitration |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Lis pendens |2 fast | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Hague Academy of International Law. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n50053125 | |
| 758 | |i has work: |a Lis pendens in international litigation (Text) |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGWVGGCxG6xjMCgMCXv6Xd |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork | ||
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a McLachlan, Campbell. |t Lis pendens in international litigation. |d Leiden ; Boston : Martinus Nijhoff, 2009 |z 9789004179097 |w (DLC) 2009279448 |w (OCoLC)433565326 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Pocketbooks of the Hague Academy of International Law. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2009070105 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=527026 |3 Volltext |
| 938 | |a ebrary |b EBRY |n ebr10648728 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 527026 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 9983088 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn825067692 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816882220061687808 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | McLachlan, Campbell |
| author_corporate | Hague Academy of International Law |
| author_corporate_role | |
| author_facet | McLachlan, Campbell Hague Academy of International Law |
| author_role | |
| author_sort | McLachlan, Campbell |
| author_variant | c m cm |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | K7041 |
| callnumber-raw | K7041 .M36 2009eb |
| callnumber-search | K7041 .M36 2009eb |
| callnumber-sort | K 47041 M36 42009EB |
| callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | Copyright; HAGUE ACADEMY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW; Lis Pendens in International Litigation; TABLE OF CONTENTS; CHAPTER I* INTRODUCTION; A. Of the Conflict of Litigation; B. The litispendence phenomenon; 1. Forum shopping in parallel litigation; 2. Horizontality; 3. Overlapping jurisdiction-conferring rules; 4. Kompetenz-Kompetenz : who determines jurisdiction ?; C. Intellectual origins of the idea of lis pendens; 1. Civil Law: in the image of Roman Law?; 2. Common Law: the legacy of Equity's struggle for supremacy in England; D. Legal techniques for the control of competingjurisdictions 1. Tolerance of parallel proceedings and res judicata2. Rules of priority; 3. Consolidation of related proceedings; 4. Party autonomy, election and waiver; 5. Discretions to decline jurisdiction or control parallel litigation; E. The Rule of Law and the Function of Adjudication in International Cases; Chapter II. Private international litigation; A. Deference, indifference or control ?; 1. A world of two hemispheres ?; 2. Two contrasting approaches in Civil Law systems; 3. Two contrasting approaches in a Common Law system; B. Strict lis pendens : pursuing the res judicataparallel 1. Translation of an internal into an international rule2. The search for identity of action; (a) Same parties; (b) Same subject-matter and same cause; 3. Assessment of effects; (a) The negative declaration; (b) The reflexive effect of a convention; C. Jurisdiction-declining discretions; 1. Litispendence within the forum non conveniens enquiry; (a) Double litigation by the same plaintiff; (b) A forum contest between plaintiff and defendant; 2. Declining jurisdiction in favour of related proceedings; D. The rise and fall of the anti-suit injunction 1. Commonwealth use of anti-suit injunctions to control foreign parallel litigation2. A division of principle in the United States; 3. Contraction of the anti-suit injunction in the face of comity concerns; (a) Conflict of laws cedes where no true litispendence; (b) Requirement of jurisdictional nexus; (c) European law constraints; E. Interim conclusions; Chapter III. International arbitration; A. The place of parallel proceedings in international arbitration; 1. The use of party autonomy as an escape from multiple fora; 2. Instances of overlapping jurisdiction. B. International commercial arbitration1. Kompetenz-Kompetenz or who decides on arbitral jurisdiction; (a) The arbitral tribunal or the courts; (b) The courts of the seat and other courts; 2. Parallel and related arbitral proceedings; 3. The anti-suit injunction in arbitration; (a) Issue of anti-suit injunctions by arbitrators; (b) The Front Comor and anti-suit injunctions in aid of arbitration; (c) Anti-arbitration injunctions; C. Investment treaty arbitration; 1. The particular potential for conflicts of jurisdictionin investment treaty arbitration |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)825067692 |
| dewey-full | 341 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 341 - Law of nations |
| dewey-raw | 341 |
| dewey-search | 341 |
| dewey-sort | 3341 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>06514cam a2200673 a 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn825067692</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr cnu---unuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">130124s2009 ne ob 000 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">N$T</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">E7B</subfield><subfield code="d">YDXCP</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">AZK</subfield><subfield code="d">COCUF</subfield><subfield code="d">MOR</subfield><subfield code="d">PIFAG</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">U3W</subfield><subfield code="d">STF</subfield><subfield code="d">WRM</subfield><subfield code="d">VTS</subfield><subfield code="d">NRAMU</subfield><subfield code="d">VT2</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">WYU</subfield><subfield code="d">TKN</subfield><subfield code="d">M8D</subfield><subfield code="d">HS0</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">961675347</subfield><subfield code="a">962600280</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789047441441</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9047441443</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9789004179097</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9004179097</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)825067692</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)961675347</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)962600280</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">K7041</subfield><subfield code="b">.M36 2009eb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">051000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">341</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">McLachlan, Campbell.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Lis pendens in international litigation /</subfield><subfield code="c">Campbell McLachlan.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Leiden ;</subfield><subfield code="a">Boston :</subfield><subfield code="b">Martinus Nijhoff,</subfield><subfield code="c">2009.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (485 pages).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pocketbooks of the Hague Academy of International Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Full text of the lecture published in August 2009 in the Recueil des cours, Vol. 338 (2008)"--T.p.verso.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (pages 468-480).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Copyright; HAGUE ACADEMY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW; Lis Pendens in International Litigation; TABLE OF CONTENTS; CHAPTER I* INTRODUCTION; A. Of the Conflict of Litigation; B. The litispendence phenomenon; 1. Forum shopping in parallel litigation; 2. Horizontality; 3. Overlapping jurisdiction-conferring rules; 4. Kompetenz-Kompetenz : who determines jurisdiction ?; C. Intellectual origins of the idea of lis pendens; 1. Civil Law: in the image of Roman Law?; 2. Common Law: the legacy of Equity's struggle for supremacy in England; D. Legal techniques for the control of competingjurisdictions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. Tolerance of parallel proceedings and res judicata2. Rules of priority; 3. Consolidation of related proceedings; 4. Party autonomy, election and waiver; 5. Discretions to decline jurisdiction or control parallel litigation; E. The Rule of Law and the Function of Adjudication in International Cases; Chapter II. Private international litigation; A. Deference, indifference or control ?; 1. A world of two hemispheres ?; 2. Two contrasting approaches in Civil Law systems; 3. Two contrasting approaches in a Common Law system; B. Strict lis pendens : pursuing the res judicataparallel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. Translation of an internal into an international rule2. The search for identity of action; (a) Same parties; (b) Same subject-matter and same cause; 3. Assessment of effects; (a) The negative declaration; (b) The reflexive effect of a convention; C. Jurisdiction-declining discretions; 1. Litispendence within the forum non conveniens enquiry; (a) Double litigation by the same plaintiff; (b) A forum contest between plaintiff and defendant; 2. Declining jurisdiction in favour of related proceedings; D. The rise and fall of the anti-suit injunction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. Commonwealth use of anti-suit injunctions to control foreign parallel litigation2. A division of principle in the United States; 3. Contraction of the anti-suit injunction in the face of comity concerns; (a) Conflict of laws cedes where no true litispendence; (b) Requirement of jurisdictional nexus; (c) European law constraints; E. Interim conclusions; Chapter III. International arbitration; A. The place of parallel proceedings in international arbitration; 1. The use of party autonomy as an escape from multiple fora; 2. Instances of overlapping jurisdiction.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">B. International commercial arbitration1. Kompetenz-Kompetenz or who decides on arbitral jurisdiction; (a) The arbitral tribunal or the courts; (b) The courts of the seat and other courts; 2. Parallel and related arbitral proceedings; 3. The anti-suit injunction in arbitration; (a) Issue of anti-suit injunctions by arbitrators; (b) The Front Comor and anti-suit injunctions in aid of arbitration; (c) Anti-arbitration injunctions; C. Investment treaty arbitration; 1. The particular potential for conflicts of jurisdictionin investment treaty arbitration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">What legal principles apply when courts in different jurisdictions are simultaneously seised with the same dispute ? This question - of international lis pendens - has long been controversial. But it has taken on new and urgent importance in our age. Globalization has driven an unprecedented rise in forum shopping between national courts and a proliferation of new international tribunals. Problems of litispendence have spawned some of the most dramatic litigation of modern times - from anti-suit injunction battles in commercial disputes, to the appeals of prisoners on death row to internationa.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Lis pendens.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85077434</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Conflict of laws</subfield><subfield code="x">Arbitration and award.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85030973</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International commercial arbitration.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85006457</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Conflict of laws.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85030965</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Litispendance.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Droit international privé.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">International.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Conflict of laws</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Conflict of laws</subfield><subfield code="x">Arbitration and award</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">International commercial arbitration</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Lis pendens</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hague Academy of International Law.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n50053125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="758" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">has work:</subfield><subfield code="a">Lis pendens in international litigation (Text)</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGWVGGCxG6xjMCgMCXv6Xd</subfield><subfield code="4">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="a">McLachlan, Campbell.</subfield><subfield code="t">Lis pendens in international litigation.</subfield><subfield code="d">Leiden ; Boston : Martinus Nijhoff, 2009</subfield><subfield code="z">9789004179097</subfield><subfield code="w">(DLC) 2009279448</subfield><subfield code="w">(OCoLC)433565326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Pocketbooks of the Hague Academy of International Law.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2009070105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=527026</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ebrary</subfield><subfield code="b">EBRY</subfield><subfield code="n">ebr10648728</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">527026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">9983088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn825067692 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:25:09Z |
| institution | BVB |
| institution_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n50053125 |
| isbn | 9789047441441 9047441443 |
| language | English |
| oclc_num | 825067692 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 online resource (485 pages). |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| publishDateSearch | 2009 |
| publishDateSort | 2009 |
| publisher | Martinus Nijhoff, |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Pocketbooks of the Hague Academy of International Law. |
| series2 | Pocketbooks of the Hague Academy of International Law |
| spelling | McLachlan, Campbell. Lis pendens in international litigation / Campbell McLachlan. Leiden ; Boston : Martinus Nijhoff, 2009. 1 online resource (485 pages). text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Pocketbooks of the Hague Academy of International Law "Full text of the lecture published in August 2009 in the Recueil des cours, Vol. 338 (2008)"--T.p.verso. Includes bibliographical references (pages 468-480). Print version record. Copyright; HAGUE ACADEMY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW; Lis Pendens in International Litigation; TABLE OF CONTENTS; CHAPTER I* INTRODUCTION; A. Of the Conflict of Litigation; B. The litispendence phenomenon; 1. Forum shopping in parallel litigation; 2. Horizontality; 3. Overlapping jurisdiction-conferring rules; 4. Kompetenz-Kompetenz : who determines jurisdiction ?; C. Intellectual origins of the idea of lis pendens; 1. Civil Law: in the image of Roman Law?; 2. Common Law: the legacy of Equity's struggle for supremacy in England; D. Legal techniques for the control of competingjurisdictions 1. Tolerance of parallel proceedings and res judicata2. Rules of priority; 3. Consolidation of related proceedings; 4. Party autonomy, election and waiver; 5. Discretions to decline jurisdiction or control parallel litigation; E. The Rule of Law and the Function of Adjudication in International Cases; Chapter II. Private international litigation; A. Deference, indifference or control ?; 1. A world of two hemispheres ?; 2. Two contrasting approaches in Civil Law systems; 3. Two contrasting approaches in a Common Law system; B. Strict lis pendens : pursuing the res judicataparallel 1. Translation of an internal into an international rule2. The search for identity of action; (a) Same parties; (b) Same subject-matter and same cause; 3. Assessment of effects; (a) The negative declaration; (b) The reflexive effect of a convention; C. Jurisdiction-declining discretions; 1. Litispendence within the forum non conveniens enquiry; (a) Double litigation by the same plaintiff; (b) A forum contest between plaintiff and defendant; 2. Declining jurisdiction in favour of related proceedings; D. The rise and fall of the anti-suit injunction 1. Commonwealth use of anti-suit injunctions to control foreign parallel litigation2. A division of principle in the United States; 3. Contraction of the anti-suit injunction in the face of comity concerns; (a) Conflict of laws cedes where no true litispendence; (b) Requirement of jurisdictional nexus; (c) European law constraints; E. Interim conclusions; Chapter III. International arbitration; A. The place of parallel proceedings in international arbitration; 1. The use of party autonomy as an escape from multiple fora; 2. Instances of overlapping jurisdiction. B. International commercial arbitration1. Kompetenz-Kompetenz or who decides on arbitral jurisdiction; (a) The arbitral tribunal or the courts; (b) The courts of the seat and other courts; 2. Parallel and related arbitral proceedings; 3. The anti-suit injunction in arbitration; (a) Issue of anti-suit injunctions by arbitrators; (b) The Front Comor and anti-suit injunctions in aid of arbitration; (c) Anti-arbitration injunctions; C. Investment treaty arbitration; 1. The particular potential for conflicts of jurisdictionin investment treaty arbitration What legal principles apply when courts in different jurisdictions are simultaneously seised with the same dispute ? This question - of international lis pendens - has long been controversial. But it has taken on new and urgent importance in our age. Globalization has driven an unprecedented rise in forum shopping between national courts and a proliferation of new international tribunals. Problems of litispendence have spawned some of the most dramatic litigation of modern times - from anti-suit injunction battles in commercial disputes, to the appeals of prisoners on death row to internationa. Lis pendens. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85077434 Conflict of laws Arbitration and award. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85030973 International commercial arbitration. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85006457 Conflict of laws. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85030965 Litispendance. Droit international privé. LAW International. bisacsh Conflict of laws fast Conflict of laws Arbitration and award fast International commercial arbitration fast Lis pendens fast Hague Academy of International Law. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n50053125 has work: Lis pendens in international litigation (Text) https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGWVGGCxG6xjMCgMCXv6Xd https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork Print version: McLachlan, Campbell. Lis pendens in international litigation. Leiden ; Boston : Martinus Nijhoff, 2009 9789004179097 (DLC) 2009279448 (OCoLC)433565326 Pocketbooks of the Hague Academy of International Law. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2009070105 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=527026 Volltext |
| spellingShingle | McLachlan, Campbell Lis pendens in international litigation / Pocketbooks of the Hague Academy of International Law. Copyright; HAGUE ACADEMY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW; Lis Pendens in International Litigation; TABLE OF CONTENTS; CHAPTER I* INTRODUCTION; A. Of the Conflict of Litigation; B. The litispendence phenomenon; 1. Forum shopping in parallel litigation; 2. Horizontality; 3. Overlapping jurisdiction-conferring rules; 4. Kompetenz-Kompetenz : who determines jurisdiction ?; C. Intellectual origins of the idea of lis pendens; 1. Civil Law: in the image of Roman Law?; 2. Common Law: the legacy of Equity's struggle for supremacy in England; D. Legal techniques for the control of competingjurisdictions 1. Tolerance of parallel proceedings and res judicata2. Rules of priority; 3. Consolidation of related proceedings; 4. Party autonomy, election and waiver; 5. Discretions to decline jurisdiction or control parallel litigation; E. The Rule of Law and the Function of Adjudication in International Cases; Chapter II. Private international litigation; A. Deference, indifference or control ?; 1. A world of two hemispheres ?; 2. Two contrasting approaches in Civil Law systems; 3. Two contrasting approaches in a Common Law system; B. Strict lis pendens : pursuing the res judicataparallel 1. Translation of an internal into an international rule2. The search for identity of action; (a) Same parties; (b) Same subject-matter and same cause; 3. Assessment of effects; (a) The negative declaration; (b) The reflexive effect of a convention; C. Jurisdiction-declining discretions; 1. Litispendence within the forum non conveniens enquiry; (a) Double litigation by the same plaintiff; (b) A forum contest between plaintiff and defendant; 2. Declining jurisdiction in favour of related proceedings; D. The rise and fall of the anti-suit injunction 1. Commonwealth use of anti-suit injunctions to control foreign parallel litigation2. A division of principle in the United States; 3. Contraction of the anti-suit injunction in the face of comity concerns; (a) Conflict of laws cedes where no true litispendence; (b) Requirement of jurisdictional nexus; (c) European law constraints; E. Interim conclusions; Chapter III. International arbitration; A. The place of parallel proceedings in international arbitration; 1. The use of party autonomy as an escape from multiple fora; 2. Instances of overlapping jurisdiction. B. International commercial arbitration1. Kompetenz-Kompetenz or who decides on arbitral jurisdiction; (a) The arbitral tribunal or the courts; (b) The courts of the seat and other courts; 2. Parallel and related arbitral proceedings; 3. The anti-suit injunction in arbitration; (a) Issue of anti-suit injunctions by arbitrators; (b) The Front Comor and anti-suit injunctions in aid of arbitration; (c) Anti-arbitration injunctions; C. Investment treaty arbitration; 1. The particular potential for conflicts of jurisdictionin investment treaty arbitration Lis pendens. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85077434 Conflict of laws Arbitration and award. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85030973 International commercial arbitration. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85006457 Conflict of laws. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85030965 Litispendance. Droit international privé. LAW International. bisacsh Conflict of laws fast Conflict of laws Arbitration and award fast International commercial arbitration fast Lis pendens fast |
| subject_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85077434 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85030973 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85006457 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85030965 |
| title | Lis pendens in international litigation / |
| title_auth | Lis pendens in international litigation / |
| title_exact_search | Lis pendens in international litigation / |
| title_full | Lis pendens in international litigation / Campbell McLachlan. |
| title_fullStr | Lis pendens in international litigation / Campbell McLachlan. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Lis pendens in international litigation / Campbell McLachlan. |
| title_short | Lis pendens in international litigation / |
| title_sort | lis pendens in international litigation |
| topic | Lis pendens. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85077434 Conflict of laws Arbitration and award. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85030973 International commercial arbitration. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85006457 Conflict of laws. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85030965 Litispendance. Droit international privé. LAW International. bisacsh Conflict of laws fast Conflict of laws Arbitration and award fast International commercial arbitration fast Lis pendens fast |
| topic_facet | Lis pendens. Conflict of laws Arbitration and award. International commercial arbitration. Conflict of laws. Litispendance. Droit international privé. LAW International. Conflict of laws Conflict of laws Arbitration and award International commercial arbitration Lis pendens |
| url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=527026 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mclachlancampbell lispendensininternationallitigation AT hagueacademyofinternationallaw lispendensininternationallitigation |