Split intransitivity in Italian /:
Split intransitivity has received a great deal of attention in theoretical linguistics since the formulation of the Unaccusative Hypothesis by David Perlmutter (1978). This book provides an in-depth investigation of split intransitivity as it occurs in Italian. The principal proposal is that the man...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English Italian |
Veröffentlicht: |
Berlin ; New York :
Mouton de Gruyter,
©2006.
|
Schriftenreihe: | Empirical Approaches to Language Typology EALT.
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | Split intransitivity has received a great deal of attention in theoretical linguistics since the formulation of the Unaccusative Hypothesis by David Perlmutter (1978). This book provides an in-depth investigation of split intransitivity as it occurs in Italian. The principal proposal is that the manifestations of split intransitivity in Italian, whilst being variously constrained by well-formedness conditions on the encoding of information structure, primarily derive from the tension between accusative (syntactic) and active (semantic) alignment. In contrast to approaches which consider the selection of the perfective operator to be the primary diagnostic of unaccusative or unergative syntax, this study identifies two morphosemantic domains in intransitive constructions on the basis of the analysis of a cluster of related phenomena (including agreement, argument suppression, ne -cliticization, past-participle behaviour, the morphosyntax of experiencer predicates and word order, as well as the selection of the perfective operator). Analysing the degree to which semantic, syntactic and discourse factors interact in determining each manifestation of split intransitivity, this work captures successfully the mismatches in the scope of the various diagnostics. Drawing upon insights provided by Role and Reference Grammar, and relying on corpus-based evidence and crossdialectal comparison, this study makes new empirical and theoretical contributions to the debate on split intransitivity. The book is accessible to linguists of all theoretical persuasions and will make stimulating reading for researchers and scholars in Italian and Romance linguistics, typology and theoretical linguistics. |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (xiv, 455 pages) : illustrations |
Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references (pages 423-450) and index. |
ISBN: | 9783110896053 3110896052 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000cam a2200000Ma 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn811407698 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr cn||||||||| | ||
008 | 060717s2006 gw a ob 001 0 eng d | ||
010 | |z 2006023626 | ||
040 | |a E7B |b eng |e pn |c E7B |d N$T |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d YDXCP |d COO |d OCLCQ |d EBLCP |d OCLCO |d S3O |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d DEBSZ |d AZK |d OCLCO |d LOA |d AGLDB |d COCUF |d MOR |d PIFAG |d MERUC |d OCLCQ |d EUM |d ZCU |d OCLCA |d U3W |d OCLCF |d STF |d WRM |d VTS |d NRAMU |d ICG |d OCLCQ |d OTZ |d VT2 |d WYU |d DKC |d OCLCQ |d UKAHL |d OCLCQ |d OCLCA |d OCLCQ |d UKCRE |d VLY |d AJS |d UWK |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL |d NUI |d SXB |d OCLCQ | ||
019 | |a 873016868 |a 922944775 |a 961609355 |a 962661498 |a 975208718 |a 975244475 |a 1018083656 |a 1043648939 |a 1102733939 |a 1119092818 |a 1153472872 |a 1162006539 | ||
020 | |a 9783110896053 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |a 3110896052 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |z 9783110179972 |q (cloth ; |q alk. paper) | ||
020 | |z 3110179970 |q (cloth ; |q alk. paper) | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)811407698 |z (OCoLC)873016868 |z (OCoLC)922944775 |z (OCoLC)961609355 |z (OCoLC)962661498 |z (OCoLC)975208718 |z (OCoLC)975244475 |z (OCoLC)1018083656 |z (OCoLC)1043648939 |z (OCoLC)1102733939 |z (OCoLC)1119092818 |z (OCoLC)1153472872 |z (OCoLC)1162006539 | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng |a ita | |
050 | 4 | |a PC1315.T72 |b B46 2006eb | |
072 | 7 | |a FOR |x 013000 |2 bisacsh | |
082 | 7 | |a 455 |2 22 | |
084 | |a IS 5840 |2 rvk | ||
049 | |a MAIN | ||
100 | 1 | |a Bentley, Delia. | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Split intransitivity in Italian / |c by Delia Bentley. |
260 | |a Berlin ; |a New York : |b Mouton de Gruyter, |c ©2006. | ||
300 | |a 1 online resource (xiv, 455 pages) : |b illustrations | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Empirical Approaches to Language Typology [EALT] | |
504 | |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 423-450) and index. | ||
505 | 0 | |a Acknowledgements -- Abbreviations -- 1. Introduction -- 1.1 Split intransitivity: An introduction -- 1.2 Split intransitivity in Italian -- 1.3 The diagnostics -- 1.4 Role and Reference Grammar -- 2. Perfective operators -- 2.1 The problem -- 2.2 The markedness of the Privileged Syntactic Argument -- 2.3 Avere or essere? -- 2.4 Crossdialectal and crosslinguistic variation -- 2.5 Complex predicates -- 2.6 Conclusion -- 3. Experiencer predicates -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 Type-(i) experiencer predicates -- 3.3 Type-(ii) experiencer predicates | |
505 | 8 | |a 3.4 Type-(iii) experiencer predicates3.5 Conclusion -- 4. Si-constructions and unexpressed arguments -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Reflexives -- 4.3 Impersonal si-constructions -- 4.4 Unexpressed arguments -- 4.5 Conclusion -- 5. Agreement -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 The agreement of perfective and passive past participles -- 5.3 Variability and change in perfective past-participle agreement -- 5.4 Non-finite agreement in complex predicates -- 5.5 Non-finite agreement in absolute participles | |
505 | 8 | |a 5.6 Non-finite agreement in constructions with adjectival and nominal predicates5.7 Finite agreement: Crossdialectal evidence -- 5.8 Agreement in crossdialectal perspective -- 5.9 Conclusion -- 6. Ne-cliticization -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.2 Canonical ne-cliticization -- 6.3 Some putative exceptions -- 6.4 Constructions with non-verbal predicates -- 6.5 Ne-cliticization in si-constructions -- 6.6 Other functions of ne -- 6.7 Conclusion -- 7. Past participles -- 7.1 Introduction -- 7.2 Attributive past participles: Restrictive and descriptive constructions | |
505 | 8 | |a 7.3 Predicative past participles: Passive and resultative constructions7.4 Passive and resultative venire �come� and andare �go� -- 7.5 Predicative past participles: Absolute constructions -- 7.6 Compounds with ben(e) or mal(e) plus a participle -- 7.7 Conclusion -- 8. Word order -- 8.1 Introduction -- 8.2 Word order and split intransitivity -- 8.3 The interaction of syntax with discourse -- 8.4 Intransitive constructions with a postnuclear PSA -- 8.5 Conclusion -- 9. Conclusion -- Notes -- References -- Index | |
546 | |a English. | ||
520 | |a Split intransitivity has received a great deal of attention in theoretical linguistics since the formulation of the Unaccusative Hypothesis by David Perlmutter (1978). This book provides an in-depth investigation of split intransitivity as it occurs in Italian. The principal proposal is that the manifestations of split intransitivity in Italian, whilst being variously constrained by well-formedness conditions on the encoding of information structure, primarily derive from the tension between accusative (syntactic) and active (semantic) alignment. In contrast to approaches which consider the selection of the perfective operator to be the primary diagnostic of unaccusative or unergative syntax, this study identifies two morphosemantic domains in intransitive constructions on the basis of the analysis of a cluster of related phenomena (including agreement, argument suppression, ne -cliticization, past-participle behaviour, the morphosyntax of experiencer predicates and word order, as well as the selection of the perfective operator). Analysing the degree to which semantic, syntactic and discourse factors interact in determining each manifestation of split intransitivity, this work captures successfully the mismatches in the scope of the various diagnostics. Drawing upon insights provided by Role and Reference Grammar, and relying on corpus-based evidence and crossdialectal comparison, this study makes new empirical and theoretical contributions to the debate on split intransitivity. The book is accessible to linguists of all theoretical persuasions and will make stimulating reading for researchers and scholars in Italian and Romance linguistics, typology and theoretical linguistics. | ||
650 | 0 | |a Italian language |x Transitivity. | |
650 | 0 | |a Italian language |x Verb. | |
650 | 0 | |a Italian language |x Syntax. | |
650 | 6 | |a Italien (Langue) |x Transitivité. | |
650 | 6 | |a Italien (Langue) |x Syntaxe. | |
650 | 7 | |a FOREIGN LANGUAGE STUDY |x Italian. |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a Italian language |x Syntax |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Italian language |x Verb |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Italienisch |2 gnd | |
650 | 7 | |a Intransitives Verb |2 gnd | |
653 | |a Semantics. | ||
653 | |a Syntax. | ||
655 | 4 | |a Electronic book. | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Bentley, Delia. |t Split intransitivity in Italian. |d Berlin ; New York : Mouton de Gruyter, ©2006 |w (DLC) 2006023626 |
830 | 0 | |a Empirical Approaches to Language Typology EALT. | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=558167 |3 Volltext |
938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH25319317 | ||
938 | |a EBL - Ebook Library |b EBLB |n EBL3041899 | ||
938 | |a ebrary |b EBRY |n ebr10597675 | ||
938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 558167 | ||
938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 9644402 | ||
994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
049 | |a DE-863 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn811407698 |
---|---|
_version_ | 1816882209048494080 |
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Bentley, Delia |
author_facet | Bentley, Delia |
author_role | |
author_sort | Bentley, Delia |
author_variant | d b db |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | localFWS |
callnumber-first | P - Language and Literature |
callnumber-label | PC1315 |
callnumber-raw | PC1315.T72 B46 2006eb |
callnumber-search | PC1315.T72 B46 2006eb |
callnumber-sort | PC 41315 T72 B46 42006EB |
callnumber-subject | PC - Romanic Languages |
classification_rvk | IS 5840 |
collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
contents | Acknowledgements -- Abbreviations -- 1. Introduction -- 1.1 Split intransitivity: An introduction -- 1.2 Split intransitivity in Italian -- 1.3 The diagnostics -- 1.4 Role and Reference Grammar -- 2. Perfective operators -- 2.1 The problem -- 2.2 The markedness of the Privileged Syntactic Argument -- 2.3 Avere or essere? -- 2.4 Crossdialectal and crosslinguistic variation -- 2.5 Complex predicates -- 2.6 Conclusion -- 3. Experiencer predicates -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 Type-(i) experiencer predicates -- 3.3 Type-(ii) experiencer predicates 3.4 Type-(iii) experiencer predicates3.5 Conclusion -- 4. Si-constructions and unexpressed arguments -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Reflexives -- 4.3 Impersonal si-constructions -- 4.4 Unexpressed arguments -- 4.5 Conclusion -- 5. Agreement -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 The agreement of perfective and passive past participles -- 5.3 Variability and change in perfective past-participle agreement -- 5.4 Non-finite agreement in complex predicates -- 5.5 Non-finite agreement in absolute participles 5.6 Non-finite agreement in constructions with adjectival and nominal predicates5.7 Finite agreement: Crossdialectal evidence -- 5.8 Agreement in crossdialectal perspective -- 5.9 Conclusion -- 6. Ne-cliticization -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.2 Canonical ne-cliticization -- 6.3 Some putative exceptions -- 6.4 Constructions with non-verbal predicates -- 6.5 Ne-cliticization in si-constructions -- 6.6 Other functions of ne -- 6.7 Conclusion -- 7. Past participles -- 7.1 Introduction -- 7.2 Attributive past participles: Restrictive and descriptive constructions 7.3 Predicative past participles: Passive and resultative constructions7.4 Passive and resultative venire �come� and andare �go� -- 7.5 Predicative past participles: Absolute constructions -- 7.6 Compounds with ben(e) or mal(e) plus a participle -- 7.7 Conclusion -- 8. Word order -- 8.1 Introduction -- 8.2 Word order and split intransitivity -- 8.3 The interaction of syntax with discourse -- 8.4 Intransitive constructions with a postnuclear PSA -- 8.5 Conclusion -- 9. Conclusion -- Notes -- References -- Index |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)811407698 |
dewey-full | 455 |
dewey-hundreds | 400 - Language |
dewey-ones | 455 - Grammar of standard Italian |
dewey-raw | 455 |
dewey-search | 455 |
dewey-sort | 3455 |
dewey-tens | 450 - Italian, Romanian & related languages |
discipline | Romanistik |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>06965cam a2200709Ma 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn811407698</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr cn|||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">060717s2006 gw a ob 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z"> 2006023626</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">E7B</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">E7B</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">YDXCP</subfield><subfield code="d">COO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">S3O</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">DEBSZ</subfield><subfield code="d">AZK</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">LOA</subfield><subfield code="d">AGLDB</subfield><subfield code="d">COCUF</subfield><subfield code="d">MOR</subfield><subfield code="d">PIFAG</subfield><subfield code="d">MERUC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">EUM</subfield><subfield code="d">ZCU</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCA</subfield><subfield code="d">U3W</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">STF</subfield><subfield code="d">WRM</subfield><subfield code="d">VTS</subfield><subfield code="d">NRAMU</subfield><subfield code="d">ICG</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OTZ</subfield><subfield code="d">VT2</subfield><subfield code="d">WYU</subfield><subfield code="d">DKC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">UKAHL</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCA</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">UKCRE</subfield><subfield code="d">VLY</subfield><subfield code="d">AJS</subfield><subfield code="d">UWK</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield><subfield code="d">NUI</subfield><subfield code="d">SXB</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">873016868</subfield><subfield code="a">922944775</subfield><subfield code="a">961609355</subfield><subfield code="a">962661498</subfield><subfield code="a">975208718</subfield><subfield code="a">975244475</subfield><subfield code="a">1018083656</subfield><subfield code="a">1043648939</subfield><subfield code="a">1102733939</subfield><subfield code="a">1119092818</subfield><subfield code="a">1153472872</subfield><subfield code="a">1162006539</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783110896053</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3110896052</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9783110179972</subfield><subfield code="q">(cloth ;</subfield><subfield code="q">alk. paper)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">3110179970</subfield><subfield code="q">(cloth ;</subfield><subfield code="q">alk. paper)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)811407698</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)873016868</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)922944775</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)961609355</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)962661498</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)975208718</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)975244475</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1018083656</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1043648939</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1102733939</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1119092818</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1153472872</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1162006539</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">ita</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">PC1315.T72</subfield><subfield code="b">B46 2006eb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">FOR</subfield><subfield code="x">013000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">455</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">IS 5840</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bentley, Delia.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Split intransitivity in Italian /</subfield><subfield code="c">by Delia Bentley.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Berlin ;</subfield><subfield code="a">New York :</subfield><subfield code="b">Mouton de Gruyter,</subfield><subfield code="c">©2006.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (xiv, 455 pages) :</subfield><subfield code="b">illustrations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Empirical Approaches to Language Typology [EALT]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (pages 423-450) and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Acknowledgements -- Abbreviations -- 1. Introduction -- 1.1 Split intransitivity: An introduction -- 1.2 Split intransitivity in Italian -- 1.3 The diagnostics -- 1.4 Role and Reference Grammar -- 2. Perfective operators -- 2.1 The problem -- 2.2 The markedness of the Privileged Syntactic Argument -- 2.3 Avere or essere? -- 2.4 Crossdialectal and crosslinguistic variation -- 2.5 Complex predicates -- 2.6 Conclusion -- 3. Experiencer predicates -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 Type-(i) experiencer predicates -- 3.3 Type-(ii) experiencer predicates</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3.4 Type-(iii) experiencer predicates3.5 Conclusion -- 4. Si-constructions and unexpressed arguments -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Reflexives -- 4.3 Impersonal si-constructions -- 4.4 Unexpressed arguments -- 4.5 Conclusion -- 5. Agreement -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 The agreement of perfective and passive past participles -- 5.3 Variability and change in perfective past-participle agreement -- 5.4 Non-finite agreement in complex predicates -- 5.5 Non-finite agreement in absolute participles</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5.6 Non-finite agreement in constructions with adjectival and nominal predicates5.7 Finite agreement: Crossdialectal evidence -- 5.8 Agreement in crossdialectal perspective -- 5.9 Conclusion -- 6. Ne-cliticization -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.2 Canonical ne-cliticization -- 6.3 Some putative exceptions -- 6.4 Constructions with non-verbal predicates -- 6.5 Ne-cliticization in si-constructions -- 6.6 Other functions of ne -- 6.7 Conclusion -- 7. Past participles -- 7.1 Introduction -- 7.2 Attributive past participles: Restrictive and descriptive constructions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7.3 Predicative past participles: Passive and resultative constructions7.4 Passive and resultative venire â€?comeâ€? and andare â€?goâ€? -- 7.5 Predicative past participles: Absolute constructions -- 7.6 Compounds with ben(e) or mal(e) plus a participle -- 7.7 Conclusion -- 8. Word order -- 8.1 Introduction -- 8.2 Word order and split intransitivity -- 8.3 The interaction of syntax with discourse -- 8.4 Intransitive constructions with a postnuclear PSA -- 8.5 Conclusion -- 9. Conclusion -- Notes -- References -- Index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">English.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Split intransitivity has received a great deal of attention in theoretical linguistics since the formulation of the Unaccusative Hypothesis by David Perlmutter (1978). This book provides an in-depth investigation of split intransitivity as it occurs in Italian. The principal proposal is that the manifestations of split intransitivity in Italian, whilst being variously constrained by well-formedness conditions on the encoding of information structure, primarily derive from the tension between accusative (syntactic) and active (semantic) alignment. In contrast to approaches which consider the selection of the perfective operator to be the primary diagnostic of unaccusative or unergative syntax, this study identifies two morphosemantic domains in intransitive constructions on the basis of the analysis of a cluster of related phenomena (including agreement, argument suppression, ne -cliticization, past-participle behaviour, the morphosyntax of experiencer predicates and word order, as well as the selection of the perfective operator). Analysing the degree to which semantic, syntactic and discourse factors interact in determining each manifestation of split intransitivity, this work captures successfully the mismatches in the scope of the various diagnostics. Drawing upon insights provided by Role and Reference Grammar, and relying on corpus-based evidence and crossdialectal comparison, this study makes new empirical and theoretical contributions to the debate on split intransitivity. The book is accessible to linguists of all theoretical persuasions and will make stimulating reading for researchers and scholars in Italian and Romance linguistics, typology and theoretical linguistics.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Italian language</subfield><subfield code="x">Transitivity.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Italian language</subfield><subfield code="x">Verb.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Italian language</subfield><subfield code="x">Syntax.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Italien (Langue)</subfield><subfield code="x">Transitivité.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Italien (Langue)</subfield><subfield code="x">Syntaxe.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">FOREIGN LANGUAGE STUDY</subfield><subfield code="x">Italian.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Italian language</subfield><subfield code="x">Syntax</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Italian language</subfield><subfield code="x">Verb</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Italienisch</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Intransitives Verb</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Semantics.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Syntax.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electronic book.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="a">Bentley, Delia.</subfield><subfield code="t">Split intransitivity in Italian.</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin ; New York : Mouton de Gruyter, ©2006</subfield><subfield code="w">(DLC) 2006023626</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Empirical Approaches to Language Typology EALT.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=558167</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askews and Holts Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">ASKH</subfield><subfield code="n">AH25319317</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBL - Ebook Library</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL3041899</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ebrary</subfield><subfield code="b">EBRY</subfield><subfield code="n">ebr10597675</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">558167</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">9644402</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
genre | Electronic book. |
genre_facet | Electronic book. |
id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn811407698 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:24:58Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9783110896053 3110896052 |
language | English Italian |
oclc_num | 811407698 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 online resource (xiv, 455 pages) : illustrations |
psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
publishDate | 2006 |
publishDateSearch | 2006 |
publishDateSort | 2006 |
publisher | Mouton de Gruyter, |
record_format | marc |
series | Empirical Approaches to Language Typology EALT. |
series2 | Empirical Approaches to Language Typology [EALT] |
spelling | Bentley, Delia. Split intransitivity in Italian / by Delia Bentley. Berlin ; New York : Mouton de Gruyter, ©2006. 1 online resource (xiv, 455 pages) : illustrations text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Empirical Approaches to Language Typology [EALT] Includes bibliographical references (pages 423-450) and index. Acknowledgements -- Abbreviations -- 1. Introduction -- 1.1 Split intransitivity: An introduction -- 1.2 Split intransitivity in Italian -- 1.3 The diagnostics -- 1.4 Role and Reference Grammar -- 2. Perfective operators -- 2.1 The problem -- 2.2 The markedness of the Privileged Syntactic Argument -- 2.3 Avere or essere? -- 2.4 Crossdialectal and crosslinguistic variation -- 2.5 Complex predicates -- 2.6 Conclusion -- 3. Experiencer predicates -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 Type-(i) experiencer predicates -- 3.3 Type-(ii) experiencer predicates 3.4 Type-(iii) experiencer predicates3.5 Conclusion -- 4. Si-constructions and unexpressed arguments -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Reflexives -- 4.3 Impersonal si-constructions -- 4.4 Unexpressed arguments -- 4.5 Conclusion -- 5. Agreement -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 The agreement of perfective and passive past participles -- 5.3 Variability and change in perfective past-participle agreement -- 5.4 Non-finite agreement in complex predicates -- 5.5 Non-finite agreement in absolute participles 5.6 Non-finite agreement in constructions with adjectival and nominal predicates5.7 Finite agreement: Crossdialectal evidence -- 5.8 Agreement in crossdialectal perspective -- 5.9 Conclusion -- 6. Ne-cliticization -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.2 Canonical ne-cliticization -- 6.3 Some putative exceptions -- 6.4 Constructions with non-verbal predicates -- 6.5 Ne-cliticization in si-constructions -- 6.6 Other functions of ne -- 6.7 Conclusion -- 7. Past participles -- 7.1 Introduction -- 7.2 Attributive past participles: Restrictive and descriptive constructions 7.3 Predicative past participles: Passive and resultative constructions7.4 Passive and resultative venire â€?comeâ€? and andare â€?goâ€? -- 7.5 Predicative past participles: Absolute constructions -- 7.6 Compounds with ben(e) or mal(e) plus a participle -- 7.7 Conclusion -- 8. Word order -- 8.1 Introduction -- 8.2 Word order and split intransitivity -- 8.3 The interaction of syntax with discourse -- 8.4 Intransitive constructions with a postnuclear PSA -- 8.5 Conclusion -- 9. Conclusion -- Notes -- References -- Index English. Split intransitivity has received a great deal of attention in theoretical linguistics since the formulation of the Unaccusative Hypothesis by David Perlmutter (1978). This book provides an in-depth investigation of split intransitivity as it occurs in Italian. The principal proposal is that the manifestations of split intransitivity in Italian, whilst being variously constrained by well-formedness conditions on the encoding of information structure, primarily derive from the tension between accusative (syntactic) and active (semantic) alignment. In contrast to approaches which consider the selection of the perfective operator to be the primary diagnostic of unaccusative or unergative syntax, this study identifies two morphosemantic domains in intransitive constructions on the basis of the analysis of a cluster of related phenomena (including agreement, argument suppression, ne -cliticization, past-participle behaviour, the morphosyntax of experiencer predicates and word order, as well as the selection of the perfective operator). Analysing the degree to which semantic, syntactic and discourse factors interact in determining each manifestation of split intransitivity, this work captures successfully the mismatches in the scope of the various diagnostics. Drawing upon insights provided by Role and Reference Grammar, and relying on corpus-based evidence and crossdialectal comparison, this study makes new empirical and theoretical contributions to the debate on split intransitivity. The book is accessible to linguists of all theoretical persuasions and will make stimulating reading for researchers and scholars in Italian and Romance linguistics, typology and theoretical linguistics. Italian language Transitivity. Italian language Verb. Italian language Syntax. Italien (Langue) Transitivité. Italien (Langue) Syntaxe. FOREIGN LANGUAGE STUDY Italian. bisacsh Italian language Syntax fast Italian language Verb fast Italienisch gnd Intransitives Verb gnd Semantics. Syntax. Electronic book. Print version: Bentley, Delia. Split intransitivity in Italian. Berlin ; New York : Mouton de Gruyter, ©2006 (DLC) 2006023626 Empirical Approaches to Language Typology EALT. FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=558167 Volltext |
spellingShingle | Bentley, Delia Split intransitivity in Italian / Empirical Approaches to Language Typology EALT. Acknowledgements -- Abbreviations -- 1. Introduction -- 1.1 Split intransitivity: An introduction -- 1.2 Split intransitivity in Italian -- 1.3 The diagnostics -- 1.4 Role and Reference Grammar -- 2. Perfective operators -- 2.1 The problem -- 2.2 The markedness of the Privileged Syntactic Argument -- 2.3 Avere or essere? -- 2.4 Crossdialectal and crosslinguistic variation -- 2.5 Complex predicates -- 2.6 Conclusion -- 3. Experiencer predicates -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 Type-(i) experiencer predicates -- 3.3 Type-(ii) experiencer predicates 3.4 Type-(iii) experiencer predicates3.5 Conclusion -- 4. Si-constructions and unexpressed arguments -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Reflexives -- 4.3 Impersonal si-constructions -- 4.4 Unexpressed arguments -- 4.5 Conclusion -- 5. Agreement -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 The agreement of perfective and passive past participles -- 5.3 Variability and change in perfective past-participle agreement -- 5.4 Non-finite agreement in complex predicates -- 5.5 Non-finite agreement in absolute participles 5.6 Non-finite agreement in constructions with adjectival and nominal predicates5.7 Finite agreement: Crossdialectal evidence -- 5.8 Agreement in crossdialectal perspective -- 5.9 Conclusion -- 6. Ne-cliticization -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.2 Canonical ne-cliticization -- 6.3 Some putative exceptions -- 6.4 Constructions with non-verbal predicates -- 6.5 Ne-cliticization in si-constructions -- 6.6 Other functions of ne -- 6.7 Conclusion -- 7. Past participles -- 7.1 Introduction -- 7.2 Attributive past participles: Restrictive and descriptive constructions 7.3 Predicative past participles: Passive and resultative constructions7.4 Passive and resultative venire â€?comeâ€? and andare â€?goâ€? -- 7.5 Predicative past participles: Absolute constructions -- 7.6 Compounds with ben(e) or mal(e) plus a participle -- 7.7 Conclusion -- 8. Word order -- 8.1 Introduction -- 8.2 Word order and split intransitivity -- 8.3 The interaction of syntax with discourse -- 8.4 Intransitive constructions with a postnuclear PSA -- 8.5 Conclusion -- 9. Conclusion -- Notes -- References -- Index Italian language Transitivity. Italian language Verb. Italian language Syntax. Italien (Langue) Transitivité. Italien (Langue) Syntaxe. FOREIGN LANGUAGE STUDY Italian. bisacsh Italian language Syntax fast Italian language Verb fast Italienisch gnd Intransitives Verb gnd |
title | Split intransitivity in Italian / |
title_auth | Split intransitivity in Italian / |
title_exact_search | Split intransitivity in Italian / |
title_full | Split intransitivity in Italian / by Delia Bentley. |
title_fullStr | Split intransitivity in Italian / by Delia Bentley. |
title_full_unstemmed | Split intransitivity in Italian / by Delia Bentley. |
title_short | Split intransitivity in Italian / |
title_sort | split intransitivity in italian |
topic | Italian language Transitivity. Italian language Verb. Italian language Syntax. Italien (Langue) Transitivité. Italien (Langue) Syntaxe. FOREIGN LANGUAGE STUDY Italian. bisacsh Italian language Syntax fast Italian language Verb fast Italienisch gnd Intransitives Verb gnd |
topic_facet | Italian language Transitivity. Italian language Verb. Italian language Syntax. Italien (Langue) Transitivité. Italien (Langue) Syntaxe. FOREIGN LANGUAGE STUDY Italian. Italian language Syntax Italian language Verb Italienisch Intransitives Verb Electronic book. |
url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=558167 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bentleydelia splitintransitivityinitalian |