Bureaucratic landscapes :: interagency cooperation and the preservation of biodiversity /
Political scientists have long been concerned about the tension between institutional fragmentation and policy coordination in the U.S. bureaucracy. The literature is rife with examples of agencies competing with each other or asserting their independence, while cooperation is relatively rare. This...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, Mass. :
MIT Press,
©2003.
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Politics, science, and the environment.
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | Political scientists have long been concerned about the tension between institutional fragmentation and policy coordination in the U.S. bureaucracy. The literature is rife with examples of agencies competing with each other or asserting their independence, while cooperation is relatively rare. This is of particular importance in policy areas such as biodiversity, where species, habitats, and ecosystems cross various agency jurisdictions. Bureaucratic Landscapes explores the reasons for the success and failure of interagency cooperation, focusing on several case studies of efforts to preserve biodiversity in California. The book examines why public officials tried to cooperate and the obstacles they faced, providing indirect evidence of policy impacts as well. Among other topics, it examines the role of courts in prompting agency action, the role of scientific knowledge in organizational learning, and the emergence of new institutions to resolve collective-action problems. Notable findings include the crucial role of environmental lawsuits in prompting agency action and the surprisingly active role of the Bureau of Land Management in resource preservation. |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (xxii, 353 pages) |
| Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references (pages 327-345) and index. |
| ISBN: | 9780262284882 026228488X 0585456704 9780585456706 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocm52596692 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr cn||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 030711s2003 mau ob 001 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a N$T |b eng |e pn |c N$T |d YDXCP |d OCLCQ |d N$T |d OCLCQ |d TNF |d T5N |d OCLCQ |d NA5 |d OCLCF |d NLGGC |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d INTCL |d PIFBR |d OCLCQ |d WY@ |d LUE |d RCC |d VTS |d AGLDB |d OCLCQ |d INT |d TOF |d OCLCQ |d MITPR |d STF |d M8D |d SFB |d UKSSU |d INARC |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d WSU |d OCLCO |d OCLCL |d OCLCQ | ||
| 015 | |a GBA2U5779 |2 bnb | ||
| 019 | |a 793524216 |a 847088853 |a 961657271 |a 962700336 |a 1150155559 |a 1154905414 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780262284882 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 026228488X |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 0585456704 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9780585456706 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)52596692 |z (OCoLC)793524216 |z (OCoLC)847088853 |z (OCoLC)961657271 |z (OCoLC)962700336 |z (OCoLC)1150155559 |z (OCoLC)1154905414 | ||
| 037 | |a 1699 |b MIT Press | ||
| 037 | |a 9780262284882 |b MIT Press | ||
| 043 | |a n-us-ca |a n-us--- | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a QH76.5.C2 |b T54 2003eb | |
| 072 | 7 | |a SCI |x 088000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a NAT |x 037000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 7 | |a 333.95/16/0976 |2 21 | |
| 084 | |a BIO 125f |2 stub | ||
| 084 | |a GEO 283f |2 stub | ||
| 084 | |a UMW 103f |2 stub | ||
| 049 | |a MAIN | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Thomas, Craig W. |c (Associate professor of political science) |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjJf8M89rjCCtxD4gM6R8C |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2002102049 | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Bureaucratic landscapes : |b interagency cooperation and the preservation of biodiversity / |c Craig W. Thomas. |
| 260 | |a Cambridge, Mass. : |b MIT Press, |c ©2003. | ||
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (xxii, 353 pages) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Politics, science, and the environment | |
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 327-345) and index. | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
| 505 | 0 | 0 | |g Machine generated contents note: |g 1. |t Fragmented Jurisdictions, Fragmented Habitat -- |g 2. |t What Cooperation Means to Agency Officials -- |g 3. |t Emergence of Cooperation among Agency Directors -- |g 4. |t Institutionalizing Cooperation -- |g 5. |t Klamath Bioregion: Local Cooperation and the Demise of the Bioregional Ideal -- |g 6. |t South Coast Bioregion: Making Cooperation Work through Regulation -- |g 7. |t San Joaquin Valley Bioregion: BLM's Co-operation Strategy Fails at the Bioregional Level -- |g 8. |t Explaining Interagency Cooperation: Or, Why the BLM Cooperates More Than the NPS -- |g App. B |t Memorandum of Understanding on Biological Diversity -- |g App. C |t Statement of Intent to Support the Agreement on Biological Diversity. |
| 520 | |a Political scientists have long been concerned about the tension between institutional fragmentation and policy coordination in the U.S. bureaucracy. The literature is rife with examples of agencies competing with each other or asserting their independence, while cooperation is relatively rare. This is of particular importance in policy areas such as biodiversity, where species, habitats, and ecosystems cross various agency jurisdictions. Bureaucratic Landscapes explores the reasons for the success and failure of interagency cooperation, focusing on several case studies of efforts to preserve biodiversity in California. The book examines why public officials tried to cooperate and the obstacles they faced, providing indirect evidence of policy impacts as well. Among other topics, it examines the role of courts in prompting agency action, the role of scientific knowledge in organizational learning, and the emergence of new institutions to resolve collective-action problems. Notable findings include the crucial role of environmental lawsuits in prompting agency action and the surprisingly active role of the Bureau of Land Management in resource preservation. | ||
| 546 | |a English. | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Biodiversity conservation |x Government policy |z California |v Case studies. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Biodiversity conservation |x Government policy |z United States |v Case studies. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Natural resources |z California |x Management |v Case studies. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Natural resources |z United States |x Management |v Case studies. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Interorganizational relations |z California |v Case studies. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Interorganizational relations |z United States |v Case studies. | |
| 650 | 3 | |a Biodiversity. | |
| 650 | 3 | |a Natural resources conservation. | |
| 650 | 3 | |a Natural resource management. | |
| 651 | 3 | |a California | |
| 651 | 3 | |a United States | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Biodiversité |x Conservation |x Politique gouvernementale |z Californie |v Études de cas. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Biodiversité |x Conservation |x Politique gouvernementale |z États-Unis |v Études de cas. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Ressources naturelles |z Californie |x Gestion |v Études de cas. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Ressources naturelles |z États-Unis |x Gestion |v Études de cas. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Relations interorganisationnelles |z Californie |v Études de cas. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Relations interorganisationnelles |z États-Unis |v Études de cas. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a SCIENCE |x Life Sciences |x Biological Diversity. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a NATURE |x Animals |x Wildlife. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Biodiversity conservation |x Government policy |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Interorganizational relations |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Natural resources |x Management |2 fast | |
| 651 | 7 | |a California |2 fast |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJt8p3GDkhpJkC9y6FY3wC | |
| 651 | 7 | |a United States |2 fast |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq | |
| 651 | 7 | |a USA |2 gnd |0 http://d-nb.info/gnd/4078704-7 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Biodiversität |2 gnd |0 http://d-nb.info/gnd/4601495-0 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Naturschutz |2 gnd |0 http://d-nb.info/gnd/4115348-0 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Diversité biologique |x Conservation des ressources |x Politique publique |z États-Unis |z Californie (États-Unis) |2 ram | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Relations interorganisationnelles |z États-Unis |z Californie (États-Unis) |2 ram | |
| 653 | |a ENVIRONMENT/Environmental Politics & Policy | ||
| 655 | 7 | |a Case studies |2 fast | |
| 655 | 7 | |a Case studies. |2 lcgft |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/genreForms/gf2017026140 | |
| 655 | 7 | |a Études de cas. |2 rvmgf | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Thomas, Craig W. |t Bureaucratic landscapes. |d Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, ©2003 |z 0262201410 |w (DLC) 2002071779 |w (OCoLC)49905485 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Politics, science, and the environment. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no97049002 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=81095 |3 Volltext |
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 81095 | ||
| 938 | |a Internet Archive |b INAR |n bureaucraticland0000thom | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 2333864 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 3411333 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocm52596692 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816881608619196416 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Thomas, Craig W. (Associate professor of political science) |
| author_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2002102049 |
| author_facet | Thomas, Craig W. (Associate professor of political science) |
| author_role | |
| author_sort | Thomas, Craig W. (Associate professor of political science) |
| author_variant | c w t cw cwt |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| callnumber-first | Q - Science |
| callnumber-label | QH76 |
| callnumber-raw | QH76.5.C2 T54 2003eb |
| callnumber-search | QH76.5.C2 T54 2003eb |
| callnumber-sort | QH 276.5 C2 T54 42003EB |
| callnumber-subject | QH - Natural History and Biology |
| classification_tum | BIO 125f GEO 283f UMW 103f |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | Fragmented Jurisdictions, Fragmented Habitat -- What Cooperation Means to Agency Officials -- Emergence of Cooperation among Agency Directors -- Institutionalizing Cooperation -- Klamath Bioregion: Local Cooperation and the Demise of the Bioregional Ideal -- South Coast Bioregion: Making Cooperation Work through Regulation -- San Joaquin Valley Bioregion: BLM's Co-operation Strategy Fails at the Bioregional Level -- Explaining Interagency Cooperation: Or, Why the BLM Cooperates More Than the NPS -- Memorandum of Understanding on Biological Diversity -- Statement of Intent to Support the Agreement on Biological Diversity. |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)52596692 |
| dewey-full | 333.95/16/0976 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 333 - Economics of land and energy |
| dewey-raw | 333.95/16/0976 |
| dewey-search | 333.95/16/0976 |
| dewey-sort | 3333.95 216 3976 |
| dewey-tens | 330 - Economics |
| discipline | Geowissenschaften Biologie Wirtschaftswissenschaften Umwelt |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>06875cam a2200973 a 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocm52596692 </controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr cn|||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">030711s2003 mau ob 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">N$T</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">YDXCP</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">TNF</subfield><subfield code="d">T5N</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">NA5</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">NLGGC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">INTCL</subfield><subfield code="d">PIFBR</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">WY@</subfield><subfield code="d">LUE</subfield><subfield code="d">RCC</subfield><subfield code="d">VTS</subfield><subfield code="d">AGLDB</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">INT</subfield><subfield code="d">TOF</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">MITPR</subfield><subfield code="d">STF</subfield><subfield code="d">M8D</subfield><subfield code="d">SFB</subfield><subfield code="d">UKSSU</subfield><subfield code="d">INARC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">WSU</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="015" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBA2U5779</subfield><subfield code="2">bnb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">793524216</subfield><subfield code="a">847088853</subfield><subfield code="a">961657271</subfield><subfield code="a">962700336</subfield><subfield code="a">1150155559</subfield><subfield code="a">1154905414</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780262284882</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">026228488X</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0585456704</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780585456706</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)52596692</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)793524216</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)847088853</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)961657271</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)962700336</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1150155559</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1154905414</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1699</subfield><subfield code="b">MIT Press</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780262284882</subfield><subfield code="b">MIT Press</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">n-us-ca</subfield><subfield code="a">n-us---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">QH76.5.C2</subfield><subfield code="b">T54 2003eb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">SCI</subfield><subfield code="x">088000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">NAT</subfield><subfield code="x">037000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">333.95/16/0976</subfield><subfield code="2">21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIO 125f</subfield><subfield code="2">stub</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GEO 283f</subfield><subfield code="2">stub</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">UMW 103f</subfield><subfield code="2">stub</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Thomas, Craig W.</subfield><subfield code="c">(Associate professor of political science)</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjJf8M89rjCCtxD4gM6R8C</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2002102049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Bureaucratic landscapes :</subfield><subfield code="b">interagency cooperation and the preservation of biodiversity /</subfield><subfield code="c">Craig W. Thomas.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cambridge, Mass. :</subfield><subfield code="b">MIT Press,</subfield><subfield code="c">©2003.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (xxii, 353 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Politics, science, and the environment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (pages 327-345) and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="g">Machine generated contents note:</subfield><subfield code="g">1.</subfield><subfield code="t">Fragmented Jurisdictions, Fragmented Habitat --</subfield><subfield code="g">2.</subfield><subfield code="t">What Cooperation Means to Agency Officials --</subfield><subfield code="g">3.</subfield><subfield code="t">Emergence of Cooperation among Agency Directors --</subfield><subfield code="g">4.</subfield><subfield code="t">Institutionalizing Cooperation --</subfield><subfield code="g">5.</subfield><subfield code="t">Klamath Bioregion: Local Cooperation and the Demise of the Bioregional Ideal --</subfield><subfield code="g">6.</subfield><subfield code="t">South Coast Bioregion: Making Cooperation Work through Regulation --</subfield><subfield code="g">7.</subfield><subfield code="t">San Joaquin Valley Bioregion: BLM's Co-operation Strategy Fails at the Bioregional Level --</subfield><subfield code="g">8.</subfield><subfield code="t">Explaining Interagency Cooperation: Or, Why the BLM Cooperates More Than the NPS --</subfield><subfield code="g">App. B</subfield><subfield code="t">Memorandum of Understanding on Biological Diversity --</subfield><subfield code="g">App. C</subfield><subfield code="t">Statement of Intent to Support the Agreement on Biological Diversity.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Political scientists have long been concerned about the tension between institutional fragmentation and policy coordination in the U.S. bureaucracy. The literature is rife with examples of agencies competing with each other or asserting their independence, while cooperation is relatively rare. This is of particular importance in policy areas such as biodiversity, where species, habitats, and ecosystems cross various agency jurisdictions. Bureaucratic Landscapes explores the reasons for the success and failure of interagency cooperation, focusing on several case studies of efforts to preserve biodiversity in California. The book examines why public officials tried to cooperate and the obstacles they faced, providing indirect evidence of policy impacts as well. Among other topics, it examines the role of courts in prompting agency action, the role of scientific knowledge in organizational learning, and the emergence of new institutions to resolve collective-action problems. Notable findings include the crucial role of environmental lawsuits in prompting agency action and the surprisingly active role of the Bureau of Land Management in resource preservation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">English.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Biodiversity conservation</subfield><subfield code="x">Government policy</subfield><subfield code="z">California</subfield><subfield code="v">Case studies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Biodiversity conservation</subfield><subfield code="x">Government policy</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Case studies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Natural resources</subfield><subfield code="z">California</subfield><subfield code="x">Management</subfield><subfield code="v">Case studies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Natural resources</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Management</subfield><subfield code="v">Case studies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Interorganizational relations</subfield><subfield code="z">California</subfield><subfield code="v">Case studies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Interorganizational relations</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Case studies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Biodiversity.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Natural resources conservation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Natural resource management.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="3"><subfield code="a">California</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="3"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Biodiversité</subfield><subfield code="x">Conservation</subfield><subfield code="x">Politique gouvernementale</subfield><subfield code="z">Californie</subfield><subfield code="v">Études de cas.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Biodiversité</subfield><subfield code="x">Conservation</subfield><subfield code="x">Politique gouvernementale</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis</subfield><subfield code="v">Études de cas.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Ressources naturelles</subfield><subfield code="z">Californie</subfield><subfield code="x">Gestion</subfield><subfield code="v">Études de cas.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Ressources naturelles</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis</subfield><subfield code="x">Gestion</subfield><subfield code="v">Études de cas.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Relations interorganisationnelles</subfield><subfield code="z">Californie</subfield><subfield code="v">Études de cas.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Relations interorganisationnelles</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis</subfield><subfield code="v">Études de cas.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">SCIENCE</subfield><subfield code="x">Life Sciences</subfield><subfield code="x">Biological Diversity.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">NATURE</subfield><subfield code="x">Animals</subfield><subfield code="x">Wildlife.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Biodiversity conservation</subfield><subfield code="x">Government policy</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Interorganizational relations</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Natural resources</subfield><subfield code="x">Management</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">California</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJt8p3GDkhpJkC9y6FY3wC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="0">http://d-nb.info/gnd/4078704-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Biodiversität</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="0">http://d-nb.info/gnd/4601495-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Naturschutz</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="0">http://d-nb.info/gnd/4115348-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Diversité biologique</subfield><subfield code="x">Conservation des ressources</subfield><subfield code="x">Politique publique</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis</subfield><subfield code="z">Californie (États-Unis)</subfield><subfield code="2">ram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Relations interorganisationnelles</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis</subfield><subfield code="z">Californie (États-Unis)</subfield><subfield code="2">ram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ENVIRONMENT/Environmental Politics & Policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Case studies</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Case studies.</subfield><subfield code="2">lcgft</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/genreForms/gf2017026140</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Études de cas.</subfield><subfield code="2">rvmgf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="a">Thomas, Craig W.</subfield><subfield code="t">Bureaucratic landscapes.</subfield><subfield code="d">Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, ©2003</subfield><subfield code="z">0262201410</subfield><subfield code="w">(DLC) 2002071779</subfield><subfield code="w">(OCoLC)49905485</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Politics, science, and the environment.</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no97049002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=81095</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">81095</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Internet Archive</subfield><subfield code="b">INAR</subfield><subfield code="n">bureaucraticland0000thom</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">2333864</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">3411333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | Case studies fast Case studies. lcgft http://id.loc.gov/authorities/genreForms/gf2017026140 Études de cas. rvmgf |
| genre_facet | Case studies Case studies. Études de cas. |
| geographic | California United States California fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJt8p3GDkhpJkC9y6FY3wC United States fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq USA gnd http://d-nb.info/gnd/4078704-7 |
| geographic_facet | California United States USA |
| id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocm52596692 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:15:25Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780262284882 026228488X 0585456704 9780585456706 |
| language | English |
| oclc_num | 52596692 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 online resource (xxii, 353 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
| publishDate | 2003 |
| publishDateSearch | 2003 |
| publishDateSort | 2003 |
| publisher | MIT Press, |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Politics, science, and the environment. |
| series2 | Politics, science, and the environment |
| spelling | Thomas, Craig W. (Associate professor of political science) https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjJf8M89rjCCtxD4gM6R8C http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2002102049 Bureaucratic landscapes : interagency cooperation and the preservation of biodiversity / Craig W. Thomas. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, ©2003. 1 online resource (xxii, 353 pages) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Politics, science, and the environment Includes bibliographical references (pages 327-345) and index. Print version record. Machine generated contents note: 1. Fragmented Jurisdictions, Fragmented Habitat -- 2. What Cooperation Means to Agency Officials -- 3. Emergence of Cooperation among Agency Directors -- 4. Institutionalizing Cooperation -- 5. Klamath Bioregion: Local Cooperation and the Demise of the Bioregional Ideal -- 6. South Coast Bioregion: Making Cooperation Work through Regulation -- 7. San Joaquin Valley Bioregion: BLM's Co-operation Strategy Fails at the Bioregional Level -- 8. Explaining Interagency Cooperation: Or, Why the BLM Cooperates More Than the NPS -- App. B Memorandum of Understanding on Biological Diversity -- App. C Statement of Intent to Support the Agreement on Biological Diversity. Political scientists have long been concerned about the tension between institutional fragmentation and policy coordination in the U.S. bureaucracy. The literature is rife with examples of agencies competing with each other or asserting their independence, while cooperation is relatively rare. This is of particular importance in policy areas such as biodiversity, where species, habitats, and ecosystems cross various agency jurisdictions. Bureaucratic Landscapes explores the reasons for the success and failure of interagency cooperation, focusing on several case studies of efforts to preserve biodiversity in California. The book examines why public officials tried to cooperate and the obstacles they faced, providing indirect evidence of policy impacts as well. Among other topics, it examines the role of courts in prompting agency action, the role of scientific knowledge in organizational learning, and the emergence of new institutions to resolve collective-action problems. Notable findings include the crucial role of environmental lawsuits in prompting agency action and the surprisingly active role of the Bureau of Land Management in resource preservation. English. Biodiversity conservation Government policy California Case studies. Biodiversity conservation Government policy United States Case studies. Natural resources California Management Case studies. Natural resources United States Management Case studies. Interorganizational relations California Case studies. Interorganizational relations United States Case studies. Biodiversity. Natural resources conservation. Natural resource management. California United States Biodiversité Conservation Politique gouvernementale Californie Études de cas. Biodiversité Conservation Politique gouvernementale États-Unis Études de cas. Ressources naturelles Californie Gestion Études de cas. Ressources naturelles États-Unis Gestion Études de cas. Relations interorganisationnelles Californie Études de cas. Relations interorganisationnelles États-Unis Études de cas. SCIENCE Life Sciences Biological Diversity. bisacsh NATURE Animals Wildlife. bisacsh Biodiversity conservation Government policy fast Interorganizational relations fast Natural resources Management fast California fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJt8p3GDkhpJkC9y6FY3wC United States fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq USA gnd http://d-nb.info/gnd/4078704-7 Biodiversität gnd http://d-nb.info/gnd/4601495-0 Naturschutz gnd http://d-nb.info/gnd/4115348-0 Diversité biologique Conservation des ressources Politique publique États-Unis Californie (États-Unis) ram Relations interorganisationnelles États-Unis Californie (États-Unis) ram ENVIRONMENT/Environmental Politics & Policy Case studies fast Case studies. lcgft http://id.loc.gov/authorities/genreForms/gf2017026140 Études de cas. rvmgf Print version: Thomas, Craig W. Bureaucratic landscapes. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, ©2003 0262201410 (DLC) 2002071779 (OCoLC)49905485 Politics, science, and the environment. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no97049002 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=81095 Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Thomas, Craig W. (Associate professor of political science) Bureaucratic landscapes : interagency cooperation and the preservation of biodiversity / Politics, science, and the environment. Fragmented Jurisdictions, Fragmented Habitat -- What Cooperation Means to Agency Officials -- Emergence of Cooperation among Agency Directors -- Institutionalizing Cooperation -- Klamath Bioregion: Local Cooperation and the Demise of the Bioregional Ideal -- South Coast Bioregion: Making Cooperation Work through Regulation -- San Joaquin Valley Bioregion: BLM's Co-operation Strategy Fails at the Bioregional Level -- Explaining Interagency Cooperation: Or, Why the BLM Cooperates More Than the NPS -- Memorandum of Understanding on Biological Diversity -- Statement of Intent to Support the Agreement on Biological Diversity. Biodiversity conservation Government policy California Case studies. Biodiversity conservation Government policy United States Case studies. Natural resources California Management Case studies. Natural resources United States Management Case studies. Interorganizational relations California Case studies. Interorganizational relations United States Case studies. Biodiversity. Natural resources conservation. Natural resource management. Biodiversité Conservation Politique gouvernementale Californie Études de cas. Biodiversité Conservation Politique gouvernementale États-Unis Études de cas. Ressources naturelles Californie Gestion Études de cas. Ressources naturelles États-Unis Gestion Études de cas. Relations interorganisationnelles Californie Études de cas. Relations interorganisationnelles États-Unis Études de cas. SCIENCE Life Sciences Biological Diversity. bisacsh NATURE Animals Wildlife. bisacsh Biodiversity conservation Government policy fast Interorganizational relations fast Natural resources Management fast Biodiversität gnd http://d-nb.info/gnd/4601495-0 Naturschutz gnd http://d-nb.info/gnd/4115348-0 Diversité biologique Conservation des ressources Politique publique États-Unis Californie (États-Unis) ram Relations interorganisationnelles États-Unis Californie (États-Unis) ram |
| subject_GND | http://d-nb.info/gnd/4078704-7 http://d-nb.info/gnd/4601495-0 http://d-nb.info/gnd/4115348-0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/genreForms/gf2017026140 |
| title | Bureaucratic landscapes : interagency cooperation and the preservation of biodiversity / |
| title_alt | Fragmented Jurisdictions, Fragmented Habitat -- What Cooperation Means to Agency Officials -- Emergence of Cooperation among Agency Directors -- Institutionalizing Cooperation -- Klamath Bioregion: Local Cooperation and the Demise of the Bioregional Ideal -- South Coast Bioregion: Making Cooperation Work through Regulation -- San Joaquin Valley Bioregion: BLM's Co-operation Strategy Fails at the Bioregional Level -- Explaining Interagency Cooperation: Or, Why the BLM Cooperates More Than the NPS -- Memorandum of Understanding on Biological Diversity -- Statement of Intent to Support the Agreement on Biological Diversity. |
| title_auth | Bureaucratic landscapes : interagency cooperation and the preservation of biodiversity / |
| title_exact_search | Bureaucratic landscapes : interagency cooperation and the preservation of biodiversity / |
| title_full | Bureaucratic landscapes : interagency cooperation and the preservation of biodiversity / Craig W. Thomas. |
| title_fullStr | Bureaucratic landscapes : interagency cooperation and the preservation of biodiversity / Craig W. Thomas. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Bureaucratic landscapes : interagency cooperation and the preservation of biodiversity / Craig W. Thomas. |
| title_short | Bureaucratic landscapes : |
| title_sort | bureaucratic landscapes interagency cooperation and the preservation of biodiversity |
| title_sub | interagency cooperation and the preservation of biodiversity / |
| topic | Biodiversity conservation Government policy California Case studies. Biodiversity conservation Government policy United States Case studies. Natural resources California Management Case studies. Natural resources United States Management Case studies. Interorganizational relations California Case studies. Interorganizational relations United States Case studies. Biodiversity. Natural resources conservation. Natural resource management. Biodiversité Conservation Politique gouvernementale Californie Études de cas. Biodiversité Conservation Politique gouvernementale États-Unis Études de cas. Ressources naturelles Californie Gestion Études de cas. Ressources naturelles États-Unis Gestion Études de cas. Relations interorganisationnelles Californie Études de cas. Relations interorganisationnelles États-Unis Études de cas. SCIENCE Life Sciences Biological Diversity. bisacsh NATURE Animals Wildlife. bisacsh Biodiversity conservation Government policy fast Interorganizational relations fast Natural resources Management fast Biodiversität gnd http://d-nb.info/gnd/4601495-0 Naturschutz gnd http://d-nb.info/gnd/4115348-0 Diversité biologique Conservation des ressources Politique publique États-Unis Californie (États-Unis) ram Relations interorganisationnelles États-Unis Californie (États-Unis) ram |
| topic_facet | Biodiversity conservation Government policy California Case studies. Biodiversity conservation Government policy United States Case studies. Natural resources California Management Case studies. Natural resources United States Management Case studies. Interorganizational relations California Case studies. Interorganizational relations United States Case studies. Biodiversity. Natural resources conservation. Natural resource management. California United States Biodiversité Conservation Politique gouvernementale Californie Études de cas. Biodiversité Conservation Politique gouvernementale États-Unis Études de cas. Ressources naturelles Californie Gestion Études de cas. Ressources naturelles États-Unis Gestion Études de cas. Relations interorganisationnelles Californie Études de cas. Relations interorganisationnelles États-Unis Études de cas. SCIENCE Life Sciences Biological Diversity. NATURE Animals Wildlife. Biodiversity conservation Government policy Interorganizational relations Natural resources Management USA Biodiversität Naturschutz Diversité biologique Conservation des ressources Politique publique États-Unis Californie (États-Unis) Relations interorganisationnelles États-Unis Californie (États-Unis) Case studies Case studies. Études de cas. |
| url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=81095 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT thomascraigw bureaucraticlandscapesinteragencycooperationandthepreservationofbiodiversity |