Strategic Review: Implications of Proposals to Date for Mitigation Contributions:
Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) produced a negotiating text in February 2015, which forms the basis for negotiations toward a climate change agreement scheduled for adoption at the 21st Conference of the Parties in December 2015. This document aims to better underst...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2015
|
| Schriftenreihe: | OECD/IEA Climate Change Expert Group Papers
no.2015/02 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) produced a negotiating text in February 2015, which forms the basis for negotiations toward a climate change agreement scheduled for adoption at the 21st Conference of the Parties in December 2015. This document aims to better understand proposals in the Geneva negotiating text related to the notion of strengthening nationally determined contributions (NDCs) over time, contained under the headings "strategic review of implementation", "aggregate ambition assessment" and "enhanced ambition mechanism". This paper focuses on how key elements of these proposals might apply to mitigation contributions or the mitigation component of NDCs: The document examines the main proposals in terms of their relevance, coherence, assumptions, scope, and feasibility, in the context of a cycle of mitigation contributions that seek to become more ambitious over time. It also explores whether the proposals are likely to be effective in achieving their foreseen outcomes, the majority of which involve changes to NDCs. In general, it finds that there is significant overlap between proposals for various "review" processes in different parts of the Geneva negotiating text, as well as overlap with monitoring, reporting and verification processes under the UNFCCC. The document also presents some broad messages on the subject of "strategic review" expressed during the CCXG Global Forum in March 2015. It is currently unclear what a review or assessment process would comprise, largely because it relates to an overarching process - a cycle of contributions - for which there is not yet an agreed vision or scope. |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (22 p.) 21 x 29.7cm. |
| DOI: | 10.1787/5jrxg3st7x6d-en |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-13-SOC-06131966X | ||
| 003 | DE-627-1 | ||
| 005 | 20231204121545.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210204s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/5jrxg3st7x6d-en |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627-1)06131966X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KEP06131966X | ||
| 035 | |a (FR-PaOEC)5jrxg3st7x6d-en | ||
| 035 | |a (EBP)06131966X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a F53 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a H87 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a Q56 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a Q58 |2 jelc | ||
| 084 | |a Q54 |2 jelc | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Moarif, Sara |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Strategic Review: Implications of Proposals to Date for Mitigation Contributions |c Sara, Moarif = L'Examen Stratégique: conséquences des propositions sur les contributions d'atténuation / Sara, Moarif |
| 246 | 3 | 3 | |a L'Examen Stratégique: conséquences des propositions sur les contributions d'atténuation |
| 264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2015 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (22 p.) |c 21 x 29.7cm. | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a OECD/IEA Climate Change Expert Group Papers |v no.2015/02 | |
| 520 | |a Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) produced a negotiating text in February 2015, which forms the basis for negotiations toward a climate change agreement scheduled for adoption at the 21st Conference of the Parties in December 2015. This document aims to better understand proposals in the Geneva negotiating text related to the notion of strengthening nationally determined contributions (NDCs) over time, contained under the headings "strategic review of implementation", "aggregate ambition assessment" and "enhanced ambition mechanism". This paper focuses on how key elements of these proposals might apply to mitigation contributions or the mitigation component of NDCs: The document examines the main proposals in terms of their relevance, coherence, assumptions, scope, and feasibility, in the context of a cycle of mitigation contributions that seek to become more ambitious over time. It also explores whether the proposals are likely to be effective in achieving their foreseen outcomes, the majority of which involve changes to NDCs. In general, it finds that there is significant overlap between proposals for various "review" processes in different parts of the Geneva negotiating text, as well as overlap with monitoring, reporting and verification processes under the UNFCCC. The document also presents some broad messages on the subject of "strategic review" expressed during the CCXG Global Forum in March 2015. It is currently unclear what a review or assessment process would comprise, largely because it relates to an overarching process - a cycle of contributions - for which there is not yet an agreed vision or scope. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Energy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Environment | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |q FWS_PDA_SOC |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrxg3st7x6d-en |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 951 | |a BO | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-13-SOC-06131966X |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816797332832780288 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Moarif, Sara |
| author_facet | Moarif, Sara |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Moarif, Sara |
| author_variant | s m sm |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
| ctrlnum | (DE-627-1)06131966X (DE-599)KEP06131966X (FR-PaOEC)5jrxg3st7x6d-en (EBP)06131966X |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1787/5jrxg3st7x6d-en |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03112cam a22004212 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-13-SOC-06131966X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627-1</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231204121545.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210204s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/5jrxg3st7x6d-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627-1)06131966X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KEP06131966X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(FR-PaOEC)5jrxg3st7x6d-en</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EBP)06131966X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">F53</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">H87</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Q56</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Q58</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Q54</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Moarif, Sara</subfield><subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Strategic Review: Implications of Proposals to Date for Mitigation Contributions</subfield><subfield code="c">Sara, Moarif = L'Examen Stratégique: conséquences des propositions sur les contributions d'atténuation / Sara, Moarif</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="3" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">L'Examen Stratégique: conséquences des propositions sur les contributions d'atténuation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (22 p.)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 x 29.7cm.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD/IEA Climate Change Expert Group Papers</subfield><subfield code="v">no.2015/02</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) produced a negotiating text in February 2015, which forms the basis for negotiations toward a climate change agreement scheduled for adoption at the 21st Conference of the Parties in December 2015. This document aims to better understand proposals in the Geneva negotiating text related to the notion of strengthening nationally determined contributions (NDCs) over time, contained under the headings "strategic review of implementation", "aggregate ambition assessment" and "enhanced ambition mechanism". This paper focuses on how key elements of these proposals might apply to mitigation contributions or the mitigation component of NDCs: The document examines the main proposals in terms of their relevance, coherence, assumptions, scope, and feasibility, in the context of a cycle of mitigation contributions that seek to become more ambitious over time. It also explores whether the proposals are likely to be effective in achieving their foreseen outcomes, the majority of which involve changes to NDCs. In general, it finds that there is significant overlap between proposals for various "review" processes in different parts of the Geneva negotiating text, as well as overlap with monitoring, reporting and verification processes under the UNFCCC. The document also presents some broad messages on the subject of "strategic review" expressed during the CCXG Global Forum in March 2015. It is currently unclear what a review or assessment process would comprise, largely because it relates to an overarching process - a cycle of contributions - for which there is not yet an agreed vision or scope.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Energy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Environment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_SOC</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrxg3st7x6d-en</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | ZDB-13-SOC-06131966X |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-26T14:55:54Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (22 p.) 21 x 29.7cm. |
| psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publishDateSearch | 2015 |
| publishDateSort | 2015 |
| publisher | OECD Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | OECD/IEA Climate Change Expert Group Papers |
| spelling | Moarif, Sara VerfasserIn aut Strategic Review: Implications of Proposals to Date for Mitigation Contributions Sara, Moarif = L'Examen Stratégique: conséquences des propositions sur les contributions d'atténuation / Sara, Moarif L'Examen Stratégique: conséquences des propositions sur les contributions d'atténuation Paris OECD Publishing 2015 1 Online-Ressource (22 p.) 21 x 29.7cm. Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier OECD/IEA Climate Change Expert Group Papers no.2015/02 Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) produced a negotiating text in February 2015, which forms the basis for negotiations toward a climate change agreement scheduled for adoption at the 21st Conference of the Parties in December 2015. This document aims to better understand proposals in the Geneva negotiating text related to the notion of strengthening nationally determined contributions (NDCs) over time, contained under the headings "strategic review of implementation", "aggregate ambition assessment" and "enhanced ambition mechanism". This paper focuses on how key elements of these proposals might apply to mitigation contributions or the mitigation component of NDCs: The document examines the main proposals in terms of their relevance, coherence, assumptions, scope, and feasibility, in the context of a cycle of mitigation contributions that seek to become more ambitious over time. It also explores whether the proposals are likely to be effective in achieving their foreseen outcomes, the majority of which involve changes to NDCs. In general, it finds that there is significant overlap between proposals for various "review" processes in different parts of the Geneva negotiating text, as well as overlap with monitoring, reporting and verification processes under the UNFCCC. The document also presents some broad messages on the subject of "strategic review" expressed during the CCXG Global Forum in March 2015. It is currently unclear what a review or assessment process would comprise, largely because it relates to an overarching process - a cycle of contributions - for which there is not yet an agreed vision or scope. Energy Environment FWS01 ZDB-13-SOC FWS_PDA_SOC https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrxg3st7x6d-en Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Moarif, Sara Strategic Review: Implications of Proposals to Date for Mitigation Contributions Energy Environment |
| title | Strategic Review: Implications of Proposals to Date for Mitigation Contributions |
| title_alt | L'Examen Stratégique: conséquences des propositions sur les contributions d'atténuation |
| title_auth | Strategic Review: Implications of Proposals to Date for Mitigation Contributions |
| title_exact_search | Strategic Review: Implications of Proposals to Date for Mitigation Contributions |
| title_full | Strategic Review: Implications of Proposals to Date for Mitigation Contributions Sara, Moarif = L'Examen Stratégique: conséquences des propositions sur les contributions d'atténuation / Sara, Moarif |
| title_fullStr | Strategic Review: Implications of Proposals to Date for Mitigation Contributions Sara, Moarif = L'Examen Stratégique: conséquences des propositions sur les contributions d'atténuation / Sara, Moarif |
| title_full_unstemmed | Strategic Review: Implications of Proposals to Date for Mitigation Contributions Sara, Moarif = L'Examen Stratégique: conséquences des propositions sur les contributions d'atténuation / Sara, Moarif |
| title_short | Strategic Review: Implications of Proposals to Date for Mitigation Contributions |
| title_sort | strategic review implications of proposals to date for mitigation contributions |
| topic | Energy Environment |
| topic_facet | Energy Environment |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrxg3st7x6d-en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT moarifsara strategicreviewimplicationsofproposalstodateformitigationcontributions AT moarifsara lexamenstrategiqueconsequencesdespropositionssurlescontributionsdattenuation |