Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane?:
The rapid emergence of gig economy platforms that use digital technologies to intermediate labour on a per-task basis has triggered an intense policy debate about the economic and social implications. This paper takes stock of the emerging evidence. The results suggest that gig economy platforms...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Weitere Verfasser: | , , |
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2019
|
Schriftenreihe: | OECD Economics Department Working Papers
no.1550 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | The rapid emergence of gig economy platforms that use digital technologies to intermediate labour on a per-task basis has triggered an intense policy debate about the economic and social implications. This paper takes stock of the emerging evidence. The results suggest that gig economy platforms' size remains modest (1-3 per cent of overall employment). Their growth has been most pronounced in a small number of services industries with high shares of own-account workers, suggesting that thus far they have been a substitute for traditional self-employment rather than dependent employment. New evidence provided in this paper is consistent with positive effects of platform growth on overall employment and small negative or insignificant effects on dependent employment and wages. While most empirical studies suggest that platforms are more efficient in matching workers to clients, reductions in barriers to work could offset such productivity-enhancing effects by creating employment opportunities for low-productivity workers. Fully reaping the potential benefits from gig economy platforms while protecting workers and consumers requires adapting existing policy settings in product and labour markets and applying them to traditional businesses and platforms on an equal footing. |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (33 p.) |
DOI: | 10.1787/fdb0570b-en |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000cam a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ZDB-13-SOC-061305529 | ||
003 | DE-627-1 | ||
005 | 20231204121138.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210204s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/fdb0570b-en |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627-1)061305529 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KEP061305529 | ||
035 | |a (FR-PaOEC)fdb0570b-en | ||
035 | |a (EBP)061305529 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a J40 |2 jelc | ||
084 | |a J48 |2 jelc | ||
084 | |a J21 |2 jelc | ||
100 | 1 | |a Schwellnus, Cyrille |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane? |c Cyrille, Schwellnus ... [et al] |
264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2019 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (33 p.) | ||
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a OECD Economics Department Working Papers |v no.1550 | |
520 | |a The rapid emergence of gig economy platforms that use digital technologies to intermediate labour on a per-task basis has triggered an intense policy debate about the economic and social implications. This paper takes stock of the emerging evidence. The results suggest that gig economy platforms' size remains modest (1-3 per cent of overall employment). Their growth has been most pronounced in a small number of services industries with high shares of own-account workers, suggesting that thus far they have been a substitute for traditional self-employment rather than dependent employment. New evidence provided in this paper is consistent with positive effects of platform growth on overall employment and small negative or insignificant effects on dependent employment and wages. While most empirical studies suggest that platforms are more efficient in matching workers to clients, reductions in barriers to work could offset such productivity-enhancing effects by creating employment opportunities for low-productivity workers. Fully reaping the potential benefits from gig economy platforms while protecting workers and consumers requires adapting existing policy settings in product and labour markets and applying them to traditional businesses and platforms on an equal footing. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Economics | |
700 | 1 | |a Geva, Assaf |e MitwirkendeR |4 ctb | |
700 | 1 | |a Pak, Mathilde |e MitwirkendeR |4 ctb | |
700 | 1 | |a Veiel, Rafael |e MitwirkendeR |4 ctb | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |q FWS_PDA_SOC |u https://doi.org/10.1787/fdb0570b-en |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
951 | |a BO | ||
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
049 | |a DE-863 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-13-SOC-061305529 |
---|---|
_version_ | 1816797334889037824 |
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Schwellnus, Cyrille |
author2 | Geva, Assaf Pak, Mathilde Veiel, Rafael |
author2_role | ctb ctb ctb |
author2_variant | a g ag m p mp r v rv |
author_facet | Schwellnus, Cyrille Geva, Assaf Pak, Mathilde Veiel, Rafael |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Schwellnus, Cyrille |
author_variant | c s cs |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | localFWS |
collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
ctrlnum | (DE-627-1)061305529 (DE-599)KEP061305529 (FR-PaOEC)fdb0570b-en (EBP)061305529 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1787/fdb0570b-en |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02529cam a22004092 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-13-SOC-061305529</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627-1</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231204121138.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210204s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/fdb0570b-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627-1)061305529</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KEP061305529</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(FR-PaOEC)fdb0570b-en</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EBP)061305529</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">J40</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">J48</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">J21</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schwellnus, Cyrille</subfield><subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane?</subfield><subfield code="c">Cyrille, Schwellnus ... [et al]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (33 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Economics Department Working Papers</subfield><subfield code="v">no.1550</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The rapid emergence of gig economy platforms that use digital technologies to intermediate labour on a per-task basis has triggered an intense policy debate about the economic and social implications. This paper takes stock of the emerging evidence. The results suggest that gig economy platforms' size remains modest (1-3 per cent of overall employment). Their growth has been most pronounced in a small number of services industries with high shares of own-account workers, suggesting that thus far they have been a substitute for traditional self-employment rather than dependent employment. New evidence provided in this paper is consistent with positive effects of platform growth on overall employment and small negative or insignificant effects on dependent employment and wages. While most empirical studies suggest that platforms are more efficient in matching workers to clients, reductions in barriers to work could offset such productivity-enhancing effects by creating employment opportunities for low-productivity workers. Fully reaping the potential benefits from gig economy platforms while protecting workers and consumers requires adapting existing policy settings in product and labour markets and applying them to traditional businesses and platforms on an equal footing.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Geva, Assaf</subfield><subfield code="e">MitwirkendeR</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pak, Mathilde</subfield><subfield code="e">MitwirkendeR</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Veiel, Rafael</subfield><subfield code="e">MitwirkendeR</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_SOC</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/fdb0570b-en</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | ZDB-13-SOC-061305529 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-11-26T14:55:56Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (33 p.) |
psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
publishDate | 2019 |
publishDateSearch | 2019 |
publishDateSort | 2019 |
publisher | OECD Publishing |
record_format | marc |
series2 | OECD Economics Department Working Papers |
spelling | Schwellnus, Cyrille VerfasserIn aut Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane? Cyrille, Schwellnus ... [et al] Paris OECD Publishing 2019 1 Online-Ressource (33 p.) Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier OECD Economics Department Working Papers no.1550 The rapid emergence of gig economy platforms that use digital technologies to intermediate labour on a per-task basis has triggered an intense policy debate about the economic and social implications. This paper takes stock of the emerging evidence. The results suggest that gig economy platforms' size remains modest (1-3 per cent of overall employment). Their growth has been most pronounced in a small number of services industries with high shares of own-account workers, suggesting that thus far they have been a substitute for traditional self-employment rather than dependent employment. New evidence provided in this paper is consistent with positive effects of platform growth on overall employment and small negative or insignificant effects on dependent employment and wages. While most empirical studies suggest that platforms are more efficient in matching workers to clients, reductions in barriers to work could offset such productivity-enhancing effects by creating employment opportunities for low-productivity workers. Fully reaping the potential benefits from gig economy platforms while protecting workers and consumers requires adapting existing policy settings in product and labour markets and applying them to traditional businesses and platforms on an equal footing. Economics Geva, Assaf MitwirkendeR ctb Pak, Mathilde MitwirkendeR ctb Veiel, Rafael MitwirkendeR ctb FWS01 ZDB-13-SOC FWS_PDA_SOC https://doi.org/10.1787/fdb0570b-en Volltext |
spellingShingle | Schwellnus, Cyrille Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane? Economics |
title | Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane? |
title_auth | Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane? |
title_exact_search | Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane? |
title_full | Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane? Cyrille, Schwellnus ... [et al] |
title_fullStr | Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane? Cyrille, Schwellnus ... [et al] |
title_full_unstemmed | Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane? Cyrille, Schwellnus ... [et al] |
title_short | Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane? |
title_sort | gig economy platforms boon or bane |
topic | Economics |
topic_facet | Economics |
url | https://doi.org/10.1787/fdb0570b-en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schwellnuscyrille gigeconomyplatformsboonorbane AT gevaassaf gigeconomyplatformsboonorbane AT pakmathilde gigeconomyplatformsboonorbane AT veielrafael gigeconomyplatformsboonorbane |