Policy responses to the issue of implicit bank debt guarantees: OECD survey results
Bank regulatory reform is expected to limit the value of implicit bank debt guarantees, even if not plainly targeting such values. According to the responses from 35 countries to a survey on implicit bank debt guarantees, there is however no one specific policy capable of fully eliminating the marke...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Weitere Verfasser: | |
Format: | Elektronisch Artikel |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2014
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | Bank regulatory reform is expected to limit the value of implicit bank debt guarantees, even if not plainly targeting such values. According to the responses from 35 countries to a survey on implicit bank debt guarantees, there is however no one specific policy capable of fully eliminating the market perception that bank debt is "special". A mixture of several different and complementary policy measures is considered more helpful, with recurrent elements including the implementation of internationally agreed capital and liquidity standards, the tightening of micro- and macro-prudential supervision and making bank failure resolution more effective. As regards the overall thrust of bank regulatory reform efforts, most respondents suggest "strengthening banks" and "strengthening the capacity to withdraw the guarantee function" describes best their own efforts. By contrast, labelling certain policy measures as "effectively charging a user fee" is considered problematic as it might make explicit what currently is at most implicit. |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (30 p.) 21 x 28cm. |
DOI: | 10.1787/fmt-2014-5jxzbv3r1x9x |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ZDB-13-SOC-061297674 | ||
003 | DE-627-1 | ||
005 | 20231204121121.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210204s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/fmt-2014-5jxzbv3r1x9x |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627-1)061297674 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KEP061297674 | ||
035 | |a (FR-PaOEC)fmt-2014-5jxzbv3r1x9x | ||
035 | |a (EBP)061297674 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a G28 |2 jelc | ||
084 | |a G21 |2 jelc | ||
100 | 1 | |a Schich, Sebastian |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Policy responses to the issue of implicit bank debt guarantees |b OECD survey results |c Sebastian, Schich and Yesim, Aydin |
264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2014 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (30 p.) |c 21 x 28cm. | ||
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Bank regulatory reform is expected to limit the value of implicit bank debt guarantees, even if not plainly targeting such values. According to the responses from 35 countries to a survey on implicit bank debt guarantees, there is however no one specific policy capable of fully eliminating the market perception that bank debt is "special". A mixture of several different and complementary policy measures is considered more helpful, with recurrent elements including the implementation of internationally agreed capital and liquidity standards, the tightening of micro- and macro-prudential supervision and making bank failure resolution more effective. As regards the overall thrust of bank regulatory reform efforts, most respondents suggest "strengthening banks" and "strengthening the capacity to withdraw the guarantee function" describes best their own efforts. By contrast, labelling certain policy measures as "effectively charging a user fee" is considered problematic as it might make explicit what currently is at most implicit. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Finance and Investment | |
700 | 1 | |a Aydin, Yesim |e MitwirkendeR |4 ctb | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends |g Vol. 2014, no. 1, p. 69-98 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:2014 |g year:2014 |g number:1 |g pages:69-98 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |q FWS_PDA_SOC |u https://doi.org/10.1787/fmt-2014-5jxzbv3r1x9x |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC-article | ||
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
049 | |a DE-863 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-13-SOC-061297674 |
---|---|
_version_ | 1816797352553349120 |
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Schich, Sebastian |
author2 | Aydin, Yesim |
author2_role | ctb |
author2_variant | y a ya |
author_facet | Schich, Sebastian Aydin, Yesim |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Schich, Sebastian |
author_variant | s s ss |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | localFWS |
collection | ZDB-13-SOC ZDB-13-SOC-article |
ctrlnum | (DE-627-1)061297674 (DE-599)KEP061297674 (FR-PaOEC)fmt-2014-5jxzbv3r1x9x (EBP)061297674 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1787/fmt-2014-5jxzbv3r1x9x |
format | Electronic Article |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02386caa a22003972 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-13-SOC-061297674</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627-1</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231204121121.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210204s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/fmt-2014-5jxzbv3r1x9x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627-1)061297674</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KEP061297674</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(FR-PaOEC)fmt-2014-5jxzbv3r1x9x</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EBP)061297674</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">G28</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">G21</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schich, Sebastian</subfield><subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Policy responses to the issue of implicit bank debt guarantees</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD survey results</subfield><subfield code="c">Sebastian, Schich and Yesim, Aydin</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (30 p.)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 x 28cm.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bank regulatory reform is expected to limit the value of implicit bank debt guarantees, even if not plainly targeting such values. According to the responses from 35 countries to a survey on implicit bank debt guarantees, there is however no one specific policy capable of fully eliminating the market perception that bank debt is "special". A mixture of several different and complementary policy measures is considered more helpful, with recurrent elements including the implementation of internationally agreed capital and liquidity standards, the tightening of micro- and macro-prudential supervision and making bank failure resolution more effective. As regards the overall thrust of bank regulatory reform efforts, most respondents suggest "strengthening banks" and "strengthening the capacity to withdraw the guarantee function" describes best their own efforts. By contrast, labelling certain policy measures as "effectively charging a user fee" is considered problematic as it might make explicit what currently is at most implicit.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Finance and Investment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aydin, Yesim</subfield><subfield code="e">MitwirkendeR</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends</subfield><subfield code="g">Vol. 2014, no. 1, p. 69-98</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:69-98</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_SOC</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/fmt-2014-5jxzbv3r1x9x</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC-article</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | ZDB-13-SOC-061297674 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-11-26T14:56:13Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (30 p.) 21 x 28cm. |
psigel | ZDB-13-SOC ZDB-13-SOC-article |
publishDate | 2014 |
publishDateSearch | 2014 |
publishDateSort | 2014 |
publisher | OECD Publishing |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Schich, Sebastian VerfasserIn aut Policy responses to the issue of implicit bank debt guarantees OECD survey results Sebastian, Schich and Yesim, Aydin Paris OECD Publishing 2014 1 Online-Ressource (30 p.) 21 x 28cm. Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Bank regulatory reform is expected to limit the value of implicit bank debt guarantees, even if not plainly targeting such values. According to the responses from 35 countries to a survey on implicit bank debt guarantees, there is however no one specific policy capable of fully eliminating the market perception that bank debt is "special". A mixture of several different and complementary policy measures is considered more helpful, with recurrent elements including the implementation of internationally agreed capital and liquidity standards, the tightening of micro- and macro-prudential supervision and making bank failure resolution more effective. As regards the overall thrust of bank regulatory reform efforts, most respondents suggest "strengthening banks" and "strengthening the capacity to withdraw the guarantee function" describes best their own efforts. By contrast, labelling certain policy measures as "effectively charging a user fee" is considered problematic as it might make explicit what currently is at most implicit. Finance and Investment Aydin, Yesim MitwirkendeR ctb Enthalten in OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends Vol. 2014, no. 1, p. 69-98 volume:2014 year:2014 number:1 pages:69-98 FWS01 ZDB-13-SOC FWS_PDA_SOC https://doi.org/10.1787/fmt-2014-5jxzbv3r1x9x Volltext |
spellingShingle | Schich, Sebastian Policy responses to the issue of implicit bank debt guarantees OECD survey results Finance and Investment |
title | Policy responses to the issue of implicit bank debt guarantees OECD survey results |
title_auth | Policy responses to the issue of implicit bank debt guarantees OECD survey results |
title_exact_search | Policy responses to the issue of implicit bank debt guarantees OECD survey results |
title_full | Policy responses to the issue of implicit bank debt guarantees OECD survey results Sebastian, Schich and Yesim, Aydin |
title_fullStr | Policy responses to the issue of implicit bank debt guarantees OECD survey results Sebastian, Schich and Yesim, Aydin |
title_full_unstemmed | Policy responses to the issue of implicit bank debt guarantees OECD survey results Sebastian, Schich and Yesim, Aydin |
title_short | Policy responses to the issue of implicit bank debt guarantees |
title_sort | policy responses to the issue of implicit bank debt guarantees oecd survey results |
title_sub | OECD survey results |
topic | Finance and Investment |
topic_facet | Finance and Investment |
url | https://doi.org/10.1787/fmt-2014-5jxzbv3r1x9x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schichsebastian policyresponsestotheissueofimplicitbankdebtguaranteesoecdsurveyresults AT aydinyesim policyresponsestotheissueofimplicitbankdebtguaranteesoecdsurveyresults |