Estimating Wider Economic Impacts in Transport Project Prioritisation using Ex-Post Analysis:
Transport project prioritisation and selection processes require consideration of many aspects of costs, intended benefits and other impacts. Economic analysis methods can measure many of those factors, though the analysis methods must be specified in ways that meet the information needs of decision...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2016
|
| Schriftenreihe: | International Transport Forum Discussion Papers
no.2016/03 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | Transport project prioritisation and selection processes require consideration of many aspects of costs, intended benefits and other impacts. Economic analysis methods can measure many of those factors, though the analysis methods must be specified in ways that meet the information needs of decision-makers. This paper examines how benefit-cost analysis, economic impact analysis and multi-criteria analysis approaches have evolved and been applied to address the specific form of governmental decision processes that exist in the U.S. and some other countries. It discusses how "ex-post" case studies and associated statistical studies of have been promoted and utilised to both inform and refine "ex-ante" evaluation methods. It concludes by discussing the advantages, limitations and trade-offs involved in the use of this approach for transport project decision-making. |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (32 p.) |
| DOI: | 10.1787/444ad5c1-en |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-13-SOC-061281417 | ||
| 003 | DE-627-1 | ||
| 005 | 20231204121045.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210204s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/444ad5c1-en |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627-1)061281417 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KEP061281417 | ||
| 035 | |a (FR-PaOEC)444ad5c1-en | ||
| 035 | |a (EBP)061281417 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Weisbrod, Glen E... |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Estimating Wider Economic Impacts in Transport Project Prioritisation using Ex-Post Analysis |c Glen E., Weisbrod |
| 264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2016 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (32 p.) | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a International Transport Forum Discussion Papers |v no.2016/03 | |
| 520 | |a Transport project prioritisation and selection processes require consideration of many aspects of costs, intended benefits and other impacts. Economic analysis methods can measure many of those factors, though the analysis methods must be specified in ways that meet the information needs of decision-makers. This paper examines how benefit-cost analysis, economic impact analysis and multi-criteria analysis approaches have evolved and been applied to address the specific form of governmental decision processes that exist in the U.S. and some other countries. It discusses how "ex-post" case studies and associated statistical studies of have been promoted and utilised to both inform and refine "ex-ante" evaluation methods. It concludes by discussing the advantages, limitations and trade-offs involved in the use of this approach for transport project decision-making. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Transport | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |q FWS_PDA_SOC |u https://doi.org/10.1787/444ad5c1-en |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 951 | |a BO | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 049 | |a DE-863 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-13-SOC-061281417 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1816797338316832768 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Weisbrod, Glen E.. |
| author_facet | Weisbrod, Glen E.. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Weisbrod, Glen E.. |
| author_variant | g e w ge gew |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localFWS |
| collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
| ctrlnum | (DE-627-1)061281417 (DE-599)KEP061281417 (FR-PaOEC)444ad5c1-en (EBP)061281417 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1787/444ad5c1-en |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01941cam a22003372 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-13-SOC-061281417</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627-1</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231204121045.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210204s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/444ad5c1-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627-1)061281417</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KEP061281417</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(FR-PaOEC)444ad5c1-en</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EBP)061281417</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Weisbrod, Glen E...</subfield><subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Estimating Wider Economic Impacts in Transport Project Prioritisation using Ex-Post Analysis</subfield><subfield code="c">Glen E., Weisbrod</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (32 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">International Transport Forum Discussion Papers</subfield><subfield code="v">no.2016/03</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Transport project prioritisation and selection processes require consideration of many aspects of costs, intended benefits and other impacts. Economic analysis methods can measure many of those factors, though the analysis methods must be specified in ways that meet the information needs of decision-makers. This paper examines how benefit-cost analysis, economic impact analysis and multi-criteria analysis approaches have evolved and been applied to address the specific form of governmental decision processes that exist in the U.S. and some other countries. It discusses how "ex-post" case studies and associated statistical studies of have been promoted and utilised to both inform and refine "ex-ante" evaluation methods. It concludes by discussing the advantages, limitations and trade-offs involved in the use of this approach for transport project decision-making.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Transport</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_SOC</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/444ad5c1-en</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | ZDB-13-SOC-061281417 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-26T14:55:59Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (32 p.) |
| psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publishDateSearch | 2016 |
| publishDateSort | 2016 |
| publisher | OECD Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | International Transport Forum Discussion Papers |
| spelling | Weisbrod, Glen E... VerfasserIn aut Estimating Wider Economic Impacts in Transport Project Prioritisation using Ex-Post Analysis Glen E., Weisbrod Paris OECD Publishing 2016 1 Online-Ressource (32 p.) Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier International Transport Forum Discussion Papers no.2016/03 Transport project prioritisation and selection processes require consideration of many aspects of costs, intended benefits and other impacts. Economic analysis methods can measure many of those factors, though the analysis methods must be specified in ways that meet the information needs of decision-makers. This paper examines how benefit-cost analysis, economic impact analysis and multi-criteria analysis approaches have evolved and been applied to address the specific form of governmental decision processes that exist in the U.S. and some other countries. It discusses how "ex-post" case studies and associated statistical studies of have been promoted and utilised to both inform and refine "ex-ante" evaluation methods. It concludes by discussing the advantages, limitations and trade-offs involved in the use of this approach for transport project decision-making. Transport FWS01 ZDB-13-SOC FWS_PDA_SOC https://doi.org/10.1787/444ad5c1-en Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Weisbrod, Glen E.. Estimating Wider Economic Impacts in Transport Project Prioritisation using Ex-Post Analysis Transport |
| title | Estimating Wider Economic Impacts in Transport Project Prioritisation using Ex-Post Analysis |
| title_auth | Estimating Wider Economic Impacts in Transport Project Prioritisation using Ex-Post Analysis |
| title_exact_search | Estimating Wider Economic Impacts in Transport Project Prioritisation using Ex-Post Analysis |
| title_full | Estimating Wider Economic Impacts in Transport Project Prioritisation using Ex-Post Analysis Glen E., Weisbrod |
| title_fullStr | Estimating Wider Economic Impacts in Transport Project Prioritisation using Ex-Post Analysis Glen E., Weisbrod |
| title_full_unstemmed | Estimating Wider Economic Impacts in Transport Project Prioritisation using Ex-Post Analysis Glen E., Weisbrod |
| title_short | Estimating Wider Economic Impacts in Transport Project Prioritisation using Ex-Post Analysis |
| title_sort | estimating wider economic impacts in transport project prioritisation using ex post analysis |
| topic | Transport |
| topic_facet | Transport |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1787/444ad5c1-en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT weisbrodglene estimatingwidereconomicimpactsintransportprojectprioritisationusingexpostanalysis |