Comparing the Robustness of PAYG Pension Schemes:
This paper provides a framework for comparing a defined benefit (DB) and a defined contribution (DC) point schemes, which are both pay-as-you go (PAYG) financed. Two stylised PAYG pension schemes are modelled and simulated to compare their robustness to shocks. The same demographic developments (dis...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2014
|
Schriftenreihe: | OECD Economics Department Working Papers
no.1134 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | This paper provides a framework for comparing a defined benefit (DB) and a defined contribution (DC) point schemes, which are both pay-as-you go (PAYG) financed. Two stylised PAYG pension schemes are modelled and simulated to compare their robustness to shocks. The same demographic developments (distribution of workers by age and revenue and distribution of survival rate by age) are applied to the two schemes. The impacts of different shocks (productivity, migration and longevity) on the two schemes are compared. Different policy reforms (increasing the contribution rate, diminishing the pension benefit, changing the up-rating and increasing the retirement age) to cope with the ageing shock are analysed and compared. |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (31 p.) 21 x 29.7cm. |
DOI: | 10.1787/5jz158w3ghmx-en |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000cam a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ZDB-13-SOC-061238856 | ||
003 | DE-627-1 | ||
005 | 20231204120907.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210204s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/5jz158w3ghmx-en |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627-1)061238856 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KEP061238856 | ||
035 | |a (FR-PaOEC)5jz158w3ghmx-en | ||
035 | |a (EBP)061238856 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a J32 |2 jelc | ||
084 | |a C6 |2 jelc | ||
084 | |a H75 |2 jelc | ||
084 | |a H55 |2 jelc | ||
100 | 1 | |a Fall, Falilou |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparing the Robustness of PAYG Pension Schemes |c Falilou, Fall = Une comparaison de la robustesse des systèmes de retraite en répartition / Falilou, Fall |
246 | 3 | 3 | |a Une comparaison de la robustesse des systèmes de retraite en répartition |
264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2014 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (31 p.) |c 21 x 29.7cm. | ||
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a OECD Economics Department Working Papers |v no.1134 | |
520 | |a This paper provides a framework for comparing a defined benefit (DB) and a defined contribution (DC) point schemes, which are both pay-as-you go (PAYG) financed. Two stylised PAYG pension schemes are modelled and simulated to compare their robustness to shocks. The same demographic developments (distribution of workers by age and revenue and distribution of survival rate by age) are applied to the two schemes. The impacts of different shocks (productivity, migration and longevity) on the two schemes are compared. Different policy reforms (increasing the contribution rate, diminishing the pension benefit, changing the up-rating and increasing the retirement age) to cope with the ageing shock are analysed and compared. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Social Issues/Migration/Health | |
650 | 4 | |a Economics | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |q FWS_PDA_SOC |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5jz158w3ghmx-en |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
951 | |a BO | ||
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
049 | |a DE-863 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-13-SOC-061238856 |
---|---|
_version_ | 1816797344399622144 |
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Fall, Falilou |
author_facet | Fall, Falilou |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Fall, Falilou |
author_variant | f f ff |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | localFWS |
collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
ctrlnum | (DE-627-1)061238856 (DE-599)KEP061238856 (FR-PaOEC)5jz158w3ghmx-en (EBP)061238856 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1787/5jz158w3ghmx-en |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02093cam a22004092 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-13-SOC-061238856</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627-1</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231204120907.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210204s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/5jz158w3ghmx-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627-1)061238856</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KEP061238856</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(FR-PaOEC)5jz158w3ghmx-en</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EBP)061238856</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">J32</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">C6</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">H75</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">H55</subfield><subfield code="2">jelc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fall, Falilou</subfield><subfield code="e">VerfasserIn</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparing the Robustness of PAYG Pension Schemes</subfield><subfield code="c">Falilou, Fall = Une comparaison de la robustesse des systèmes de retraite en répartition / Falilou, Fall</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="3" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Une comparaison de la robustesse des systèmes de retraite en répartition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (31 p.)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 x 29.7cm.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Economics Department Working Papers</subfield><subfield code="v">no.1134</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper provides a framework for comparing a defined benefit (DB) and a defined contribution (DC) point schemes, which are both pay-as-you go (PAYG) financed. Two stylised PAYG pension schemes are modelled and simulated to compare their robustness to shocks. The same demographic developments (distribution of workers by age and revenue and distribution of survival rate by age) are applied to the two schemes. The impacts of different shocks (productivity, migration and longevity) on the two schemes are compared. Different policy reforms (increasing the contribution rate, diminishing the pension benefit, changing the up-rating and increasing the retirement age) to cope with the ageing shock are analysed and compared.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social Issues/Migration/Health</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_SOC</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5jz158w3ghmx-en</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | ZDB-13-SOC-061238856 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-11-26T14:56:05Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (31 p.) 21 x 29.7cm. |
psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
publishDate | 2014 |
publishDateSearch | 2014 |
publishDateSort | 2014 |
publisher | OECD Publishing |
record_format | marc |
series2 | OECD Economics Department Working Papers |
spelling | Fall, Falilou VerfasserIn aut Comparing the Robustness of PAYG Pension Schemes Falilou, Fall = Une comparaison de la robustesse des systèmes de retraite en répartition / Falilou, Fall Une comparaison de la robustesse des systèmes de retraite en répartition Paris OECD Publishing 2014 1 Online-Ressource (31 p.) 21 x 29.7cm. Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier OECD Economics Department Working Papers no.1134 This paper provides a framework for comparing a defined benefit (DB) and a defined contribution (DC) point schemes, which are both pay-as-you go (PAYG) financed. Two stylised PAYG pension schemes are modelled and simulated to compare their robustness to shocks. The same demographic developments (distribution of workers by age and revenue and distribution of survival rate by age) are applied to the two schemes. The impacts of different shocks (productivity, migration and longevity) on the two schemes are compared. Different policy reforms (increasing the contribution rate, diminishing the pension benefit, changing the up-rating and increasing the retirement age) to cope with the ageing shock are analysed and compared. Social Issues/Migration/Health Economics FWS01 ZDB-13-SOC FWS_PDA_SOC https://doi.org/10.1787/5jz158w3ghmx-en Volltext |
spellingShingle | Fall, Falilou Comparing the Robustness of PAYG Pension Schemes Social Issues/Migration/Health Economics |
title | Comparing the Robustness of PAYG Pension Schemes |
title_alt | Une comparaison de la robustesse des systèmes de retraite en répartition |
title_auth | Comparing the Robustness of PAYG Pension Schemes |
title_exact_search | Comparing the Robustness of PAYG Pension Schemes |
title_full | Comparing the Robustness of PAYG Pension Schemes Falilou, Fall = Une comparaison de la robustesse des systèmes de retraite en répartition / Falilou, Fall |
title_fullStr | Comparing the Robustness of PAYG Pension Schemes Falilou, Fall = Une comparaison de la robustesse des systèmes de retraite en répartition / Falilou, Fall |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the Robustness of PAYG Pension Schemes Falilou, Fall = Une comparaison de la robustesse des systèmes de retraite en répartition / Falilou, Fall |
title_short | Comparing the Robustness of PAYG Pension Schemes |
title_sort | comparing the robustness of payg pension schemes |
topic | Social Issues/Migration/Health Economics |
topic_facet | Social Issues/Migration/Health Economics |
url | https://doi.org/10.1787/5jz158w3ghmx-en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fallfalilou comparingtherobustnessofpaygpensionschemes AT fallfalilou unecomparaisondelarobustessedessystemesderetraiteenrepartition |