State Power in Land Reform: Barriers to Implementation in the Western and Northern Cape, South Africa, 1990-2006
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Oxford
African Minds
2025
|
| Edition: | 1st ed |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | DE-2070s |
| Item Description: | Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources |
| Physical Description: | 1 Online-Ressource (168 Seiten) |
| ISBN: | 9781928502876 |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV050174648 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 250219s2025 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781928502876 |9 978-1-928502-87-6 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-30-PQE)EBC31887693 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-30-PAD)EBC31887693 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL31887693 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1493001159 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV050174648 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-2070s | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 338.1868 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Gran, Thorvald |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a State Power in Land Reform |b Barriers to Implementation in the Western and Northern Cape, South Africa, 1990-2006 |
| 250 | |a 1st ed | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford |b African Minds |c 2025 | |
| 264 | 4 | |c ©2024 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (168 Seiten) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a Front cover -- Title page -- Copyright -- Table of Contents -- List of tables -- List of figures -- Works on land reform previously published by this author -- Foreword -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Problem and research question -- Five background processes -- 1.2 Searle's (2001) theory of rationality: Disjunctions and reflection rooms -- 1.3 Mamdani's (1996) theory of communal land and political power -- 1.4 Seligman (1997): Trust assigns freedom and authority to another -- Figure 1: Trust and its transformations -- Figure 2: The land state: The institutions included in the study -- 1.5 The Hupe (2011) theory of incongruent implementation -- 1.6 Norman Long (1989, 2001) on disjunctions between persons, institutions and systems -- 1.7 Fields of study, selected institutions -- 1.8 The empirical investigations -- 1.9 World Bank economists Binswanger and Deininger (1996) on organization in agriculture -- 1.10 Farms: The national picture -- Table 1: Farms in South Africa -- Table 2: Ownership formats in Western Cape agriculture -- Table 3: Land reform projects as of 1999 -- 1.11 Rural imbalances confronting the ANC Government -- 1.11.1 Poverty -- 1.11.2 Livelihoods -- Table 4: Forms of livelihood in rural parts of South Africa -- 1.11.3 Water -- 2 ANC land policy 1990-2005: A critique -- 2.1 The Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP) -- 2.2 The Growth, Employment and Redistribution (GEAR) program -- 2.3 The Land Redistribution for Agricultural Development (LRAD) program -- 2.4 All LRAD eggs in one basket? -- 3 2019 Government-appointed panel on land reform: A critique -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 Land is not a commodity -- 3.3 Land reform has not worked -- 3.4 An anachronistic model -- 3.5 African communalism: In a new presence? -- 3.6 Private ownership: A basic value also into the future -- 3.7 Life unfolds locally -- 3.8 Municipal organization | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 3.9 Democracy at all levels -- 3.10 People are subjects -- 3.11 Panel conclusion -- 4 Powerful inherited structures -- 4.1 European mission stations -- 4.2 Myths -- 4.3 Communal land -- 4.4 Urban-rural relations -- 4.5 Land productivity -- 4.6 Bricolage -- 4.7 Subsistence production in capitalism -- 5 The ANC's burden of state organization -- 5.1 Nationalisations -- 5.2 Land under chiefs -- 5.3 Varying views on land reform -- 5.4 The Landless People's Movement -- 5.5 The ANC's state organization dilemma -- 5.6 Struggles of state in ANC -- 5.7 Ben Cousins (PLAAS): Stages of land reform 1994-2016 -- 5.8 Overall evaluation -- 5.9 Costs of land reform -- 5.10 The relevance of the South Africa case -- 6 The land state in the western region of South Africa -- 6.1 Land reform on the ground -- 6.2 Livelihood improvements -- 6.3 Study group (SG): The public land elite -- 6.4 The politicians -- Table 5: Party affiliations in legislatures and in the study group -- Table 6: ANC and DA in legislatures and in the study group -- 6.5 Party leadership -- Table 7: Location of politicians in the party hierarchy -- 6.6 Structures in the land state -- 6.6.1 Gender representation among the politicians -- 6.6.2 The bureaucrats -- 6.6.3 The provincial land states -- Table 8: Age distribution in study group from each institution -- 6.6.4 Education -- Table 9: Levels of education in the study group, specified for each institution -- 6.6.5 Study group lifetime in rural areas -- 6.6.6 Occupation before entering public service -- 6.7 Agents -- 6.7.1 Views on land reform from within the state apparatus -- 6.7.2 The importance of land reform according to provincial land bureaucrats -- 6.7.3 Bureaucrats' engagement in land reform -- Table 10: Bureaucrats' votes for government assigning high importance to land reform -- The weak link in land reform | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 6.7.4 The importance of land reform according to politicians -- 6.7.5 Politicians' views on relations between political parties -- Table 11: The other main party in land reform -- Table 12: The other main party in national politics -- Table 13: The other main party in provincial politics -- 6.7.6 The smaller parties -- 6.7.7 The political priority of land reform -- Table 14: The national government's engagement in land reform -- 6.7.8 Political democracy -- 6.8 Politicians' evaluations of the agricultural bureaucracy -- 6.8.1 Evaluations of the Department of Land Affairs (DLA) -- Table 15: Politicians' evaluations of DLA -- 6.8.2 Evaluations of the Departments of Agriculture -- 6.8.3 Intergovernmental relations between the DLA and DoA -- 6.8.4 Gendered opinions -- 6.9 Democracy in place: The legislatures are more divided on land reform than the bureaucracy -- 6.10 Obligations on land in the Department of Agriculture at Elsenburg -- 6.10.1 Apartheid in Western Cape agriculture -- 6.10.2 Elsenburg in commercial agriculture -- 6.10.3 Professional competence in the Department -- 6.10.4 Privileged white commercial agriculture -- 6.10.5 The dismantling of the apartheid state in agriculture -- 6.10.6 Elsenburg's organization -- 6.10.7 Permanency and change in the Elsenburg structure -- 6.10.8 Conceptions of authority among land bureaucrats at Elsenburg -- 6.10.9 The budget -- 6.10.10 The Extension Services Directorate -- 6.10.11 Education and training -- 6.10.12 Infrastructural support to small-scale producers -- 6.11 The new Elsenburg (1997): Miniscule but creative land reform within commercial agriculture -- 6.12 Weak support for reorientation -- 7 The power of a transformed bureaucracy in land reform: Professionalism in the public sector -- 7.1 Democratisation of the land administration -- 7.2 Administration of water -- 7.3 The Water Research Commission | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 7.4 The development perspective of the Agricultural Research Council -- 7.5 The land and water management regimes -- 7.6 The land administration: Devalued and fragmented -- 7.7 The land state's conceptions of state authority, markets and stakeholders in land -- Table 16: The land elite's ranking of supportive stakeholders -- Table 17: Ranking on support to stakeholders (column II of Table 16 ordered) -- 7.7.1 Passive and destructive stakeholders -- Table 18: Destructive and passive stakeholders -- 7.7.2 The way forward: Land reform obligations -- Table 19: How to improve land reform: Distributions on first, second and third priorities -- 7.7.3 Four reality models -- Table 20: Reality models drawn from first priority votes on improvement strategy (from Table 19) -- Table 21: Reality models within 1, 2 and 3 priority votes (from Table 19) -- 7.7.4 Reality models within the institutions -- Table 22: Total votes for each model across institutions in the two provinces -- 7.8 The land state: Competent, but poorly integrated and distrusting of stakeholders -- 8 Land reform in Paulshoek and Saron -- 8.1 Land politics in Paulshoek -- 8.2 Public management in Namaqualand -- 8.3 Saron: Survival and commercial pressure on land -- 8.4 The Del Monte fruit company -- 9 Conclusion: The barriers to land reform in the state: Lack of municipal democracy and administrative competence -- Figure 3: Three related institutional fields -- 9.1 Findings -- 9.2 The welfare state -- 9.3 Emerging black farmers -- 9.4 The ANC as a rational actor: Making good on its obligations -- 10 References -- Back cover | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Agriculture and state-South Africa | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Land reform-South Africa | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Land reform beneficiaries-South Africa | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Gran, Thorvald |t State Power in Land Reform |d Oxford : African Minds,c2025 |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035510528 | |
| 966 | e | |u https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/hwr/detail.action?docID=31887693 |l DE-2070s |p ZDB-30-PQE |q HWR_PDA_PQE |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1824508703795052546 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Gran, Thorvald |
| author_facet | Gran, Thorvald |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Gran, Thorvald |
| author_variant | t g tg |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV050174648 |
| contents | Front cover -- Title page -- Copyright -- Table of Contents -- List of tables -- List of figures -- Works on land reform previously published by this author -- Foreword -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Problem and research question -- Five background processes -- 1.2 Searle's (2001) theory of rationality: Disjunctions and reflection rooms -- 1.3 Mamdani's (1996) theory of communal land and political power -- 1.4 Seligman (1997): Trust assigns freedom and authority to another -- Figure 1: Trust and its transformations -- Figure 2: The land state: The institutions included in the study -- 1.5 The Hupe (2011) theory of incongruent implementation -- 1.6 Norman Long (1989, 2001) on disjunctions between persons, institutions and systems -- 1.7 Fields of study, selected institutions -- 1.8 The empirical investigations -- 1.9 World Bank economists Binswanger and Deininger (1996) on organization in agriculture -- 1.10 Farms: The national picture -- Table 1: Farms in South Africa -- Table 2: Ownership formats in Western Cape agriculture -- Table 3: Land reform projects as of 1999 -- 1.11 Rural imbalances confronting the ANC Government -- 1.11.1 Poverty -- 1.11.2 Livelihoods -- Table 4: Forms of livelihood in rural parts of South Africa -- 1.11.3 Water -- 2 ANC land policy 1990-2005: A critique -- 2.1 The Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP) -- 2.2 The Growth, Employment and Redistribution (GEAR) program -- 2.3 The Land Redistribution for Agricultural Development (LRAD) program -- 2.4 All LRAD eggs in one basket? -- 3 2019 Government-appointed panel on land reform: A critique -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 Land is not a commodity -- 3.3 Land reform has not worked -- 3.4 An anachronistic model -- 3.5 African communalism: In a new presence? -- 3.6 Private ownership: A basic value also into the future -- 3.7 Life unfolds locally -- 3.8 Municipal organization 3.9 Democracy at all levels -- 3.10 People are subjects -- 3.11 Panel conclusion -- 4 Powerful inherited structures -- 4.1 European mission stations -- 4.2 Myths -- 4.3 Communal land -- 4.4 Urban-rural relations -- 4.5 Land productivity -- 4.6 Bricolage -- 4.7 Subsistence production in capitalism -- 5 The ANC's burden of state organization -- 5.1 Nationalisations -- 5.2 Land under chiefs -- 5.3 Varying views on land reform -- 5.4 The Landless People's Movement -- 5.5 The ANC's state organization dilemma -- 5.6 Struggles of state in ANC -- 5.7 Ben Cousins (PLAAS): Stages of land reform 1994-2016 -- 5.8 Overall evaluation -- 5.9 Costs of land reform -- 5.10 The relevance of the South Africa case -- 6 The land state in the western region of South Africa -- 6.1 Land reform on the ground -- 6.2 Livelihood improvements -- 6.3 Study group (SG): The public land elite -- 6.4 The politicians -- Table 5: Party affiliations in legislatures and in the study group -- Table 6: ANC and DA in legislatures and in the study group -- 6.5 Party leadership -- Table 7: Location of politicians in the party hierarchy -- 6.6 Structures in the land state -- 6.6.1 Gender representation among the politicians -- 6.6.2 The bureaucrats -- 6.6.3 The provincial land states -- Table 8: Age distribution in study group from each institution -- 6.6.4 Education -- Table 9: Levels of education in the study group, specified for each institution -- 6.6.5 Study group lifetime in rural areas -- 6.6.6 Occupation before entering public service -- 6.7 Agents -- 6.7.1 Views on land reform from within the state apparatus -- 6.7.2 The importance of land reform according to provincial land bureaucrats -- 6.7.3 Bureaucrats' engagement in land reform -- Table 10: Bureaucrats' votes for government assigning high importance to land reform -- The weak link in land reform 6.7.4 The importance of land reform according to politicians -- 6.7.5 Politicians' views on relations between political parties -- Table 11: The other main party in land reform -- Table 12: The other main party in national politics -- Table 13: The other main party in provincial politics -- 6.7.6 The smaller parties -- 6.7.7 The political priority of land reform -- Table 14: The national government's engagement in land reform -- 6.7.8 Political democracy -- 6.8 Politicians' evaluations of the agricultural bureaucracy -- 6.8.1 Evaluations of the Department of Land Affairs (DLA) -- Table 15: Politicians' evaluations of DLA -- 6.8.2 Evaluations of the Departments of Agriculture -- 6.8.3 Intergovernmental relations between the DLA and DoA -- 6.8.4 Gendered opinions -- 6.9 Democracy in place: The legislatures are more divided on land reform than the bureaucracy -- 6.10 Obligations on land in the Department of Agriculture at Elsenburg -- 6.10.1 Apartheid in Western Cape agriculture -- 6.10.2 Elsenburg in commercial agriculture -- 6.10.3 Professional competence in the Department -- 6.10.4 Privileged white commercial agriculture -- 6.10.5 The dismantling of the apartheid state in agriculture -- 6.10.6 Elsenburg's organization -- 6.10.7 Permanency and change in the Elsenburg structure -- 6.10.8 Conceptions of authority among land bureaucrats at Elsenburg -- 6.10.9 The budget -- 6.10.10 The Extension Services Directorate -- 6.10.11 Education and training -- 6.10.12 Infrastructural support to small-scale producers -- 6.11 The new Elsenburg (1997): Miniscule but creative land reform within commercial agriculture -- 6.12 Weak support for reorientation -- 7 The power of a transformed bureaucracy in land reform: Professionalism in the public sector -- 7.1 Democratisation of the land administration -- 7.2 Administration of water -- 7.3 The Water Research Commission 7.4 The development perspective of the Agricultural Research Council -- 7.5 The land and water management regimes -- 7.6 The land administration: Devalued and fragmented -- 7.7 The land state's conceptions of state authority, markets and stakeholders in land -- Table 16: The land elite's ranking of supportive stakeholders -- Table 17: Ranking on support to stakeholders (column II of Table 16 ordered) -- 7.7.1 Passive and destructive stakeholders -- Table 18: Destructive and passive stakeholders -- 7.7.2 The way forward: Land reform obligations -- Table 19: How to improve land reform: Distributions on first, second and third priorities -- 7.7.3 Four reality models -- Table 20: Reality models drawn from first priority votes on improvement strategy (from Table 19) -- Table 21: Reality models within 1, 2 and 3 priority votes (from Table 19) -- 7.7.4 Reality models within the institutions -- Table 22: Total votes for each model across institutions in the two provinces -- 7.8 The land state: Competent, but poorly integrated and distrusting of stakeholders -- 8 Land reform in Paulshoek and Saron -- 8.1 Land politics in Paulshoek -- 8.2 Public management in Namaqualand -- 8.3 Saron: Survival and commercial pressure on land -- 8.4 The Del Monte fruit company -- 9 Conclusion: The barriers to land reform in the state: Lack of municipal democracy and administrative competence -- Figure 3: Three related institutional fields -- 9.1 Findings -- 9.2 The welfare state -- 9.3 Emerging black farmers -- 9.4 The ANC as a rational actor: Making good on its obligations -- 10 References -- Back cover |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-30-PQE)EBC31887693 (ZDB-30-PAD)EBC31887693 (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL31887693 (OCoLC)1493001159 (DE-599)BVBBV050174648 |
| dewey-full | 338.1868 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 338 - Production |
| dewey-raw | 338.1868 |
| dewey-search | 338.1868 |
| dewey-sort | 3338.1868 |
| dewey-tens | 330 - Economics |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| edition | 1st ed |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV050174648</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">250219s2025 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781928502876</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-928502-87-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-30-PQE)EBC31887693</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-30-PAD)EBC31887693</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-89-EBL)EBL31887693</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1493001159</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV050174648</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-2070s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">338.1868</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gran, Thorvald</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">State Power in Land Reform</subfield><subfield code="b">Barriers to Implementation in the Western and Northern Cape, South Africa, 1990-2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1st ed</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford</subfield><subfield code="b">African Minds</subfield><subfield code="c">2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (168 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Front cover -- Title page -- Copyright -- Table of Contents -- List of tables -- List of figures -- Works on land reform previously published by this author -- Foreword -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Problem and research question -- Five background processes -- 1.2 Searle's (2001) theory of rationality: Disjunctions and reflection rooms -- 1.3 Mamdani's (1996) theory of communal land and political power -- 1.4 Seligman (1997): Trust assigns freedom and authority to another -- Figure 1: Trust and its transformations -- Figure 2: The land state: The institutions included in the study -- 1.5 The Hupe (2011) theory of incongruent implementation -- 1.6 Norman Long (1989, 2001) on disjunctions between persons, institutions and systems -- 1.7 Fields of study, selected institutions -- 1.8 The empirical investigations -- 1.9 World Bank economists Binswanger and Deininger (1996) on organization in agriculture -- 1.10 Farms: The national picture -- Table 1: Farms in South Africa -- Table 2: Ownership formats in Western Cape agriculture -- Table 3: Land reform projects as of 1999 -- 1.11 Rural imbalances confronting the ANC Government -- 1.11.1 Poverty -- 1.11.2 Livelihoods -- Table 4: Forms of livelihood in rural parts of South Africa -- 1.11.3 Water -- 2 ANC land policy 1990-2005: A critique -- 2.1 The Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP) -- 2.2 The Growth, Employment and Redistribution (GEAR) program -- 2.3 The Land Redistribution for Agricultural Development (LRAD) program -- 2.4 All LRAD eggs in one basket? -- 3 2019 Government-appointed panel on land reform: A critique -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 Land is not a commodity -- 3.3 Land reform has not worked -- 3.4 An anachronistic model -- 3.5 African communalism: In a new presence? -- 3.6 Private ownership: A basic value also into the future -- 3.7 Life unfolds locally -- 3.8 Municipal organization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3.9 Democracy at all levels -- 3.10 People are subjects -- 3.11 Panel conclusion -- 4 Powerful inherited structures -- 4.1 European mission stations -- 4.2 Myths -- 4.3 Communal land -- 4.4 Urban-rural relations -- 4.5 Land productivity -- 4.6 Bricolage -- 4.7 Subsistence production in capitalism -- 5 The ANC's burden of state organization -- 5.1 Nationalisations -- 5.2 Land under chiefs -- 5.3 Varying views on land reform -- 5.4 The Landless People's Movement -- 5.5 The ANC's state organization dilemma -- 5.6 Struggles of state in ANC -- 5.7 Ben Cousins (PLAAS): Stages of land reform 1994-2016 -- 5.8 Overall evaluation -- 5.9 Costs of land reform -- 5.10 The relevance of the South Africa case -- 6 The land state in the western region of South Africa -- 6.1 Land reform on the ground -- 6.2 Livelihood improvements -- 6.3 Study group (SG): The public land elite -- 6.4 The politicians -- Table 5: Party affiliations in legislatures and in the study group -- Table 6: ANC and DA in legislatures and in the study group -- 6.5 Party leadership -- Table 7: Location of politicians in the party hierarchy -- 6.6 Structures in the land state -- 6.6.1 Gender representation among the politicians -- 6.6.2 The bureaucrats -- 6.6.3 The provincial land states -- Table 8: Age distribution in study group from each institution -- 6.6.4 Education -- Table 9: Levels of education in the study group, specified for each institution -- 6.6.5 Study group lifetime in rural areas -- 6.6.6 Occupation before entering public service -- 6.7 Agents -- 6.7.1 Views on land reform from within the state apparatus -- 6.7.2 The importance of land reform according to provincial land bureaucrats -- 6.7.3 Bureaucrats' engagement in land reform -- Table 10: Bureaucrats' votes for government assigning high importance to land reform -- The weak link in land reform</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6.7.4 The importance of land reform according to politicians -- 6.7.5 Politicians' views on relations between political parties -- Table 11: The other main party in land reform -- Table 12: The other main party in national politics -- Table 13: The other main party in provincial politics -- 6.7.6 The smaller parties -- 6.7.7 The political priority of land reform -- Table 14: The national government's engagement in land reform -- 6.7.8 Political democracy -- 6.8 Politicians' evaluations of the agricultural bureaucracy -- 6.8.1 Evaluations of the Department of Land Affairs (DLA) -- Table 15: Politicians' evaluations of DLA -- 6.8.2 Evaluations of the Departments of Agriculture -- 6.8.3 Intergovernmental relations between the DLA and DoA -- 6.8.4 Gendered opinions -- 6.9 Democracy in place: The legislatures are more divided on land reform than the bureaucracy -- 6.10 Obligations on land in the Department of Agriculture at Elsenburg -- 6.10.1 Apartheid in Western Cape agriculture -- 6.10.2 Elsenburg in commercial agriculture -- 6.10.3 Professional competence in the Department -- 6.10.4 Privileged white commercial agriculture -- 6.10.5 The dismantling of the apartheid state in agriculture -- 6.10.6 Elsenburg's organization -- 6.10.7 Permanency and change in the Elsenburg structure -- 6.10.8 Conceptions of authority among land bureaucrats at Elsenburg -- 6.10.9 The budget -- 6.10.10 The Extension Services Directorate -- 6.10.11 Education and training -- 6.10.12 Infrastructural support to small-scale producers -- 6.11 The new Elsenburg (1997): Miniscule but creative land reform within commercial agriculture -- 6.12 Weak support for reorientation -- 7 The power of a transformed bureaucracy in land reform: Professionalism in the public sector -- 7.1 Democratisation of the land administration -- 7.2 Administration of water -- 7.3 The Water Research Commission</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7.4 The development perspective of the Agricultural Research Council -- 7.5 The land and water management regimes -- 7.6 The land administration: Devalued and fragmented -- 7.7 The land state's conceptions of state authority, markets and stakeholders in land -- Table 16: The land elite's ranking of supportive stakeholders -- Table 17: Ranking on support to stakeholders (column II of Table 16 ordered) -- 7.7.1 Passive and destructive stakeholders -- Table 18: Destructive and passive stakeholders -- 7.7.2 The way forward: Land reform obligations -- Table 19: How to improve land reform: Distributions on first, second and third priorities -- 7.7.3 Four reality models -- Table 20: Reality models drawn from first priority votes on improvement strategy (from Table 19) -- Table 21: Reality models within 1, 2 and 3 priority votes (from Table 19) -- 7.7.4 Reality models within the institutions -- Table 22: Total votes for each model across institutions in the two provinces -- 7.8 The land state: Competent, but poorly integrated and distrusting of stakeholders -- 8 Land reform in Paulshoek and Saron -- 8.1 Land politics in Paulshoek -- 8.2 Public management in Namaqualand -- 8.3 Saron: Survival and commercial pressure on land -- 8.4 The Del Monte fruit company -- 9 Conclusion: The barriers to land reform in the state: Lack of municipal democracy and administrative competence -- Figure 3: Three related institutional fields -- 9.1 Findings -- 9.2 The welfare state -- 9.3 Emerging black farmers -- 9.4 The ANC as a rational actor: Making good on its obligations -- 10 References -- Back cover</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Agriculture and state-South Africa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Land reform-South Africa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Land reform beneficiaries-South Africa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Gran, Thorvald</subfield><subfield code="t">State Power in Land Reform</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford : African Minds,c2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035510528</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/hwr/detail.action?docID=31887693</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-2070s</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-30-PQE</subfield><subfield code="q">HWR_PDA_PQE</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV050174648 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2025-02-19T17:44:50Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781928502876 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035510528 |
| oclc_num | 1493001159 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-2070s |
| owner_facet | DE-2070s |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (168 Seiten) |
| psigel | ZDB-30-PQE HWR_PDA_PQE |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateSearch | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | African Minds |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Gran, Thorvald Verfasser aut State Power in Land Reform Barriers to Implementation in the Western and Northern Cape, South Africa, 1990-2006 1st ed Oxford African Minds 2025 ©2024 1 Online-Ressource (168 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources Front cover -- Title page -- Copyright -- Table of Contents -- List of tables -- List of figures -- Works on land reform previously published by this author -- Foreword -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Problem and research question -- Five background processes -- 1.2 Searle's (2001) theory of rationality: Disjunctions and reflection rooms -- 1.3 Mamdani's (1996) theory of communal land and political power -- 1.4 Seligman (1997): Trust assigns freedom and authority to another -- Figure 1: Trust and its transformations -- Figure 2: The land state: The institutions included in the study -- 1.5 The Hupe (2011) theory of incongruent implementation -- 1.6 Norman Long (1989, 2001) on disjunctions between persons, institutions and systems -- 1.7 Fields of study, selected institutions -- 1.8 The empirical investigations -- 1.9 World Bank economists Binswanger and Deininger (1996) on organization in agriculture -- 1.10 Farms: The national picture -- Table 1: Farms in South Africa -- Table 2: Ownership formats in Western Cape agriculture -- Table 3: Land reform projects as of 1999 -- 1.11 Rural imbalances confronting the ANC Government -- 1.11.1 Poverty -- 1.11.2 Livelihoods -- Table 4: Forms of livelihood in rural parts of South Africa -- 1.11.3 Water -- 2 ANC land policy 1990-2005: A critique -- 2.1 The Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP) -- 2.2 The Growth, Employment and Redistribution (GEAR) program -- 2.3 The Land Redistribution for Agricultural Development (LRAD) program -- 2.4 All LRAD eggs in one basket? -- 3 2019 Government-appointed panel on land reform: A critique -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 Land is not a commodity -- 3.3 Land reform has not worked -- 3.4 An anachronistic model -- 3.5 African communalism: In a new presence? -- 3.6 Private ownership: A basic value also into the future -- 3.7 Life unfolds locally -- 3.8 Municipal organization 3.9 Democracy at all levels -- 3.10 People are subjects -- 3.11 Panel conclusion -- 4 Powerful inherited structures -- 4.1 European mission stations -- 4.2 Myths -- 4.3 Communal land -- 4.4 Urban-rural relations -- 4.5 Land productivity -- 4.6 Bricolage -- 4.7 Subsistence production in capitalism -- 5 The ANC's burden of state organization -- 5.1 Nationalisations -- 5.2 Land under chiefs -- 5.3 Varying views on land reform -- 5.4 The Landless People's Movement -- 5.5 The ANC's state organization dilemma -- 5.6 Struggles of state in ANC -- 5.7 Ben Cousins (PLAAS): Stages of land reform 1994-2016 -- 5.8 Overall evaluation -- 5.9 Costs of land reform -- 5.10 The relevance of the South Africa case -- 6 The land state in the western region of South Africa -- 6.1 Land reform on the ground -- 6.2 Livelihood improvements -- 6.3 Study group (SG): The public land elite -- 6.4 The politicians -- Table 5: Party affiliations in legislatures and in the study group -- Table 6: ANC and DA in legislatures and in the study group -- 6.5 Party leadership -- Table 7: Location of politicians in the party hierarchy -- 6.6 Structures in the land state -- 6.6.1 Gender representation among the politicians -- 6.6.2 The bureaucrats -- 6.6.3 The provincial land states -- Table 8: Age distribution in study group from each institution -- 6.6.4 Education -- Table 9: Levels of education in the study group, specified for each institution -- 6.6.5 Study group lifetime in rural areas -- 6.6.6 Occupation before entering public service -- 6.7 Agents -- 6.7.1 Views on land reform from within the state apparatus -- 6.7.2 The importance of land reform according to provincial land bureaucrats -- 6.7.3 Bureaucrats' engagement in land reform -- Table 10: Bureaucrats' votes for government assigning high importance to land reform -- The weak link in land reform 6.7.4 The importance of land reform according to politicians -- 6.7.5 Politicians' views on relations between political parties -- Table 11: The other main party in land reform -- Table 12: The other main party in national politics -- Table 13: The other main party in provincial politics -- 6.7.6 The smaller parties -- 6.7.7 The political priority of land reform -- Table 14: The national government's engagement in land reform -- 6.7.8 Political democracy -- 6.8 Politicians' evaluations of the agricultural bureaucracy -- 6.8.1 Evaluations of the Department of Land Affairs (DLA) -- Table 15: Politicians' evaluations of DLA -- 6.8.2 Evaluations of the Departments of Agriculture -- 6.8.3 Intergovernmental relations between the DLA and DoA -- 6.8.4 Gendered opinions -- 6.9 Democracy in place: The legislatures are more divided on land reform than the bureaucracy -- 6.10 Obligations on land in the Department of Agriculture at Elsenburg -- 6.10.1 Apartheid in Western Cape agriculture -- 6.10.2 Elsenburg in commercial agriculture -- 6.10.3 Professional competence in the Department -- 6.10.4 Privileged white commercial agriculture -- 6.10.5 The dismantling of the apartheid state in agriculture -- 6.10.6 Elsenburg's organization -- 6.10.7 Permanency and change in the Elsenburg structure -- 6.10.8 Conceptions of authority among land bureaucrats at Elsenburg -- 6.10.9 The budget -- 6.10.10 The Extension Services Directorate -- 6.10.11 Education and training -- 6.10.12 Infrastructural support to small-scale producers -- 6.11 The new Elsenburg (1997): Miniscule but creative land reform within commercial agriculture -- 6.12 Weak support for reorientation -- 7 The power of a transformed bureaucracy in land reform: Professionalism in the public sector -- 7.1 Democratisation of the land administration -- 7.2 Administration of water -- 7.3 The Water Research Commission 7.4 The development perspective of the Agricultural Research Council -- 7.5 The land and water management regimes -- 7.6 The land administration: Devalued and fragmented -- 7.7 The land state's conceptions of state authority, markets and stakeholders in land -- Table 16: The land elite's ranking of supportive stakeholders -- Table 17: Ranking on support to stakeholders (column II of Table 16 ordered) -- 7.7.1 Passive and destructive stakeholders -- Table 18: Destructive and passive stakeholders -- 7.7.2 The way forward: Land reform obligations -- Table 19: How to improve land reform: Distributions on first, second and third priorities -- 7.7.3 Four reality models -- Table 20: Reality models drawn from first priority votes on improvement strategy (from Table 19) -- Table 21: Reality models within 1, 2 and 3 priority votes (from Table 19) -- 7.7.4 Reality models within the institutions -- Table 22: Total votes for each model across institutions in the two provinces -- 7.8 The land state: Competent, but poorly integrated and distrusting of stakeholders -- 8 Land reform in Paulshoek and Saron -- 8.1 Land politics in Paulshoek -- 8.2 Public management in Namaqualand -- 8.3 Saron: Survival and commercial pressure on land -- 8.4 The Del Monte fruit company -- 9 Conclusion: The barriers to land reform in the state: Lack of municipal democracy and administrative competence -- Figure 3: Three related institutional fields -- 9.1 Findings -- 9.2 The welfare state -- 9.3 Emerging black farmers -- 9.4 The ANC as a rational actor: Making good on its obligations -- 10 References -- Back cover Agriculture and state-South Africa Land reform-South Africa Land reform beneficiaries-South Africa Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Gran, Thorvald State Power in Land Reform Oxford : African Minds,c2025 |
| spellingShingle | Gran, Thorvald State Power in Land Reform Barriers to Implementation in the Western and Northern Cape, South Africa, 1990-2006 Front cover -- Title page -- Copyright -- Table of Contents -- List of tables -- List of figures -- Works on land reform previously published by this author -- Foreword -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Problem and research question -- Five background processes -- 1.2 Searle's (2001) theory of rationality: Disjunctions and reflection rooms -- 1.3 Mamdani's (1996) theory of communal land and political power -- 1.4 Seligman (1997): Trust assigns freedom and authority to another -- Figure 1: Trust and its transformations -- Figure 2: The land state: The institutions included in the study -- 1.5 The Hupe (2011) theory of incongruent implementation -- 1.6 Norman Long (1989, 2001) on disjunctions between persons, institutions and systems -- 1.7 Fields of study, selected institutions -- 1.8 The empirical investigations -- 1.9 World Bank economists Binswanger and Deininger (1996) on organization in agriculture -- 1.10 Farms: The national picture -- Table 1: Farms in South Africa -- Table 2: Ownership formats in Western Cape agriculture -- Table 3: Land reform projects as of 1999 -- 1.11 Rural imbalances confronting the ANC Government -- 1.11.1 Poverty -- 1.11.2 Livelihoods -- Table 4: Forms of livelihood in rural parts of South Africa -- 1.11.3 Water -- 2 ANC land policy 1990-2005: A critique -- 2.1 The Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP) -- 2.2 The Growth, Employment and Redistribution (GEAR) program -- 2.3 The Land Redistribution for Agricultural Development (LRAD) program -- 2.4 All LRAD eggs in one basket? -- 3 2019 Government-appointed panel on land reform: A critique -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 Land is not a commodity -- 3.3 Land reform has not worked -- 3.4 An anachronistic model -- 3.5 African communalism: In a new presence? -- 3.6 Private ownership: A basic value also into the future -- 3.7 Life unfolds locally -- 3.8 Municipal organization 3.9 Democracy at all levels -- 3.10 People are subjects -- 3.11 Panel conclusion -- 4 Powerful inherited structures -- 4.1 European mission stations -- 4.2 Myths -- 4.3 Communal land -- 4.4 Urban-rural relations -- 4.5 Land productivity -- 4.6 Bricolage -- 4.7 Subsistence production in capitalism -- 5 The ANC's burden of state organization -- 5.1 Nationalisations -- 5.2 Land under chiefs -- 5.3 Varying views on land reform -- 5.4 The Landless People's Movement -- 5.5 The ANC's state organization dilemma -- 5.6 Struggles of state in ANC -- 5.7 Ben Cousins (PLAAS): Stages of land reform 1994-2016 -- 5.8 Overall evaluation -- 5.9 Costs of land reform -- 5.10 The relevance of the South Africa case -- 6 The land state in the western region of South Africa -- 6.1 Land reform on the ground -- 6.2 Livelihood improvements -- 6.3 Study group (SG): The public land elite -- 6.4 The politicians -- Table 5: Party affiliations in legislatures and in the study group -- Table 6: ANC and DA in legislatures and in the study group -- 6.5 Party leadership -- Table 7: Location of politicians in the party hierarchy -- 6.6 Structures in the land state -- 6.6.1 Gender representation among the politicians -- 6.6.2 The bureaucrats -- 6.6.3 The provincial land states -- Table 8: Age distribution in study group from each institution -- 6.6.4 Education -- Table 9: Levels of education in the study group, specified for each institution -- 6.6.5 Study group lifetime in rural areas -- 6.6.6 Occupation before entering public service -- 6.7 Agents -- 6.7.1 Views on land reform from within the state apparatus -- 6.7.2 The importance of land reform according to provincial land bureaucrats -- 6.7.3 Bureaucrats' engagement in land reform -- Table 10: Bureaucrats' votes for government assigning high importance to land reform -- The weak link in land reform 6.7.4 The importance of land reform according to politicians -- 6.7.5 Politicians' views on relations between political parties -- Table 11: The other main party in land reform -- Table 12: The other main party in national politics -- Table 13: The other main party in provincial politics -- 6.7.6 The smaller parties -- 6.7.7 The political priority of land reform -- Table 14: The national government's engagement in land reform -- 6.7.8 Political democracy -- 6.8 Politicians' evaluations of the agricultural bureaucracy -- 6.8.1 Evaluations of the Department of Land Affairs (DLA) -- Table 15: Politicians' evaluations of DLA -- 6.8.2 Evaluations of the Departments of Agriculture -- 6.8.3 Intergovernmental relations between the DLA and DoA -- 6.8.4 Gendered opinions -- 6.9 Democracy in place: The legislatures are more divided on land reform than the bureaucracy -- 6.10 Obligations on land in the Department of Agriculture at Elsenburg -- 6.10.1 Apartheid in Western Cape agriculture -- 6.10.2 Elsenburg in commercial agriculture -- 6.10.3 Professional competence in the Department -- 6.10.4 Privileged white commercial agriculture -- 6.10.5 The dismantling of the apartheid state in agriculture -- 6.10.6 Elsenburg's organization -- 6.10.7 Permanency and change in the Elsenburg structure -- 6.10.8 Conceptions of authority among land bureaucrats at Elsenburg -- 6.10.9 The budget -- 6.10.10 The Extension Services Directorate -- 6.10.11 Education and training -- 6.10.12 Infrastructural support to small-scale producers -- 6.11 The new Elsenburg (1997): Miniscule but creative land reform within commercial agriculture -- 6.12 Weak support for reorientation -- 7 The power of a transformed bureaucracy in land reform: Professionalism in the public sector -- 7.1 Democratisation of the land administration -- 7.2 Administration of water -- 7.3 The Water Research Commission 7.4 The development perspective of the Agricultural Research Council -- 7.5 The land and water management regimes -- 7.6 The land administration: Devalued and fragmented -- 7.7 The land state's conceptions of state authority, markets and stakeholders in land -- Table 16: The land elite's ranking of supportive stakeholders -- Table 17: Ranking on support to stakeholders (column II of Table 16 ordered) -- 7.7.1 Passive and destructive stakeholders -- Table 18: Destructive and passive stakeholders -- 7.7.2 The way forward: Land reform obligations -- Table 19: How to improve land reform: Distributions on first, second and third priorities -- 7.7.3 Four reality models -- Table 20: Reality models drawn from first priority votes on improvement strategy (from Table 19) -- Table 21: Reality models within 1, 2 and 3 priority votes (from Table 19) -- 7.7.4 Reality models within the institutions -- Table 22: Total votes for each model across institutions in the two provinces -- 7.8 The land state: Competent, but poorly integrated and distrusting of stakeholders -- 8 Land reform in Paulshoek and Saron -- 8.1 Land politics in Paulshoek -- 8.2 Public management in Namaqualand -- 8.3 Saron: Survival and commercial pressure on land -- 8.4 The Del Monte fruit company -- 9 Conclusion: The barriers to land reform in the state: Lack of municipal democracy and administrative competence -- Figure 3: Three related institutional fields -- 9.1 Findings -- 9.2 The welfare state -- 9.3 Emerging black farmers -- 9.4 The ANC as a rational actor: Making good on its obligations -- 10 References -- Back cover Agriculture and state-South Africa Land reform-South Africa Land reform beneficiaries-South Africa |
| title | State Power in Land Reform Barriers to Implementation in the Western and Northern Cape, South Africa, 1990-2006 |
| title_auth | State Power in Land Reform Barriers to Implementation in the Western and Northern Cape, South Africa, 1990-2006 |
| title_exact_search | State Power in Land Reform Barriers to Implementation in the Western and Northern Cape, South Africa, 1990-2006 |
| title_full | State Power in Land Reform Barriers to Implementation in the Western and Northern Cape, South Africa, 1990-2006 |
| title_fullStr | State Power in Land Reform Barriers to Implementation in the Western and Northern Cape, South Africa, 1990-2006 |
| title_full_unstemmed | State Power in Land Reform Barriers to Implementation in the Western and Northern Cape, South Africa, 1990-2006 |
| title_short | State Power in Land Reform |
| title_sort | state power in land reform barriers to implementation in the western and northern cape south africa 1990 2006 |
| title_sub | Barriers to Implementation in the Western and Northern Cape, South Africa, 1990-2006 |
| topic | Agriculture and state-South Africa Land reform-South Africa Land reform beneficiaries-South Africa |
| topic_facet | Agriculture and state-South Africa Land reform-South Africa Land reform beneficiaries-South Africa |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT granthorvald statepowerinlandreformbarrierstoimplementationinthewesternandnortherncapesouthafrica19902006 |