Governance of Human Gene Editing and Transhumanism: Tasks for Today’s Bioethics
This book focuses on the implications of the common themes and works on three urgent tasks for bioethicists. Are there common themes between transhumanism and the WHO framework for global governance of human genome editing? If yes, what are the implications of that? To find possible common themes, t...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cham
Springer
2025
|
| Ausgabe: | 2024 |
| Schriftenreihe: | Integrated Science
28 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | This book focuses on the implications of the common themes and works on three urgent tasks for bioethicists. Are there common themes between transhumanism and the WHO framework for global governance of human genome editing? If yes, what are the implications of that? To find possible common themes, the author applied the reflective thematic analysis (RTA) method to a set of texts on transhumanism and a set of texts on the global governance of human genome editing. The transhumanist texts were the three documents Humanity+, the former World Transhumanist Association, calls the "original documents on transhumanism" (the Transhumanist Declaration, Transhumanist FAQ 3.0, the Transhumanist Manifesto v.4). The selected texts to represent the current global governance of human genome editing were the three documents published by WHO on the topic in 2021 (human genome editing: a framework for governance, human genome editing: recommendations, human genome editing: position paper): the only plan for the global governance of HGE to date. As a result of his application of the RTA method, he found three common themes.What does this mean for our society? What are the implications of the current situation? What are the tasks for bioethics? There are emerging questions on the human condition and new concerns to be addressed, such as the do-it-yourself mentality. The limits of "therapy vs. enhancement" ask for serious work on a bioethical framework for enhancement. Finally, the authors question the predominant values and propose a refinement to some conceptions of autonomy, protection, and equality. Recognising the current situation and working on the identified tasks has become crucial for contemporary Bioethics |
| Beschreibung: | X, 190 p. 4 illus. - This book focuses on the implications of the common themes and works on three urgent tasks for bioethicists. Are there common themes between transhumanism and the WHO framework for global governance of human genome editing? If yes, what are the implications of that? To find possible common themes, the author applied the reflective thematic analysis (RTA) method to a set of texts on transhumanism and a set of texts on the global governance of human genome editing. The transhumanist texts were the three documents Humanity+, the former World Transhumanist Association, calls the "original documents on transhumanism" (the Transhumanist Declaration, Transhumanist FAQ 3.0, the Transhumanist Manifesto v.4). The selected texts to represent the current global governance of human genome editing were the three documents published by WHO on the topic in 2021 (human genome editing: a framework for governance, human genome editing: recommendations, human genome editing: position paper): the only plan for the global governance of HGE to date. As a result of his application of the RTA method, he found three common themes.What does this mean for our society? What are the implications of the current situation? What are the tasks for bioethics? There are emerging questions on the human condition and new concerns to be addressed, such as the do-it-yourself mentality. The limits of "therapy vs. enhancement" ask for serious work on a bioethical framework for enhancement. Finally, the authors question the predominant values and propose a refinement to some conceptions of autonomy, protection, and equality. Recognising the current situation and working on the identified tasks has become crucial for contemporary Bioethics Introduction to the Global Governance of Human Genome Editing and Transhumanism.- PART I Common Themes Between the Global Governance of Human Genome Editing and Transhumanism.- Chapter 1 The Global Governance of Human Genome Editing and the World Health Organization Framework.- Chapter 2 Transhumanism and its Original Documents.- Chapter 3 Common Themes Between the Governance of Human Genome Editing and Transhumanism.- PART II Tasks for Today’s Bioethics.- Chapter 4 Addressing Possibilities, Desires, and Questions.- Chapter 5 The Limitations of "Therapy (Allowed) Versus Enhancement (Forbidden).- Chapter 6 From "Therapy versus Enhancement" to Proportionality.- Chapter 7 Principle of Proportionality for the Choice Among Legitimate Means for Intervention.- Chapter 8 Bioethics’ Role in the Global Governance of Human Genome Editing.- Chapter 9 Refining the Predominant Values for the Global Governance of Human Genome Editing.- Chapter 10 Specifying the Ethics of Human Genome Editing.- Conclusion Lessons Learned.- Annexes Interactive Presentations.- Bibliography. |
| Beschreibung: | 190 Seiten 235 mm |
| ISBN: | 9783031708626 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV050120172 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 250113s2025 xx |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9783031708626 |9 978-3-031-70862-6 | ||
| 024 | 3 | |a 9783031708626 | |
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV050120172 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-29 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Santos, Lílian |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Governance of Human Gene Editing and Transhumanism |b Tasks for Today’s Bioethics |
| 250 | |a 2024 | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Cham |b Springer |c 2025 | |
| 300 | |a 190 Seiten |c 235 mm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Integrated Science |v 28 | |
| 500 | |a X, 190 p. 4 illus. - This book focuses on the implications of the common themes and works on three urgent tasks for bioethicists. Are there common themes between transhumanism and the WHO framework for global governance of human genome editing? If yes, what are the implications of that? To find possible common themes, the author applied the reflective thematic analysis (RTA) method to a set of texts on transhumanism and a set of texts on the global governance of human genome editing. The transhumanist texts were the three documents Humanity+, the former World Transhumanist Association, calls the "original documents on transhumanism" (the Transhumanist Declaration, Transhumanist FAQ 3.0, the Transhumanist Manifesto v.4). The selected texts to represent the current global governance of human genome editing were the three documents published by WHO on the topic in 2021 (human genome editing: a framework for governance, human genome editing: recommendations, human genome editing: position paper): the only plan for the global governance of HGE to date. As a result of his application of the RTA method, he found three common themes.What does this mean for our society? What are the implications of the current situation? What are the tasks for bioethics? There are emerging questions on the human condition and new concerns to be addressed, such as the do-it-yourself mentality. The limits of "therapy vs. enhancement" ask for serious work on a bioethical framework for enhancement. Finally, the authors question the predominant values and propose a refinement to some conceptions of autonomy, protection, and equality. Recognising the current situation and working on the identified tasks has become crucial for contemporary Bioethics | ||
| 500 | |a Introduction to the Global Governance of Human Genome Editing and Transhumanism.- PART I Common Themes Between the Global Governance of Human Genome Editing and Transhumanism.- Chapter 1 The Global Governance of Human Genome Editing and the World Health Organization Framework.- Chapter 2 Transhumanism and its Original Documents.- Chapter 3 Common Themes Between the Governance of Human Genome Editing and Transhumanism.- PART II Tasks for Today’s Bioethics.- Chapter 4 Addressing Possibilities, Desires, and Questions.- Chapter 5 The Limitations of "Therapy (Allowed) Versus Enhancement (Forbidden).- Chapter 6 From "Therapy versus Enhancement" to Proportionality.- Chapter 7 Principle of Proportionality for the Choice Among Legitimate Means for Intervention.- Chapter 8 Bioethics’ Role in the Global Governance of Human Genome Editing.- Chapter 9 Refining the Predominant Values for the Global Governance of Human Genome Editing.- Chapter 10 Specifying the Ethics of Human Genome Editing.- Conclusion Lessons Learned.- Annexes Interactive Presentations.- Bibliography. | ||
| 520 | |a This book focuses on the implications of the common themes and works on three urgent tasks for bioethicists. Are there common themes between transhumanism and the WHO framework for global governance of human genome editing? If yes, what are the implications of that? To find possible common themes, the author applied the reflective thematic analysis (RTA) method to a set of texts on transhumanism and a set of texts on the global governance of human genome editing. The transhumanist texts were the three documents Humanity+, the former World Transhumanist Association, calls the "original documents on transhumanism" (the Transhumanist Declaration, Transhumanist FAQ 3.0, the Transhumanist Manifesto v.4). The selected texts to represent the current global governance of human genome editing were the three documents published by WHO on the topic in 2021 (human genome editing: a framework for governance, human genome editing: recommendations, human genome editing: position paper): the only plan for the global governance of HGE to date. As a result of his application of the RTA method, he found three common themes.What does this mean for our society? What are the implications of the current situation? What are the tasks for bioethics? There are emerging questions on the human condition and new concerns to be addressed, such as the do-it-yourself mentality. The limits of "therapy vs. enhancement" ask for serious work on a bioethical framework for enhancement. Finally, the authors question the predominant values and propose a refinement to some conceptions of autonomy, protection, and equality. Recognising the current situation and working on the identified tasks has become crucial for contemporary Bioethics | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a bicssc | |
| 650 | 4 | |a bicssc | |
| 650 | 4 | |a bicssc | |
| 650 | 4 | |a bicssc | |
| 650 | 4 | |a bicssc | |
| 650 | 4 | |a bisacsh | |
| 650 | 4 | |a bisacsh | |
| 650 | 4 | |a bisacsh | |
| 650 | 4 | |a bisacsh | |
| 650 | 4 | |a bisacsh | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Genetics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Biotechnology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public health | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Medical policy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bioethics | |
| 653 | |a Hardcover, Softcover / Philosophie/Allgemeines, Lexika | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035457027 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1821176460935692288 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Santos, Lílian |
| author_facet | Santos, Lílian |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Santos, Lílian |
| author_variant | l s ls |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV050120172 |
| ctrlnum | (DE-599)BVBBV050120172 |
| edition | 2024 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV050120172</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">250113s2025 xx |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783031708626</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-031-70862-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783031708626</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV050120172</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Santos, Lílian</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Governance of Human Gene Editing and Transhumanism</subfield><subfield code="b">Tasks for Today’s Bioethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cham</subfield><subfield code="b">Springer</subfield><subfield code="c">2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">190 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="c">235 mm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Integrated Science</subfield><subfield code="v">28</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">X, 190 p. 4 illus. - This book focuses on the implications of the common themes and works on three urgent tasks for bioethicists. Are there common themes between transhumanism and the WHO framework for global governance of human genome editing? If yes, what are the implications of that? To find possible common themes, the author applied the reflective thematic analysis (RTA) method to a set of texts on transhumanism and a set of texts on the global governance of human genome editing. The transhumanist texts were the three documents Humanity+, the former World Transhumanist Association, calls the "original documents on transhumanism" (the Transhumanist Declaration, Transhumanist FAQ 3.0, the Transhumanist Manifesto v.4). The selected texts to represent the current global governance of human genome editing were the three documents published by WHO on the topic in 2021 (human genome editing: a framework for governance, human genome editing: recommendations, human genome editing: position paper): the only plan for the global governance of HGE to date. As a result of his application of the RTA method, he found three common themes.What does this mean for our society? What are the implications of the current situation? What are the tasks for bioethics? There are emerging questions on the human condition and new concerns to be addressed, such as the do-it-yourself mentality. The limits of "therapy vs. enhancement" ask for serious work on a bioethical framework for enhancement. Finally, the authors question the predominant values and propose a refinement to some conceptions of autonomy, protection, and equality. Recognising the current situation and working on the identified tasks has become crucial for contemporary Bioethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction to the Global Governance of Human Genome Editing and Transhumanism.- PART I Common Themes Between the Global Governance of Human Genome Editing and Transhumanism.- Chapter 1 The Global Governance of Human Genome Editing and the World Health Organization Framework.- Chapter 2 Transhumanism and its Original Documents.- Chapter 3 Common Themes Between the Governance of Human Genome Editing and Transhumanism.- PART II Tasks for Today’s Bioethics.- Chapter 4 Addressing Possibilities, Desires, and Questions.- Chapter 5 The Limitations of "Therapy (Allowed) Versus Enhancement (Forbidden).- Chapter 6 From "Therapy versus Enhancement" to Proportionality.- Chapter 7 Principle of Proportionality for the Choice Among Legitimate Means for Intervention.- Chapter 8 Bioethics’ Role in the Global Governance of Human Genome Editing.- Chapter 9 Refining the Predominant Values for the Global Governance of Human Genome Editing.- Chapter 10 Specifying the Ethics of Human Genome Editing.- Conclusion Lessons Learned.- Annexes Interactive Presentations.- Bibliography.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This book focuses on the implications of the common themes and works on three urgent tasks for bioethicists. Are there common themes between transhumanism and the WHO framework for global governance of human genome editing? If yes, what are the implications of that? To find possible common themes, the author applied the reflective thematic analysis (RTA) method to a set of texts on transhumanism and a set of texts on the global governance of human genome editing. The transhumanist texts were the three documents Humanity+, the former World Transhumanist Association, calls the "original documents on transhumanism" (the Transhumanist Declaration, Transhumanist FAQ 3.0, the Transhumanist Manifesto v.4). The selected texts to represent the current global governance of human genome editing were the three documents published by WHO on the topic in 2021 (human genome editing: a framework for governance, human genome editing: recommendations, human genome editing: position paper): the only plan for the global governance of HGE to date. As a result of his application of the RTA method, he found three common themes.What does this mean for our society? What are the implications of the current situation? What are the tasks for bioethics? There are emerging questions on the human condition and new concerns to be addressed, such as the do-it-yourself mentality. The limits of "therapy vs. enhancement" ask for serious work on a bioethical framework for enhancement. Finally, the authors question the predominant values and propose a refinement to some conceptions of autonomy, protection, and equality. Recognising the current situation and working on the identified tasks has become crucial for contemporary Bioethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bicssc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bicssc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bicssc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bicssc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bicssc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Genetics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biotechnology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public health</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Medical policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bioethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hardcover, Softcover / Philosophie/Allgemeines, Lexika</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035457027</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV050120172 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2025-01-13T23:00:16Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9783031708626 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035457027 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-29 |
| owner_facet | DE-29 |
| physical | 190 Seiten 235 mm |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateSearch | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | Springer |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Integrated Science |
| spelling | Santos, Lílian Verfasser aut Governance of Human Gene Editing and Transhumanism Tasks for Today’s Bioethics 2024 Cham Springer 2025 190 Seiten 235 mm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Integrated Science 28 X, 190 p. 4 illus. - This book focuses on the implications of the common themes and works on three urgent tasks for bioethicists. Are there common themes between transhumanism and the WHO framework for global governance of human genome editing? If yes, what are the implications of that? To find possible common themes, the author applied the reflective thematic analysis (RTA) method to a set of texts on transhumanism and a set of texts on the global governance of human genome editing. The transhumanist texts were the three documents Humanity+, the former World Transhumanist Association, calls the "original documents on transhumanism" (the Transhumanist Declaration, Transhumanist FAQ 3.0, the Transhumanist Manifesto v.4). The selected texts to represent the current global governance of human genome editing were the three documents published by WHO on the topic in 2021 (human genome editing: a framework for governance, human genome editing: recommendations, human genome editing: position paper): the only plan for the global governance of HGE to date. As a result of his application of the RTA method, he found three common themes.What does this mean for our society? What are the implications of the current situation? What are the tasks for bioethics? There are emerging questions on the human condition and new concerns to be addressed, such as the do-it-yourself mentality. The limits of "therapy vs. enhancement" ask for serious work on a bioethical framework for enhancement. Finally, the authors question the predominant values and propose a refinement to some conceptions of autonomy, protection, and equality. Recognising the current situation and working on the identified tasks has become crucial for contemporary Bioethics Introduction to the Global Governance of Human Genome Editing and Transhumanism.- PART I Common Themes Between the Global Governance of Human Genome Editing and Transhumanism.- Chapter 1 The Global Governance of Human Genome Editing and the World Health Organization Framework.- Chapter 2 Transhumanism and its Original Documents.- Chapter 3 Common Themes Between the Governance of Human Genome Editing and Transhumanism.- PART II Tasks for Today’s Bioethics.- Chapter 4 Addressing Possibilities, Desires, and Questions.- Chapter 5 The Limitations of "Therapy (Allowed) Versus Enhancement (Forbidden).- Chapter 6 From "Therapy versus Enhancement" to Proportionality.- Chapter 7 Principle of Proportionality for the Choice Among Legitimate Means for Intervention.- Chapter 8 Bioethics’ Role in the Global Governance of Human Genome Editing.- Chapter 9 Refining the Predominant Values for the Global Governance of Human Genome Editing.- Chapter 10 Specifying the Ethics of Human Genome Editing.- Conclusion Lessons Learned.- Annexes Interactive Presentations.- Bibliography. This book focuses on the implications of the common themes and works on three urgent tasks for bioethicists. Are there common themes between transhumanism and the WHO framework for global governance of human genome editing? If yes, what are the implications of that? To find possible common themes, the author applied the reflective thematic analysis (RTA) method to a set of texts on transhumanism and a set of texts on the global governance of human genome editing. The transhumanist texts were the three documents Humanity+, the former World Transhumanist Association, calls the "original documents on transhumanism" (the Transhumanist Declaration, Transhumanist FAQ 3.0, the Transhumanist Manifesto v.4). The selected texts to represent the current global governance of human genome editing were the three documents published by WHO on the topic in 2021 (human genome editing: a framework for governance, human genome editing: recommendations, human genome editing: position paper): the only plan for the global governance of HGE to date. As a result of his application of the RTA method, he found three common themes.What does this mean for our society? What are the implications of the current situation? What are the tasks for bioethics? There are emerging questions on the human condition and new concerns to be addressed, such as the do-it-yourself mentality. The limits of "therapy vs. enhancement" ask for serious work on a bioethical framework for enhancement. Finally, the authors question the predominant values and propose a refinement to some conceptions of autonomy, protection, and equality. Recognising the current situation and working on the identified tasks has become crucial for contemporary Bioethics bicssc bisacsh Ethics Genetics Biotechnology Public health Medical policy Bioethics Hardcover, Softcover / Philosophie/Allgemeines, Lexika |
| spellingShingle | Santos, Lílian Governance of Human Gene Editing and Transhumanism Tasks for Today’s Bioethics bicssc bisacsh Ethics Genetics Biotechnology Public health Medical policy Bioethics |
| title | Governance of Human Gene Editing and Transhumanism Tasks for Today’s Bioethics |
| title_auth | Governance of Human Gene Editing and Transhumanism Tasks for Today’s Bioethics |
| title_exact_search | Governance of Human Gene Editing and Transhumanism Tasks for Today’s Bioethics |
| title_full | Governance of Human Gene Editing and Transhumanism Tasks for Today’s Bioethics |
| title_fullStr | Governance of Human Gene Editing and Transhumanism Tasks for Today’s Bioethics |
| title_full_unstemmed | Governance of Human Gene Editing and Transhumanism Tasks for Today’s Bioethics |
| title_short | Governance of Human Gene Editing and Transhumanism |
| title_sort | governance of human gene editing and transhumanism tasks for today s bioethics |
| title_sub | Tasks for Today’s Bioethics |
| topic | bicssc bisacsh Ethics Genetics Biotechnology Public health Medical policy Bioethics |
| topic_facet | bicssc bisacsh Ethics Genetics Biotechnology Public health Medical policy Bioethics |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT santoslilian governanceofhumangeneeditingandtranshumanismtasksfortodaysbioethics |