Rethinking jointness?: the strategic value of jointness in major power competition and conflict
For more than 30 years, the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has placed substantial emphasis on jointness. Whether in bolstering the relative influence of such joint organizations as combatant commands, requiring joint service for senior-level promotions, or achieving cross-service interoperability...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Santa Monica, CA
RAND
2023
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Report |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | For more than 30 years, the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has placed substantial emphasis on jointness. Whether in bolstering the relative influence of such joint organizations as combatant commands, requiring joint service for senior-level promotions, or achieving cross-service interoperability between operational units, jointness is valued conceptually from the strategic to the tactical levels. However, in practice, the value of jointness remains unmeasured and ill-defined, particularly as it relates to strategic competition. Many questions remain about the true utility of jointness to DoD goals, potential negative ramifications of jointness as it was implemented following the passage of the Goldwater-Nichols Act (GNA), and how the pursuit of jointness affects DoD's ability to innovate and adapt to future challenges. Moreover, it is not currently understood how jointness affects competitive advantage relative to the United States' primary adversaries. This study seeks to examine whether the assumption that jointness is inherently valuable is correct, and if so, in what ways. Understanding what aspects of jointness are most valuable and why can help DoD compete more effectively against its adversaries and maximize the United States' competitive military advantages |
| Beschreibung: | xi, 217 Seiten 23 cm |
| ISBN: | 9781977411075 |
| DOI: | 10.7249/RRA1560-1 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV049880567 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20241105 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 240923s2023 xx |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781977411075 |c pbk |9 978-1-9774-1107-5 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1466914869 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049880567 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Cozad, Mark R. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1137727640 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Rethinking jointness? |b the strategic value of jointness in major power competition and conflict |c Mark Cozad, Maria McCollester, Jonathan Welch, Matthew Fay |
| 264 | 1 | |a Santa Monica, CA |b RAND |c 2023 | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2023 | |
| 300 | |a xi, 217 Seiten |c 23 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a For more than 30 years, the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has placed substantial emphasis on jointness. Whether in bolstering the relative influence of such joint organizations as combatant commands, requiring joint service for senior-level promotions, or achieving cross-service interoperability between operational units, jointness is valued conceptually from the strategic to the tactical levels. However, in practice, the value of jointness remains unmeasured and ill-defined, particularly as it relates to strategic competition. Many questions remain about the true utility of jointness to DoD goals, potential negative ramifications of jointness as it was implemented following the passage of the Goldwater-Nichols Act (GNA), and how the pursuit of jointness affects DoD's ability to innovate and adapt to future challenges. Moreover, it is not currently understood how jointness affects competitive advantage relative to the United States' primary adversaries. This study seeks to examine whether the assumption that jointness is inherently valuable is correct, and if so, in what ways. Understanding what aspects of jointness are most valuable and why can help DoD compete more effectively against its adversaries and maximize the United States' competitive military advantages | |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a USA |b Department of Defense |0 (DE-588)1019534-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a USA |b Army |0 (DE-588)2188-X |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Militärpolitik |0 (DE-588)4065004-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 653 | 0 | |a Unified operations (Military science) | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Military planning / United States | |
| 653 | 0 | |a China | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Joint Operations | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Military Strategy | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Military Transformation | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Russia | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Warfare and Military Operations | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Opérations interarmes (Science militaire) | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Planification militaire / États-Unis | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Military planning | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Unified operations (Military science) | |
| 653 | 2 | |a United States | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |b Army |0 (DE-588)2188-X |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a USA |b Department of Defense |0 (DE-588)1019534-8 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Militärpolitik |0 (DE-588)4065004-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a McCollester, Maria |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Welch, Jonathan |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)1211745724 |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fay, Matthew |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035219938 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1817696821202386944 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Cozad, Mark R. |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1137727640 (DE-588)1211745724 |
| author_facet | Cozad, Mark R. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Cozad, Mark R. |
| author_variant | m r c mr mrc |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV049880567 |
| contents | Chapter One: Introduction -- Chapter Two: Origins of Contemporary Jointness -- Chapter Three: Valued Aspects of Jointness -- Chapter Four: The Effects of Jointness on Military Organization, Capabilities, and Roles -- Chapter Five: Trade-Offs and Unintended Consequences -- Chapter Six: Chinese Views on the Strategic Value of Jointness -- Chapter Seven: Jointness and Major Power Competition -- Chapter Eight: Conclusions |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1466914869 (DE-599)BVBBV049880567 |
| doi_str_mv | 10.7249/RRA1560-1 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049880567</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241105</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240923s2023 xx |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781977411075</subfield><subfield code="c">pbk</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-9774-1107-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1466914869</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049880567</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cozad, Mark R.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1137727640</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rethinking jointness?</subfield><subfield code="b">the strategic value of jointness in major power competition and conflict</subfield><subfield code="c">Mark Cozad, Maria McCollester, Jonathan Welch, Matthew Fay</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Santa Monica, CA</subfield><subfield code="b">RAND</subfield><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xi, 217 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="c">23 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">For more than 30 years, the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has placed substantial emphasis on jointness. Whether in bolstering the relative influence of such joint organizations as combatant commands, requiring joint service for senior-level promotions, or achieving cross-service interoperability between operational units, jointness is valued conceptually from the strategic to the tactical levels. However, in practice, the value of jointness remains unmeasured and ill-defined, particularly as it relates to strategic competition. Many questions remain about the true utility of jointness to DoD goals, potential negative ramifications of jointness as it was implemented following the passage of the Goldwater-Nichols Act (GNA), and how the pursuit of jointness affects DoD's ability to innovate and adapt to future challenges. Moreover, it is not currently understood how jointness affects competitive advantage relative to the United States' primary adversaries. This study seeks to examine whether the assumption that jointness is inherently valuable is correct, and if so, in what ways. Understanding what aspects of jointness are most valuable and why can help DoD compete more effectively against its adversaries and maximize the United States' competitive military advantages</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Department of Defense</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1019534-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Army</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)2188-X</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Militärpolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4065004-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Unified operations (Military science)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Military planning / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">China</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Joint Operations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Military Strategy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Military Transformation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Russia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Warfare and Military Operations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Opérations interarmes (Science militaire)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Planification militaire / États-Unis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Military planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Unified operations (Military science)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Army</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)2188-X</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Department of Defense</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1019534-8</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Militärpolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4065004-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">McCollester, Maria</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Welch, Jonathan</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1211745724</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fay, Matthew</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035219938</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV049880567 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-06T13:12:53Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781977411075 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035219938 |
| oclc_num | 1466914869 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | xi, 217 Seiten 23 cm |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publishDateSearch | 2023 |
| publishDateSort | 2023 |
| publisher | RAND |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Report |
| spelling | Cozad, Mark R. Verfasser (DE-588)1137727640 aut Rethinking jointness? the strategic value of jointness in major power competition and conflict Mark Cozad, Maria McCollester, Jonathan Welch, Matthew Fay Santa Monica, CA RAND 2023 © 2023 xi, 217 Seiten 23 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier For more than 30 years, the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has placed substantial emphasis on jointness. Whether in bolstering the relative influence of such joint organizations as combatant commands, requiring joint service for senior-level promotions, or achieving cross-service interoperability between operational units, jointness is valued conceptually from the strategic to the tactical levels. However, in practice, the value of jointness remains unmeasured and ill-defined, particularly as it relates to strategic competition. Many questions remain about the true utility of jointness to DoD goals, potential negative ramifications of jointness as it was implemented following the passage of the Goldwater-Nichols Act (GNA), and how the pursuit of jointness affects DoD's ability to innovate and adapt to future challenges. Moreover, it is not currently understood how jointness affects competitive advantage relative to the United States' primary adversaries. This study seeks to examine whether the assumption that jointness is inherently valuable is correct, and if so, in what ways. Understanding what aspects of jointness are most valuable and why can help DoD compete more effectively against its adversaries and maximize the United States' competitive military advantages USA Department of Defense (DE-588)1019534-8 gnd rswk-swf USA Army (DE-588)2188-X gnd rswk-swf Militärpolitik (DE-588)4065004-2 gnd rswk-swf Unified operations (Military science) Military planning / United States China Joint Operations Military Strategy Military Transformation Russia Warfare and Military Operations Opérations interarmes (Science militaire) Planification militaire / États-Unis Military planning United States USA Army (DE-588)2188-X b USA Department of Defense (DE-588)1019534-8 b Militärpolitik (DE-588)4065004-2 s DE-604 McCollester, Maria Sonstige oth Welch, Jonathan Sonstige (DE-588)1211745724 oth Fay, Matthew Sonstige oth |
| spellingShingle | Cozad, Mark R. Rethinking jointness? the strategic value of jointness in major power competition and conflict Chapter One: Introduction -- Chapter Two: Origins of Contemporary Jointness -- Chapter Three: Valued Aspects of Jointness -- Chapter Four: The Effects of Jointness on Military Organization, Capabilities, and Roles -- Chapter Five: Trade-Offs and Unintended Consequences -- Chapter Six: Chinese Views on the Strategic Value of Jointness -- Chapter Seven: Jointness and Major Power Competition -- Chapter Eight: Conclusions USA Department of Defense (DE-588)1019534-8 gnd USA Army (DE-588)2188-X gnd Militärpolitik (DE-588)4065004-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)1019534-8 (DE-588)2188-X (DE-588)4065004-2 |
| title | Rethinking jointness? the strategic value of jointness in major power competition and conflict |
| title_auth | Rethinking jointness? the strategic value of jointness in major power competition and conflict |
| title_exact_search | Rethinking jointness? the strategic value of jointness in major power competition and conflict |
| title_full | Rethinking jointness? the strategic value of jointness in major power competition and conflict Mark Cozad, Maria McCollester, Jonathan Welch, Matthew Fay |
| title_fullStr | Rethinking jointness? the strategic value of jointness in major power competition and conflict Mark Cozad, Maria McCollester, Jonathan Welch, Matthew Fay |
| title_full_unstemmed | Rethinking jointness? the strategic value of jointness in major power competition and conflict Mark Cozad, Maria McCollester, Jonathan Welch, Matthew Fay |
| title_short | Rethinking jointness? |
| title_sort | rethinking jointness the strategic value of jointness in major power competition and conflict |
| title_sub | the strategic value of jointness in major power competition and conflict |
| topic | USA Department of Defense (DE-588)1019534-8 gnd USA Army (DE-588)2188-X gnd Militärpolitik (DE-588)4065004-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | USA Department of Defense USA Army Militärpolitik |
| url | https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA1560-1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT cozadmarkr rethinkingjointnessthestrategicvalueofjointnessinmajorpowercompetitionandconflict AT mccollestermaria rethinkingjointnessthestrategicvalueofjointnessinmajorpowercompetitionandconflict AT welchjonathan rethinkingjointnessthestrategicvalueofjointnessinmajorpowercompetitionandconflict AT faymatthew rethinkingjointnessthestrategicvalueofjointnessinmajorpowercompetitionandconflict |