Constitutional Justice under Populism: The Transformation of Constitutional Jurisprudence in Hungary Since 2010
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Alphen aan den Rijn
Wolters Kluwer Law International
2024
|
| Ausgabe: | 1st ed |
| Online-Zugang: | DE-2070s |
| Beschreibung: | Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (250 Seiten) |
| ISBN: | 9789403520483 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV049875855 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240919s2024 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789403520483 |9 978-94-035-2048-3 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-30-PQE)EBC31458395 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-30-PAD)EBC31458395 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL31458395 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049875855 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-2070s | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gárdos-Orosz, Fruzsina |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Constitutional Justice under Populism |b The Transformation of Constitutional Jurisprudence in Hungary Since 2010 |
| 250 | |a 1st ed | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Alphen aan den Rijn |b Wolters Kluwer Law International |c 2024 | |
| 264 | 4 | |c ©2024 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (250 Seiten) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a Front cover -- Constitutional Justice under Populism -- Title -- Copyright -- Table of content -- INTRODUCTION -- 1. CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW,CONSTITUTIONAL COURTSAND THE INSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGESOF THE 21ST CENTURY IN EUROPE -- 2. THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTOF THE FUNDAMENTAL LAW.THE BEGINNINGS -- 2.1. Concerning the transformation -- 2.2. The experience of competences -- 2.2.1. The constitutional complaint -- 2.2.1.1. Against a judicial decision.Review of the constitutionality of the law applied -- 2.2.1.2. Review of legislation wherethe application directly infringes fundamental rights -- 2.2.1.3. Against a judicial decision: Review of the constitutionalityof a judicial decision -- 2.2.2. Judicial referral - concrete norm control -- 2.2.3. Ex-post abstract norm control -- 2.2.4. Preliminary abstract norm control -- 2.3. The approach to the pre-Fundamental Lawcase law -- 2.4. The role of international law and EU law -- 3. AFTER THE BEGINNING -NEW CHALLENGES - NEW RESPONSES -- 3.1. The principles of interpretation -- 3.1.1. A new set of interpretative methods or a reformulationof classic interpretative methods? -- 3.1.2. Application of mandatory interpretation methodsin the practice of the Constitutional Court -- 3.1.2.1. Application of the new mandatory interpretation methods -- 3.1.2.2. Politically sensitive cases -- 3.1.3. Conclusions -- 3.2. Constitutional protection of the identityof the Fundamental Law -- 3.2.1. Populist constitutionalism -- 3.2.2. The role of the "constitutional tradition" in the identityof the Fundamental Law -- 3.2.3. The revival of the historical constitution? -- 3.2.4. The protection of constitutional identity bythe Constitutional Court -- 3.2.5. Conclusions -- 3.3. Some classic dilemmas of constitutionaladjudication in a new light -- 3.3.1. A "countermajoritarian difficulty" -- 3.3.2. Activism and/or deference | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 3.3.3. Constitutional review of the amendmentof the Fundamental Law -- 4. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THECONSTITUTIONAL COURTAND THE ORDINARY COURTS IN THEPROTECTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS -- 4.1. Constitutional presumptions -- 4.2. The signifi cance of the constitutional complaint -- 4.2.1. Subject of the inquiry -- 4.2.2. Constitutional complaint pursuant to Article 27 of the Acton the Constitutional Court -- 4.2.3. Figures on inclusiveness and success rates -- 4.2.4. The traditional approach - the importanceof the admissibility procedure in the relationship betweenthe ordinary court and the Constitutional Court -- 4.2.4.1. Admissibility: what is "prejudice to a right guaranteed bythe Fundamental Law?" -- 4.2.4.2. Admissibility: what is the fundamental constitutional issue? -- 4.2.5. Conclusions -- 4.3. The enforcement of fundamental rightsin the practice of ordinary courts and the roleof the Constitutional Court -- 4.3.1. Introduction -- 4.3.2. The starting point - the purpose of the legal construct -- 4.3.3. Th e doctrine of horizontal eff ect and the new constitutionalbases - lessons from the judicial practice -- 4.3.3.1. Right to property -- 4.3.3.2. Freedom of the press and freedom of expression -- 4.3.3.3. "Police offi cer's portrait" -- 4.3.3.4. Violation of the right to privacy -- 4.3.4. Sub-summary: the horizontal eff ect and its practice underthe Fundamental Law -- 4.3.5. Conclusions -- 5. FROM CRISIS TO CRISIS.HUNGARIAN CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEWIN THE EUROPEAN SPACE -- 5.1. Changes in the practice of the ConstitutionalCourt in the context of the economic crisis,the migration crisis, the fi ght against terrorism,national security and the pandemic -- 5.1.1. The standards of fundamental rights protectionin normalcy and in emergency in Hungary -- 5.1.1.1. The history of fundamental rights protectionin Hungary | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 5.1.1.2. What is a fundamental right in normalcy and in emergencyin Hungary? -- 5.1.1.3. Content of the state obligation to protect rights -- 5.1.1.4. The test of fundamental rights restrictions -- 5.1.1.5. Standards of human rights protection in the special legal order -- 5.1.1.6. Conclusions -- 5.1.2. The impact of the economic crisis on constitutional jurisprudence -- 5.1.2.1. Background -- 5.1.2.2. Changes in the practice of the Constitutional Court -- 5.1.2.3. Foreign currency credit loan cases -- 5.1.3. Migration -- 5.1.4. Terrorism threat and security challenges -- 5.1.5. Covid-19 and Constitutional Court in Hungary -- 5.1.5.1. The special legal order -- 5.1.5.2. The complicated practice of the Constitutional Court -- 5.2. The Hungarian Constitutional Courtin the European Constitutional Space -- 5.2.1. Introduction -- 5.2.2. European constitutional courts' responses to social,economic and political challenges -- 5.2.2.1. The change -- 5.2.2.2. Continuity and change -- 5.2.2.3. Stability and continuity -- 5.2.3. The exceptions -- 5.2.3.1. Specifi c routes -- 5.2.3.2. The Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Courtof Human Rights -- 5.2.4. Main constitutional strategies to address socialand economic challenges -- 5.2.4.1. General solutions -- 5.2.4.2. New interpretative methods and substantive conceptsin constitutional law -- 5.3. Possible reasons for changes in case law -- 5.3.1. European trends -- 5.3.2. Explanation of Hungarian Constitutional Court practice -in a crisis situation -- 6. QUO VADIS, HUNGARIANCONSTITUTIONAL COURT? -- 6.1. On the benchmarks for evaluatingconstitutional review -- 6.2. Not everything is what it appears to be -- BIBLIOGRAPHY -- Back cover | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Gárdos-Orosz, Fruzsina |t Constitutional Justice under Populism |d Alphen aan den Rijn : Wolters Kluwer Law International,c2024 |z 9789403520285 |
| 912 | |a ZDB-30-PQE | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035215313 | |
| 966 | e | |u https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/hwr/detail.action?docID=31458395 |l DE-2070s |p ZDB-30-PQE |q HWR_PDA_PQE |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1810600654642610176 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Gárdos-Orosz, Fruzsina |
| author_facet | Gárdos-Orosz, Fruzsina |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Gárdos-Orosz, Fruzsina |
| author_variant | f g o fgo |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV049875855 |
| collection | ZDB-30-PQE |
| contents | Front cover -- Constitutional Justice under Populism -- Title -- Copyright -- Table of content -- INTRODUCTION -- 1. CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW,CONSTITUTIONAL COURTSAND THE INSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGESOF THE 21ST CENTURY IN EUROPE -- 2. THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTOF THE FUNDAMENTAL LAW.THE BEGINNINGS -- 2.1. Concerning the transformation -- 2.2. The experience of competences -- 2.2.1. The constitutional complaint -- 2.2.1.1. Against a judicial decision.Review of the constitutionality of the law applied -- 2.2.1.2. Review of legislation wherethe application directly infringes fundamental rights -- 2.2.1.3. Against a judicial decision: Review of the constitutionalityof a judicial decision -- 2.2.2. Judicial referral - concrete norm control -- 2.2.3. Ex-post abstract norm control -- 2.2.4. Preliminary abstract norm control -- 2.3. The approach to the pre-Fundamental Lawcase law -- 2.4. The role of international law and EU law -- 3. AFTER THE BEGINNING -NEW CHALLENGES - NEW RESPONSES -- 3.1. The principles of interpretation -- 3.1.1. A new set of interpretative methods or a reformulationof classic interpretative methods? -- 3.1.2. Application of mandatory interpretation methodsin the practice of the Constitutional Court -- 3.1.2.1. Application of the new mandatory interpretation methods -- 3.1.2.2. Politically sensitive cases -- 3.1.3. Conclusions -- 3.2. Constitutional protection of the identityof the Fundamental Law -- 3.2.1. Populist constitutionalism -- 3.2.2. The role of the "constitutional tradition" in the identityof the Fundamental Law -- 3.2.3. The revival of the historical constitution? -- 3.2.4. The protection of constitutional identity bythe Constitutional Court -- 3.2.5. Conclusions -- 3.3. Some classic dilemmas of constitutionaladjudication in a new light -- 3.3.1. A "countermajoritarian difficulty" -- 3.3.2. Activism and/or deference 3.3.3. Constitutional review of the amendmentof the Fundamental Law -- 4. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THECONSTITUTIONAL COURTAND THE ORDINARY COURTS IN THEPROTECTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS -- 4.1. Constitutional presumptions -- 4.2. The signifi cance of the constitutional complaint -- 4.2.1. Subject of the inquiry -- 4.2.2. Constitutional complaint pursuant to Article 27 of the Acton the Constitutional Court -- 4.2.3. Figures on inclusiveness and success rates -- 4.2.4. The traditional approach - the importanceof the admissibility procedure in the relationship betweenthe ordinary court and the Constitutional Court -- 4.2.4.1. Admissibility: what is "prejudice to a right guaranteed bythe Fundamental Law?" -- 4.2.4.2. Admissibility: what is the fundamental constitutional issue? -- 4.2.5. Conclusions -- 4.3. The enforcement of fundamental rightsin the practice of ordinary courts and the roleof the Constitutional Court -- 4.3.1. Introduction -- 4.3.2. The starting point - the purpose of the legal construct -- 4.3.3. Th e doctrine of horizontal eff ect and the new constitutionalbases - lessons from the judicial practice -- 4.3.3.1. Right to property -- 4.3.3.2. Freedom of the press and freedom of expression -- 4.3.3.3. "Police offi cer's portrait" -- 4.3.3.4. Violation of the right to privacy -- 4.3.4. Sub-summary: the horizontal eff ect and its practice underthe Fundamental Law -- 4.3.5. Conclusions -- 5. FROM CRISIS TO CRISIS.HUNGARIAN CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEWIN THE EUROPEAN SPACE -- 5.1. Changes in the practice of the ConstitutionalCourt in the context of the economic crisis,the migration crisis, the fi ght against terrorism,national security and the pandemic -- 5.1.1. The standards of fundamental rights protectionin normalcy and in emergency in Hungary -- 5.1.1.1. The history of fundamental rights protectionin Hungary 5.1.1.2. What is a fundamental right in normalcy and in emergencyin Hungary? -- 5.1.1.3. Content of the state obligation to protect rights -- 5.1.1.4. The test of fundamental rights restrictions -- 5.1.1.5. Standards of human rights protection in the special legal order -- 5.1.1.6. Conclusions -- 5.1.2. The impact of the economic crisis on constitutional jurisprudence -- 5.1.2.1. Background -- 5.1.2.2. Changes in the practice of the Constitutional Court -- 5.1.2.3. Foreign currency credit loan cases -- 5.1.3. Migration -- 5.1.4. Terrorism threat and security challenges -- 5.1.5. Covid-19 and Constitutional Court in Hungary -- 5.1.5.1. The special legal order -- 5.1.5.2. The complicated practice of the Constitutional Court -- 5.2. The Hungarian Constitutional Courtin the European Constitutional Space -- 5.2.1. Introduction -- 5.2.2. European constitutional courts' responses to social,economic and political challenges -- 5.2.2.1. The change -- 5.2.2.2. Continuity and change -- 5.2.2.3. Stability and continuity -- 5.2.3. The exceptions -- 5.2.3.1. Specifi c routes -- 5.2.3.2. The Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Courtof Human Rights -- 5.2.4. Main constitutional strategies to address socialand economic challenges -- 5.2.4.1. General solutions -- 5.2.4.2. New interpretative methods and substantive conceptsin constitutional law -- 5.3. Possible reasons for changes in case law -- 5.3.1. European trends -- 5.3.2. Explanation of Hungarian Constitutional Court practice -in a crisis situation -- 6. QUO VADIS, HUNGARIANCONSTITUTIONAL COURT? -- 6.1. On the benchmarks for evaluatingconstitutional review -- 6.2. Not everything is what it appears to be -- BIBLIOGRAPHY -- Back cover |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-30-PQE)EBC31458395 (ZDB-30-PAD)EBC31458395 (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL31458395 (DE-599)BVBBV049875855 |
| edition | 1st ed |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nmm a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049875855</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240919s2024 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789403520483</subfield><subfield code="9">978-94-035-2048-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-30-PQE)EBC31458395</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-30-PAD)EBC31458395</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-89-EBL)EBL31458395</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049875855</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-2070s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gárdos-Orosz, Fruzsina</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Justice under Populism</subfield><subfield code="b">The Transformation of Constitutional Jurisprudence in Hungary Since 2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1st ed</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Alphen aan den Rijn</subfield><subfield code="b">Wolters Kluwer Law International</subfield><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (250 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Front cover -- Constitutional Justice under Populism -- Title -- Copyright -- Table of content -- INTRODUCTION -- 1. CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW,CONSTITUTIONAL COURTSAND THE INSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGESOF THE 21ST CENTURY IN EUROPE -- 2. THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTOF THE FUNDAMENTAL LAW.THE BEGINNINGS -- 2.1. Concerning the transformation -- 2.2. The experience of competences -- 2.2.1. The constitutional complaint -- 2.2.1.1. Against a judicial decision.Review of the constitutionality of the law applied -- 2.2.1.2. Review of legislation wherethe application directly infringes fundamental rights -- 2.2.1.3. Against a judicial decision: Review of the constitutionalityof a judicial decision -- 2.2.2. Judicial referral - concrete norm control -- 2.2.3. Ex-post abstract norm control -- 2.2.4. Preliminary abstract norm control -- 2.3. The approach to the pre-Fundamental Lawcase law -- 2.4. The role of international law and EU law -- 3. AFTER THE BEGINNING -NEW CHALLENGES - NEW RESPONSES -- 3.1. The principles of interpretation -- 3.1.1. A new set of interpretative methods or a reformulationof classic interpretative methods? -- 3.1.2. Application of mandatory interpretation methodsin the practice of the Constitutional Court -- 3.1.2.1. Application of the new mandatory interpretation methods -- 3.1.2.2. Politically sensitive cases -- 3.1.3. Conclusions -- 3.2. Constitutional protection of the identityof the Fundamental Law -- 3.2.1. Populist constitutionalism -- 3.2.2. The role of the "constitutional tradition" in the identityof the Fundamental Law -- 3.2.3. The revival of the historical constitution? -- 3.2.4. The protection of constitutional identity bythe Constitutional Court -- 3.2.5. Conclusions -- 3.3. Some classic dilemmas of constitutionaladjudication in a new light -- 3.3.1. A "countermajoritarian difficulty" -- 3.3.2. Activism and/or deference</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3.3.3. Constitutional review of the amendmentof the Fundamental Law -- 4. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THECONSTITUTIONAL COURTAND THE ORDINARY COURTS IN THEPROTECTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS -- 4.1. Constitutional presumptions -- 4.2. The signifi cance of the constitutional complaint -- 4.2.1. Subject of the inquiry -- 4.2.2. Constitutional complaint pursuant to Article 27 of the Acton the Constitutional Court -- 4.2.3. Figures on inclusiveness and success rates -- 4.2.4. The traditional approach - the importanceof the admissibility procedure in the relationship betweenthe ordinary court and the Constitutional Court -- 4.2.4.1. Admissibility: what is "prejudice to a right guaranteed bythe Fundamental Law?" -- 4.2.4.2. Admissibility: what is the fundamental constitutional issue? -- 4.2.5. Conclusions -- 4.3. The enforcement of fundamental rightsin the practice of ordinary courts and the roleof the Constitutional Court -- 4.3.1. Introduction -- 4.3.2. The starting point - the purpose of the legal construct -- 4.3.3. Th e doctrine of horizontal eff ect and the new constitutionalbases - lessons from the judicial practice -- 4.3.3.1. Right to property -- 4.3.3.2. Freedom of the press and freedom of expression -- 4.3.3.3. "Police offi cer's portrait" -- 4.3.3.4. Violation of the right to privacy -- 4.3.4. Sub-summary: the horizontal eff ect and its practice underthe Fundamental Law -- 4.3.5. Conclusions -- 5. FROM CRISIS TO CRISIS.HUNGARIAN CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEWIN THE EUROPEAN SPACE -- 5.1. Changes in the practice of the ConstitutionalCourt in the context of the economic crisis,the migration crisis, the fi ght against terrorism,national security and the pandemic -- 5.1.1. The standards of fundamental rights protectionin normalcy and in emergency in Hungary -- 5.1.1.1. The history of fundamental rights protectionin Hungary</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5.1.1.2. What is a fundamental right in normalcy and in emergencyin Hungary? -- 5.1.1.3. Content of the state obligation to protect rights -- 5.1.1.4. The test of fundamental rights restrictions -- 5.1.1.5. Standards of human rights protection in the special legal order -- 5.1.1.6. Conclusions -- 5.1.2. The impact of the economic crisis on constitutional jurisprudence -- 5.1.2.1. Background -- 5.1.2.2. Changes in the practice of the Constitutional Court -- 5.1.2.3. Foreign currency credit loan cases -- 5.1.3. Migration -- 5.1.4. Terrorism threat and security challenges -- 5.1.5. Covid-19 and Constitutional Court in Hungary -- 5.1.5.1. The special legal order -- 5.1.5.2. The complicated practice of the Constitutional Court -- 5.2. The Hungarian Constitutional Courtin the European Constitutional Space -- 5.2.1. Introduction -- 5.2.2. European constitutional courts' responses to social,economic and political challenges -- 5.2.2.1. The change -- 5.2.2.2. Continuity and change -- 5.2.2.3. Stability and continuity -- 5.2.3. The exceptions -- 5.2.3.1. Specifi c routes -- 5.2.3.2. The Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Courtof Human Rights -- 5.2.4. Main constitutional strategies to address socialand economic challenges -- 5.2.4.1. General solutions -- 5.2.4.2. New interpretative methods and substantive conceptsin constitutional law -- 5.3. Possible reasons for changes in case law -- 5.3.1. European trends -- 5.3.2. Explanation of Hungarian Constitutional Court practice -in a crisis situation -- 6. QUO VADIS, HUNGARIANCONSTITUTIONAL COURT? -- 6.1. On the benchmarks for evaluatingconstitutional review -- 6.2. Not everything is what it appears to be -- BIBLIOGRAPHY -- Back cover</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Gárdos-Orosz, Fruzsina</subfield><subfield code="t">Constitutional Justice under Populism</subfield><subfield code="d">Alphen aan den Rijn : Wolters Kluwer Law International,c2024</subfield><subfield code="z">9789403520285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-30-PQE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035215313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/hwr/detail.action?docID=31458395</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-2070s</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-30-PQE</subfield><subfield code="q">HWR_PDA_PQE</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV049875855 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-09-19T05:22:21Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789403520483 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035215313 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-2070s |
| owner_facet | DE-2070s |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (250 Seiten) |
| psigel | ZDB-30-PQE ZDB-30-PQE HWR_PDA_PQE |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateSearch | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Law International |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Gárdos-Orosz, Fruzsina Verfasser aut Constitutional Justice under Populism The Transformation of Constitutional Jurisprudence in Hungary Since 2010 1st ed Alphen aan den Rijn Wolters Kluwer Law International 2024 ©2024 1 Online-Ressource (250 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources Front cover -- Constitutional Justice under Populism -- Title -- Copyright -- Table of content -- INTRODUCTION -- 1. CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW,CONSTITUTIONAL COURTSAND THE INSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGESOF THE 21ST CENTURY IN EUROPE -- 2. THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTOF THE FUNDAMENTAL LAW.THE BEGINNINGS -- 2.1. Concerning the transformation -- 2.2. The experience of competences -- 2.2.1. The constitutional complaint -- 2.2.1.1. Against a judicial decision.Review of the constitutionality of the law applied -- 2.2.1.2. Review of legislation wherethe application directly infringes fundamental rights -- 2.2.1.3. Against a judicial decision: Review of the constitutionalityof a judicial decision -- 2.2.2. Judicial referral - concrete norm control -- 2.2.3. Ex-post abstract norm control -- 2.2.4. Preliminary abstract norm control -- 2.3. The approach to the pre-Fundamental Lawcase law -- 2.4. The role of international law and EU law -- 3. AFTER THE BEGINNING -NEW CHALLENGES - NEW RESPONSES -- 3.1. The principles of interpretation -- 3.1.1. A new set of interpretative methods or a reformulationof classic interpretative methods? -- 3.1.2. Application of mandatory interpretation methodsin the practice of the Constitutional Court -- 3.1.2.1. Application of the new mandatory interpretation methods -- 3.1.2.2. Politically sensitive cases -- 3.1.3. Conclusions -- 3.2. Constitutional protection of the identityof the Fundamental Law -- 3.2.1. Populist constitutionalism -- 3.2.2. The role of the "constitutional tradition" in the identityof the Fundamental Law -- 3.2.3. The revival of the historical constitution? -- 3.2.4. The protection of constitutional identity bythe Constitutional Court -- 3.2.5. Conclusions -- 3.3. Some classic dilemmas of constitutionaladjudication in a new light -- 3.3.1. A "countermajoritarian difficulty" -- 3.3.2. Activism and/or deference 3.3.3. Constitutional review of the amendmentof the Fundamental Law -- 4. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THECONSTITUTIONAL COURTAND THE ORDINARY COURTS IN THEPROTECTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS -- 4.1. Constitutional presumptions -- 4.2. The signifi cance of the constitutional complaint -- 4.2.1. Subject of the inquiry -- 4.2.2. Constitutional complaint pursuant to Article 27 of the Acton the Constitutional Court -- 4.2.3. Figures on inclusiveness and success rates -- 4.2.4. The traditional approach - the importanceof the admissibility procedure in the relationship betweenthe ordinary court and the Constitutional Court -- 4.2.4.1. Admissibility: what is "prejudice to a right guaranteed bythe Fundamental Law?" -- 4.2.4.2. Admissibility: what is the fundamental constitutional issue? -- 4.2.5. Conclusions -- 4.3. The enforcement of fundamental rightsin the practice of ordinary courts and the roleof the Constitutional Court -- 4.3.1. Introduction -- 4.3.2. The starting point - the purpose of the legal construct -- 4.3.3. Th e doctrine of horizontal eff ect and the new constitutionalbases - lessons from the judicial practice -- 4.3.3.1. Right to property -- 4.3.3.2. Freedom of the press and freedom of expression -- 4.3.3.3. "Police offi cer's portrait" -- 4.3.3.4. Violation of the right to privacy -- 4.3.4. Sub-summary: the horizontal eff ect and its practice underthe Fundamental Law -- 4.3.5. Conclusions -- 5. FROM CRISIS TO CRISIS.HUNGARIAN CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEWIN THE EUROPEAN SPACE -- 5.1. Changes in the practice of the ConstitutionalCourt in the context of the economic crisis,the migration crisis, the fi ght against terrorism,national security and the pandemic -- 5.1.1. The standards of fundamental rights protectionin normalcy and in emergency in Hungary -- 5.1.1.1. The history of fundamental rights protectionin Hungary 5.1.1.2. What is a fundamental right in normalcy and in emergencyin Hungary? -- 5.1.1.3. Content of the state obligation to protect rights -- 5.1.1.4. The test of fundamental rights restrictions -- 5.1.1.5. Standards of human rights protection in the special legal order -- 5.1.1.6. Conclusions -- 5.1.2. The impact of the economic crisis on constitutional jurisprudence -- 5.1.2.1. Background -- 5.1.2.2. Changes in the practice of the Constitutional Court -- 5.1.2.3. Foreign currency credit loan cases -- 5.1.3. Migration -- 5.1.4. Terrorism threat and security challenges -- 5.1.5. Covid-19 and Constitutional Court in Hungary -- 5.1.5.1. The special legal order -- 5.1.5.2. The complicated practice of the Constitutional Court -- 5.2. The Hungarian Constitutional Courtin the European Constitutional Space -- 5.2.1. Introduction -- 5.2.2. European constitutional courts' responses to social,economic and political challenges -- 5.2.2.1. The change -- 5.2.2.2. Continuity and change -- 5.2.2.3. Stability and continuity -- 5.2.3. The exceptions -- 5.2.3.1. Specifi c routes -- 5.2.3.2. The Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Courtof Human Rights -- 5.2.4. Main constitutional strategies to address socialand economic challenges -- 5.2.4.1. General solutions -- 5.2.4.2. New interpretative methods and substantive conceptsin constitutional law -- 5.3. Possible reasons for changes in case law -- 5.3.1. European trends -- 5.3.2. Explanation of Hungarian Constitutional Court practice -in a crisis situation -- 6. QUO VADIS, HUNGARIANCONSTITUTIONAL COURT? -- 6.1. On the benchmarks for evaluatingconstitutional review -- 6.2. Not everything is what it appears to be -- BIBLIOGRAPHY -- Back cover Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Gárdos-Orosz, Fruzsina Constitutional Justice under Populism Alphen aan den Rijn : Wolters Kluwer Law International,c2024 9789403520285 |
| spellingShingle | Gárdos-Orosz, Fruzsina Constitutional Justice under Populism The Transformation of Constitutional Jurisprudence in Hungary Since 2010 Front cover -- Constitutional Justice under Populism -- Title -- Copyright -- Table of content -- INTRODUCTION -- 1. CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW,CONSTITUTIONAL COURTSAND THE INSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGESOF THE 21ST CENTURY IN EUROPE -- 2. THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTOF THE FUNDAMENTAL LAW.THE BEGINNINGS -- 2.1. Concerning the transformation -- 2.2. The experience of competences -- 2.2.1. The constitutional complaint -- 2.2.1.1. Against a judicial decision.Review of the constitutionality of the law applied -- 2.2.1.2. Review of legislation wherethe application directly infringes fundamental rights -- 2.2.1.3. Against a judicial decision: Review of the constitutionalityof a judicial decision -- 2.2.2. Judicial referral - concrete norm control -- 2.2.3. Ex-post abstract norm control -- 2.2.4. Preliminary abstract norm control -- 2.3. The approach to the pre-Fundamental Lawcase law -- 2.4. The role of international law and EU law -- 3. AFTER THE BEGINNING -NEW CHALLENGES - NEW RESPONSES -- 3.1. The principles of interpretation -- 3.1.1. A new set of interpretative methods or a reformulationof classic interpretative methods? -- 3.1.2. Application of mandatory interpretation methodsin the practice of the Constitutional Court -- 3.1.2.1. Application of the new mandatory interpretation methods -- 3.1.2.2. Politically sensitive cases -- 3.1.3. Conclusions -- 3.2. Constitutional protection of the identityof the Fundamental Law -- 3.2.1. Populist constitutionalism -- 3.2.2. The role of the "constitutional tradition" in the identityof the Fundamental Law -- 3.2.3. The revival of the historical constitution? -- 3.2.4. The protection of constitutional identity bythe Constitutional Court -- 3.2.5. Conclusions -- 3.3. Some classic dilemmas of constitutionaladjudication in a new light -- 3.3.1. A "countermajoritarian difficulty" -- 3.3.2. Activism and/or deference 3.3.3. Constitutional review of the amendmentof the Fundamental Law -- 4. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THECONSTITUTIONAL COURTAND THE ORDINARY COURTS IN THEPROTECTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS -- 4.1. Constitutional presumptions -- 4.2. The signifi cance of the constitutional complaint -- 4.2.1. Subject of the inquiry -- 4.2.2. Constitutional complaint pursuant to Article 27 of the Acton the Constitutional Court -- 4.2.3. Figures on inclusiveness and success rates -- 4.2.4. The traditional approach - the importanceof the admissibility procedure in the relationship betweenthe ordinary court and the Constitutional Court -- 4.2.4.1. Admissibility: what is "prejudice to a right guaranteed bythe Fundamental Law?" -- 4.2.4.2. Admissibility: what is the fundamental constitutional issue? -- 4.2.5. Conclusions -- 4.3. The enforcement of fundamental rightsin the practice of ordinary courts and the roleof the Constitutional Court -- 4.3.1. Introduction -- 4.3.2. The starting point - the purpose of the legal construct -- 4.3.3. Th e doctrine of horizontal eff ect and the new constitutionalbases - lessons from the judicial practice -- 4.3.3.1. Right to property -- 4.3.3.2. Freedom of the press and freedom of expression -- 4.3.3.3. "Police offi cer's portrait" -- 4.3.3.4. Violation of the right to privacy -- 4.3.4. Sub-summary: the horizontal eff ect and its practice underthe Fundamental Law -- 4.3.5. Conclusions -- 5. FROM CRISIS TO CRISIS.HUNGARIAN CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEWIN THE EUROPEAN SPACE -- 5.1. Changes in the practice of the ConstitutionalCourt in the context of the economic crisis,the migration crisis, the fi ght against terrorism,national security and the pandemic -- 5.1.1. The standards of fundamental rights protectionin normalcy and in emergency in Hungary -- 5.1.1.1. The history of fundamental rights protectionin Hungary 5.1.1.2. What is a fundamental right in normalcy and in emergencyin Hungary? -- 5.1.1.3. Content of the state obligation to protect rights -- 5.1.1.4. The test of fundamental rights restrictions -- 5.1.1.5. Standards of human rights protection in the special legal order -- 5.1.1.6. Conclusions -- 5.1.2. The impact of the economic crisis on constitutional jurisprudence -- 5.1.2.1. Background -- 5.1.2.2. Changes in the practice of the Constitutional Court -- 5.1.2.3. Foreign currency credit loan cases -- 5.1.3. Migration -- 5.1.4. Terrorism threat and security challenges -- 5.1.5. Covid-19 and Constitutional Court in Hungary -- 5.1.5.1. The special legal order -- 5.1.5.2. The complicated practice of the Constitutional Court -- 5.2. The Hungarian Constitutional Courtin the European Constitutional Space -- 5.2.1. Introduction -- 5.2.2. European constitutional courts' responses to social,economic and political challenges -- 5.2.2.1. The change -- 5.2.2.2. Continuity and change -- 5.2.2.3. Stability and continuity -- 5.2.3. The exceptions -- 5.2.3.1. Specifi c routes -- 5.2.3.2. The Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Courtof Human Rights -- 5.2.4. Main constitutional strategies to address socialand economic challenges -- 5.2.4.1. General solutions -- 5.2.4.2. New interpretative methods and substantive conceptsin constitutional law -- 5.3. Possible reasons for changes in case law -- 5.3.1. European trends -- 5.3.2. Explanation of Hungarian Constitutional Court practice -in a crisis situation -- 6. QUO VADIS, HUNGARIANCONSTITUTIONAL COURT? -- 6.1. On the benchmarks for evaluatingconstitutional review -- 6.2. Not everything is what it appears to be -- BIBLIOGRAPHY -- Back cover |
| title | Constitutional Justice under Populism The Transformation of Constitutional Jurisprudence in Hungary Since 2010 |
| title_auth | Constitutional Justice under Populism The Transformation of Constitutional Jurisprudence in Hungary Since 2010 |
| title_exact_search | Constitutional Justice under Populism The Transformation of Constitutional Jurisprudence in Hungary Since 2010 |
| title_full | Constitutional Justice under Populism The Transformation of Constitutional Jurisprudence in Hungary Since 2010 |
| title_fullStr | Constitutional Justice under Populism The Transformation of Constitutional Jurisprudence in Hungary Since 2010 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Constitutional Justice under Populism The Transformation of Constitutional Jurisprudence in Hungary Since 2010 |
| title_short | Constitutional Justice under Populism |
| title_sort | constitutional justice under populism the transformation of constitutional jurisprudence in hungary since 2010 |
| title_sub | The Transformation of Constitutional Jurisprudence in Hungary Since 2010 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gardosoroszfruzsina constitutionaljusticeunderpopulismthetransformationofconstitutionaljurisprudenceinhungarysince2010 |