Conscientious objection in medicine:
The Element examines ethical and conceptual issues about conscientious objection in medicine. Concepts analyzed include conscientious objection, conscientious provision, conscience, moral complicity, and moral integrity. Several ongoing ethical controversies are identified and critically analyzed. O...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2024
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Cambridge elements. Elements in bioethics and neuroethics
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | DE-12 DE-473 URL des Erstveröffentlichers |
| Zusammenfassung: | The Element examines ethical and conceptual issues about conscientious objection in medicine. Concepts analyzed include conscientious objection, conscientious provision, conscience, moral complicity, and moral integrity. Several ongoing ethical controversies are identified and critically analyzed. One is a disagreement about whether conscientious objection is compatible with physicians' professional obligations. The Element argues that incompatibilists fail to offer a justifiable specification of professional obligations that supports their position. The Element also argues that a challenge for compatibilists who support a reason-giving requirement is to specify justifiable and unambiguous criteria for reviewing objectors' reasons. Arguments for and against requirements to inform and refer patients are critically analyzed, and an alternative, context-dependent requirement is offered. Another subject of controversy is about the justifiability of asymmetry between responses to conscientious objectors and conscientious providers. Typically, only the former receive accommodation. The Element critically examines arguments for asymmetry and maintains that none provides a convincing justi |
| Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 12 Mar 2024) What is conscientious objection? -- Should conscientious objectors be accommodated? -- Assessing objectors' beliefs and reasons -- Accommodation and conscientious provision |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (84 Seiten) |
| ISBN: | 9781009076081 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/9781009076081 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV049859692 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240909s2024 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781009076081 |c Online |9 978-1-009-07608-1 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/9781009076081 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781009076081 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1456130498 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049859692 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 174.2 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Wicclair, Mark R. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)172737648 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Conscientious objection in medicine |c Mark Wicclair |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2024 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (84 Seiten) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Cambridge elements. Elements in bioethics and neuroethics | |
| 500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 12 Mar 2024) | ||
| 500 | |a What is conscientious objection? -- Should conscientious objectors be accommodated? -- Assessing objectors' beliefs and reasons -- Accommodation and conscientious provision | ||
| 520 | |a The Element examines ethical and conceptual issues about conscientious objection in medicine. Concepts analyzed include conscientious objection, conscientious provision, conscience, moral complicity, and moral integrity. Several ongoing ethical controversies are identified and critically analyzed. One is a disagreement about whether conscientious objection is compatible with physicians' professional obligations. The Element argues that incompatibilists fail to offer a justifiable specification of professional obligations that supports their position. The Element also argues that a challenge for compatibilists who support a reason-giving requirement is to specify justifiable and unambiguous criteria for reviewing objectors' reasons. Arguments for and against requirements to inform and refer patients are critically analyzed, and an alternative, context-dependent requirement is offered. Another subject of controversy is about the justifiability of asymmetry between responses to conscientious objectors and conscientious providers. Typically, only the former receive accommodation. The Element critically examines arguments for asymmetry and maintains that none provides a convincing justi | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Medical ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Conscientious objection | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Refusal to treat | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover |z 978-1-009-53358-4 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback |z 978-1-009-07479-7 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009076081?locatt=mode:legacy |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035199437 | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009076081?locatt=mode:legacy |l DE-12 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009076081?locatt=mode:legacy |l DE-473 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1812974033501683712 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Wicclair, Mark R. |
| author_GND | (DE-588)172737648 |
| author_facet | Wicclair, Mark R. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Wicclair, Mark R. |
| author_variant | m r w mr mrw |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV049859692 |
| collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781009076081 (OCoLC)1456130498 (DE-599)BVBBV049859692 |
| dewey-full | 174.2 |
| dewey-hundreds | 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
| dewey-ones | 174 - Occupational ethics |
| dewey-raw | 174.2 |
| dewey-search | 174.2 |
| dewey-sort | 3174.2 |
| dewey-tens | 170 - Ethics (Moral philosophy) |
| discipline | Philosophie |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/9781009076081 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nmm a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049859692</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240909s2024 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781009076081</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-009-07608-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/9781009076081</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781009076081</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1456130498</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049859692</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">174.2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wicclair, Mark R.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)172737648</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Conscientious objection in medicine</subfield><subfield code="c">Mark Wicclair</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (84 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cambridge elements. Elements in bioethics and neuroethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 12 Mar 2024)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">What is conscientious objection? -- Should conscientious objectors be accommodated? -- Assessing objectors' beliefs and reasons -- Accommodation and conscientious provision</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The Element examines ethical and conceptual issues about conscientious objection in medicine. Concepts analyzed include conscientious objection, conscientious provision, conscience, moral complicity, and moral integrity. Several ongoing ethical controversies are identified and critically analyzed. One is a disagreement about whether conscientious objection is compatible with physicians' professional obligations. The Element argues that incompatibilists fail to offer a justifiable specification of professional obligations that supports their position. The Element also argues that a challenge for compatibilists who support a reason-giving requirement is to specify justifiable and unambiguous criteria for reviewing objectors' reasons. Arguments for and against requirements to inform and refer patients are critically analyzed, and an alternative, context-dependent requirement is offered. Another subject of controversy is about the justifiability of asymmetry between responses to conscientious objectors and conscientious providers. Typically, only the former receive accommodation. The Element critically examines arguments for asymmetry and maintains that none provides a convincing justi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Medical ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conscientious objection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Refusal to treat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-009-53358-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-009-07479-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009076081?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035199437</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009076081?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009076081?locatt=mode:legacy</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV049859692 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-10-15T10:06:12Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781009076081 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035199437 |
| oclc_num | 1456130498 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (84 Seiten) |
| psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateSearch | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Cambridge elements. Elements in bioethics and neuroethics |
| spelling | Wicclair, Mark R. Verfasser (DE-588)172737648 aut Conscientious objection in medicine Mark Wicclair Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2024 1 Online-Ressource (84 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Cambridge elements. Elements in bioethics and neuroethics Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 12 Mar 2024) What is conscientious objection? -- Should conscientious objectors be accommodated? -- Assessing objectors' beliefs and reasons -- Accommodation and conscientious provision The Element examines ethical and conceptual issues about conscientious objection in medicine. Concepts analyzed include conscientious objection, conscientious provision, conscience, moral complicity, and moral integrity. Several ongoing ethical controversies are identified and critically analyzed. One is a disagreement about whether conscientious objection is compatible with physicians' professional obligations. The Element argues that incompatibilists fail to offer a justifiable specification of professional obligations that supports their position. The Element also argues that a challenge for compatibilists who support a reason-giving requirement is to specify justifiable and unambiguous criteria for reviewing objectors' reasons. Arguments for and against requirements to inform and refer patients are critically analyzed, and an alternative, context-dependent requirement is offered. Another subject of controversy is about the justifiability of asymmetry between responses to conscientious objectors and conscientious providers. Typically, only the former receive accommodation. The Element critically examines arguments for asymmetry and maintains that none provides a convincing justi Medical ethics Conscientious objection Refusal to treat Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover 978-1-009-53358-4 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback 978-1-009-07479-7 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009076081?locatt=mode:legacy Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Wicclair, Mark R. Conscientious objection in medicine Medical ethics Conscientious objection Refusal to treat |
| title | Conscientious objection in medicine |
| title_auth | Conscientious objection in medicine |
| title_exact_search | Conscientious objection in medicine |
| title_full | Conscientious objection in medicine Mark Wicclair |
| title_fullStr | Conscientious objection in medicine Mark Wicclair |
| title_full_unstemmed | Conscientious objection in medicine Mark Wicclair |
| title_short | Conscientious objection in medicine |
| title_sort | conscientious objection in medicine |
| topic | Medical ethics Conscientious objection Refusal to treat |
| topic_facet | Medical ethics Conscientious objection Refusal to treat |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009076081?locatt=mode:legacy |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT wicclairmarkr conscientiousobjectioninmedicine |