The aesthetic analysis of a garden:
Offering aesthetic judgments of gardens is common. These judgments follow an evidentiary structure that is common to the evaluation of other aesthetic objects: summary judgments evidenced by the attribution of narrow formal aesthetic properties, "formal-adjacent" aesthetic properties, and...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[2024]
|
| Subjects: | |
| Summary: | Offering aesthetic judgments of gardens is common. These judgments follow an evidentiary structure that is common to the evaluation of other aesthetic objects: summary judgments evidenced by the attribution of narrow formal aesthetic properties, "formal-adjacent" aesthetic properties, and relevant contextual relations. Yet, in a garden, these evidencing properties and relations take on forms that are different from those of other aesthetic and/or art objects. In this article, I consider these differences and consider whether aesthetic analyses of gardens rest on one or more conceptual mistakes. In the end, I conclude that we can meet all challenges. |
| ISSN: | 0021-8529 |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV049833714 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20240828 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 240826s2024 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1454761650 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049833714 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-255 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Fenner, David E. W. |d 1963- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)173184634 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The aesthetic analysis of a garden |c David Fenner |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2024] | |
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Offering aesthetic judgments of gardens is common. These judgments follow an evidentiary structure that is common to the evaluation of other aesthetic objects: summary judgments evidenced by the attribution of narrow formal aesthetic properties, "formal-adjacent" aesthetic properties, and relevant contextual relations. Yet, in a garden, these evidencing properties and relations take on forms that are different from those of other aesthetic and/or art objects. In this article, I consider these differences and consider whether aesthetic analyses of gardens rest on one or more conceptual mistakes. In the end, I conclude that we can meet all challenges. | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gartenkunst |0 (DE-588)4125179-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Ästhetik |0 (DE-588)4000626-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a St. James’s Park |g London |0 (DE-588)1060473984 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Gartenkunst |0 (DE-588)4125179-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Ästhetik |0 (DE-588)4000626-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |a St. James’s Park |g London |0 (DE-588)1060473984 |D g |
| 689 | 1 | 1 | |a Ästhetik |0 (DE-588)4000626-8 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:82 |g number:1 |g year:2024 |g pages:7-17 |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |t The journal of aesthetics and art criticism / American Society for Aesthetics. Ed. Thomas Munro |d Hoboken, NJ, 2024 |g Volume 82, number 1 (winter 2024), Seite 7-17 |w (DE-604)BV002662422 |x 0021-8529 |o (DE-600)2930-0 |
| 941 | |b 82 |h 1 |j 2024 |s 7-17 | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035173644 | |
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1809767919913009152 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| article_link | (DE-604)BV002662422 |
| author | Fenner, David E. W. 1963- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)173184634 |
| author_facet | Fenner, David E. W. 1963- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Fenner, David E. W. 1963- |
| author_variant | d e w f dew dewf |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV049833714 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1454761650 (DE-599)BVBBV049833714 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000naa a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049833714</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240828</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240826s2024 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1454761650</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049833714</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-255</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fenner, David E. W.</subfield><subfield code="d">1963-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)173184634</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The aesthetic analysis of a garden</subfield><subfield code="c">David Fenner</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">[2024]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Offering aesthetic judgments of gardens is common. These judgments follow an evidentiary structure that is common to the evaluation of other aesthetic objects: summary judgments evidenced by the attribution of narrow formal aesthetic properties, "formal-adjacent" aesthetic properties, and relevant contextual relations. Yet, in a garden, these evidencing properties and relations take on forms that are different from those of other aesthetic and/or art objects. In this article, I consider these differences and consider whether aesthetic analyses of gardens rest on one or more conceptual mistakes. In the end, I conclude that we can meet all challenges.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gartenkunst</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4125179-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ästhetik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4000626-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">St. James’s Park</subfield><subfield code="g">London</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1060473984</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Gartenkunst</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4125179-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Ästhetik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4000626-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">St. James’s Park</subfield><subfield code="g">London</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1060473984</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Ästhetik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4000626-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:82</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2024</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:7-17</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="t">The journal of aesthetics and art criticism / American Society for Aesthetics. Ed. Thomas Munro</subfield><subfield code="d">Hoboken, NJ, 2024</subfield><subfield code="g">Volume 82, number 1 (winter 2024), Seite 7-17</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV002662422</subfield><subfield code="x">0021-8529</subfield><subfield code="o">(DE-600)2930-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="941" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">82</subfield><subfield code="h">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2024</subfield><subfield code="s">7-17</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035173644</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | St. James’s Park London (DE-588)1060473984 gnd |
| geographic_facet | St. James’s Park London |
| id | DE-604.BV049833714 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-09-10T00:46:23Z |
| institution | BVB |
| issn | 0021-8529 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035173644 |
| oclc_num | 1454761650 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-255 |
| owner_facet | DE-255 |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateSearch | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Fenner, David E. W. 1963- Verfasser (DE-588)173184634 aut The aesthetic analysis of a garden David Fenner [2024] txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Offering aesthetic judgments of gardens is common. These judgments follow an evidentiary structure that is common to the evaluation of other aesthetic objects: summary judgments evidenced by the attribution of narrow formal aesthetic properties, "formal-adjacent" aesthetic properties, and relevant contextual relations. Yet, in a garden, these evidencing properties and relations take on forms that are different from those of other aesthetic and/or art objects. In this article, I consider these differences and consider whether aesthetic analyses of gardens rest on one or more conceptual mistakes. In the end, I conclude that we can meet all challenges. Gartenkunst (DE-588)4125179-9 gnd rswk-swf Ästhetik (DE-588)4000626-8 gnd rswk-swf St. James’s Park London (DE-588)1060473984 gnd rswk-swf Gartenkunst (DE-588)4125179-9 s Ästhetik (DE-588)4000626-8 s DE-604 St. James’s Park London (DE-588)1060473984 g volume:82 number:1 year:2024 pages:7-17 The journal of aesthetics and art criticism / American Society for Aesthetics. Ed. Thomas Munro Hoboken, NJ, 2024 Volume 82, number 1 (winter 2024), Seite 7-17 (DE-604)BV002662422 0021-8529 (DE-600)2930-0 |
| spellingShingle | Fenner, David E. W. 1963- The aesthetic analysis of a garden Gartenkunst (DE-588)4125179-9 gnd Ästhetik (DE-588)4000626-8 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4125179-9 (DE-588)4000626-8 (DE-588)1060473984 |
| title | The aesthetic analysis of a garden |
| title_auth | The aesthetic analysis of a garden |
| title_exact_search | The aesthetic analysis of a garden |
| title_full | The aesthetic analysis of a garden David Fenner |
| title_fullStr | The aesthetic analysis of a garden David Fenner |
| title_full_unstemmed | The aesthetic analysis of a garden David Fenner |
| title_short | The aesthetic analysis of a garden |
| title_sort | the aesthetic analysis of a garden |
| topic | Gartenkunst (DE-588)4125179-9 gnd Ästhetik (DE-588)4000626-8 gnd |
| topic_facet | Gartenkunst Ästhetik St. James’s Park London |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fennerdavidew theaestheticanalysisofagarden |