The evolution of authoritarianism and contentious action in Russia:
"This Element examines the evolution of authoritarianism in Russia from 2011 to 2023, focusing on its impact on contentious action. It argues that the primary determinant of contention, at both federal and regional levels, is authoritarian innovation characterized by reactive and proactive repr...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cambridge ; New York ; Melbourne ; New Delhi ; Singapore
Cambridge University Press
[2024]
|
| Series: | Elements in contentious politics
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Literaturverzeichnis |
| Summary: | "This Element examines the evolution of authoritarianism in Russia from 2011 to 2023, focusing on its impact on contentious action. It argues that the primary determinant of contention, at both federal and regional levels, is authoritarian innovation characterized by reactive and proactive repression. Drawing on Russian legislation, reports from human rights organizations, media coverage, and a novel dataset of contentious events created from user-generated reports on Twitter using computational techniques, this Element contributes to the understanding of contentious politics in authoritarian regimes, underscoring the role of authoritarianism and its innovative responses in shaping contentious action." |
| Physical Description: | 98 Seiten Illustrationen, Diagramme |
| ISBN: | 9781009560658 9781009560689 |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV049766262 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20250307 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 240703s2024 xx a||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781009560658 |c pbk |9 978-1-009-56065-8 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781009560689 |c hbk |9 978-1-009-56068-9 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1466929086 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049766262 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-29 |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Mamaev, Bogdan |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1334300534 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The evolution of authoritarianism and contentious action in Russia |c Bogdan Mamaev |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge ; New York ; Melbourne ; New Delhi ; Singapore |b Cambridge University Press |c [2024] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2024 | |
| 300 | |a 98 Seiten |b Illustrationen, Diagramme | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Elements in contentious politics | |
| 520 | 3 | |a "This Element examines the evolution of authoritarianism in Russia from 2011 to 2023, focusing on its impact on contentious action. It argues that the primary determinant of contention, at both federal and regional levels, is authoritarian innovation characterized by reactive and proactive repression. Drawing on Russian legislation, reports from human rights organizations, media coverage, and a novel dataset of contentious events created from user-generated reports on Twitter using computational techniques, this Element contributes to the understanding of contentious politics in authoritarian regimes, underscoring the role of authoritarianism and its innovative responses in shaping contentious action." | |
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 2011-2023 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Unterdrückung |0 (DE-588)4257314-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Autoritärer Staat |0 (DE-588)4256521-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Russland |0 (DE-588)4076899-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Authoritarianism / Russia (Federation) | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Post-communism / Russia (Federation) | |
| 653 | 2 | |a Russia (Federation) / Politics and government / 1991- | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Russland |0 (DE-588)4076899-5 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Autoritärer Staat |0 (DE-588)4256521-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Unterdrückung |0 (DE-588)4257314-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Geschichte 2011-2023 |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-1-009-56067-2 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=035107566&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=035107566&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20250307 | |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 090513 |g 471 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 471 |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035107566 | |
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1826854015739101184 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Explaining Authoritarianism andContentious Action 5 3 Methodology 19 4 Authoritarian Innovationand Contentious Action in Russia 32 Conclusion 80 References 85 5
References Adamson, F. В. (2020). Non-state authoritarianism and diaspora politics. Global Networks, 20(1), 150-169. Alexanyan, K., Barash, V., Etling, B., et al. (2012). Exploring Russian cyberspace: Digitally-mediated collective action and the networked public sphere. Berkman Center Research Publication, (2). Alieva, I., Moffitt, J., Carley, K. Μ. (2022). How disinformation operations against Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny influence the international audience on Twitter. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 12(1), 80. Almeida, P. (2003). Opportunity organizations and threat-induced contention: Protest waves in authoritarian settings. American Journal of Sociology, 109(2), 345—400. Alvarez, Μ., Cheibub, J. A., Limongi, E, Przeworski, A. (1996). Classifying political regimes. Studies in Comparative International Development, 31, 3-36. Amnesty International. (2012). The circle of injustice: Security operations and human rights violations in Ingushetia (Tech. Rep.), www.amnesty.org/ en/documents/eur46/005/2012/en/ Anckar, C., Fredriksson, C. (2019). Classifying political regimes 1800-2016: A typology and a new dataset. European Political Science, 18(1), 84-96. Arslanalp, Μ., Erkmen, T. D. (2020). Mobile emergency rule in Turkey: Legal repression of protests during authoritarian transformation. Democra tization, 27(6), 947-969. Ash, K. (2015). The election trap: The cycle of post-electoral repression and opposition fragmentation in Lukashenko’s Belarus. Democratization, 22(6), 1030-1053. Azhgikhina, N. (2007). The struggle for press freedom in Russia: Reflections of
a Russianjournalist. Europe-Asia Studies, 59(8), 1245-1262. Bader, Μ., Enikolopov, R., Petrova, Μ., Sonin, K. (2014). Fraud and elec tions in authoritarian regimes: Evidence from a field experiment in Russia. American Political Science Review, 108(1), 144—158. BBC News. (2016, November 1). Russia activist Ildar Dadin accuses prison of torture, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-37836739 Biggs, Μ. (2015). Has protest increased since the 1970s? How a survey ques tion can construct a spurious trend. British Journal of Sociology, 66(1), 141-62.
86 References Biggs, Μ. (2018). Size matters: Quantifying protest by counting participants. Sociological Methods Research, 47(3), 351-383. Bjornskov, C., Rode, Μ. (2019). Regime types and regime change: A new dataset on democracy, coups, and political institutions. The Review of International Organizations, 15(2), 531-551. Bjornskov, C., Rode, Μ. (2020). Regime types and regime change: A new dataset on democracy, coups, and political institutions. The Review of International Organizations, 15, 531-551. Bodrunova, S. S., Litvinenko, A., Nigmatullina, K. (2021). Who is the censor? Self-censorship of Russian journalists in professional routines and social networking. Journalism, 22(12), 2919-2937. Boon, K. Μ. (2022). ‘The only thing is you have to know them first’: Protest policing and Malaysia’s BERSIH protests (2011-2016). Small Wars Insurgencies, 55(4-5), 868-901. Boutros, Μ. (2017). Place and tactical innovation in social movements: The emergence of Egypt’s anti-harassment groups. Theory and Society, 46,543575. Breuer, A., Landman, T., Farquhar, D. (2015). Social media and protest mobilization: Evidence from the Tunisian revolution. Democratization, 22(4), 764-792. Buitinck, L., Louppe, G., Blondel, Μ., et al. (2013). API design for machine learning software: Experiences from the scikit-learn project. arXivpreprint arXiv: 1309.0238. Burtsev, Μ., Seliverstov, A., Airapetyan, R., et al. (2018). Deeppavlov: Opensource library for dialogue systems. In Proceedings of ACL 2018, system demonstrations (pp. 122-127). Carles, B., Miller, Μ., Sebastian, R. (2018). Boix-miller-rosato
dichotomous coding of democracy, 1800-2015. Harvard Dataverse. Centre, Μ. H. R. (2013). The case ofGelendghik human rights activists, https:// memohrc .org/ru/special-proj ects/delo-gelendzhikskih-pravozashchitnikov Cha, Μ., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., Gummadi, K. (2010). Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy. In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media (Vol. 4, pp. 10-17). Chaisty, P., Whitefield, S. (2013). Forward to democracy or back to author itarianism? The attitudinal bases of mass support for the Russian election protests of 2011-2012. Post-Soviet Affairs, 29(5), 387—403. Chau, T- H., Wan, K.- Μ. (2024). Pour (tear) gas on fire? Violent con frontations and anti-government backlash. Political Science Research and Methods, 12(1), 184-194.
References 87 Chen, X., Moss, D. Μ. (2018). Authoritarian regimes and social movements. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, H. Kriesi, H. J. McCammon (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 666-681). Chichester: John Wiley Sons. Cheskin, A., March, L. (2015). State-society relations in contemporary Rus sia: New forms of political and social contention. East European Politics, 31(3), 261-273. Coppedge, Μ., Lindberg, S., Skaaning, S. E., Teorell, J. (2016). Measur ing high-level democratic principles using the v-dem data. International Political Science Review, 37(5), 580-593. Corduneanu-Huci, C., Osa, Μ. (2003). Running uphill: Political opportunity in non-democracies. Comparative Sociology, 2(4), 605-629. Crossley, N. (2002). Repertoires of contention and tactical diversity in the UK psychiatric survivors movement: The question of appropriation. Social Movement Studies, 7(1), 47-71. Curato, N., Fossati, D. (2020). Authoritarian innovations: Crafting support for a less democratic Southeast Asia. Democratization, 27(6), 1006-1020. Dahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy. Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press. Daucé, F. (2014). The government and human rights groups in Russia: Civilized oppression? Journal of Civil Society, 10(3), 239-254. Davenport, C. (1995). Multi-dimensional threat perception and state repres sion: An inquiry into why states apply negative sanctions. American Journal ofPolitical Science, 683-713. Dehghan, E., Glazunova, S. (2021). “Fake news” discourses: An exploration of Russian and Persian tweets. Journal ofLanguage and
Politics, 20(5), 741760. della Porta, D. (2011). Eventful protest, global conflicts. Distinktion: Journal ofSocial Theory. 9(2.), 27-56. Devlin, J., Chang, Μ.- W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K. (2018). BERT: Pre training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1810.04805. Dollbaum, J. Μ. (2021a). Protest event analysis under conditions of limited press freedom: Comparing data sources. Media and Communication, 9(4), 104-115. Dollbaum, J. Μ. (202 lb). Social policy on social media: How opposition actors used Twitter and VKontakte to oppose the Russian pension reform. Problems ofPost-Communism, 68(6), 509-520. Earl, J. (2003). Tanks, tear gas, and taxes: Toward a theory of movement repression. Sociological Theory, 27(1), 44-68.
88 References Earl, J. (2011 ). Political repression: Iron fists, velvet gloves, and diffuse control. Annual Review ofSociology, 37,261-284. Edwards, G. (2016). In N. Crossley J. Krinsky (Eds.), Social networks and social movements (pp. 48-69). Routledge. Eisinger, P. K. (1973). The conditions of protest behavior in American cities. American Political Science Review. 67(1), 11-28. Enikolopov, R., Korovkin, V., Petrova, Μ., Sonin, K., Zakharov, A. V. (2012). Field experiment estimate of electoral fraud in Russian parliamentary elections. Proceedings ofthe National Academy ofSciences. Esen, B., Gumuscu, S. (2016). Rising competitive authoritarianism in Turkey. Third World Quarterly, 37(9), 1581-1606. Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. (2004). Federal Law ofJune 19, 2004 No. 54-FZ. Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. (2022). Article 20.2 of Code of Administrative Offences [Government Document], Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. (2023a). Administrative Code of the Russian Federation. Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. (2023b). Article 20.2 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation. Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. (2023c). Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Federal Protective Service of the Russian Federation. (2023). Official internet portal oflegal information, http://pravo.gov.ru/ FIDH. (2018). Russia 2012—2018: 50 anti-democracy laws entered into force within last presidential mandate, www.fidh.org/en/region/europe-centralasia/russia/russia-2012-2018-50-anti-democracy-laws-entered-into-forcewithin FIDH. (2023).
FIDH documents the destruction of civil society in Russia, law after law. www.fidh.org/en/region/europe-central-asia/russia/fidh-docu ments-the-destruction-of-civil-society-in-russia-law-after Ford, Μ., Gillan, Μ., Ward, K. (2021). Authoritarian innovations in labor governance: The case of Cambodia. Governance, 34(A), 1255-1271. Freedom House. (2023). Marking 50 years in the struggle for democ racy (Report). Freedom House, https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedomworld/2023/marking-50-years Gabdulhakov, R. (2020). (Con)trolling the web: Social media user arrests, statesupported vigilantism and citizen counter-forces in Russia. Global Crime, 21(3-A), 283-305. Gabowitsch, Μ. (2018). Are copycats subversive? Strategy-31, the Rus sian runs, the immortal regiment, and the transformative potential of
References 89 non-hierarchical movements. Problems of Post-Communism, 65(5), 297314. Galeotti, Μ. (2021). The silovik-industrial complex: Russia’s national guard as coercive, political, economic and cultural force. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal ofPost-Soviet Democratization, 29(V), 3-29. Gandhi, J., Przeworski, A. (2007). Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats. Comparative Political Studies, 40(11), 1279-1301. Gel'man, V. (2016). The politics of fear: How Russia’s rulers counter their rivals. Russian Politics, 7(1), 27-45. Glasius, Μ. (2018). What authoritarianism is . and is not: A practice perspec tive. International Affairs, 94(3), 515-533. Göbel, C. (2021). The political logic of protest repression in China. Journal of Contemporary China, 30(128), 169-185. Goldstone, J. (2016). Protest and repression in democracies and autocracies: Europe, Iran, Thailand and the Middle East 2010-11. In S. Seferiades H. Johnston (Eds.), Violent protest, contentious politics, and the neoliberal state (p. 103-117). Routledge. Goldstone, J., Tilly, C. (2001). Threat (and opportunity): Popular action and state response in the dynamics of contentious action. Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics, 179-194. Grießhaber, D., Maucher, J., Vu, N. T. (2020). Fine-tuning BERT for lowresource natural language understanding via active learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.02462. Grimm, J., Harders, C. (2018). Unpacking the effects of repression: The evo lution of Islamist repertoires of contention in Egypt after the fall of president Morsi. Social Movement Studies,
17(\), 1-18. Gupta, D. K., Singh, H., Sprague, T. (1993). Government coercion of dis sidents: Deterrence or provocation? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37(2), 301-339. Guriev, S., Treisman, D. (2020). A theory of informational autocracy. Journal ofPublic Economics, 186, 104158. Hall, S. G., Ambrosio, T. (2017). Authoritarian learning: A conceptual overview. East European Politics, 33(2), 143-161. Hassanpour, N. (2014). Media disruption and revolutionary unrest: Evidence from Mubarak’s quasi-experiment. Political Communication, 31(1), 1-24. Hellmeier, S., Weidmann, N. B. (2020). Pulling the strings? The strategic use of pro-government mobilization in authoritarian regimes. Comparative Political Studies, 53(1), 71-108. Heydemann, S. (2013). Tracking the Arab Spring: Syria and the future of authoritarianism. Journal ofDemocracy, 24(4), 59-73.
90 References Heydemann, S., Leenders, R. (2011). Authoritarian learning and authoritar ian resilience: Regime responses to the “Arab Awakening.” Globalizations, 8(5), 647-653. Heydemann, S., Leenders, R. (2014). Authoritarian learning and counterrev olution. In Μ. Lynch (ed.), The Arab uprisings explained: New contentious politics in the middle east (pp. 75-92). Columbia University Press. Horvath, R. (2011). Putin’s “preventive counter-revolution”: Post-soviet authoritarianism and the spectre of velvet revolution. Europe-Asia Studies, 63(1), 1-25. Human Rights Watch. (2008). World report 2008: Russia, www.hrw.org/worldreport/2008/country-chapters-6 Jay Chen, C.- J. (2020). A protest society evaluated: Popular protests in China, 2000-2019. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 25(SI), 641660. Judicial Department of the Supreme Court. (2023). Report on the work of courts ofgeneraljurisdiction in considering cases ofadministrative offences. www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79 item=3417. Khovalyg, D. (2023). On “New Tuva” anti-war movement. Inner Asia, 25(1), 118-125. Kriesi, H., Hutter, S., Bojar, A. (2019). Contentious episode analysis. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 24(3), 251-273. Kuratov, Y, Arkhipov, Μ. (2019). Adaptation of deep bidirectional multilin gual transformers for Russian Language. Computing Research Repository. http://arxiv.Org/abs/l 905.07213. Lang, B. (2018). Authoritarian learning in china’s civil society regulations: Towards a multi-level framework. Journal ofCurrent Chinese Affairs, 47(3), 147-186. Lankina, T. (2015). The dynamics of regional
and national contentious poli tics in Russia: Evidence from a new dataset. Problems ofPost-Communism, 62(1), 26-44. LaPorte, J. (2015). Hidden in plain sight: Political opposition and hegemonic authoritarianism in Azerbaijan. Post-Soviet Affairs, 31(4), 339-366. Levitsky, S., Way, L. A. (2002). Elections without democracy: The rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal ofDemocracy, 13(2), 51-65. Levitsky, S., Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the cold war. Cambridge University Press. Libman, A. (2017). Subnational political regimes and formal economic regu lation: Evidence from Russian regions. Regional Federal Studies, 27(2), 127-151.
References 91 Lichbach, Μ. I. (1987). Deterrence or escalation?: The puzzle of aggregate studies of repression and dissent. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31(2), 266-297. Lipman, Μ. (2010). Freedom of expression without freedom of the press. Journal ofInternational Affairs, 63(2), 153-169. Lipsky, Μ. (1968). Protest as a political resources. American Political Science Review, 62(4), 1144-1158. Loshchilov, I., Hutter, F. (2017). Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXivpreprint arXiv: 1711.05101. Loveman, Μ. (1998). High-risk collective action: Defending human rights in Chile, Uruguay, and Argentina. American Journal ofSociology, 104(2),4Ί7525. Lührmann, A., Tannenberg, Μ., Lindberg, S. I. (2018). Regimes of the world (row): Opening new avenues for the comparative study of political regimes. Politics and Governance, 6(1), 60-77. Maddi, S. R., Harvey, R. H., Khoshaba, D. Μ., et al. (2006). The personal ity construct of hardiness, iii: Relationships with repression, innovativeness, authoritarianism, and performance. Journal ofPersonality, 74(2), 575-598. Magaloni, B., Chu, J., Min, E. (2013). Autocracies of the world, 1950-2012 (version 1.0). Dataset, Stanford University. Mapes, N., White, A., Medury, R., Dua, S. (2019). Divisive language and propaganda detection using multi-head attention transformers with deep learning BERT-based language models for binary classification. In Proceed ings of the second workshop on natural language processing for internet freedom: Censorship, disinformation, and propaganda (p. 103-106). Marshall, Μ. G., Jaggers, K., Gurr, T. R. (2010).
Polity iv project: Politi cal regime characteristics and transitions, 1800-2010. Center for Systemic Peace, 10, 24-37. Marty, D. (2009). Situation in the North Caucasus region: security and human rights (Tech. Rep.). Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights, Par liamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, http://assembly.coe.int/ CommitteeDocs/2009/ajdoc43_2009.pdf McAdam, D. (1983). Tactical innovation and the pace of insurgency. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 73 5-754. McAdam, D., Tarrow, S. (2018). The political context of social movements. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, H. Kriesi, H. J. McCammon (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 17-42). John Wiley Sons. McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., Tilly, C. (2012). Dynamics of contention. Cam bridge University Press.
92 References McCarthy, J. D., Zaid, Μ. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212— 1241. McCarthy, L. A., Rice, D., Lokhmutov, A. (2023). Fourmonths of“discrediting the military”: Repressive law in wartime Russia. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal ofPost-Soviet Democratization, 31(2), 125-160. Meyer, D. (2004). Protest and political opportunities. Annual Review of Soci ology, 30, 125-145. Mietzner, Μ. (2020). Authoritarian innovations in Indonesia: Electoral nar rowing, identity politics and executive illiberalism. Democratization, 27(6), 1021-1036. Moore, W. H. (1998). Repression and dissent: Substitution, context, and timing. American Journal ofPolitical Science, 42(3), 851-873. Morgenbesser, L. (2020a). The menu of autocratic innovation. Democratiza tion, 27(6), 1053-1072. Morgenbesser, L. (2020b). The rise ofsophisticated authoritarianism in South east Asia. Cambridge University Press. Morris, A. D. (1984). The origins of the civil rights movement. Simon and Schuster. Moss, D. (2014). Repression, response, and contained escalation under “liberal ized” authoritarianism in Jordan. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 19(3), 261-286. Munck, G. L., Verkuilen, J. (2002). Conceptualizing and measuring democ racy - evaluating alternative indices. Comparative Political Studies, 35(1), 5-34. Mustafa, B. (2023). Post-tishreen online feminism: Continuity, rupture, depar ture. International Journal ofMiddle East Studies, 55(2), 328-335. Nicholson, Μ. (2020). Towards a Russia ofthe regions. Routledge.
Norén-Nilsson, A. (2021). Fresh news, innovative news: Popularizing Cambo dia’s authoritarian turn. Critical Asian Studies, 53(1), 89-108. Novaya Gazeta. (2021). The Ingush case of Russia. Novaya Gazeta, https:// novayagazeta.ru/articles/2021/05/13/ingushskoe-delo-rossii Omelicheva, Μ. Y. (2021). Repression trap: The mechanism of escalating state violence in Russia (Tech. Rep.). Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). Ong, L. H., Han, D. (2019). What drives people to protest in an authoritarian country? Resources and rewards vs risks of protests in urban and rural China. Political Studies, 67(1), 224-248. Opp, K. (2022). Advanced introduction to social movements and political protests. Edward Elgar.
References 93 Opp, K.- D. (1994). Repression and revolutionary action: East Germany in 1989. Rationality and Society, 6(1), 101-138. Opp, K.- D. (2009). Theories ofpolitical protest and social movements: A mul tidisciplinary introduction, critique, and synthesis. New York: Routledge. Ortmann, S. (2023). When protests become a threat to authoritarian rule: The case of environmental protests in Viet Nam. Third World Quarterly, 44(9), 2063-2079. Ortmann, S., Thompson, Μ. R. (2020). China’s “Singapore model” and authoritarian learning. Routledge. Osa, Μ., Schock, K. (2007). A long, hard slog: Political opportunities, social networks and the mobilization of dissent in non-democracies. In G. C. Patrick (Ed.), Research in social movements, conflicts and change (Vol. 27, pp. 123-153). Emerald Group. OVD-Info. (2014). Political repressions in Russia in 2011-2014: Criminal prosecutions, https://reports.ovdinfo.org/2014/cr-report/ OVD-Info. (2018, October 27). The “New Greatness" case: Who are these people, and why are they being tried? An OVD-Info guide, https://ovd.info/ articles/2018/10/27/delo-novogo-velichiya-kto-eti-lyudi-i-za-chto-ihsudyat-gid-ovd-info OVD-Info. (2019, May 13). The “Network" case: Who are these peo ple, and why are they being tried? An OVD-Info guide, https://ovd.info/ articles/2019/05/13/delo-seti-kto-eti-lyudi-i-za-chto-ih-sudyat-gid-ovd-info OVD-Info. (2023a, July 17). Database ofpolitically motivated criminal pros ecutions. https://data.ovd.info/politpressing OVD-Info. (2023b). 20.2 administrative offenses code: Application, https:// data-
scripts.ovd.info/20_2/ Pan, J. (2017). How market dynamics of domestic and foreign social media firms shape strategies of internet censorship. Problems ofPost-Communism, 64(2-4), 167-188. Parliamentary Assembly. (2012, October 3). The definition of political pris oner. https://pace.coe.int/en/files/l 9150/html Pepinsky, T. (2020). Authoritarian innovations: Theoretical foundations and practical implications. Democratization, 27(6), 1092-1101. Politkovskaya, A. (2012). Putin ÿ Russia: The definitive account ofPutin i rise to power. Random House. Przeworski, A., Alvarez, Μ. E., Cheibub, J. A., et al. (2000). Democracy and development: Political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950-1990 (No. 3). Cambridge University Press. Reimers, N., Gurevych, I. (2019). Sentence-BERT: Sentence embeddings using Siamese bert-networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.10084.
94 References Riquelme, E, Gonzälez-Cantergiani, P. (2016). Measuring user influence on Twitter: A survey. Information Processing Management, 52(5), 949-975. Ritter, E. H„ Conrad, C. R. (2016). Preventing and responding to dissent: The observational challenges of explaining strategic repression. American Political Science Review, 110(1), 85-99. Robertson, G. (2013). Protesting Putinism. Problems of Post-Communism, 60(2), 11-23. Rossman, E. (2022). Meet Russia’s feminist resistance to Putin’s war on Ukraine. Green Left Weekly, (1341), 13. https://search.informit.org/doi/ 10.3316/informit.393839445920891. Roudakova, N. (2009). Journalism as “prostitution”: Understanding Russia’s reactions to Anna Politkovskaya’s murder. Political Communication, 26(4), 412—429. Rouvinsky, R. (2021). Lawmaking in times of domestic and foreign-policy instability (the Russian experience). The Theory and Practice ofLegislation, 9(1), 117-139. Sainz, O., Rigau, G. (2021). Ask2transformers: Zero-shot domain labelling with pre-trained language models. arXivpreprint arXiv:2101.02661. Schedler, A. (2013). The politics of uncertainty: Sustaining and subverting electoral authoritarianism. Oxford University Press. Schock, K. (1999). People power and political opportunities: Social movement mobilization and outcomes in the Philippines and Burma. Social Problems, 46(3), 355-375. Shahi, A., Abdoh-Tabrizi, E. (2020). Iran’s 2019-2020 demonstrations: The changing dynamics of political protests in Iran. Asian Affairs, 51(1), 1-41. Shriver, T. E., Adams, A. E. (2010). Cycles of repression and tacti cal
innovation: The evolution of environmental dissidence in communist Czechoslovakia. The Sociological Quarterly, 51(2), 329-354. Siegel, D. A. (2011). When does repression work? Collective action in social networks. The Journal ofPolitics, 73(4), 993-1010. Skaaning, S.- E. (2021). Lexical index of electoral democracy (LIED) dataset v6.0. Harvard Dataverse. Smith, W. (2011). Europe to the rescue: The killing ofjournalists in Russia and the European Court of Human Rights. George Washington International Law Review, 43, 493. Snow, D. A., Vliegenthart, R., Ketelaars, P. (2018). The framing perspec tive on social movements. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, H. Kriesi, H. J. McCammon (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 392-410). John Wiley Sons.
References 95 Snyder, D. (1976). Theoretical and methodological problems in the analysis of governmental coercion and collective violence. Journal of Political Military Sociology, 4(2), 277-293. Sokirianskaia, E. (2005). Families and clans in Ingushetia and Chechnya: A fieldwork report. Central Asian Survey, 24(4), 453-467. Sokirianskaia, E. (2023). Bonds of blood?: State-building and clanship in Chechnya and Ingushetia. Bloomsbury. Sova. (2022). About the centre Sova, www.sova-center.ru/about-us/ SoVA Center. (2013). Illegal use of anti-extremism legislation in Russia in 2012. www.sova-center.ru/misuse/publications/2013/04/d26952/ Straughn, J. B. (2005). “Taking the state at its word”: The arts of consentful con tention in the German Democratic Republic. American Journal ofSociology, 110(6), 1598-1650. Tarrow, S. (1993). Cycles of collective action: Between moments of madness and the repertoire of contention. Social Science History, 17(2), 281-307. Tarrow, S. (2022). Power in movement. Cambridge University Press. Tarrow, S. G. (1989). Democracy and disorder: Protest and politics in Italy, 1965-1975. Clarendon Press. Taylor, V., Van Dyke, N. (2004). “Get up, stand up”: Tactical repertoires of social movements. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements, 262-293. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Tertytchnaya, K. (2023). “This rally is not authorized”: Preventive repression and public opinion in electoral autocracies. World Politics, 75(3), 482-522. The Guardian. (2014, December 30). Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny given sus pended
sentence but brotherjailed, www.theguardian.com/world/2014/dec/ 30/kremlin-critic-navalny-given-suspended-sentence-brother-jailed Tilly, C. (1993). Contentious repertoires in Great Britain, 1758-1834. Social Science History, 17(2), 253-280. Tilly, C. (2010). Regimes and repertoires. University of Chicago Press. Trejo, G. (2012). Popular movements in autocracies: Religion, repression, and indigenous collective action in Mexico. Cambridge University Press. Trenin, D., Arbatov, A., Lipman, Μ., et al. (2012). The Russian Awakening (Tech. Rep.), www.jstor.org/stable/resrepl3012 Van Laer, J., Van Aelst, P. (2013). Cyber-protest and civil society: The inter net and action repertoires in social movements. In Y. Jewkes Μ. Yar (Eds.), Handbook of internet crime (pp. 230-254). Willan. Van Stekelenburg, J., Klandermans, B., Walgrave, S. (2018). Individual par ticipation in street demonstrations. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, H. Kriesi
96 References (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, 371. John Wiley Sons. Venice Commission. (2013, June 18). Opinion on the issue of the prohibition of so-called "Propaganda of homosexuality" in the light of recent legis lation in some Council of Europe Member States, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 95th Plenary Session (14-15 June 2013) (Tech. Rep.). Council of Europe. www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDLAD(2013)022-e Venice Commission. (2021). Documents: Russia, www.venice.coe.int/ webforms/documents/default.aspx?country=26 other=true Waller, J. Μ. (1993). Russia’s legal foundations for civil repression. Demokratizatsiya, 1(3), 111. Wang, D. J., Soule, S. A. (2016). Tactical innovation in social movements: The effects of peripheral and multi-issue protest. American Sociological Review, 81(3), 517-548. Wolchik, S. L. (2012). Can there be a color revolution? Journal ofDemocracy, 23, 63. Wongngamdee, P. (2023). Propagating and resisting authoritarian innova tion online: Thailand’s ‘rote cyber’activity. In J. Ockey N. S. Talib (Eds.), Democratic recession, autocratization, and democratic backlash in southeast asia (pp. 139-165). Palgrave Macmillan. Xu, X. (2021). To repress orto co-opt? Authoritarian control in the age of digital surveillance. American Journal ofPolitical Science, 65(2), 309-325. Yabloko. (2021). Registry of repressive laws of Russia, www.yabloko.ru/catnews/2021/09/16-1 Yaghi, Μ. (2018). Frame resonance, tactical innovation, and poor people in the Tunisian uprising. In P. G. Coy (ed.), Research in social movements,
conflicts and change (Vol. 42, pp. 115-143). Emerald Group Publishing. Yuen, S. (2023). The institutional foundation of countermobilization: Elites and pro-regime grassroots organizations in post-handover Hong Kong. Govern ment and Opposition, 58(2), 316—337. Zhang, H., Pan, J. (2019). Casm: A deep-learning approach for identify ing collective action events with text and image data from social media. Sociological Methodology, 49(\), 1-57. |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Mamaev, Bogdan |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1334300534 |
| author_facet | Mamaev, Bogdan |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Mamaev, Bogdan |
| author_variant | b m bm |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV049766262 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1466929086 (DE-599)BVBBV049766262 |
| era | Geschichte 2011-2023 gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte 2011-2023 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049766262</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20250307</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240703s2024 xx a||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781009560658</subfield><subfield code="c">pbk</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-009-56065-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781009560689</subfield><subfield code="c">hbk</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-009-56068-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1466929086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049766262</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mamaev, Bogdan</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1334300534</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The evolution of authoritarianism and contentious action in Russia</subfield><subfield code="c">Bogdan Mamaev</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge ; New York ; Melbourne ; New Delhi ; Singapore</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2024]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">98 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustrationen, Diagramme</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elements in contentious politics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"This Element examines the evolution of authoritarianism in Russia from 2011 to 2023, focusing on its impact on contentious action. It argues that the primary determinant of contention, at both federal and regional levels, is authoritarian innovation characterized by reactive and proactive repression. Drawing on Russian legislation, reports from human rights organizations, media coverage, and a novel dataset of contentious events created from user-generated reports on Twitter using computational techniques, this Element contributes to the understanding of contentious politics in authoritarian regimes, underscoring the role of authoritarianism and its innovative responses in shaping contentious action."</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 2011-2023</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Unterdrückung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4257314-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Autoritärer Staat</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4256521-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Russland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4076899-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Authoritarianism / Russia (Federation)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Post-communism / Russia (Federation)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Russia (Federation) / Politics and government / 1991-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Russland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4076899-5</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Autoritärer Staat</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4256521-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Unterdrückung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4257314-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 2011-2023</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-009-56067-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=035107566&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=035107566&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20250307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090513</subfield><subfield code="g">471</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">471</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035107566</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Russland (DE-588)4076899-5 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Russland |
| id | DE-604.BV049766262 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2025-03-17T15:02:34Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781009560658 9781009560689 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035107566 |
| oclc_num | 1466929086 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-29 DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-29 DE-12 |
| physical | 98 Seiten Illustrationen, Diagramme |
| psigel | BSB_NED_20250307 |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateSearch | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Elements in contentious politics |
| spelling | Mamaev, Bogdan Verfasser (DE-588)1334300534 aut The evolution of authoritarianism and contentious action in Russia Bogdan Mamaev Cambridge ; New York ; Melbourne ; New Delhi ; Singapore Cambridge University Press [2024] © 2024 98 Seiten Illustrationen, Diagramme txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Elements in contentious politics "This Element examines the evolution of authoritarianism in Russia from 2011 to 2023, focusing on its impact on contentious action. It argues that the primary determinant of contention, at both federal and regional levels, is authoritarian innovation characterized by reactive and proactive repression. Drawing on Russian legislation, reports from human rights organizations, media coverage, and a novel dataset of contentious events created from user-generated reports on Twitter using computational techniques, this Element contributes to the understanding of contentious politics in authoritarian regimes, underscoring the role of authoritarianism and its innovative responses in shaping contentious action." Geschichte 2011-2023 gnd rswk-swf Unterdrückung (DE-588)4257314-2 gnd rswk-swf Autoritärer Staat (DE-588)4256521-2 gnd rswk-swf Russland (DE-588)4076899-5 gnd rswk-swf Authoritarianism / Russia (Federation) Post-communism / Russia (Federation) Russia (Federation) / Politics and government / 1991- Russland (DE-588)4076899-5 g Autoritärer Staat (DE-588)4256521-2 s Unterdrückung (DE-588)4257314-2 s Geschichte 2011-2023 z DE-604 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-1-009-56067-2 Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=035107566&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=035107566&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Mamaev, Bogdan The evolution of authoritarianism and contentious action in Russia Unterdrückung (DE-588)4257314-2 gnd Autoritärer Staat (DE-588)4256521-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4257314-2 (DE-588)4256521-2 (DE-588)4076899-5 |
| title | The evolution of authoritarianism and contentious action in Russia |
| title_auth | The evolution of authoritarianism and contentious action in Russia |
| title_exact_search | The evolution of authoritarianism and contentious action in Russia |
| title_full | The evolution of authoritarianism and contentious action in Russia Bogdan Mamaev |
| title_fullStr | The evolution of authoritarianism and contentious action in Russia Bogdan Mamaev |
| title_full_unstemmed | The evolution of authoritarianism and contentious action in Russia Bogdan Mamaev |
| title_short | The evolution of authoritarianism and contentious action in Russia |
| title_sort | the evolution of authoritarianism and contentious action in russia |
| topic | Unterdrückung (DE-588)4257314-2 gnd Autoritärer Staat (DE-588)4256521-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | Unterdrückung Autoritärer Staat Russland |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=035107566&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=035107566&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mamaevbogdan theevolutionofauthoritarianismandcontentiousactioninrussia |