Can construction grammar be proven wrong?:
Construction Grammar has gained prominence in linguistics, owing its popularity to its inclusive approach that considers language units of varying sizes and generality as potential constructions - mentally stored form-function units. This Element serves as a cautionary note against complacency and d...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY
Cambridge University Press
2024
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | DE-12 DE-473 Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | Construction Grammar has gained prominence in linguistics, owing its popularity to its inclusive approach that considers language units of varying sizes and generality as potential constructions - mentally stored form-function units. This Element serves as a cautionary note against complacency and dogmatism. It emphasizes the enduring importance of falsifiability as a criterion for scientific hypotheses and theories. Can every postulated construction, in principle, be empirically demonstrated not to exist? As a case study, the author examines the schematic English transitive verb-particle construction, which defies experimental verification. He argues that we can still reject its non-existence using sound linguistic reasoning. But beyond individual constructions, what could be a crucial test for Construction Grammar itself, one that would falsify it as a theory? In making a proposal for such a test, designed to prove that speakers also exhibit pure-form knowledge, this Element contributes to ongoing discussions about Construction Grammar's theoretical foundations |
| Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 12 Jan 2024) Introduction: The stakes -- Can't touch this: does CxG have an attitude problem? -- Falsificationism: a still-influential approach to scientific inquiry -- The particular but generalizable problem posed by particle verbs -- How CxG could play the science game fairly -- Keep calm and constructi-con |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (73 Seiten) |
| ISBN: | 9781009343213 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/9781009343213 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV049675387 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240503s2024 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781009343213 |c Online |9 978-1-009-34321-3 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/9781009343213 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781009343213 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1437863161 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049675387 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 415.01836 | |
| 084 | |a ET 150 |0 (DE-625)27947: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Cappelle, Bert |d 1975- |0 (DE-588)1248775767 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Can construction grammar be proven wrong? |c Bert Cappelle |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY |b Cambridge University Press |c 2024 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (73 Seiten) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 12 Jan 2024) | ||
| 500 | |a Introduction: The stakes -- Can't touch this: does CxG have an attitude problem? -- Falsificationism: a still-influential approach to scientific inquiry -- The particular but generalizable problem posed by particle verbs -- How CxG could play the science game fairly -- Keep calm and constructi-con | ||
| 520 | |a Construction Grammar has gained prominence in linguistics, owing its popularity to its inclusive approach that considers language units of varying sizes and generality as potential constructions - mentally stored form-function units. This Element serves as a cautionary note against complacency and dogmatism. It emphasizes the enduring importance of falsifiability as a criterion for scientific hypotheses and theories. Can every postulated construction, in principle, be empirically demonstrated not to exist? As a case study, the author examines the schematic English transitive verb-particle construction, which defies experimental verification. He argues that we can still reject its non-existence using sound linguistic reasoning. But beyond individual constructions, what could be a crucial test for Construction Grammar itself, one that would falsify it as a theory? In making a proposal for such a test, designed to prove that speakers also exhibit pure-form knowledge, this Element contributes to ongoing discussions about Construction Grammar's theoretical foundations | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Construction grammar | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 978-1-009-47878-6 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 978-1-009-34320-6 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009343213 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035018299 | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009343213 |l DE-12 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009343213 |l DE-473 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1814896415927697408 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Cappelle, Bert 1975- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1248775767 |
| author_facet | Cappelle, Bert 1975- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Cappelle, Bert 1975- |
| author_variant | b c bc |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV049675387 |
| classification_rvk | ET 150 |
| collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781009343213 (OCoLC)1437863161 (DE-599)BVBBV049675387 |
| dewey-full | 415.01836 |
| dewey-hundreds | 400 - Language |
| dewey-ones | 415 - Grammar |
| dewey-raw | 415.01836 |
| dewey-search | 415.01836 |
| dewey-sort | 3415.01836 |
| dewey-tens | 410 - Linguistics |
| discipline | Sprachwissenschaft Literaturwissenschaft |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/9781009343213 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nmm a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049675387</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240503s2024 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781009343213</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-009-34321-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/9781009343213</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781009343213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1437863161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049675387</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">415.01836</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ET 150</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)27947:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cappelle, Bert</subfield><subfield code="d">1975-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1248775767</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Can construction grammar be proven wrong?</subfield><subfield code="c">Bert Cappelle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (73 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 12 Jan 2024)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction: The stakes -- Can't touch this: does CxG have an attitude problem? -- Falsificationism: a still-influential approach to scientific inquiry -- The particular but generalizable problem posed by particle verbs -- How CxG could play the science game fairly -- Keep calm and constructi-con</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Construction Grammar has gained prominence in linguistics, owing its popularity to its inclusive approach that considers language units of varying sizes and generality as potential constructions - mentally stored form-function units. This Element serves as a cautionary note against complacency and dogmatism. It emphasizes the enduring importance of falsifiability as a criterion for scientific hypotheses and theories. Can every postulated construction, in principle, be empirically demonstrated not to exist? As a case study, the author examines the schematic English transitive verb-particle construction, which defies experimental verification. He argues that we can still reject its non-existence using sound linguistic reasoning. But beyond individual constructions, what could be a crucial test for Construction Grammar itself, one that would falsify it as a theory? In making a proposal for such a test, designed to prove that speakers also exhibit pure-form knowledge, this Element contributes to ongoing discussions about Construction Grammar's theoretical foundations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Construction grammar</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-009-47878-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-009-34320-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009343213</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035018299</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009343213</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009343213</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV049675387 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-11-05T15:21:38Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781009343213 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035018299 |
| oclc_num | 1437863161 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (73 Seiten) |
| psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateSearch | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Cappelle, Bert 1975- (DE-588)1248775767 aut Can construction grammar be proven wrong? Bert Cappelle Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY Cambridge University Press 2024 1 Online-Ressource (73 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 12 Jan 2024) Introduction: The stakes -- Can't touch this: does CxG have an attitude problem? -- Falsificationism: a still-influential approach to scientific inquiry -- The particular but generalizable problem posed by particle verbs -- How CxG could play the science game fairly -- Keep calm and constructi-con Construction Grammar has gained prominence in linguistics, owing its popularity to its inclusive approach that considers language units of varying sizes and generality as potential constructions - mentally stored form-function units. This Element serves as a cautionary note against complacency and dogmatism. It emphasizes the enduring importance of falsifiability as a criterion for scientific hypotheses and theories. Can every postulated construction, in principle, be empirically demonstrated not to exist? As a case study, the author examines the schematic English transitive verb-particle construction, which defies experimental verification. He argues that we can still reject its non-existence using sound linguistic reasoning. But beyond individual constructions, what could be a crucial test for Construction Grammar itself, one that would falsify it as a theory? In making a proposal for such a test, designed to prove that speakers also exhibit pure-form knowledge, this Element contributes to ongoing discussions about Construction Grammar's theoretical foundations Construction grammar Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 978-1-009-47878-6 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 978-1-009-34320-6 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009343213 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Cappelle, Bert 1975- Can construction grammar be proven wrong? Construction grammar |
| title | Can construction grammar be proven wrong? |
| title_auth | Can construction grammar be proven wrong? |
| title_exact_search | Can construction grammar be proven wrong? |
| title_full | Can construction grammar be proven wrong? Bert Cappelle |
| title_fullStr | Can construction grammar be proven wrong? Bert Cappelle |
| title_full_unstemmed | Can construction grammar be proven wrong? Bert Cappelle |
| title_short | Can construction grammar be proven wrong? |
| title_sort | can construction grammar be proven wrong |
| topic | Construction grammar |
| topic_facet | Construction grammar |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009343213 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT cappellebert canconstructiongrammarbeprovenwrong |