Planning for the aftermath: assessing options for U.S. strategy toward Russia after the Ukraine War
U.S. policy choices made at the conclusions of past wars have had enduring consequences. Although there is no end in sight to the Russia-Ukraine war at the time of this writing in late 2023, U.S. policymakers should begin considering postwar Russia strategy now. The authors of this report address th...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Santa Monica, CA
RAND
2024
|
Schriftenreihe: | Report
A2510-2 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA2510-2 Inhaltsverzeichnis Literaturverzeichnis |
Zusammenfassung: | U.S. policy choices made at the conclusions of past wars have had enduring consequences. Although there is no end in sight to the Russia-Ukraine war at the time of this writing in late 2023, U.S. policymakers should begin considering postwar Russia strategy now. The authors of this report address this issue through an alternative futures analysis. Planning for after the war is complicated by significant uncertainty: Neither the conflict's trajectory nor the international climate at the war's end can be predicted with confidence. Given this uncertainty, the implications of U.S. strategic choices must be explored in different contexts. The authors develop two ideal-type postwar worlds, as defined by the outcome of the war and the character of the broader international environment: a less favorable world and a more favorable world. They also propose two ideal-type options for postwar U.S. strategy toward Russia, a hardline approach and a less hardline approach. Then, they consider how each strategy would play out in each world over the course of the decade after the war ends, yielding four alternative futures. They draw on the history of U.S.-Russia relations and the literatures on rivalries, interstate conflict, and alliances to assess the implications of each future for U.S. interests |
Beschreibung: | Title from PDF document (title page; viewed February 12, 2024) "RAND NATIONAL SECURITY RESEARCH DIVISION |
Beschreibung: | xii, 140 Seiten Illustrationen 23 cm |
ISBN: | 9781977412836 1977412831 |
DOI: | 10.7249/RRA2510-2 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV049632972 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20240710 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 240403s2024 a||| b||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9781977412836 |c paperback |9 978-1-9774-1283-6 | ||
020 | |a 1977412831 |c paperback |9 1-9774-1283-1 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1437849820 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049632972 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
100 | 1 | |a Charap, Samuel |d 1980- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1140057758 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Planning for the aftermath |b assessing options for U.S. strategy toward Russia after the Ukraine War |c Samuel Charap and Miranda Priebe |
264 | 1 | |a Santa Monica, CA |b RAND |c 2024 | |
300 | |a xii, 140 Seiten |b Illustrationen |c 23 cm | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Report |v A2510-2 | |
500 | |a Title from PDF document (title page; viewed February 12, 2024) | ||
500 | |a "RAND NATIONAL SECURITY RESEARCH DIVISION | ||
505 | 8 | |a Chapter One: Introduction -- Chapter Two: Anticipating the Postwar World -- Chapter Three: Options for Postwar U.S. Strategy Toward Russia -- Chapter Four: Alternative Postwar Futures -- Chapter Five: Implications for U.S. Interests -- Chapter Six: Conclusion | |
520 | 3 | |a U.S. policy choices made at the conclusions of past wars have had enduring consequences. Although there is no end in sight to the Russia-Ukraine war at the time of this writing in late 2023, U.S. policymakers should begin considering postwar Russia strategy now. The authors of this report address this issue through an alternative futures analysis. Planning for after the war is complicated by significant uncertainty: Neither the conflict's trajectory nor the international climate at the war's end can be predicted with confidence. Given this uncertainty, the implications of U.S. strategic choices must be explored in different contexts. The authors develop two ideal-type postwar worlds, as defined by the outcome of the war and the character of the broader international environment: a less favorable world and a more favorable world. They also propose two ideal-type options for postwar U.S. strategy toward Russia, a hardline approach and a less hardline approach. Then, they consider how each strategy would play out in each world over the course of the decade after the war ends, yielding four alternative futures. They draw on the history of U.S.-Russia relations and the literatures on rivalries, interstate conflict, and alliances to assess the implications of each future for U.S. interests | |
648 | 7 | |a Prognose |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Strategie |0 (DE-588)4057952-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
651 | 7 | |a Russland |0 (DE-588)4076899-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
653 | 2 | |a North Atlantic Treaty Organization | |
653 | 0 | |a National security / United States | |
653 | 0 | |a Strategy | |
653 | 0 | |a Security, International | |
653 | 0 | |a Russian Invasion of Ukraine, 2022 | |
653 | 2 | |a United States / Military policy | |
653 | 2 | |a United States / Foreign relations / Russia (Federation) | |
653 | 2 | |a Russia (Federation) / Foreign relations / United States | |
653 | 0 | |a North Atlantic Treaty Organization | |
653 | 0 | |a Russia | |
653 | 0 | |a Security Cooperation | |
653 | 0 | |a Ukraine | |
653 | 0 | |a United States | |
653 | 0 | |a Warfare and Military Operations | |
653 | 0 | |a Stratégie | |
653 | 0 | |a Invasion russe de l'Ukraine, 2022- | |
653 | 2 | |a États-Unis / Relations extérieures / Russie | |
653 | 0 | |a HISTORY / Europe / General | |
653 | 0 | |a HISTORY / Europe / Eastern | |
653 | 0 | |a HISTORY / United States / General | |
653 | 0 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Terrorism | |
653 | 0 | |a Cooperation | |
653 | 0 | |a Defense Planning | |
653 | 0 | |a International Security | |
653 | 0 | |a NATO | |
653 | 0 | |a Postwar | |
653 | 0 | |a Russia | |
653 | 0 | |a Scenarios | |
653 | 0 | |a Strategy | |
653 | 0 | |a Ukraine | |
653 | 0 | |a United States | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Strategie |0 (DE-588)4057952-9 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Russland |0 (DE-588)4076899-5 |D g |
689 | 0 | 3 | |a Prognose |A z |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
700 | 1 | |a Priebe, Miranda |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1152015044 |4 aut | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA2510-2 |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034976758&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034976758&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
940 | 1 | |n oe | |
940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20240710 | |
942 | 1 | 1 | |c 355.009 |e 22/bsb |f 090513 |g 471 |
942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 090513 |g 471 |
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034976758 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1815416357389336576 |
---|---|
adam_text |
Contents About This Report.iii Summary. v Figures, Tables, and Boxes. xi CHAPTER 1 Introduction. 1 The Importance of Planning for the Postwar Period. 2 Overview of Methodological Approach.3 CHAPTER 2 Anticipating the Postwar World. 5 Approach to Generating Postwar Worlds. 5 World A: After the Less Favorable War.9 World B: After the More Favorable War . 16 CHAPTER 3 Options for Postwar U.S. Strategy Toward Russia. 23 The Spectrum of Approaches to Relations with U.S. Rivals.23 Framework for Postwar Strategy Toward Russia. 25 Applying the Framework. 26 Hardline Approach. 28 Less Hardline
Approach. 33 CHAPTER 4 Alternative Postwar Futures. 39 Future 1: Pervasive Instability. 40 Future 2: Localized Instability. 50 Future 3: Cold War 2.0. 58 Future 4: Cold Peace.65 CHAPTER 5 Implications for U.S. Interests. 73 U.S. Interests. 73 U.S. Position in the Global Distribution of Power . 75 IX
Planning for the Aftermath Avoiding a Major Power Conflict . 86 Strength of the U.S. Economy. 98 Ukraine’s Security and Prosperity . 102 Minimizing Conflict Risk in Other Non-NATO Former Soviet States . 113 Comparing the Futures. 116 CHAPTER 6 Conclusion. 121 Analytical Observations. 121 Conclusion. 128 Abbreviations. 129 References. 131 X
References Akinci, Ozge, and Paolo Pesenti, “Do Economic Crises in Europe Affect the U.S.? Some Lessons from the Past Three Decades,” Liberty Street Economics, May 31,2023. Arthur, David, and F. Matthew Woodward, Long-Term Implications of the 2023 Future Years Defense Program, Congressional Budget Office, January 2023. Aza, Hibai Arbide, and Miguel Gonzalez, “US Offered Disarmament Measures to Russia in Exchange for Deescalation of Military Threat in Ukraine,” El Pais, February 2, 2022. Baker, Sinead, and Jake Epstein, "Front-Line NATO Allies Worry They Could Be Next After Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine and Are Getting Ready for a Fight,” Business Insider, April 23,2023. Barrass, Gordon, “Able Archer 83: What Were the Soviets Thinking?” Survival, Vol. 58, No. 6, December 2016-January 2017. Bell, Mark S„ and Julia Macdonald, “How to Think About Nuclear Crises (February 2019),” Texas National Security Review, Vol. 2, No. 2, February 2019. Biden, Joseph R., Jr., “Remarks by President Biden on Russia,” White House, April 15,2021. Biden, Joseph R„ Jr., National Security Strategy, White House, October 12, 2022. Binnendijk, Anika, and Miranda Priebe, An Attack Against Them All? Drivers of Decisions to Contribute to NATO Collective Defense, RAND Corporation, RR-2964-OSD, 2019. As of November 21, 2023: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2964.html Boose, Donald W., Jr., “The Korean War Truce Talks: A Study in Conflict Termination,” Parameters, Vol. 30, No. 1, Spring 2000. Brooks, Linton F„ “The End of Arms Control?” Daedalus, Vol. 149, No. 2, Spring 2020. Bruhin, Jonas, Rolf
Scheufele, and Yannic Stucki, “The Economic Impact of Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine on European Countries—a SVAR Approach,” SSRN Working Paper No. 04-2024, September 22,2023. Cable, Jonathan, “Worsening Euro Zone Business Downturn Reignites Recession Fears,” Reuters, July 24,2023. Charap, Samuel, “An Unwinnable War: Washington Needs an Endgame in Ukraine,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 102, No. 4, July-August 2023. 131
Planning for the Aftermath Charap, Samuel, and Timothy J. Colton, Everyone Loses: The Ukraine Crisis and the Ruinous Contestfor Post-Soviet Eurasia, Routledge, 2017. Charap, Samuel, John J. Drennan, Luke Griffith, Edward Geist, and Brian G. Carlson, Mitigating Challenges to U.S.-Russia Strategic Stability, RAND Corporation, RR-A1094-1,2022. As of November 21,2023: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1094-l.html Charap, Samuel, Edward Geist, Bryan Frederick, John J. Drennan, Nathan Chandler, and Jennifer Kavanagh, Russia’s Military Interventions: Patterns, Drivers, and Signposts, RAND Corporation, RR-A444-3, 2021. As of January 2, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA444-3.html Charap, Samuel, Alice Lynch, John J. Drennan, Dara Massicot, and Giacomo Persi Paoli, A New Approach to Conventional Arms Control in Europe: Addressing the Security Challenges of the 21st Century, RAND Corporation, RR-4346, 2020. As of November 21, 2023: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR4346.html Charap, Samuel, Dara Massicot, Miranda Priebe, Alyssa Demus, Clint Reach, Mark Stalczynski, Eugeniu Han, and Lynn E. Davis, Russian Grand Strategy: Rhetoric and Reality, RAND Corporation, RR-4238-A, 2021. As of November 21,2023: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR4238.html Charap, Samuel, and Miranda Priebe, Avoiding a Long War: U.S. Policy and the Trajectory of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict, RAND Corporation, PE-A2510-1,2023. As of November 21,2023: https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA2510-l.html Chekinov, Sergei, and Sergei Bogdanov, “The Essence and
Content of the Evolving Notion of War in the 21st Century,” Military Thought, Vol. 1, 2017. Chernenko, Elena, “Vladimir Putin’s Letter Reached the Right Addressee,” Kommersant, November 27,2019. Clauset, Aaron, “Trends and Fluctuations in the Severity of Interstate Wars,” Science Advances, Vol. 4, No. 2, February 2018. Cohen, Patricia, “Russia’s Economy Is Increasingly Structured Around Its War in Ukraine,” New York Times, October 9,2023. Colton, Timothy, “Ukraine and Russia: War and Political Regimes,” Journal of Democracy, Vol. 33, No. 4, October 2022. Copeland, Dale C., The Origins of Major War, Cornell University Press, 2000. Copp, Tara, “How Ukraine War Has Shaped US Planning for a China Conflict,” Associated Press, February 16,2023. 132
References Council of Europe, “G7 Joint Declaration of Support for Ukraine,” July 12, 2023. Creedon, Madelyn R., Jon L. Kyi, Marshall S. Billingslea, Gloria C. Duffy, Rose E. Gottemoeller, Lisa E. Gordon-Hagerty, Rebeccah L. Heinrichs, John E. Hyten, Robert Μ. Scher, Matthew H. Kroenig, Franklin C. Miller, and Leonor A. Tomero, Americas Strategic Posture: The Final Report of the Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States, Institute for Defense Analyses, October 2023. Cunningham, Fiona S., and Μ. Taylor Fravel, “Assuring Assured Retaliation: China’s Nuclear Posture and U.S.-China Strategic Stability,” International Security, Vol. 40, No. 2, Fall 2015. Cunningham, Fiona S., and Μ. Taylor Fravel, “Dangerous Confidence? Chinese Views on Nuclear Escalation,” International Security, Vol. 44, No. 2, Fall 2019. “The Curious Case of Russia’s Missing Air Force,” The Economist, March 8, 2022. Davies, Shawn, Therèse Pettersson, and Magnus Öberg, “Organized Violence 1989-2022, and the Return of Conflict Between States,” Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 60, No. 4, July 2023. Demarais, Agathe, “What Does ‘De-Risking’ Actually Mean?” Foreign Policy, August 23,2023. Democratic Initiatives Foundation, Analytical Report Based on the Results of War, Peace, Victory, and Future Survey, August 16,2023. Deudney, Daniel, and G. John Ikenberry, “The Unravelling of the Cold War Settlement,” Survival, Vol. 51, No. 6, December 2009-January 2010. Disney, Richard, “What Is the Current State of the Russian Economy Under Sanctions?” Economics Observatory, April 27,2023. Dvorkin,
Vladimir, “Preserving Strategic Stability Amid U.S.-Russian Confrontation,” Carnegie Moscow Center, February 2019. European Council, “Infographie—Impact of Sanctions on the Russian Economy,” last reviewed October 12,2023. Evans, Alexandra T., Alternative Futures Following a Great Power War, Vol. 2: Supporting Material on Historical Great Power Wars, RAND Corporation, RR-A591-2, 2023. As of November 29, 2023: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA591-2.html Eversden, Andrew, “Missile Defense Chief‘Confident’ Poland’s Aegis Ashore Ready in 2023,” Breaking Defense, August 12,2022. Faulconbridge, Guy, “Blood and Billions: The Cost of Russia’s War in Ukraine,” Reuters, August 23,2023. 133
Planning for the Aftermath Fearon, James D., “Two States, Two Types, Two Actions,” Security Studies, Vol. 20, No. 3,2011. Feickert, Andrew, The U.S. Army’s Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon (LRHW), Congressional Research Service, IF 11991, updated September 15,2023a. Feickert, Andrew, The U.S. Army’s Strategic Mid-Range Fires (SMRF) System (Formerly Mid-Range Capabilities [MRC] System), Congressional Research Service, IF12135, updated November 28,2023b. Felbermayr, Gabriel, Hendrik Mahlkow, and Alexander Sandkamp, “Cutting Through the Value Chain: The Long-Run Effects of Decoupling the East from the West,” Empirica: Journal of European Economics, Vol. 50, No. 1, February 2023. Fix, Liana, and Michael Kimmage, “How China Could Save Putin’s War in Ukraine: The Logic—and Consequences—of Chinese Military Support for Russia,” Foreign Affairs, April 26,2023. Fortna, Virginia Page, “Scraps of Paper? Agreements and the Durability of Peace,” International Organization, Vol. 57, No. 2, Spring 2003. Fortna, Virginia Page, Peace Time: Cease-Fire Agreements and the Durability of Peace, Princeton University Press, 2004a. Fortna, Virginia Page, “Interstate Peacekeeping: Causal Mechanisms and Empirical Effects,” World Politics, Vol. 56, No. 4, July 2004b. Frederick, Bryan, Samuel Charap, Scott Boston, Stephen J. Flanagan, Michael J. Mazarr, Jennifer D. P. Moroney, and Karl P. Mueller, Pathways to Russian Escalation Against NATO from the Ukraine War, RAND Corporation, PE-A1971-1,2022. As of November 29,2023: https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA1971-l.html Frederick, Bryan, Mark Cozad, and
Alexandra Stark, Escalation in the War in Ukraine: Lessons Learned and Risks for the Future, RAND Corporation, RR-A2807-1,2023. As of November 29,2023: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2807-l.html “Full Transcript: Biden’s Speech on Israel-Hamas and Russia-Ukraine Wars,” New York Times, October 19,2023. Gamio, Lazaro, and Ana Swanson, “How Russia Pays for War,” New York Times, October 30,2022. Harris, Bryant, “Document Reveals $14 Billion Backlog of US Defense Transfers to Taiwan,” Defense News, April 14,2022. Heisbourg, François, “How to End a War: Some Historical Lessons for Ukraine,” Survival, Vol. 65, No. 4, August-September 2023. 134
References Hill, Fiona, and Angela Stent, “The World Putin Wants: How Distortions About the Past Feed Delusions About the Future,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 101, No. 5, September-October 2022. Hollinger, Peggy, “Russia’s War on Ukraine Holds Still More Pain for European Business,” Financial Times, August 9, 2023. Hruby, Jill, Russia’s New Nuclear Weapon Delivery Systems: An Open-Source Technical Review, Nuclear Threat Initiative, November 13, 2019. Ikenberry, G. John, After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars, Princeton University Press, 2001. Inbar, Efraim, and Eitan Shamir, “‘Mowing the Grass’: Israel’s Strategy for Protracted Intractable Conflict,” Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2014. International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook: Navigating Global Divergences, October 1,2023. Janzen, Joe, and Carl Zulauf, “The Russia-Ukraine War and Changes in Ukraine Corn and Wheat Supply: Impacts on Global Agricultural Markets,” Farmdoc Daily, Vol. 13, No. 34, February 24, 2023. Jervis, Robert, Perception and Misperception in International Politics, Princeton University Press, 1976. Jones, Marc, “JPMorgan Flags Some Signs of Emerging De-Dollarisation,” Reuters, June 5,2023. Kearn, David, Jr., Reassessing U.S. Nuclear Strategy, Cambria Press, 2019. Kirchberger, Sarah, “Obstacles and Breakthroughs in China’s Defense Technological Development : China’s Undersea Warfare,” testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, April 13,2023. Kirshner, Jonathan, “Rationalist Explanations for War?”
Security Studies, Vol. 10, No. 1, Autumn 2000. Kluge, Janis, “The West Shouldn’t Underestimate Russia’s Resilience,” Moscow Times, September 15,2023. Kluth, Andreas, “Ukraine’s Future Isn’t German or Israeli but Korean,” Bloomberg, August 30,2023. Krastev, Ivan, and Mark Leonard, “Peace Versus Justice: The Coming European Split over the War in Ukraine,” ECFR Policy Brief, No. 452, June 15, 2022. Kristensen, Hans Μ., Matt Korda, and Eliana Johns, “Nuclear Notebook: Russian Nuclear Weapons, 2023,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 79, No. 3, 2023. 135
Planning for the Aftermath Kristensen, Hans Μ., Matt Korda, Eliana Johns, and Kate Kohn, “Status of World Nuclear Forces,” Federation of American Scientists, March 31,2023. Kroenig, Matthew, “Nuclear Superiority and the Balance of Resolve: Explaining Nuclear Crisis Outcomes,” International Organization, Vol. 67, No. 1, Winter 2013. Leromain, Elsa, and Marcus Biermann, “How Has the Russian Invasion of Ukraine Affected Global Financial Markets?” Economics Observatory, May 25, 2023. Levy, Jack S., “Preventive War: Concept and Propositions,” International Interactions, Vol. 37, No. 1,2011. Levy, Jack S., and Joseph R. Gochal, “Democracy and Preventive War: Israel and the 1956 Sinai Campaign,” Security Studies, Vol. 11, No. 2, Autumn 2001. Lieber, Keir A., and Daryl G. Press, “The Rise of U.S. Nuclear Primacy,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 85, No. 2, March-April 2006. Lieber, Keir A., and Daryl G. Press, “The New Era of Counterforce: Technological Change and the Future of Nuclear Deterrence,” International Security, Vol. 41, No. 4, Spring 2017. Lin, Bonny, “The China-Russia Axis Takes Shape,” Foreign Policy, September 11,2023. Logan, David C„ “The Nuclear Balance Is What States Make of It,” International Security, Vol. 46, No. 4, Spring 2022. Lührmann, Anna, and Bryan Rooney, “Autocratization by Decree: States of Emergency and Democratic Decline,” Comparative Politics, Vol. 53, No. 4, July 2021. Malkasian, Carter, “The Korea Model: Why an Armistice Offers the Best Hope for Peace in Ukraine,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 102, No. 4, July-August 2023. Masters, Jonathan, and Will Merrow,
“Nuclear Weapons in Europe: Mapping U.S. and Russian Deployments,” Council on Foreign Relations, March 30, 2023. Matray, James L, “Korea’s War at 60: A Survey of the Literature,” Cold War History, Vol. 11, No. 1,2011. Medcalf, Rory, Katherine Mansted, Stephan Frühling, and James Goldrick, eds., The Future of the Undersea Deterrent: A Global Survey, Australian National University, National Security College, Indo-Pacific Strategy Series, February 2020. Merchant, Nomaan, Ellen Knickmeyer, Zeke Miller, and Tara Copp, “US Announces $345 Million Military Aid Package for Taiwan,” Associated Press, July 29, 2023. 136
References Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Poland, “Statement of the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Poland in Connection with the Statement by the US Secretary of State on Providing Airplanes to Ukraine,” August 3,2022. Mueller, Karl R, Jasen J. Castillo, Forrest E. Morgan, Negeen Pegahi, and Brian Rosen, Striking First: Preemptive and Preventive Attack in U.S. National Security Policy, RAND Corporation, MG-403-AF, 2006. As of November 29, 2023: https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG403.html Murray, William S., “Revisiting Taiwan’s Defense Strategy,” Naval War College Review, Vol. 61, No. 3, Summer 2008. NATO—See North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Nephew, Richard, “The Hard Part: The Art of Sanctions Relief,” Washington Quarterly, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2018. North Atlantic Treaty Organization, North Atlantic Treaty, signed at Washington, D.C., 1949. North Atlantic Treaty Organization, “Final Communiqué,” statement at the meeting of the North Atlantic Council Defence Ministers Session, M-NAC(DM)-3(96)172, December 18,1996. North Atlantic Treaty Organization, “Bucharest Summit Declaration,” April 3, 2008. OECD—See Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Economic Outlook, Interim Report, March 1,2023. Pérez, Louis A„ Jr., “The Meaning of the Maine: Causation and the Historiography of the Spanish-American War,” Pacific Historical Review, Vol. 58, No. 3, August 1989. Posen, Barry R„ Restraint: A New Foundation for U.S. Grand Strategy, Cornell University Press, 2014. President of
Russia, “Statement by Vladimir Putin on Additional Steps to De-Escalate the Situation in Europe in the Context of the Termination of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty,” October 26,2020. Press, Daryl G., Calculating Credibility: How Leaders Assess Military Threats, Cornell University Press, 2005. Pressman, Jeremy, Warring Friends: Alliance Restraint in International Politics, Cornell University Press, 2008. 137
Planning for the Aftermath Priebe, Miranda, Bryan Frederick, Anika Binnendijk, Alexandra T. Evans, Karl P. Mueller, Cortez A. Cooper III, James Benkowski, Asha Clark, and Stephanie Anne Pillion, Alternative Futures Following a Great Power War, Vol. 1: Scenarios, Findings, and Recommendations, RAND Corporation, RR-A591-1,2023. As of November 29,2023: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA591-l.html Priebe, Miranda, Bryan Frederick, Alexandra T. Evans, Samuel Charap, Gabrielle Tarini, and Bryan Rooney, Future U.S. Peacetime Policy Toward Russia: Exploring the Benefits and Costs of a Less-Hardline Approach, RAND Corporation, RR-A1862-1,2023. As of November 29,2023: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1862-l.html Quackenbush, Stephen L, “The Problem with Accidental War,” Conflict Management and Peace Science, Vol. 40, No. 6, November 2023. Radin, Andrew, Andrew Scobell, Elina Treyger, J. D. Williams, Logan Ma, Howard J. Shatz, Sean Μ. Zeigler, Eugeniu Han, and Clint Reach, ChinaRussia Cooperation: Determining Factors, Future Trajectories, Implications for the United States, RAND Corporation, RR-3067-A, 2021. As of November 29, 2023: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR3067.html Reiter, Dan, “Exploding the Powder Keg Myth: Preemptive Wars Almost Never Happen,” International Security, Vol. 20, No. 2, Fall 1995. Reporters Without Borders, “RSF’s 2022 World Press Freedom Index: A New Era of Polarisation,” May 3,2022. Rogoff, Kenneth, “The Long-Lasting Economic Shock of War,” International Monetary Fund, March 2023. Rooney, Bryan, Grant Johnson, Tobias
Sytsma, and Miranda Priebe, Does the U.S. Economy Benefitfrom U.S. Alliances and Forward Military Presence? RAND Corporation, RR-A739-5,2022. As of November 29,2023: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA739-5.html Roque, Ashley, “To Combat China, Pentagon Eyeing Multi-Year Munition Buys in FY24,” Breaking Defense, March 13,2023. “Russia’s Defense Chief Proposes Re-Establishing Moscow, Leningrad Military Districts,” TASS, December 21,2022. Rustamova, Farida, “Ukraine’s 10-Point Plan,” Faridaily blog, March 29,2022. As of November 29,2023: https://faridaily.substack.eom/p/ukraines-10-point-plan Saine, Cindy, “Biden Cites US Resolve in Facing Aggression from Russia and China,” Voice of America, February 8,2023. Schelling, Thomas C., and Morton H. Halperin, Strategy and Arms Control, Pergamon-Brassey’s, 1985. 138
References Schweller, Randall L., “Domestic Structure and Preventive War: Are Democracies More Pacific?” World Politics, Vol. 44, No. 2, January 1992. Sechser, Todd S., and Matthew Fuhrmann, “Crisis Bargaining and Nuclear Blackmail,” International Organization, Vol. 67, No. 1, Winter 2013. Snyder, Glenn H„ “The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics,” World Politics, Vol. 36, No. 4, July 1984. Snyder, Ryan, Benoit Pelopidas, Keir A. Lieber, and Daryl G. Press, “Correspondence: New Era or New Error? Technology and the Future of Deterrence,” International Security, Vol. 43, No. 3, Winter 2018-2019. Stueck, William, The Korean War: An International History, Princeton University Press, 1995. Stueck, William, “Conclusion,” in William Stueck, ed., The Korean War in World History, University Press of Kentucky, 2004. Sullivan, Jake, “Remarks by National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan for the Arms Control Association (АСА) Annual Forum,” June 2,2023. Talmadge, Caitlin, “Would China Go Nuclear? Assessing the Risk of Chinese Nuclear Escalation in a Conventional War with the United States,” International Security, Vol. 41, No. 4, Spring 2017. Trachtenberg, Marc, “The ‘Accidental War’ Question,” February 14, 2000. “Ukraine War: Putin Confirms First Nuclear Weapons Moved to Belarus,” BBC News, June 17, 2023. U.S. Department of Defense, 2022 Nuclear Posture Review, 2022a. U.S. Department of Defense, “Statement by Pentagon Press Secretary John F. Kirby on Security Assistance to Ukraine,” March 8, 2022b. U.S. Department of Defense, “Fact Sheet—U.S. Defense Contributions to Europe,” June
29,2022c. U.S. Department of Defense, Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China, Annual Report to Congress, November 29,2022d. U.S. Department of Defense, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Defense Law of War Manual, updated 2016. Van Evera, Stephen, Causes of War: Structures of Power and the Roots of International Conflict, Cornell University Press, 1999. Warrick, Joby, “China Is Building More Than 100 New Missile Silos in Its Western Desert, Analysts Say,” Washington Post, June 30,2021. Weisiger, Alex, and Keren Yarhi-Milo, “Revisiting Reputation: How Past Actions Matter in International Politics,” International Organization, Vol. 69, No. 2, Spring 2015. 139
Planning for the Aftermath Werner, Suzanne, “The Precarious Nature of Peace: Resolving the Issues, Enforcing the Settlement, and Renegotiating the Terms,” American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 43, No. 3, July 1999. Wilkening, Dean A., “Strategic Stability Between the United States and Russia,” in David Ochmanek and Michael Sulmeyer, eds., Challenges in U.S. National Security Policy: A Festschrift Honoring Edward L. (Ted) Warner, RAND Corporation, CP-765-RAS, 2014. As of November 29,2023: https://www.rand.org/pubs/corporate_pubs/CP765.html World Bank, Ukraine Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment: February 2022February 2023,2023. Ziegler, Charles E., “A Crisis of Diverging Perspectives: U.S.-Russian Relations and the Security Dilemma,” Texas National Security Review, Vol. 4, No. 1, Winter 2020-2021. Г Bayorische I SteateblNtothek München 140 |
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | 1 |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Charap, Samuel 1980- Priebe, Miranda |
author_GND | (DE-588)1140057758 (DE-588)1152015044 |
author_facet | Charap, Samuel 1980- Priebe, Miranda |
author_role | aut aut |
author_sort | Charap, Samuel 1980- |
author_variant | s c sc m p mp |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV049632972 |
contents | Chapter One: Introduction -- Chapter Two: Anticipating the Postwar World -- Chapter Three: Options for Postwar U.S. Strategy Toward Russia -- Chapter Four: Alternative Postwar Futures -- Chapter Five: Implications for U.S. Interests -- Chapter Six: Conclusion |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1437849820 (DE-599)BVBBV049632972 |
doi_str_mv | 10.7249/RRA2510-2 |
era | Prognose gnd |
era_facet | Prognose |
format | Electronic Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049632972</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240710</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240403s2024 a||| b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781977412836</subfield><subfield code="c">paperback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-9774-1283-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1977412831</subfield><subfield code="c">paperback</subfield><subfield code="9">1-9774-1283-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1437849820</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049632972</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Charap, Samuel</subfield><subfield code="d">1980-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1140057758</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Planning for the aftermath</subfield><subfield code="b">assessing options for U.S. strategy toward Russia after the Ukraine War</subfield><subfield code="c">Samuel Charap and Miranda Priebe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Santa Monica, CA</subfield><subfield code="b">RAND</subfield><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xii, 140 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustrationen</subfield><subfield code="c">23 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Report</subfield><subfield code="v">A2510-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from PDF document (title page; viewed February 12, 2024)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"RAND NATIONAL SECURITY RESEARCH DIVISION</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chapter One: Introduction -- Chapter Two: Anticipating the Postwar World -- Chapter Three: Options for Postwar U.S. Strategy Toward Russia -- Chapter Four: Alternative Postwar Futures -- Chapter Five: Implications for U.S. Interests -- Chapter Six: Conclusion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">U.S. policy choices made at the conclusions of past wars have had enduring consequences. Although there is no end in sight to the Russia-Ukraine war at the time of this writing in late 2023, U.S. policymakers should begin considering postwar Russia strategy now. The authors of this report address this issue through an alternative futures analysis. Planning for after the war is complicated by significant uncertainty: Neither the conflict's trajectory nor the international climate at the war's end can be predicted with confidence. Given this uncertainty, the implications of U.S. strategic choices must be explored in different contexts. The authors develop two ideal-type postwar worlds, as defined by the outcome of the war and the character of the broader international environment: a less favorable world and a more favorable world. They also propose two ideal-type options for postwar U.S. strategy toward Russia, a hardline approach and a less hardline approach. Then, they consider how each strategy would play out in each world over the course of the decade after the war ends, yielding four alternative futures. They draw on the history of U.S.-Russia relations and the literatures on rivalries, interstate conflict, and alliances to assess the implications of each future for U.S. interests</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Prognose</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Strategie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4057952-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Russland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4076899-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">North Atlantic Treaty Organization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">National security / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Strategy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Security, International</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Russian Invasion of Ukraine, 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">United States / Military policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">United States / Foreign relations / Russia (Federation)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Russia (Federation) / Foreign relations / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">North Atlantic Treaty Organization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Russia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Security Cooperation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ukraine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Warfare and Military Operations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Stratégie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Invasion russe de l'Ukraine, 2022-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">États-Unis / Relations extérieures / Russie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HISTORY / Europe / General</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HISTORY / Europe / Eastern</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HISTORY / United States / General</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE / Terrorism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cooperation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Defense Planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International Security</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">NATO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Postwar</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Russia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Scenarios</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Strategy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ukraine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Strategie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4057952-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Russland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4076899-5</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Prognose</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Priebe, Miranda</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1152015044</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA2510-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034976758&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034976758&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20240710</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">355.009</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090513</subfield><subfield code="g">471</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090513</subfield><subfield code="g">471</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034976758</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd Russland (DE-588)4076899-5 gnd |
geographic_facet | USA Russland |
id | DE-604.BV049632972 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T23:38:35Z |
indexdate | 2024-11-11T09:05:53Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781977412836 1977412831 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034976758 |
oclc_num | 1437849820 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | xii, 140 Seiten Illustrationen 23 cm |
psigel | BSB_NED_20240710 |
publishDate | 2024 |
publishDateSearch | 2024 |
publishDateSort | 2024 |
publisher | RAND |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Report |
spelling | Charap, Samuel 1980- Verfasser (DE-588)1140057758 aut Planning for the aftermath assessing options for U.S. strategy toward Russia after the Ukraine War Samuel Charap and Miranda Priebe Santa Monica, CA RAND 2024 xii, 140 Seiten Illustrationen 23 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia c rdamedia nc rdacarrier cr rdacarrier Report A2510-2 Title from PDF document (title page; viewed February 12, 2024) "RAND NATIONAL SECURITY RESEARCH DIVISION Chapter One: Introduction -- Chapter Two: Anticipating the Postwar World -- Chapter Three: Options for Postwar U.S. Strategy Toward Russia -- Chapter Four: Alternative Postwar Futures -- Chapter Five: Implications for U.S. Interests -- Chapter Six: Conclusion U.S. policy choices made at the conclusions of past wars have had enduring consequences. Although there is no end in sight to the Russia-Ukraine war at the time of this writing in late 2023, U.S. policymakers should begin considering postwar Russia strategy now. The authors of this report address this issue through an alternative futures analysis. Planning for after the war is complicated by significant uncertainty: Neither the conflict's trajectory nor the international climate at the war's end can be predicted with confidence. Given this uncertainty, the implications of U.S. strategic choices must be explored in different contexts. The authors develop two ideal-type postwar worlds, as defined by the outcome of the war and the character of the broader international environment: a less favorable world and a more favorable world. They also propose two ideal-type options for postwar U.S. strategy toward Russia, a hardline approach and a less hardline approach. Then, they consider how each strategy would play out in each world over the course of the decade after the war ends, yielding four alternative futures. They draw on the history of U.S.-Russia relations and the literatures on rivalries, interstate conflict, and alliances to assess the implications of each future for U.S. interests Prognose gnd rswk-swf Strategie (DE-588)4057952-9 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf Russland (DE-588)4076899-5 gnd rswk-swf North Atlantic Treaty Organization National security / United States Strategy Security, International Russian Invasion of Ukraine, 2022 United States / Military policy United States / Foreign relations / Russia (Federation) Russia (Federation) / Foreign relations / United States Russia Security Cooperation Ukraine United States Warfare and Military Operations Stratégie Invasion russe de l'Ukraine, 2022- États-Unis / Relations extérieures / Russie HISTORY / Europe / General HISTORY / Europe / Eastern HISTORY / United States / General POLITICAL SCIENCE / Terrorism Cooperation Defense Planning International Security NATO Postwar Scenarios USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Strategie (DE-588)4057952-9 s Russland (DE-588)4076899-5 g Prognose z DE-604 Priebe, Miranda Verfasser (DE-588)1152015044 aut https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA2510-2 Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034976758&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034976758&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Charap, Samuel 1980- Priebe, Miranda Planning for the aftermath assessing options for U.S. strategy toward Russia after the Ukraine War Chapter One: Introduction -- Chapter Two: Anticipating the Postwar World -- Chapter Three: Options for Postwar U.S. Strategy Toward Russia -- Chapter Four: Alternative Postwar Futures -- Chapter Five: Implications for U.S. Interests -- Chapter Six: Conclusion Strategie (DE-588)4057952-9 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4057952-9 (DE-588)4078704-7 (DE-588)4076899-5 |
title | Planning for the aftermath assessing options for U.S. strategy toward Russia after the Ukraine War |
title_auth | Planning for the aftermath assessing options for U.S. strategy toward Russia after the Ukraine War |
title_exact_search | Planning for the aftermath assessing options for U.S. strategy toward Russia after the Ukraine War |
title_exact_search_txtP | Planning for the Aftermath Assessing Options for U.S. Strategy Toward Russia After the Ukraine War |
title_full | Planning for the aftermath assessing options for U.S. strategy toward Russia after the Ukraine War Samuel Charap and Miranda Priebe |
title_fullStr | Planning for the aftermath assessing options for U.S. strategy toward Russia after the Ukraine War Samuel Charap and Miranda Priebe |
title_full_unstemmed | Planning for the aftermath assessing options for U.S. strategy toward Russia after the Ukraine War Samuel Charap and Miranda Priebe |
title_short | Planning for the aftermath |
title_sort | planning for the aftermath assessing options for u s strategy toward russia after the ukraine war |
title_sub | assessing options for U.S. strategy toward Russia after the Ukraine War |
topic | Strategie (DE-588)4057952-9 gnd |
topic_facet | Strategie USA Russland |
url | https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA2510-2 http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034976758&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=034976758&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT charapsamuel planningfortheaftermathassessingoptionsforusstrategytowardrussiaaftertheukrainewar AT priebemiranda planningfortheaftermathassessingoptionsforusstrategytowardrussiaaftertheukrainewar |