Morgan, T. d. 1. (1737). The moral philosopher: In a dialogue between Philalethes a Christian deist, and Theophanes a Christian Jew. In which The Grounds and Reasons of Religion in general, and particularly of Christianity, as distinguish'd from the Religion of Nature; the different Methods of conveying and proposing Moral Truths to the Mind, and the necessary Marks or Criteria on which they must all equally depend; the Nature of positive Laws, Rites and Ceremonies, and how far they are capable of Proof as of standing perpetual Obligation; with many other Matters of the utmost Consequence in Religion, are fairly considered, and debated, and the Arguments on both Sides impartially represented. printed for the author.
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationMorgan, Thomas d. 1743. The Moral Philosopher: In a Dialogue Between Philalethes a Christian Deist, and Theophanes a Christian Jew. In Which The Grounds and Reasons of Religion in General, and Particularly of Christianity, as Distinguish'd from the Religion of Nature; the Different Methods of Conveying and Proposing Moral Truths to the Mind, and the Necessary Marks or Criteria on Which They Must All Equally Depend; the Nature of Positive Laws, Rites and Ceremonies, and How Far They Are Capable of Proof as of Standing Perpetual Obligation; with Many Other Matters of the Utmost Consequence in Religion, Are Fairly Considered, and Debated, and the Arguments on Both Sides Impartially Represented. London: printed for the author, 1737.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationMorgan, Thomas d. 1743. The Moral Philosopher: In a Dialogue Between Philalethes a Christian Deist, and Theophanes a Christian Jew. In Which The Grounds and Reasons of Religion in General, and Particularly of Christianity, as Distinguish'd from the Religion of Nature; the Different Methods of Conveying and Proposing Moral Truths to the Mind, and the Necessary Marks or Criteria on Which They Must All Equally Depend; the Nature of Positive Laws, Rites and Ceremonies, and How Far They Are Capable of Proof as of Standing Perpetual Obligation; with Many Other Matters of the Utmost Consequence in Religion, Are Fairly Considered, and Debated, and the Arguments on Both Sides Impartially Represented. printed for the author, 1737.