Morgan, T. d. 1. (1737). The moral philosopher: In a dialogue between Philalethes a Christian deist, and Theophanes a Christian Jew. In which The Grounds and Reasons of Religion in general, and particularly of Christianity, as distinguish'd from the Religion of Nature; the different Methods of conveying and proposing Moral Truths to the Mind, and the necessary Marks or Criteria on which they must all equally depend; the Nature of positive Laws, Rites and Ceremonies, and how far they are capable of Proof as of standing perpetual Obligation; with many other Matters of the utmost Consequence in Religion, are fairly considered, and debated, and the Arguments on both Sides impartially represented. printed for the author.
Chicago-Zitierstil (17. Ausg.)Morgan, Thomas d. 1743. The Moral Philosopher: In a Dialogue Between Philalethes a Christian Deist, and Theophanes a Christian Jew. In Which The Grounds and Reasons of Religion in General, and Particularly of Christianity, as Distinguish'd from the Religion of Nature; the Different Methods of Conveying and Proposing Moral Truths to the Mind, and the Necessary Marks or Criteria on Which They Must All Equally Depend; the Nature of Positive Laws, Rites and Ceremonies, and How Far They Are Capable of Proof as of Standing Perpetual Obligation; with Many Other Matters of the Utmost Consequence in Religion, Are Fairly Considered, and Debated, and the Arguments on Both Sides Impartially Represented. London: printed for the author, 1737.
MLA-Zitierstil (9. Ausg.)Morgan, Thomas d. 1743. The Moral Philosopher: In a Dialogue Between Philalethes a Christian Deist, and Theophanes a Christian Jew. In Which The Grounds and Reasons of Religion in General, and Particularly of Christianity, as Distinguish'd from the Religion of Nature; the Different Methods of Conveying and Proposing Moral Truths to the Mind, and the Necessary Marks or Criteria on Which They Must All Equally Depend; the Nature of Positive Laws, Rites and Ceremonies, and How Far They Are Capable of Proof as of Standing Perpetual Obligation; with Many Other Matters of the Utmost Consequence in Religion, Are Fairly Considered, and Debated, and the Arguments on Both Sides Impartially Represented. printed for the author, 1737.