Prosser, T. f. 1. (1777). The oeconomy of quackery considered: In a reply to Mr. Spilsbury's pamphlet, entitled, free thoughts on quacks and their medicines. To which is added, An answer to a surgeon's letter to the Master, Wardens, and Court of Assistants, on their permitting Aliens, Apothecaries, and Quacks, to encroach on the Business of Surgeons. By Thomas Prosser. printed for J. Bew, No. 28, Pater Noster Row.
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationProsser, Thomas fl. 1790. The Oeconomy of Quackery Considered: In a Reply to Mr. Spilsbury's Pamphlet, Entitled, Free Thoughts on Quacks and Their Medicines. To Which Is Added, An Answer to a Surgeon's Letter to the Master, Wardens, and Court of Assistants, on Their Permitting Aliens, Apothecaries, and Quacks, to Encroach on the Business of Surgeons. By Thomas Prosser. London: printed for J. Bew, No. 28, Pater Noster Row, 1777.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationProsser, Thomas fl. 1790. The Oeconomy of Quackery Considered: In a Reply to Mr. Spilsbury's Pamphlet, Entitled, Free Thoughts on Quacks and Their Medicines. To Which Is Added, An Answer to a Surgeon's Letter to the Master, Wardens, and Court of Assistants, on Their Permitting Aliens, Apothecaries, and Quacks, to Encroach on the Business of Surgeons. By Thomas Prosser. printed for J. Bew, No. 28, Pater Noster Row, 1777.