(1769). The notion of eternal justification refuted: In a familiar dialogue. In which the Figment of Eternal Union is also considered; and both Proved to be equally absurd and unscriptural. printed; and sold by E. and C. Dilly, in the Poultry; W.Harris, on the North Side of St. Paul's Church-Yard; M. Folingsby, near Temple-Bar; W. Brown, the Corner of Essex-Street, in the Strand; and E. Inglefield, in West-Street, Seven-Dials.
Chicago-Zitierstil (17. Ausg.)The Notion of Eternal Justification Refuted: In a Familiar Dialogue. In Which the Figment of Eternal Union Is Also Considered; and Both Proved to Be Equally Absurd and Unscriptural. London: printed; and sold by E. and C. Dilly, in the Poultry; W.Harris, on the North Side of St. Paul's Church-Yard; M. Folingsby, near Temple-Bar; W. Brown, the Corner of Essex-Street, in the Strand; and E. Inglefield, in West-Street, Seven-Dials, 1769.
MLA-Zitierstil (9. Ausg.)The Notion of Eternal Justification Refuted: In a Familiar Dialogue. In Which the Figment of Eternal Union Is Also Considered; and Both Proved to Be Equally Absurd and Unscriptural. printed; and sold by E. and C. Dilly, in the Poultry; W.Harris, on the North Side of St. Paul's Church-Yard; M. Folingsby, near Temple-Bar; W. Brown, the Corner of Essex-Street, in the Strand; and E. Inglefield, in West-Street, Seven-Dials, 1769.