Bullock, T. 1. o. 4. (1728). The reasoning of Christ and his Apostles vindicated: In two parts. I. Being a defence of the argument from miracles, proving the Argument from Prophecy not necessary to a rational Defence of our Religion. II. Being a defence of the argument from prophecy, proving the Christian Scheme to have a rational Foundation upon the Prophecies of the Old Testament. In answer to a book intitled, The scheme of literal prophecy considered. By Thomas Bullock, M. A. Rector of North-Creak in Norfolk. printed for R. Knaplock, at the Bishop's Head in St. Paul's Church-Yard.
Chicago-Zitierstil (17. Ausg.)Bullock, Thomas 1693 or 4-1760. The Reasoning of Christ and His Apostles Vindicated: In Two Parts. I. Being a Defence of the Argument from Miracles, Proving the Argument from Prophecy Not Necessary to a Rational Defence of Our Religion. II. Being a Defence of the Argument from Prophecy, Proving the Christian Scheme to Have a Rational Foundation upon the Prophecies of the Old Testament. In Answer to a Book Intitled, The Scheme of Literal Prophecy Considered. By Thomas Bullock, M. A. Rector of North-Creak in Norfolk. London: printed for R. Knaplock, at the Bishop's Head in St. Paul's Church-Yard, 1728.
MLA-Zitierstil (9. Ausg.)Bullock, Thomas 1693 or 4-1760. The Reasoning of Christ and His Apostles Vindicated: In Two Parts. I. Being a Defence of the Argument from Miracles, Proving the Argument from Prophecy Not Necessary to a Rational Defence of Our Religion. II. Being a Defence of the Argument from Prophecy, Proving the Christian Scheme to Have a Rational Foundation upon the Prophecies of the Old Testament. In Answer to a Book Intitled, The Scheme of Literal Prophecy Considered. By Thomas Bullock, M. A. Rector of North-Creak in Norfolk. printed for R. Knaplock, at the Bishop's Head in St. Paul's Church-Yard, 1728.