APA (7th ed.) Citation

Sykes, A. A. 1. o. 4. (1735). An argument proving, that the method taken for obstructing Dr. Rundle's advancement to the See of G------r is dangerous to his Majesty's prerogative: Our most Excellent Constitution, the Liberty of Lay-Subjects, and the Christian Religion. Also a reply to the case of Dr. Rundle's promotion to the See of G----r, &c. impartially consider'd; and to the Miscellany of Dec. 7. last. printed, and sold by J. Wilford, behind the Chapter-House in St. Paul's Church-Yard, and at the pamphlet-shops of London and Westminster.

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Sykes, Arthur Ashley 1683 or 4-1756. An Argument Proving, That the Method Taken for Obstructing Dr. Rundle's Advancement to the See of G------r Is Dangerous to His Majesty's Prerogative: Our Most Excellent Constitution, the Liberty of Lay-Subjects, and the Christian Religion. Also a Reply to the Case of Dr. Rundle's Promotion to the See of G----r, &c. Impartially Consider'd; and to the Miscellany of Dec. 7. Last. London: printed, and sold by J. Wilford, behind the Chapter-House in St. Paul's Church-Yard, and at the pamphlet-shops of London and Westminster, 1735.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Sykes, Arthur Ashley 1683 or 4-1756. An Argument Proving, That the Method Taken for Obstructing Dr. Rundle's Advancement to the See of G------r Is Dangerous to His Majesty's Prerogative: Our Most Excellent Constitution, the Liberty of Lay-Subjects, and the Christian Religion. Also a Reply to the Case of Dr. Rundle's Promotion to the See of G----r, &c. Impartially Consider'd; and to the Miscellany of Dec. 7. Last. printed, and sold by J. Wilford, behind the Chapter-House in St. Paul's Church-Yard, and at the pamphlet-shops of London and Westminster, 1735.