Measuring Land Tenure at the Individual Level: Lessons from Methodological Research in Armenia
Evidence indicates that land rights are strongly associated with several indicators of well-being and development outcomes, including access to credit, resilience to shocks, productivity, and bargaining power. Accurately capturing gender differences in land rights is thus critical for development po...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Washington, D.C
The World Bank
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Volltext |
| Summary: | Evidence indicates that land rights are strongly associated with several indicators of well-being and development outcomes, including access to credit, resilience to shocks, productivity, and bargaining power. Accurately capturing gender differences in land rights is thus critical for development policy, prompting the need to shift from household-level land rights data collection to collecting more and better individual-level data on land rights. The importance of individual land rights has been recognized in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) agenda, with the inclusion of two key indicators on land rights-SDG indicators 1.4.2 and 5.a.1. Although clear guidance exists for computing and monitoring these, the choice of data collection methods may influence the resulting indicators and the understanding of the underlying land rights. Specifically, research has shown that the use of proxy respondents in the collection of data on assets, including land, results in a biased understanding of men's and women's holdings vis-a-vis self-reporting. This paper uses data from a methodological experiment in Armenia to assess the implications of survey design-Snamely, respondent strategy and the level of disaggregation of land data-Son the measurement of individual land rights and SDG indicator monitoring. The findings suggest that in the context of Armenia, the measurement of SDG 5.a.1 and 1.4.2 (a) is robust to respondent approach and data disaggregation level, driven largely by the high rates of documentation. Meanwhile, land rights that are less objective, such as the right to bequeath and perception of tenure security, are sensitive to these survey design choices |
| Physical Description: | 1 Online-Ressource (26 Seiten) |
| DOI: | 10.1596/1813-9450-10140 |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a22000001c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV049079913 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230731s2022 xxu|||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1596/1813-9450-10140 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-1-WBA)081885504 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1392136805 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KEP081885504 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxu |c XD-US | ||
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-521 |a DE-573 |a DE-523 |a DE-Re13 |a DE-19 |a DE-355 |a DE-703 |a DE-91 |a DE-706 |a DE-29 |a DE-M347 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-20 |a DE-739 |a DE-1043 |a DE-863 |a DE-862 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gourlay, Sydney |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Measuring Land Tenure at the Individual Level |b Lessons from Methodological Research in Armenia |c Sydney Gourlay |
| 264 | 1 | |a Washington, D.C |b The World Bank |c 2022 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (26 Seiten) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Evidence indicates that land rights are strongly associated with several indicators of well-being and development outcomes, including access to credit, resilience to shocks, productivity, and bargaining power. Accurately capturing gender differences in land rights is thus critical for development policy, prompting the need to shift from household-level land rights data collection to collecting more and better individual-level data on land rights. The importance of individual land rights has been recognized in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) agenda, with the inclusion of two key indicators on land rights-SDG indicators 1.4.2 and 5.a.1. Although clear guidance exists for computing and monitoring these, the choice of data collection methods may influence the resulting indicators and the understanding of the underlying land rights. Specifically, research has shown that the use of proxy respondents in the collection of data on assets, including land, results in a biased understanding of men's and women's holdings vis-a-vis self-reporting. This paper uses data from a methodological experiment in Armenia to assess the implications of survey design-Snamely, respondent strategy and the level of disaggregation of land data-Son the measurement of individual land rights and SDG indicator monitoring. The findings suggest that in the context of Armenia, the measurement of SDG 5.a.1 and 1.4.2 (a) is robust to respondent approach and data disaggregation level, driven largely by the high rates of documentation. Meanwhile, land rights that are less objective, such as the right to bequeath and perception of tenure security, are sensitive to these survey design choices | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Access To Finance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Female Land Tenure Inequity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Finance and Development | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Household Surveys | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Individual Land Rights | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Land Ownership | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Land Tenure | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Resilience To Economic Shock | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rural Development | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rural Land Policies for Poverty Reduction | |
| 650 | 4 | |a SDGS | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sustainable Development Goals | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Finance and Financial Sector Development | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Maggio, Giuseppe |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Safyan, Anahit |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zezza, Alberto |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Gourlay, Sydney |t Measuring Land Tenure at the Individual Level: Lessons from Methodological Research in Armenia |d Washington, D.C. : The World Bank, 2022 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-10140 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-WBA | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034341804 | |
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1824556231905247232 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Gourlay, Sydney |
| author_facet | Gourlay, Sydney |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Gourlay, Sydney |
| author_variant | s g sg |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV049079913 |
| collection | ZDB-1-WBA |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-1-WBA)081885504 (OCoLC)1392136805 (DE-599)KEP081885504 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1596/1813-9450-10140 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nmm a22000001c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049079913</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230731s2022 xxu|||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1596/1813-9450-10140</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-1-WBA)081885504</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1392136805</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KEP081885504</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">XD-US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-523</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Re13</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-706</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M347</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-862</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gourlay, Sydney</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Measuring Land Tenure at the Individual Level</subfield><subfield code="b">Lessons from Methodological Research in Armenia</subfield><subfield code="c">Sydney Gourlay</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Washington, D.C</subfield><subfield code="b">The World Bank</subfield><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (26 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Evidence indicates that land rights are strongly associated with several indicators of well-being and development outcomes, including access to credit, resilience to shocks, productivity, and bargaining power. Accurately capturing gender differences in land rights is thus critical for development policy, prompting the need to shift from household-level land rights data collection to collecting more and better individual-level data on land rights. The importance of individual land rights has been recognized in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) agenda, with the inclusion of two key indicators on land rights-SDG indicators 1.4.2 and 5.a.1. Although clear guidance exists for computing and monitoring these, the choice of data collection methods may influence the resulting indicators and the understanding of the underlying land rights. Specifically, research has shown that the use of proxy respondents in the collection of data on assets, including land, results in a biased understanding of men's and women's holdings vis-a-vis self-reporting. This paper uses data from a methodological experiment in Armenia to assess the implications of survey design-Snamely, respondent strategy and the level of disaggregation of land data-Son the measurement of individual land rights and SDG indicator monitoring. The findings suggest that in the context of Armenia, the measurement of SDG 5.a.1 and 1.4.2 (a) is robust to respondent approach and data disaggregation level, driven largely by the high rates of documentation. Meanwhile, land rights that are less objective, such as the right to bequeath and perception of tenure security, are sensitive to these survey design choices</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Access To Finance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Female Land Tenure Inequity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Finance and Development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Household Surveys</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Individual Land Rights</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Land Ownership</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Land Tenure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Resilience To Economic Shock</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rural Development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rural Land Policies for Poverty Reduction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">SDGS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sustainable Development Goals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Finance and Financial Sector Development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maggio, Giuseppe</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Safyan, Anahit</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zezza, Alberto</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Gourlay, Sydney</subfield><subfield code="t">Measuring Land Tenure at the Individual Level: Lessons from Methodological Research in Armenia</subfield><subfield code="d">Washington, D.C. : The World Bank, 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-10140</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-WBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034341804</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV049079913 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T22:27:56Z |
| indexdate | 2025-02-20T07:20:17Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034341804 |
| oclc_num | 1392136805 |
| open_access_boolean | 1 |
| owner | DE-12 DE-521 DE-573 DE-523 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-703 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-706 DE-29 DE-M347 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-20 DE-739 DE-1043 DE-863 DE-BY-FWS DE-862 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-521 DE-573 DE-523 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-703 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-706 DE-29 DE-M347 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-20 DE-739 DE-1043 DE-863 DE-BY-FWS DE-862 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (26 Seiten) |
| psigel | ZDB-1-WBA |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateSearch | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| publisher | The World Bank |
| record_format | marc |
| spellingShingle | Gourlay, Sydney Measuring Land Tenure at the Individual Level Lessons from Methodological Research in Armenia Access To Finance Female Land Tenure Inequity Finance and Development Household Surveys Individual Land Rights Land Ownership Land Tenure Resilience To Economic Shock Rural Development Rural Land Policies for Poverty Reduction SDGS Sustainable Development Goals Finance and Financial Sector Development |
| title | Measuring Land Tenure at the Individual Level Lessons from Methodological Research in Armenia |
| title_auth | Measuring Land Tenure at the Individual Level Lessons from Methodological Research in Armenia |
| title_exact_search | Measuring Land Tenure at the Individual Level Lessons from Methodological Research in Armenia |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Measuring Land Tenure at the Individual Level Lessons from Methodological Research in Armenia |
| title_full | Measuring Land Tenure at the Individual Level Lessons from Methodological Research in Armenia Sydney Gourlay |
| title_fullStr | Measuring Land Tenure at the Individual Level Lessons from Methodological Research in Armenia Sydney Gourlay |
| title_full_unstemmed | Measuring Land Tenure at the Individual Level Lessons from Methodological Research in Armenia Sydney Gourlay |
| title_short | Measuring Land Tenure at the Individual Level |
| title_sort | measuring land tenure at the individual level lessons from methodological research in armenia |
| title_sub | Lessons from Methodological Research in Armenia |
| topic | Access To Finance Female Land Tenure Inequity Finance and Development Household Surveys Individual Land Rights Land Ownership Land Tenure Resilience To Economic Shock Rural Development Rural Land Policies for Poverty Reduction SDGS Sustainable Development Goals Finance and Financial Sector Development |
| topic_facet | Access To Finance Female Land Tenure Inequity Finance and Development Household Surveys Individual Land Rights Land Ownership Land Tenure Resilience To Economic Shock Rural Development Rural Land Policies for Poverty Reduction SDGS Sustainable Development Goals Finance and Financial Sector Development |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-10140 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gourlaysydney measuringlandtenureattheindividuallevellessonsfrommethodologicalresearchinarmenia AT maggiogiuseppe measuringlandtenureattheindividuallevellessonsfrommethodologicalresearchinarmenia AT safyananahit measuringlandtenureattheindividuallevellessonsfrommethodologicalresearchinarmenia AT zezzaalberto measuringlandtenureattheindividuallevellessonsfrommethodologicalresearchinarmenia |