The impact on Russia of WTO accession and the DOHA agenda: the importance of liberalization of barriers against foreign direct investment in services for growth and poverty reduction
"Taking price changes from the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) model of world trade, the authors use a small open economy computable general equilibrium comparative static model of the Russian economy to assess the impact of global free trade and a successful completion of the Doha Agenda...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
[Washington, D.C]
World Bank
[2005]
|
Schriftenreihe: | Policy research working paper
3725 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BSB01 EUV01 HTW01 FHI01 IOS01 Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | "Taking price changes from the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) model of world trade, the authors use a small open economy computable general equilibrium comparative static model of the Russian economy to assess the impact of global free trade and a successful completion of the Doha Agenda on the Russian economy, and especially on the poor. They compare those results with the impact of Russian accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) on income distribution and the poor. The model incorporates all 55,000 households from the Russian Household Budget Survey as "real" households. Crucially, given the importance of foreign direct investment (FDI) liberalization as part of Russian WTO accession, the authors also include FDI and Dixit-Stiglitz endogenous productivity effects from liberalization of import barriers against goods and FDI in services. The authors estimate that Russian WTO accession in the medium run will result in gains averaged over all Russian households equal to 7.3 percent of Russian consumption (with a standard deviation of 2.2 percent of consumption), with virtually all households gaining. They find that global free trade would result in a weighted average gain to households in Russia of 0.2 percent of consumption, with a standard deviation of 0.2 percent of consumption, while a successful completion of the Doha Development Agenda would result in a weighted average gain to households of -0.3 percent of consumption (with a standard deviation of 0.2 percent of consumption). Russia, as a net food importer, loses from subsidy elimination, and the gains to Russia from tariff cuts in other countries are too small to offset these losses. The results strongly support the view that Russia's own liberalization is more important than improvements in market access as a result of reforms in tariffs or subsidies in the rest of the world. Foremost among the own reforms is liberalization of barriers against FDI in business services. "--World Bank web site |
Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references Title from PDF file as viewed on 9/23/2005 |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a22000001cb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV049074899 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230731s2005 xxu|||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-1-WBA)093222777 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1392145034 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVNLM005458927 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a xxu |c XD-US | ||
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-521 |a DE-573 |a DE-523 |a DE-Re13 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Rutherford, Thomas Fox |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The impact on Russia of WTO accession and the DOHA agenda |b the importance of liberalization of barriers against foreign direct investment in services for growth and poverty reduction |c Thomas Rutherford, David Tarr, Oleksandr Shepotylo |
264 | 1 | |a [Washington, D.C] |b World Bank |c [2005] | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Policy research working paper |v 3725 | |
500 | |a Includes bibliographical references | ||
500 | |a Title from PDF file as viewed on 9/23/2005 | ||
520 | 3 | |a "Taking price changes from the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) model of world trade, the authors use a small open economy computable general equilibrium comparative static model of the Russian economy to assess the impact of global free trade and a successful completion of the Doha Agenda on the Russian economy, and especially on the poor. They compare those results with the impact of Russian accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) on income distribution and the poor. The model incorporates all 55,000 households from the Russian Household Budget Survey as "real" households. Crucially, given the importance of foreign direct investment (FDI) liberalization as part of Russian WTO accession, the authors also include FDI and Dixit-Stiglitz endogenous productivity effects from liberalization of import barriers against goods and FDI in services. The authors estimate that Russian WTO accession in the medium run will result in gains averaged over all Russian households equal to 7.3 percent of Russian consumption (with a standard deviation of 2.2 percent of consumption), with virtually all households gaining. They find that global free trade would result in a weighted average gain to households in Russia of 0.2 percent of consumption, with a standard deviation of 0.2 percent of consumption, while a successful completion of the Doha Development Agenda would result in a weighted average gain to households of -0.3 percent of consumption (with a standard deviation of 0.2 percent of consumption). Russia, as a net food importer, loses from subsidy elimination, and the gains to Russia from tariff cuts in other countries are too small to offset these losses. The results strongly support the view that Russia's own liberalization is more important than improvements in market access as a result of reforms in tariffs or subsidies in the rest of the world. Foremost among the own reforms is liberalization of barriers against FDI in business services. "--World Bank web site | |
533 | |a Online-Ausg |n Also available in print | ||
650 | 4 | |a Free trade |z Russia (Federation) | |
650 | 4 | |a Investments, Foreign |z Russia (Federation) | |
653 | 2 | |a World Trade Organization / Russia (Federation) | |
653 | 2 | |a Doha Development Agenda / (2001- ) | |
653 | 2 | |a Russia (Federation) / Economic conditions / 1991- | |
700 | 1 | |a Tarr, David |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
710 | 2 | |a World Bank |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Rutherford, Thomas Fox |a The impact on Russia of WTO accession and the DOHA agenda |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-3725 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-1-WBA | ||
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034336790 | ||
966 | e | |u http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-3725 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-1-WBA |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-3725 |l EUV01 |p ZDB-1-WBA |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-3725 |l HTW01 |p ZDB-1-WBA |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-3725 |l FHI01 |p ZDB-1-WBA |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-3725 |l IOS01 |p ZDB-1-WBA |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804185393279533056 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Rutherford, Thomas Fox |
author_facet | Rutherford, Thomas Fox |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Rutherford, Thomas Fox |
author_variant | t f r tf tfr |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV049074899 |
collection | ZDB-1-WBA |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-1-WBA)093222777 (OCoLC)1392145034 (DE-599)GBVNLM005458927 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04455nmm a22005051cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049074899</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230731s2005 xxu|||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-1-WBA)093222777</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1392145034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVNLM005458927</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">XD-US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-523</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Re13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rutherford, Thomas Fox</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The impact on Russia of WTO accession and the DOHA agenda</subfield><subfield code="b">the importance of liberalization of barriers against foreign direct investment in services for growth and poverty reduction</subfield><subfield code="c">Thomas Rutherford, David Tarr, Oleksandr Shepotylo</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">[Washington, D.C]</subfield><subfield code="b">World Bank</subfield><subfield code="c">[2005]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Policy research working paper</subfield><subfield code="v">3725</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from PDF file as viewed on 9/23/2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Taking price changes from the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) model of world trade, the authors use a small open economy computable general equilibrium comparative static model of the Russian economy to assess the impact of global free trade and a successful completion of the Doha Agenda on the Russian economy, and especially on the poor. They compare those results with the impact of Russian accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) on income distribution and the poor. The model incorporates all 55,000 households from the Russian Household Budget Survey as "real" households. Crucially, given the importance of foreign direct investment (FDI) liberalization as part of Russian WTO accession, the authors also include FDI and Dixit-Stiglitz endogenous productivity effects from liberalization of import barriers against goods and FDI in services. The authors estimate that Russian WTO accession in the medium run will result in gains averaged over all Russian households equal to 7.3 percent of Russian consumption (with a standard deviation of 2.2 percent of consumption), with virtually all households gaining. They find that global free trade would result in a weighted average gain to households in Russia of 0.2 percent of consumption, with a standard deviation of 0.2 percent of consumption, while a successful completion of the Doha Development Agenda would result in a weighted average gain to households of -0.3 percent of consumption (with a standard deviation of 0.2 percent of consumption). Russia, as a net food importer, loses from subsidy elimination, and the gains to Russia from tariff cuts in other countries are too small to offset these losses. The results strongly support the view that Russia's own liberalization is more important than improvements in market access as a result of reforms in tariffs or subsidies in the rest of the world. Foremost among the own reforms is liberalization of barriers against FDI in business services. "--World Bank web site</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ausg</subfield><subfield code="n">Also available in print</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Free trade</subfield><subfield code="z">Russia (Federation)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Investments, Foreign</subfield><subfield code="z">Russia (Federation)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">World Trade Organization / Russia (Federation)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Doha Development Agenda / (2001- )</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Russia (Federation) / Economic conditions / 1991-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tarr, David</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">World Bank</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Rutherford, Thomas Fox</subfield><subfield code="a">The impact on Russia of WTO accession and the DOHA agenda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-3725</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-WBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034336790</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-3725</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-WBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-3725</subfield><subfield code="l">EUV01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-WBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-3725</subfield><subfield code="l">HTW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-WBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-3725</subfield><subfield code="l">FHI01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-WBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-3725</subfield><subfield code="l">IOS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-WBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV049074899 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T22:27:47Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:54:31Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034336790 |
oclc_num | 1392145034 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-521 DE-573 DE-523 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-521 DE-573 DE-523 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource |
psigel | ZDB-1-WBA |
publishDate | 2005 |
publishDateSearch | 2005 |
publishDateSort | 2005 |
publisher | World Bank |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Policy research working paper |
spelling | Rutherford, Thomas Fox Verfasser aut The impact on Russia of WTO accession and the DOHA agenda the importance of liberalization of barriers against foreign direct investment in services for growth and poverty reduction Thomas Rutherford, David Tarr, Oleksandr Shepotylo [Washington, D.C] World Bank [2005] 1 Online-Ressource txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Policy research working paper 3725 Includes bibliographical references Title from PDF file as viewed on 9/23/2005 "Taking price changes from the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) model of world trade, the authors use a small open economy computable general equilibrium comparative static model of the Russian economy to assess the impact of global free trade and a successful completion of the Doha Agenda on the Russian economy, and especially on the poor. They compare those results with the impact of Russian accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) on income distribution and the poor. The model incorporates all 55,000 households from the Russian Household Budget Survey as "real" households. Crucially, given the importance of foreign direct investment (FDI) liberalization as part of Russian WTO accession, the authors also include FDI and Dixit-Stiglitz endogenous productivity effects from liberalization of import barriers against goods and FDI in services. The authors estimate that Russian WTO accession in the medium run will result in gains averaged over all Russian households equal to 7.3 percent of Russian consumption (with a standard deviation of 2.2 percent of consumption), with virtually all households gaining. They find that global free trade would result in a weighted average gain to households in Russia of 0.2 percent of consumption, with a standard deviation of 0.2 percent of consumption, while a successful completion of the Doha Development Agenda would result in a weighted average gain to households of -0.3 percent of consumption (with a standard deviation of 0.2 percent of consumption). Russia, as a net food importer, loses from subsidy elimination, and the gains to Russia from tariff cuts in other countries are too small to offset these losses. The results strongly support the view that Russia's own liberalization is more important than improvements in market access as a result of reforms in tariffs or subsidies in the rest of the world. Foremost among the own reforms is liberalization of barriers against FDI in business services. "--World Bank web site Online-Ausg Also available in print Free trade Russia (Federation) Investments, Foreign Russia (Federation) World Trade Organization / Russia (Federation) Doha Development Agenda / (2001- ) Russia (Federation) / Economic conditions / 1991- Tarr, David Sonstige oth World Bank Sonstige oth Rutherford, Thomas Fox The impact on Russia of WTO accession and the DOHA agenda http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-3725 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
spellingShingle | Rutherford, Thomas Fox The impact on Russia of WTO accession and the DOHA agenda the importance of liberalization of barriers against foreign direct investment in services for growth and poverty reduction Free trade Russia (Federation) Investments, Foreign Russia (Federation) |
title | The impact on Russia of WTO accession and the DOHA agenda the importance of liberalization of barriers against foreign direct investment in services for growth and poverty reduction |
title_auth | The impact on Russia of WTO accession and the DOHA agenda the importance of liberalization of barriers against foreign direct investment in services for growth and poverty reduction |
title_exact_search | The impact on Russia of WTO accession and the DOHA agenda the importance of liberalization of barriers against foreign direct investment in services for growth and poverty reduction |
title_exact_search_txtP | The impact on Russia of WTO accession and the DOHA agenda the importance of liberalization of barriers against foreign direct investment in services for growth and poverty reduction |
title_full | The impact on Russia of WTO accession and the DOHA agenda the importance of liberalization of barriers against foreign direct investment in services for growth and poverty reduction Thomas Rutherford, David Tarr, Oleksandr Shepotylo |
title_fullStr | The impact on Russia of WTO accession and the DOHA agenda the importance of liberalization of barriers against foreign direct investment in services for growth and poverty reduction Thomas Rutherford, David Tarr, Oleksandr Shepotylo |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact on Russia of WTO accession and the DOHA agenda the importance of liberalization of barriers against foreign direct investment in services for growth and poverty reduction Thomas Rutherford, David Tarr, Oleksandr Shepotylo |
title_short | The impact on Russia of WTO accession and the DOHA agenda |
title_sort | the impact on russia of wto accession and the doha agenda the importance of liberalization of barriers against foreign direct investment in services for growth and poverty reduction |
title_sub | the importance of liberalization of barriers against foreign direct investment in services for growth and poverty reduction |
topic | Free trade Russia (Federation) Investments, Foreign Russia (Federation) |
topic_facet | Free trade Russia (Federation) Investments, Foreign Russia (Federation) |
url | http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-3725 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rutherfordthomasfox theimpactonrussiaofwtoaccessionandthedohaagendatheimportanceofliberalizationofbarriersagainstforeigndirectinvestmentinservicesforgrowthandpovertyreduction AT tarrdavid theimpactonrussiaofwtoaccessionandthedohaagendatheimportanceofliberalizationofbarriersagainstforeigndirectinvestmentinservicesforgrowthandpovertyreduction AT worldbank theimpactonrussiaofwtoaccessionandthedohaagendatheimportanceofliberalizationofbarriersagainstforeigndirectinvestmentinservicesforgrowthandpovertyreduction |