Persuading the Supreme Court: the significance of briefs in judicial decision-making
"Each year the public, media, and government wait in anticipation for the Supreme Court to announce big decisions. These opinions have shaped legal policy in areas as important as healthcare, marriage, abortion, and immigration. It is not surprising that parties and outside individuals and inte...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Lawrence, Kansas
University Press of Kansas
[2022]
|
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | "Each year the public, media, and government wait in anticipation for the Supreme Court to announce big decisions. These opinions have shaped legal policy in areas as important as healthcare, marriage, abortion, and immigration. It is not surprising that parties and outside individuals and interest groups invest an estimated twenty-five to fifty million dollars a year to produce roughly one thousand briefs every year to communicate information to the justices, seeking to impact these rulings. Despite the importance of the Court and the information it receives, many questions remain unanswered regarding the production of such information and its relationship to the Court's decisions. Persuading the Supreme Court leverages the very written arguments submitted to the Court to shed light on both their construction and impact. Drawing on more than 25,000 party and amicus briefs filed between 1984 and 2015 and the text of the related court opinions, as well as interviews with former Supreme Court clerks and attorneys who have prepared and filed briefs before the Supreme Court, Morgan Hazelton and Rachael Hinkle have shed light on one of the more mysterious and consequential features of Supreme Court decisionmaking"-- |
Beschreibung: | xvi, 275 Seiten Diagramme 23 cm |
ISBN: | 9780700633630 0700633634 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV049035807 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20230809 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 230705s2022 |||| b||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780700633630 |c (paperback) |9 978-0-7006-3363-0 | ||
020 | |a 0700633634 |9 0-7006-3363-4 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1369631901 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049035807 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-188 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 347.7326 |2 23 | |
100 | 1 | |a Hazelton, Morgan L. W. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1272898946 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Persuading the Supreme Court |b the significance of briefs in judicial decision-making |c Morgan L.W. Hazelton and Rachael K. Hinkle |
264 | 1 | |a Lawrence, Kansas |b University Press of Kansas |c [2022] | |
300 | |a xvi, 275 Seiten |b Diagramme |c 23 cm | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
505 | 8 | 0 | |t Briefs and the people who produce them -- |t Crafting a brief -- |t Coordinating and coalescing : investigating information sharing between briefs -- |t The win/loss column : influencing case outcomes -- |t Standing out or speaking together : how individual briefs shape opinion content -- |t Shaping the law together : collectively influencing opinion content |
520 | 3 | |a "Each year the public, media, and government wait in anticipation for the Supreme Court to announce big decisions. These opinions have shaped legal policy in areas as important as healthcare, marriage, abortion, and immigration. It is not surprising that parties and outside individuals and interest groups invest an estimated twenty-five to fifty million dollars a year to produce roughly one thousand briefs every year to communicate information to the justices, seeking to impact these rulings. Despite the importance of the Court and the information it receives, many questions remain unanswered regarding the production of such information and its relationship to the Court's decisions. Persuading the Supreme Court leverages the very written arguments submitted to the Court to shed light on both their construction and impact. Drawing on more than 25,000 party and amicus briefs filed between 1984 and 2015 and the text of the related court opinions, as well as interviews with former Supreme Court clerks and attorneys who have prepared and filed briefs before the Supreme Court, Morgan Hazelton and Rachael Hinkle have shed light on one of the more mysterious and consequential features of Supreme Court decisionmaking"-- | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Prozess |0 (DE-588)4047577-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsstreit |0 (DE-588)4139832-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
653 | 2 | |a United States / Supreme Court | |
653 | 0 | |a Judicial process / United States | |
653 | 0 | |a Legal briefs / United States | |
653 | 2 | |a United States / Supreme Court | |
653 | 0 | |a Judicial process | |
653 | 0 | |a Legal briefs | |
653 | 2 | |a United States | |
653 | 6 | |a Informational works | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Prozess |0 (DE-588)4047577-3 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Rechtsstreit |0 (DE-588)4139832-4 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-188 | |
700 | 1 | |a Hinkle, Rachael K. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1272900045 |4 aut | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |a Hazelton, Morgan L.W. |t Persuading the Supreme Court |d Lawrence, Kansas : University Press of Kansas, 2022 |z 978-0-7006-3364-7 |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034298429 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804185324793888768 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Hazelton, Morgan L. W. Hinkle, Rachael K. |
author_GND | (DE-588)1272898946 (DE-588)1272900045 |
author_facet | Hazelton, Morgan L. W. Hinkle, Rachael K. |
author_role | aut aut |
author_sort | Hazelton, Morgan L. W. |
author_variant | m l w h mlw mlwh r k h rk rkh |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV049035807 |
contents | Briefs and the people who produce them -- Crafting a brief -- Coordinating and coalescing : investigating information sharing between briefs -- The win/loss column : influencing case outcomes -- Standing out or speaking together : how individual briefs shape opinion content -- Shaping the law together : collectively influencing opinion content |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1369631901 (DE-599)BVBBV049035807 |
dewey-full | 347.7326 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
dewey-raw | 347.7326 |
dewey-search | 347.7326 |
dewey-sort | 3347.7326 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03442nam a2200505 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049035807</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230809 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230705s2022 |||| b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780700633630</subfield><subfield code="c">(paperback)</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-7006-3363-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0700633634</subfield><subfield code="9">0-7006-3363-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1369631901</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049035807</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.7326</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hazelton, Morgan L. W.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1272898946</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Persuading the Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="b">the significance of briefs in judicial decision-making</subfield><subfield code="c">Morgan L.W. Hazelton and Rachael K. Hinkle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Lawrence, Kansas</subfield><subfield code="b">University Press of Kansas</subfield><subfield code="c">[2022]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xvi, 275 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Diagramme</subfield><subfield code="c">23 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2="0"><subfield code="t">Briefs and the people who produce them --</subfield><subfield code="t">Crafting a brief --</subfield><subfield code="t">Coordinating and coalescing : investigating information sharing between briefs --</subfield><subfield code="t">The win/loss column : influencing case outcomes --</subfield><subfield code="t">Standing out or speaking together : how individual briefs shape opinion content --</subfield><subfield code="t">Shaping the law together : collectively influencing opinion content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Each year the public, media, and government wait in anticipation for the Supreme Court to announce big decisions. These opinions have shaped legal policy in areas as important as healthcare, marriage, abortion, and immigration. It is not surprising that parties and outside individuals and interest groups invest an estimated twenty-five to fifty million dollars a year to produce roughly one thousand briefs every year to communicate information to the justices, seeking to impact these rulings. Despite the importance of the Court and the information it receives, many questions remain unanswered regarding the production of such information and its relationship to the Court's decisions. Persuading the Supreme Court leverages the very written arguments submitted to the Court to shed light on both their construction and impact. Drawing on more than 25,000 party and amicus briefs filed between 1984 and 2015 and the text of the related court opinions, as well as interviews with former Supreme Court clerks and attorneys who have prepared and filed briefs before the Supreme Court, Morgan Hazelton and Rachael Hinkle have shed light on one of the more mysterious and consequential features of Supreme Court decisionmaking"--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Prozess</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4047577-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsstreit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139832-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">United States / Supreme Court</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicial process / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Legal briefs / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">United States / Supreme Court</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicial process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Legal briefs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Informational works</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Prozess</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4047577-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Rechtsstreit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139832-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hinkle, Rachael K.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1272900045</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Hazelton, Morgan L.W.</subfield><subfield code="t">Persuading the Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="d">Lawrence, Kansas : University Press of Kansas, 2022</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-7006-3364-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034298429</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
geographic_facet | USA |
id | DE-604.BV049035807 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T22:17:41Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:53:26Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780700633630 0700633634 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034298429 |
oclc_num | 1369631901 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-188 |
owner_facet | DE-188 |
physical | xvi, 275 Seiten Diagramme 23 cm |
publishDate | 2022 |
publishDateSearch | 2022 |
publishDateSort | 2022 |
publisher | University Press of Kansas |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Hazelton, Morgan L. W. Verfasser (DE-588)1272898946 aut Persuading the Supreme Court the significance of briefs in judicial decision-making Morgan L.W. Hazelton and Rachael K. Hinkle Lawrence, Kansas University Press of Kansas [2022] xvi, 275 Seiten Diagramme 23 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Briefs and the people who produce them -- Crafting a brief -- Coordinating and coalescing : investigating information sharing between briefs -- The win/loss column : influencing case outcomes -- Standing out or speaking together : how individual briefs shape opinion content -- Shaping the law together : collectively influencing opinion content "Each year the public, media, and government wait in anticipation for the Supreme Court to announce big decisions. These opinions have shaped legal policy in areas as important as healthcare, marriage, abortion, and immigration. It is not surprising that parties and outside individuals and interest groups invest an estimated twenty-five to fifty million dollars a year to produce roughly one thousand briefs every year to communicate information to the justices, seeking to impact these rulings. Despite the importance of the Court and the information it receives, many questions remain unanswered regarding the production of such information and its relationship to the Court's decisions. Persuading the Supreme Court leverages the very written arguments submitted to the Court to shed light on both their construction and impact. Drawing on more than 25,000 party and amicus briefs filed between 1984 and 2015 and the text of the related court opinions, as well as interviews with former Supreme Court clerks and attorneys who have prepared and filed briefs before the Supreme Court, Morgan Hazelton and Rachael Hinkle have shed light on one of the more mysterious and consequential features of Supreme Court decisionmaking"-- Prozess (DE-588)4047577-3 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsstreit (DE-588)4139832-4 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf United States / Supreme Court Judicial process / United States Legal briefs / United States Judicial process Legal briefs United States Informational works USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Prozess (DE-588)4047577-3 s Rechtsstreit (DE-588)4139832-4 s DE-188 Hinkle, Rachael K. Verfasser (DE-588)1272900045 aut Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe Hazelton, Morgan L.W. Persuading the Supreme Court Lawrence, Kansas : University Press of Kansas, 2022 978-0-7006-3364-7 |
spellingShingle | Hazelton, Morgan L. W. Hinkle, Rachael K. Persuading the Supreme Court the significance of briefs in judicial decision-making Briefs and the people who produce them -- Crafting a brief -- Coordinating and coalescing : investigating information sharing between briefs -- The win/loss column : influencing case outcomes -- Standing out or speaking together : how individual briefs shape opinion content -- Shaping the law together : collectively influencing opinion content Prozess (DE-588)4047577-3 gnd Rechtsstreit (DE-588)4139832-4 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4047577-3 (DE-588)4139832-4 (DE-588)4078704-7 |
title | Persuading the Supreme Court the significance of briefs in judicial decision-making |
title_alt | Briefs and the people who produce them -- Crafting a brief -- Coordinating and coalescing : investigating information sharing between briefs -- The win/loss column : influencing case outcomes -- Standing out or speaking together : how individual briefs shape opinion content -- Shaping the law together : collectively influencing opinion content |
title_auth | Persuading the Supreme Court the significance of briefs in judicial decision-making |
title_exact_search | Persuading the Supreme Court the significance of briefs in judicial decision-making |
title_exact_search_txtP | Persuading the Supreme Court the significance of briefs in judicial decision-making |
title_full | Persuading the Supreme Court the significance of briefs in judicial decision-making Morgan L.W. Hazelton and Rachael K. Hinkle |
title_fullStr | Persuading the Supreme Court the significance of briefs in judicial decision-making Morgan L.W. Hazelton and Rachael K. Hinkle |
title_full_unstemmed | Persuading the Supreme Court the significance of briefs in judicial decision-making Morgan L.W. Hazelton and Rachael K. Hinkle |
title_short | Persuading the Supreme Court |
title_sort | persuading the supreme court the significance of briefs in judicial decision making |
title_sub | the significance of briefs in judicial decision-making |
topic | Prozess (DE-588)4047577-3 gnd Rechtsstreit (DE-588)4139832-4 gnd |
topic_facet | Prozess Rechtsstreit USA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hazeltonmorganlw persuadingthesupremecourtthesignificanceofbriefsinjudicialdecisionmaking AT hinklerachaelk persuadingthesupremecourtthesignificanceofbriefsinjudicialdecisionmaking |