Iconological dualism re-thought: a new variation on two old theories
This article aims at defending the old theory of iconological dualism that opposes ‘handmade’ pictures to photographic pictures. I defend a new version of that theory, according to which photographs always enable viewers to have singular thoughts on the things photographed, while handmade pictures b...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
[2022]
|
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | This article aims at defending the old theory of iconological dualism that opposes ‘handmade’ pictures to photographic pictures. I defend a new version of that theory, according to which photographs always enable viewers to have singular thoughts on the things photographed, while handmade pictures by themselves never enable viewers to have singular thoughts but only enable them to have what I call ‘thoughts by depiction’. To this end, I defend the old theory according to which singular thoughts require a special relation—called ‘acquaintance’—between the thinker and the object thought about. I put this traditional view forward thanks to a new version of the classic spy argument for the acquaintance constraint on singular thoughts. |
ISSN: | 0021-8529 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV048857973 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20230322 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 230313s2022 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1373394602 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048857973 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-255 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Wecker, Frédéric |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Iconological dualism re-thought |b a new variation on two old theories |c Frédéric Wecker |
264 | 1 | |c [2022] | |
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | 3 | |a This article aims at defending the old theory of iconological dualism that opposes ‘handmade’ pictures to photographic pictures. I defend a new version of that theory, according to which photographs always enable viewers to have singular thoughts on the things photographed, while handmade pictures by themselves never enable viewers to have singular thoughts but only enable them to have what I call ‘thoughts by depiction’. To this end, I defend the old theory according to which singular thoughts require a special relation—called ‘acquaintance’—between the thinker and the object thought about. I put this traditional view forward thanks to a new version of the classic spy argument for the acquaintance constraint on singular thoughts. | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Malerei |0 (DE-588)4037220-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Fotografie |0 (DE-588)4045895-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Ästhetik |0 (DE-588)4000626-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Ästhetik |0 (DE-588)4000626-8 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Fotografie |0 (DE-588)4045895-7 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Malerei |0 (DE-588)4037220-0 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:80 |g number:4 |g year:2022 |g pages:494-509 |
773 | 0 | 8 | |t The journal of aesthetics and art criticism / American Society for Aesthetics. Ed. Thomas Munro |d Hoboken, NJ, 2022 |g Volume 80, number 4 (fall 2022), Seite 494-509 |w (DE-604)BV002662422 |x 0021-8529 |o (DE-600)2930-0 |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034123136 | ||
941 | |b 80 |h 4 |j 2022 |s 494-509 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804184984228986880 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
article_link | (DE-604)BV002662422 |
author | Wecker, Frédéric |
author_facet | Wecker, Frédéric |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Wecker, Frédéric |
author_variant | f w fw |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV048857973 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1373394602 (DE-599)BVBBV048857973 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02084naa a2200361 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048857973</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230322 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230313s2022 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1373394602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048857973</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-255</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wecker, Frédéric</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Iconological dualism re-thought</subfield><subfield code="b">a new variation on two old theories</subfield><subfield code="c">Frédéric Wecker</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">[2022]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This article aims at defending the old theory of iconological dualism that opposes ‘handmade’ pictures to photographic pictures. I defend a new version of that theory, according to which photographs always enable viewers to have singular thoughts on the things photographed, while handmade pictures by themselves never enable viewers to have singular thoughts but only enable them to have what I call ‘thoughts by depiction’. To this end, I defend the old theory according to which singular thoughts require a special relation—called ‘acquaintance’—between the thinker and the object thought about. I put this traditional view forward thanks to a new version of the classic spy argument for the acquaintance constraint on singular thoughts.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Malerei</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4037220-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Fotografie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4045895-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ästhetik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4000626-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ästhetik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4000626-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Fotografie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4045895-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Malerei</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4037220-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:80</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:494-509</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="t">The journal of aesthetics and art criticism / American Society for Aesthetics. Ed. Thomas Munro</subfield><subfield code="d">Hoboken, NJ, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">Volume 80, number 4 (fall 2022), Seite 494-509</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV002662422</subfield><subfield code="x">0021-8529</subfield><subfield code="o">(DE-600)2930-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034123136</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="941" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">80</subfield><subfield code="h">4</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="s">494-509</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV048857973 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T21:41:30Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:48:01Z |
institution | BVB |
issn | 0021-8529 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034123136 |
oclc_num | 1373394602 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-255 |
owner_facet | DE-255 |
publishDate | 2022 |
publishDateSearch | 2022 |
publishDateSort | 2022 |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Wecker, Frédéric Verfasser aut Iconological dualism re-thought a new variation on two old theories Frédéric Wecker [2022] txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier This article aims at defending the old theory of iconological dualism that opposes ‘handmade’ pictures to photographic pictures. I defend a new version of that theory, according to which photographs always enable viewers to have singular thoughts on the things photographed, while handmade pictures by themselves never enable viewers to have singular thoughts but only enable them to have what I call ‘thoughts by depiction’. To this end, I defend the old theory according to which singular thoughts require a special relation—called ‘acquaintance’—between the thinker and the object thought about. I put this traditional view forward thanks to a new version of the classic spy argument for the acquaintance constraint on singular thoughts. Malerei (DE-588)4037220-0 gnd rswk-swf Fotografie (DE-588)4045895-7 gnd rswk-swf Ästhetik (DE-588)4000626-8 gnd rswk-swf Ästhetik (DE-588)4000626-8 s Fotografie (DE-588)4045895-7 s Malerei (DE-588)4037220-0 s DE-604 volume:80 number:4 year:2022 pages:494-509 The journal of aesthetics and art criticism / American Society for Aesthetics. Ed. Thomas Munro Hoboken, NJ, 2022 Volume 80, number 4 (fall 2022), Seite 494-509 (DE-604)BV002662422 0021-8529 (DE-600)2930-0 |
spellingShingle | Wecker, Frédéric Iconological dualism re-thought a new variation on two old theories Malerei (DE-588)4037220-0 gnd Fotografie (DE-588)4045895-7 gnd Ästhetik (DE-588)4000626-8 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4037220-0 (DE-588)4045895-7 (DE-588)4000626-8 |
title | Iconological dualism re-thought a new variation on two old theories |
title_auth | Iconological dualism re-thought a new variation on two old theories |
title_exact_search | Iconological dualism re-thought a new variation on two old theories |
title_exact_search_txtP | Iconological dualism re-thought a new variation on two old theories |
title_full | Iconological dualism re-thought a new variation on two old theories Frédéric Wecker |
title_fullStr | Iconological dualism re-thought a new variation on two old theories Frédéric Wecker |
title_full_unstemmed | Iconological dualism re-thought a new variation on two old theories Frédéric Wecker |
title_short | Iconological dualism re-thought |
title_sort | iconological dualism re thought a new variation on two old theories |
title_sub | a new variation on two old theories |
topic | Malerei (DE-588)4037220-0 gnd Fotografie (DE-588)4045895-7 gnd Ästhetik (DE-588)4000626-8 gnd |
topic_facet | Malerei Fotografie Ästhetik |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weckerfrederic iconologicaldualismrethoughtanewvariationontwooldtheories |