New gig work or changes in reporting?: Understanding self-employment trends in tax data
Rising self-employment rates in U.S. tax data that are absent in survey data have led to speculation that tax records capture a rise in new "gig" work that surveys miss. Drawing on the universe of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) tax returns, we show that trends in firm-reported payments to...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Weitere Verfasser: | , |
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2022
|
| Schriftenreihe: | OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers
no.278 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | kostenfrei |
| Zusammenfassung: | Rising self-employment rates in U.S. tax data that are absent in survey data have led to speculation that tax records capture a rise in new "gig" work that surveys miss. Drawing on the universe of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) tax returns, we show that trends in firm-reported payments to "gig" and other contract workers do not explain the rise in self-employment reported to the IRS; rather, that increase is driven by self-reported earnings of individuals in the EITC phase-in range. We isolate pure reporting responses from real labor supply responses by examining births of workers' first children around an end-of-year cutoff for credit eligibility that creates exogenous variation in tax rates at the end of the tax year after labor supply decisions are already sunk. We find that exposing workers with sunk labor supply to negative marginal tax rates results in large increases in their propensity to self-report self-employment-only a small minority of which leads to bunching at kink-points. Consistent with pure strategic reporting behavior, we find no impact on reporting among taxpayers with no incentive to report additional income and no effects on firm-reported payments of any kind. Moreover, we find these reporting responses have grown over time as knowledge of tax incentives has become widespread. Quantitatively, our results suggest that as much as 59 percent of the growth in self-employment rates, and all counter-cyclicality, can be attributed to changes in reporting behavior that are independent of changes in the nature of work. Our findings suggest caution is warranted before deferring to administrative data over survey data when measuring labor market trends |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (72 Seiten) |
| DOI: | 10.1787/26465814-en |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a22000001cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048675062 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230125s2022 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/26465814-en |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-13-SOC)083002677 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1369563228 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KEP083002677 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-188 |a DE-521 |a DE-1028 |a DE-573 |a DE-92 |a DE-898 |a DE-1049 |a DE-861 |a DE-91 |a DE-384 |a DE-473 |a DE-355 |a DE-20 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-739 |a DE-19 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Garin, Andrew |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a New gig work or changes in reporting? |b Understanding self-employment trends in tax data |c Andrew, Garin, Emilie, Jackson and Dmitri, Koustas |
| 264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2022 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (72 Seiten) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers |v no.278 | |
| 520 | 3 | |a Rising self-employment rates in U.S. tax data that are absent in survey data have led to speculation that tax records capture a rise in new "gig" work that surveys miss. Drawing on the universe of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) tax returns, we show that trends in firm-reported payments to "gig" and other contract workers do not explain the rise in self-employment reported to the IRS; rather, that increase is driven by self-reported earnings of individuals in the EITC phase-in range. We isolate pure reporting responses from real labor supply responses by examining births of workers' first children around an end-of-year cutoff for credit eligibility that creates exogenous variation in tax rates at the end of the tax year after labor supply decisions are already sunk. We find that exposing workers with sunk labor supply to negative marginal tax rates results in large increases in their propensity to self-report self-employment-only a small minority of which leads to bunching at kink-points. Consistent with pure strategic reporting behavior, we find no impact on reporting among taxpayers with no incentive to report additional income and no effects on firm-reported payments of any kind. Moreover, we find these reporting responses have grown over time as knowledge of tax incentives has become widespread. Quantitatively, our results suggest that as much as 59 percent of the growth in self-employment rates, and all counter-cyclicality, can be attributed to changes in reporting behavior that are independent of changes in the nature of work. Our findings suggest caution is warranted before deferring to administrative data over survey data when measuring labor market trends | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Social Issues/Migration/Health | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Employment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a United States | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jackson, Emilie |4 ctb | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Koustas, Dmitri |4 ctb | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/26465814-en |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034049548 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1822611025808064512 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Garin, Andrew |
| author2 | Jackson, Emilie Koustas, Dmitri |
| author2_role | ctb ctb |
| author2_variant | e j ej d k dk |
| author_facet | Garin, Andrew Jackson, Emilie Koustas, Dmitri |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Garin, Andrew |
| author_variant | a g ag |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048675062 |
| collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-13-SOC)083002677 (OCoLC)1369563228 (DE-599)KEP083002677 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1787/26465814-en |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a22000001cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048675062</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230125s2022 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/26465814-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-13-SOC)083002677</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1369563228</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KEP083002677</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1028</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-861</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Garin, Andrew</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">New gig work or changes in reporting?</subfield><subfield code="b">Understanding self-employment trends in tax data</subfield><subfield code="c">Andrew, Garin, Emilie, Jackson and Dmitri, Koustas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (72 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers</subfield><subfield code="v">no.278</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rising self-employment rates in U.S. tax data that are absent in survey data have led to speculation that tax records capture a rise in new "gig" work that surveys miss. Drawing on the universe of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) tax returns, we show that trends in firm-reported payments to "gig" and other contract workers do not explain the rise in self-employment reported to the IRS; rather, that increase is driven by self-reported earnings of individuals in the EITC phase-in range. We isolate pure reporting responses from real labor supply responses by examining births of workers' first children around an end-of-year cutoff for credit eligibility that creates exogenous variation in tax rates at the end of the tax year after labor supply decisions are already sunk. We find that exposing workers with sunk labor supply to negative marginal tax rates results in large increases in their propensity to self-report self-employment-only a small minority of which leads to bunching at kink-points. Consistent with pure strategic reporting behavior, we find no impact on reporting among taxpayers with no incentive to report additional income and no effects on firm-reported payments of any kind. Moreover, we find these reporting responses have grown over time as knowledge of tax incentives has become widespread. Quantitatively, our results suggest that as much as 59 percent of the growth in self-employment rates, and all counter-cyclicality, can be attributed to changes in reporting behavior that are independent of changes in the nature of work. Our findings suggest caution is warranted before deferring to administrative data over survey data when measuring labor market trends</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social Issues/Migration/Health</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Employment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jackson, Emilie</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Koustas, Dmitri</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/26465814-en</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034049548</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048675062 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T21:23:47Z |
| indexdate | 2025-01-29T19:02:04Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034049548 |
| oclc_num | 1369563228 |
| open_access_boolean | 1 |
| owner | DE-188 DE-521 DE-1028 DE-573 DE-92 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-1049 DE-861 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-384 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-188 DE-521 DE-1028 DE-573 DE-92 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-1049 DE-861 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-384 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (72 Seiten) |
| psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateSearch | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| publisher | OECD Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers |
| spelling | Garin, Andrew Verfasser aut New gig work or changes in reporting? Understanding self-employment trends in tax data Andrew, Garin, Emilie, Jackson and Dmitri, Koustas Paris OECD Publishing 2022 1 Online-Ressource (72 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers no.278 Rising self-employment rates in U.S. tax data that are absent in survey data have led to speculation that tax records capture a rise in new "gig" work that surveys miss. Drawing on the universe of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) tax returns, we show that trends in firm-reported payments to "gig" and other contract workers do not explain the rise in self-employment reported to the IRS; rather, that increase is driven by self-reported earnings of individuals in the EITC phase-in range. We isolate pure reporting responses from real labor supply responses by examining births of workers' first children around an end-of-year cutoff for credit eligibility that creates exogenous variation in tax rates at the end of the tax year after labor supply decisions are already sunk. We find that exposing workers with sunk labor supply to negative marginal tax rates results in large increases in their propensity to self-report self-employment-only a small minority of which leads to bunching at kink-points. Consistent with pure strategic reporting behavior, we find no impact on reporting among taxpayers with no incentive to report additional income and no effects on firm-reported payments of any kind. Moreover, we find these reporting responses have grown over time as knowledge of tax incentives has become widespread. Quantitatively, our results suggest that as much as 59 percent of the growth in self-employment rates, and all counter-cyclicality, can be attributed to changes in reporting behavior that are independent of changes in the nature of work. Our findings suggest caution is warranted before deferring to administrative data over survey data when measuring labor market trends Social Issues/Migration/Health Employment United States Jackson, Emilie ctb Koustas, Dmitri ctb https://doi.org/10.1787/26465814-en Verlag kostenfrei Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Garin, Andrew New gig work or changes in reporting? Understanding self-employment trends in tax data Social Issues/Migration/Health Employment United States |
| title | New gig work or changes in reporting? Understanding self-employment trends in tax data |
| title_auth | New gig work or changes in reporting? Understanding self-employment trends in tax data |
| title_exact_search | New gig work or changes in reporting? Understanding self-employment trends in tax data |
| title_exact_search_txtP | New gig work or changes in reporting? Understanding self-employment trends in tax data |
| title_full | New gig work or changes in reporting? Understanding self-employment trends in tax data Andrew, Garin, Emilie, Jackson and Dmitri, Koustas |
| title_fullStr | New gig work or changes in reporting? Understanding self-employment trends in tax data Andrew, Garin, Emilie, Jackson and Dmitri, Koustas |
| title_full_unstemmed | New gig work or changes in reporting? Understanding self-employment trends in tax data Andrew, Garin, Emilie, Jackson and Dmitri, Koustas |
| title_short | New gig work or changes in reporting? |
| title_sort | new gig work or changes in reporting understanding self employment trends in tax data |
| title_sub | Understanding self-employment trends in tax data |
| topic | Social Issues/Migration/Health Employment United States |
| topic_facet | Social Issues/Migration/Health Employment United States |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1787/26465814-en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT garinandrew newgigworkorchangesinreportingunderstandingselfemploymenttrendsintaxdata AT jacksonemilie newgigworkorchangesinreportingunderstandingselfemploymenttrendsintaxdata AT koustasdmitri newgigworkorchangesinreportingunderstandingselfemploymenttrendsintaxdata |