Counterfactual reasoning in art criticism:
When we evaluate artworks, we often point to what an artist could have done or what a work could have been in order to say something about the work as it actually is. Call this counterfactual reasoning in art criticism. On my account, counterfactual claims about artworks involve comparative aestheti...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
[2022]
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | When we evaluate artworks, we often point to what an artist could have done or what a work could have been in order to say something about the work as it actually is. Call this counterfactual reasoning in art criticism. On my account, counterfactual claims about artworks involve comparative aesthetic judgments between actual artworks and hypothetical variations of those works. The practice of imagining what an artwork could have been is critically useful because it can help us understand how artworks achieve specific aesthetic effects. I conclude by responding to an objection to my account on the basis that it violates the widely accepted acquaintance principle in aesthetics, on which aesthetic judgments must be based on firsthand perceptual encounters with their objects. |
| ISSN: | 0021-8529 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048614389 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20230111 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 221216s2022 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1355306978 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048614389 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-255 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sun, Angela |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Counterfactual reasoning in art criticism |c Angela Sun |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2022] | |
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a When we evaluate artworks, we often point to what an artist could have done or what a work could have been in order to say something about the work as it actually is. Call this counterfactual reasoning in art criticism. On my account, counterfactual claims about artworks involve comparative aesthetic judgments between actual artworks and hypothetical variations of those works. The practice of imagining what an artwork could have been is critically useful because it can help us understand how artworks achieve specific aesthetic effects. I conclude by responding to an objection to my account on the basis that it violates the widely accepted acquaintance principle in aesthetics, on which aesthetic judgments must be based on firsthand perceptual encounters with their objects. | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kunstkritik |0 (DE-588)4033659-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Ästhetik |0 (DE-588)4000626-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Kunstkritik |0 (DE-588)4033659-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Ästhetik |0 (DE-588)4000626-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:80 |g number:3 |g year:2022 |g pages:276-285 |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |t The journal of aesthetics and art criticism / American Society for Aesthetics. Ed. Thomas Munro |d Hoboken, NJ, 2022 |g Volume 80, number 3 (summer 2022), Seite 276-285 |w (DE-604)BV002662422 |x 0021-8529 |o (DE-600)2930-0 |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033989703 | ||
| 941 | |b 80 |h 3 |j 2022 |s 276-285 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184671627509760 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| article_link | (DE-604)BV002662422 |
| author | Sun, Angela |
| author_facet | Sun, Angela |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Sun, Angela |
| author_variant | a s as |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048614389 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1355306978 (DE-599)BVBBV048614389 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01969naa a2200337 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048614389</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230111 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221216s2022 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1355306978</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048614389</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-255</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sun, Angela</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Counterfactual reasoning in art criticism</subfield><subfield code="c">Angela Sun</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">[2022]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">When we evaluate artworks, we often point to what an artist could have done or what a work could have been in order to say something about the work as it actually is. Call this counterfactual reasoning in art criticism. On my account, counterfactual claims about artworks involve comparative aesthetic judgments between actual artworks and hypothetical variations of those works. The practice of imagining what an artwork could have been is critically useful because it can help us understand how artworks achieve specific aesthetic effects. I conclude by responding to an objection to my account on the basis that it violates the widely accepted acquaintance principle in aesthetics, on which aesthetic judgments must be based on firsthand perceptual encounters with their objects.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kunstkritik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4033659-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ästhetik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4000626-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kunstkritik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4033659-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Ästhetik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4000626-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:80</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:276-285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="t">The journal of aesthetics and art criticism / American Society for Aesthetics. Ed. Thomas Munro</subfield><subfield code="d">Hoboken, NJ, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">Volume 80, number 3 (summer 2022), Seite 276-285</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV002662422</subfield><subfield code="x">0021-8529</subfield><subfield code="o">(DE-600)2930-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033989703</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="941" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">80</subfield><subfield code="h">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="s">276-285</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048614389 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T21:12:46Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:43:03Z |
| institution | BVB |
| issn | 0021-8529 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033989703 |
| oclc_num | 1355306978 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-255 |
| owner_facet | DE-255 |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateSearch | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Sun, Angela Verfasser aut Counterfactual reasoning in art criticism Angela Sun [2022] txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier When we evaluate artworks, we often point to what an artist could have done or what a work could have been in order to say something about the work as it actually is. Call this counterfactual reasoning in art criticism. On my account, counterfactual claims about artworks involve comparative aesthetic judgments between actual artworks and hypothetical variations of those works. The practice of imagining what an artwork could have been is critically useful because it can help us understand how artworks achieve specific aesthetic effects. I conclude by responding to an objection to my account on the basis that it violates the widely accepted acquaintance principle in aesthetics, on which aesthetic judgments must be based on firsthand perceptual encounters with their objects. Kunstkritik (DE-588)4033659-1 gnd rswk-swf Ästhetik (DE-588)4000626-8 gnd rswk-swf Kunstkritik (DE-588)4033659-1 s Ästhetik (DE-588)4000626-8 s DE-604 volume:80 number:3 year:2022 pages:276-285 The journal of aesthetics and art criticism / American Society for Aesthetics. Ed. Thomas Munro Hoboken, NJ, 2022 Volume 80, number 3 (summer 2022), Seite 276-285 (DE-604)BV002662422 0021-8529 (DE-600)2930-0 |
| spellingShingle | Sun, Angela Counterfactual reasoning in art criticism Kunstkritik (DE-588)4033659-1 gnd Ästhetik (DE-588)4000626-8 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4033659-1 (DE-588)4000626-8 |
| title | Counterfactual reasoning in art criticism |
| title_auth | Counterfactual reasoning in art criticism |
| title_exact_search | Counterfactual reasoning in art criticism |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Counterfactual reasoning in art criticism |
| title_full | Counterfactual reasoning in art criticism Angela Sun |
| title_fullStr | Counterfactual reasoning in art criticism Angela Sun |
| title_full_unstemmed | Counterfactual reasoning in art criticism Angela Sun |
| title_short | Counterfactual reasoning in art criticism |
| title_sort | counterfactual reasoning in art criticism |
| topic | Kunstkritik (DE-588)4033659-1 gnd Ästhetik (DE-588)4000626-8 gnd |
| topic_facet | Kunstkritik Ästhetik |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sunangela counterfactualreasoninginartcriticism |