Do Land Market Restrictions Hinder Structural Change in a Rural Economy?: Evidence from Sri Lanka
This paper analyzes the effects of land market restrictions on structural change from agriculture to non-farm in a rural economy. This paper develops a theoretical model that focuses on higher migration costs due to restrictions on alienability, and identifies the possibility of a reverse structural...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Washington, D.C
The World Bank
2015
|
Schriftenreihe: | World Bank E-Library Archive
|
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | This paper analyzes the effects of land market restrictions on structural change from agriculture to non-farm in a rural economy. This paper develops a theoretical model that focuses on higher migration costs due to restrictions on alienability, and identifies the possibility of a reverse structural change where the share of nonagricultural employment declines. The reverse structural change can occur under plausible conditions: if demand for the non-agricultural good is income-inelastic (assuming the non-farm good is non-tradable), or non-agriculture is less labor intensive relative to agriculture (assuming the non-farm good is tradable). For identification, this paper exploits a natural experiment in Sri Lanka where historical malaria played a unique role in land policy. The empirical evidence indicates significant adverse effects of land restrictions on manufacturing and services employment, rural wages, and per capita household consumption. The evidence on the disaggregated occupational choices suggests that land restrictions increase wage employment in agriculture, but reduce it in manufacturing and services, with no perceptible effects on self-employment in non-agriculture. The results are consistent with the migration costs model, but contradict two widely discussed alternative mechanisms: collateral effect and property rights insecurity. This paper also provides direct evidence in favor of the migration costs mechanism |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (44 p) |
DOI: | 10.1596/1813-9450-7525 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV048269151 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220609s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1596/1813-9450-7525 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-1-WBA)NLM01046414X | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1334052860 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVNLM01046414X | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-521 |a DE-573 |a DE-523 |a DE-Re13 |a DE-19 |a DE-355 |a DE-703 |a DE-91 |a DE-706 |a DE-29 |a DE-M347 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-20 |a DE-739 |a DE-1043 |a DE-863 |a DE-862 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Emran, M. Shahe |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Do Land Market Restrictions Hinder Structural Change in a Rural Economy? |b Evidence from Sri Lanka |c Emran, M. Shahe |
264 | 1 | |a Washington, D.C |b The World Bank |c 2015 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (44 p) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a World Bank E-Library Archive | |
520 | |a This paper analyzes the effects of land market restrictions on structural change from agriculture to non-farm in a rural economy. This paper develops a theoretical model that focuses on higher migration costs due to restrictions on alienability, and identifies the possibility of a reverse structural change where the share of nonagricultural employment declines. The reverse structural change can occur under plausible conditions: if demand for the non-agricultural good is income-inelastic (assuming the non-farm good is non-tradable), or non-agriculture is less labor intensive relative to agriculture (assuming the non-farm good is tradable). For identification, this paper exploits a natural experiment in Sri Lanka where historical malaria played a unique role in land policy. The empirical evidence indicates significant adverse effects of land restrictions on manufacturing and services employment, rural wages, and per capita household consumption. The evidence on the disaggregated occupational choices suggests that land restrictions increase wage employment in agriculture, but reduce it in manufacturing and services, with no perceptible effects on self-employment in non-agriculture. The results are consistent with the migration costs model, but contradict two widely discussed alternative mechanisms: collateral effect and property rights insecurity. This paper also provides direct evidence in favor of the migration costs mechanism | ||
700 | 1 | |a Shilpi, Forhad |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Emran, M. Shahe |4 oth | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Emran, M. Shahe |t Do Land Market Restrictions Hinder Structural Change in a Rural Economy? Evidence from Sri Lanka |d Washington, D.C : The World Bank, 2015 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7525 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-1-WBA | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033649346 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1812671774014308352 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Emran, M. Shahe |
author_facet | Emran, M. Shahe |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Emran, M. Shahe |
author_variant | m s e ms mse |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV048269151 |
collection | ZDB-1-WBA |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-1-WBA)NLM01046414X (OCoLC)1334052860 (DE-599)GBVNLM01046414X |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1596/1813-9450-7525 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nmm a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048269151</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1596/1813-9450-7525</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-1-WBA)NLM01046414X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334052860</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVNLM01046414X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-523</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Re13</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-706</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M347</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-862</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Emran, M. Shahe</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Do Land Market Restrictions Hinder Structural Change in a Rural Economy?</subfield><subfield code="b">Evidence from Sri Lanka</subfield><subfield code="c">Emran, M. Shahe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Washington, D.C</subfield><subfield code="b">The World Bank</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (44 p)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">World Bank E-Library Archive</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper analyzes the effects of land market restrictions on structural change from agriculture to non-farm in a rural economy. This paper develops a theoretical model that focuses on higher migration costs due to restrictions on alienability, and identifies the possibility of a reverse structural change where the share of nonagricultural employment declines. The reverse structural change can occur under plausible conditions: if demand for the non-agricultural good is income-inelastic (assuming the non-farm good is non-tradable), or non-agriculture is less labor intensive relative to agriculture (assuming the non-farm good is tradable). For identification, this paper exploits a natural experiment in Sri Lanka where historical malaria played a unique role in land policy. The empirical evidence indicates significant adverse effects of land restrictions on manufacturing and services employment, rural wages, and per capita household consumption. The evidence on the disaggregated occupational choices suggests that land restrictions increase wage employment in agriculture, but reduce it in manufacturing and services, with no perceptible effects on self-employment in non-agriculture. The results are consistent with the migration costs model, but contradict two widely discussed alternative mechanisms: collateral effect and property rights insecurity. This paper also provides direct evidence in favor of the migration costs mechanism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shilpi, Forhad</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Emran, M. Shahe</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Emran, M. Shahe</subfield><subfield code="t">Do Land Market Restrictions Hinder Structural Change in a Rural Economy? Evidence from Sri Lanka</subfield><subfield code="d">Washington, D.C : The World Bank, 2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7525</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-WBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033649346</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV048269151 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T20:00:00Z |
indexdate | 2024-10-12T04:01:54Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033649346 |
oclc_num | 1334052860 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-12 DE-521 DE-573 DE-523 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-703 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-706 DE-29 DE-M347 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-20 DE-739 DE-1043 DE-863 DE-BY-FWS DE-862 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-521 DE-573 DE-523 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-703 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-706 DE-29 DE-M347 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-20 DE-739 DE-1043 DE-863 DE-BY-FWS DE-862 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (44 p) |
psigel | ZDB-1-WBA |
publishDate | 2015 |
publishDateSearch | 2015 |
publishDateSort | 2015 |
publisher | The World Bank |
record_format | marc |
series2 | World Bank E-Library Archive |
spellingShingle | Emran, M. Shahe Do Land Market Restrictions Hinder Structural Change in a Rural Economy? Evidence from Sri Lanka |
title | Do Land Market Restrictions Hinder Structural Change in a Rural Economy? Evidence from Sri Lanka |
title_auth | Do Land Market Restrictions Hinder Structural Change in a Rural Economy? Evidence from Sri Lanka |
title_exact_search | Do Land Market Restrictions Hinder Structural Change in a Rural Economy? Evidence from Sri Lanka |
title_exact_search_txtP | Do Land Market Restrictions Hinder Structural Change in a Rural Economy? Evidence from Sri Lanka |
title_full | Do Land Market Restrictions Hinder Structural Change in a Rural Economy? Evidence from Sri Lanka Emran, M. Shahe |
title_fullStr | Do Land Market Restrictions Hinder Structural Change in a Rural Economy? Evidence from Sri Lanka Emran, M. Shahe |
title_full_unstemmed | Do Land Market Restrictions Hinder Structural Change in a Rural Economy? Evidence from Sri Lanka Emran, M. Shahe |
title_short | Do Land Market Restrictions Hinder Structural Change in a Rural Economy? |
title_sort | do land market restrictions hinder structural change in a rural economy evidence from sri lanka |
title_sub | Evidence from Sri Lanka |
url | https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7525 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT emranmshahe dolandmarketrestrictionshinderstructuralchangeinaruraleconomyevidencefromsrilanka AT shilpiforhad dolandmarketrestrictionshinderstructuralchangeinaruraleconomyevidencefromsrilanka |