Odnos Ustavnog suda i sudova u svetlosti ustavnog nadzora nad sudskim odlukama - analiza prakse Ustavnog suda Srbije:
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2019
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | In this article, the authors are giving the analyzis of selective decisions of the Constitutional Court of Serbia in relation to some dilemmas in the constitutional oversight of judicial decisions. Two aspects of the constitutional oversight of judicial decisions in Serbia are rather controversial. First is the possibility of the Constitutional Court̕ s cassation of judicial decisions which violate human rights. The second is the potential role of the Constitutional Court as a "super revision court". Those open questions make latent tensions between the Constitutional Court and the High Court of Cassation. The main thesis in the article is that the task of the Constitutional Court and the courts is almost identical. It is a complete and effective protection of human rights. The Constitutional Court is a subsidiary and not a souvereign protector of human rights. According to the authors, the interplay between the Constitutional Court and the courts has to be based on "a demand for complementarity". Without that "complementarity" no constitutional revision can prevent the persistante conflict between the Constitutional Court and the courts which endagers the implementation of the rule of law. The recent practice of the Constitutional Court indicates some positive moves towards the establishment of better institutional cooperation and mutual understanding, i. e. the constitutional culture which is less conflictual. However, much remains to be done. That is the common task of the Constitutional Court, the courts and the other institutional factors which are participating in the realization of the rule of law in Serbia |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 14) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048262853 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2019 |||| o||u| ||||||srp d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol800345 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334055925 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048262853 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a srp | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Petrov, Vladan |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Odnos Ustavnog suda i sudova u svetlosti ustavnog nadzora nad sudskim odlukama - analiza prakse Ustavnog suda Srbije |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2019 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2019 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 14) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a In this article, the authors are giving the analyzis of selective decisions of the Constitutional Court of Serbia in relation to some dilemmas in the constitutional oversight of judicial decisions. Two aspects of the constitutional oversight of judicial decisions in Serbia are rather controversial. First is the possibility of the Constitutional Court̕ s cassation of judicial decisions which violate human rights. The second is the potential role of the Constitutional Court as a "super revision court". Those open questions make latent tensions between the Constitutional Court and the High Court of Cassation. The main thesis in the article is that the task of the Constitutional Court and the courts is almost identical. It is a complete and effective protection of human rights. The Constitutional Court is a subsidiary and not a souvereign protector of human rights. According to the authors, the interplay between the Constitutional Court and the courts has to be based on "a demand for complementarity". Without that "complementarity" no constitutional revision can prevent the persistante conflict between the Constitutional Court and the courts which endagers the implementation of the rule of law. The recent practice of the Constitutional Court indicates some positive moves towards the establishment of better institutional cooperation and mutual understanding, i. e. the constitutional culture which is less conflictual. However, much remains to be done. That is the common task of the Constitutional Court, the courts and the other institutional factors which are participating in the realization of the rule of law in Serbia | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Human Rights and Humanitarian Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sociology of Law | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Prelić, Maja |4 aut | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033643056 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=800345 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184067208380416 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Petrov, Vladan Prelić, Maja |
| author_facet | Petrov, Vladan Prelić, Maja |
| author_role | aut aut |
| author_sort | Petrov, Vladan |
| author_variant | v p vp m p mp |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048262853 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol800345 (OCoLC)1334055925 (DE-599)BVBBV048262853 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02930nmm a2200397zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048262853</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2019 |||| o||u| ||||||srp d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol800345</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334055925</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048262853</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Petrov, Vladan</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Odnos Ustavnog suda i sudova u svetlosti ustavnog nadzora nad sudskim odlukama - analiza prakse Ustavnog suda Srbije</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 14)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this article, the authors are giving the analyzis of selective decisions of the Constitutional Court of Serbia in relation to some dilemmas in the constitutional oversight of judicial decisions. Two aspects of the constitutional oversight of judicial decisions in Serbia are rather controversial. First is the possibility of the Constitutional Court̕ s cassation of judicial decisions which violate human rights. The second is the potential role of the Constitutional Court as a "super revision court". Those open questions make latent tensions between the Constitutional Court and the High Court of Cassation. The main thesis in the article is that the task of the Constitutional Court and the courts is almost identical. It is a complete and effective protection of human rights. The Constitutional Court is a subsidiary and not a souvereign protector of human rights. According to the authors, the interplay between the Constitutional Court and the courts has to be based on "a demand for complementarity". Without that "complementarity" no constitutional revision can prevent the persistante conflict between the Constitutional Court and the courts which endagers the implementation of the rule of law. The recent practice of the Constitutional Court indicates some positive moves towards the establishment of better institutional cooperation and mutual understanding, i. e. the constitutional culture which is less conflictual. However, much remains to be done. That is the common task of the Constitutional Court, the courts and the other institutional factors which are participating in the realization of the rule of law in Serbia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Human Rights and Humanitarian Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sociology of Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Prelić, Maja</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033643056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=800345</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048262853 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:36Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:26Z |
| institution | BVB |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033643056 |
| oclc_num | 1334055925 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 14) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publishDateSearch | 2019 |
| publishDateSort | 2019 |
| publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Petrov, Vladan Verfasser aut Odnos Ustavnog suda i sudova u svetlosti ustavnog nadzora nad sudskim odlukama - analiza prakse Ustavnog suda Srbije Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2019 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2019 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 14) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier In this article, the authors are giving the analyzis of selective decisions of the Constitutional Court of Serbia in relation to some dilemmas in the constitutional oversight of judicial decisions. Two aspects of the constitutional oversight of judicial decisions in Serbia are rather controversial. First is the possibility of the Constitutional Court̕ s cassation of judicial decisions which violate human rights. The second is the potential role of the Constitutional Court as a "super revision court". Those open questions make latent tensions between the Constitutional Court and the High Court of Cassation. The main thesis in the article is that the task of the Constitutional Court and the courts is almost identical. It is a complete and effective protection of human rights. The Constitutional Court is a subsidiary and not a souvereign protector of human rights. According to the authors, the interplay between the Constitutional Court and the courts has to be based on "a demand for complementarity". Without that "complementarity" no constitutional revision can prevent the persistante conflict between the Constitutional Court and the courts which endagers the implementation of the rule of law. The recent practice of the Constitutional Court indicates some positive moves towards the establishment of better institutional cooperation and mutual understanding, i. e. the constitutional culture which is less conflictual. However, much remains to be done. That is the common task of the Constitutional Court, the courts and the other institutional factors which are participating in the realization of the rule of law in Serbia Constitutional Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Public Law Sociology of Law Prelić, Maja aut |
| spellingShingle | Petrov, Vladan Prelić, Maja Odnos Ustavnog suda i sudova u svetlosti ustavnog nadzora nad sudskim odlukama - analiza prakse Ustavnog suda Srbije Constitutional Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Public Law Sociology of Law |
| title | Odnos Ustavnog suda i sudova u svetlosti ustavnog nadzora nad sudskim odlukama - analiza prakse Ustavnog suda Srbije |
| title_auth | Odnos Ustavnog suda i sudova u svetlosti ustavnog nadzora nad sudskim odlukama - analiza prakse Ustavnog suda Srbije |
| title_exact_search | Odnos Ustavnog suda i sudova u svetlosti ustavnog nadzora nad sudskim odlukama - analiza prakse Ustavnog suda Srbije |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Odnos Ustavnog suda i sudova u svetlosti ustavnog nadzora nad sudskim odlukama - analiza prakse Ustavnog suda Srbije |
| title_full | Odnos Ustavnog suda i sudova u svetlosti ustavnog nadzora nad sudskim odlukama - analiza prakse Ustavnog suda Srbije |
| title_fullStr | Odnos Ustavnog suda i sudova u svetlosti ustavnog nadzora nad sudskim odlukama - analiza prakse Ustavnog suda Srbije |
| title_full_unstemmed | Odnos Ustavnog suda i sudova u svetlosti ustavnog nadzora nad sudskim odlukama - analiza prakse Ustavnog suda Srbije |
| title_short | Odnos Ustavnog suda i sudova u svetlosti ustavnog nadzora nad sudskim odlukama - analiza prakse Ustavnog suda Srbije |
| title_sort | odnos ustavnog suda i sudova u svetlosti ustavnog nadzora nad sudskim odlukama analiza prakse ustavnog suda srbije |
| topic | Constitutional Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Public Law Sociology of Law |
| topic_facet | Constitutional Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Public Law Sociology of Law |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT petrovvladan odnosustavnogsudaisudovausvetlostiustavnognadzoranadsudskimodlukamaanalizaprakseustavnogsudasrbije AT prelicmaja odnosustavnogsudaisudovausvetlostiustavnognadzoranadsudskimodlukamaanalizaprakseustavnogsudasrbije |