Sistem normiranja rada tužilaca u Bosni i Hercegovini:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | Bosnian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2018
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | The purpose of this paper is to present legal framework for individual and colective evaluation of prosecutors in the Bosnia and Herzegovina, criteria used for evaluation (quantity and quality criteria), bodie involved in these procedures (High Judicial Council and Prosecutorial Council of Bosnia and Herzegovina) and it's power. The main question arising from current legal framework is: what are the consequences of current particular evaluation criteria of prosecutors based on quantity and quality, does it de/stimulate best prosecutors to work harder and with more quality? The aim of assessing the work of a prosecutor will be presented within the scope of this article as well. Legal basis for the evaluation of prosecutor performance is set out in the provisions of the Law on the High Judicial Council and Prosecutorial Council of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Further and more detailed description is provided in the implementing act, issued by the High Judicial Council and Prosecutorial Council of Bosnia and Herzegovina on the basis of the legal authority. Criteria and measures for the evaluation comprise "prosecutor norms" according to which a check is made whether the prosecutor solved the prescribed number of cases in the course of a year, and with what quality of those decisions, altogether with "work ethics". Argumentation in the paper is based on statistic of Prosecutor's Offices in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and it's evaluation. In conclusion, the Bosnia and Herzegovina is a state where a system of formal evaluation is applied, wherein the assessment is based on the scoring principle. The paper is based on a finding solution/constructive criticism for improvement of the current evaluation system |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 14) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048262064 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2018 |||| o||u| ||||||bos d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol670315 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334017605 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048262064 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a bos | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Delić, Demirel |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Sistem normiranja rada tužilaca u Bosni i Hercegovini |c Demirel Delić |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2018 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2018 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 14) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a The purpose of this paper is to present legal framework for individual and colective evaluation of prosecutors in the Bosnia and Herzegovina, criteria used for evaluation (quantity and quality criteria), bodie involved in these procedures (High Judicial Council and Prosecutorial Council of Bosnia and Herzegovina) and it's power. The main question arising from current legal framework is: what are the consequences of current particular evaluation criteria of prosecutors based on quantity and quality, does it de/stimulate best prosecutors to work harder and with more quality? The aim of assessing the work of a prosecutor will be presented within the scope of this article as well. Legal basis for the evaluation of prosecutor performance is set out in the provisions of the Law on the High Judicial Council and Prosecutorial Council of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Further and more detailed description is provided in the implementing act, issued by the High Judicial Council and Prosecutorial Council of Bosnia and Herzegovina on the basis of the legal authority. Criteria and measures for the evaluation comprise "prosecutor norms" according to which a check is made whether the prosecutor solved the prescribed number of cases in the course of a year, and with what quality of those decisions, altogether with "work ethics". Argumentation in the paper is based on statistic of Prosecutor's Offices in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and it's evaluation. In conclusion, the Bosnia and Herzegovina is a state where a system of formal evaluation is applied, wherein the assessment is based on the scoring principle. The paper is based on a finding solution/constructive criticism for improvement of the current evaluation system | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Criminal Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evaluation research | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642267 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=670315 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184065727791104 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Delić, Demirel |
| author_facet | Delić, Demirel |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Delić, Demirel |
| author_variant | d d dd |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048262064 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol670315 (OCoLC)1334017605 (DE-599)BVBBV048262064 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02924nmm a2200385zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048262064</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2018 |||| o||u| ||||||bos d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol670315</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334017605</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048262064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">bos</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Delić, Demirel</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sistem normiranja rada tužilaca u Bosni i Hercegovini</subfield><subfield code="c">Demirel Delić</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 14)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The purpose of this paper is to present legal framework for individual and colective evaluation of prosecutors in the Bosnia and Herzegovina, criteria used for evaluation (quantity and quality criteria), bodie involved in these procedures (High Judicial Council and Prosecutorial Council of Bosnia and Herzegovina) and it's power. The main question arising from current legal framework is: what are the consequences of current particular evaluation criteria of prosecutors based on quantity and quality, does it de/stimulate best prosecutors to work harder and with more quality? The aim of assessing the work of a prosecutor will be presented within the scope of this article as well. Legal basis for the evaluation of prosecutor performance is set out in the provisions of the Law on the High Judicial Council and Prosecutorial Council of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Further and more detailed description is provided in the implementing act, issued by the High Judicial Council and Prosecutorial Council of Bosnia and Herzegovina on the basis of the legal authority. Criteria and measures for the evaluation comprise "prosecutor norms" according to which a check is made whether the prosecutor solved the prescribed number of cases in the course of a year, and with what quality of those decisions, altogether with "work ethics". Argumentation in the paper is based on statistic of Prosecutor's Offices in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and it's evaluation. In conclusion, the Bosnia and Herzegovina is a state where a system of formal evaluation is applied, wherein the assessment is based on the scoring principle. The paper is based on a finding solution/constructive criticism for improvement of the current evaluation system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Criminal Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=670315</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048262064 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:35Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:25Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | Bosnian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642267 |
| oclc_num | 1334017605 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 14) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Delić, Demirel Verfasser aut Sistem normiranja rada tužilaca u Bosni i Hercegovini Demirel Delić Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2018 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2018 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 14) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier The purpose of this paper is to present legal framework for individual and colective evaluation of prosecutors in the Bosnia and Herzegovina, criteria used for evaluation (quantity and quality criteria), bodie involved in these procedures (High Judicial Council and Prosecutorial Council of Bosnia and Herzegovina) and it's power. The main question arising from current legal framework is: what are the consequences of current particular evaluation criteria of prosecutors based on quantity and quality, does it de/stimulate best prosecutors to work harder and with more quality? The aim of assessing the work of a prosecutor will be presented within the scope of this article as well. Legal basis for the evaluation of prosecutor performance is set out in the provisions of the Law on the High Judicial Council and Prosecutorial Council of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Further and more detailed description is provided in the implementing act, issued by the High Judicial Council and Prosecutorial Council of Bosnia and Herzegovina on the basis of the legal authority. Criteria and measures for the evaluation comprise "prosecutor norms" according to which a check is made whether the prosecutor solved the prescribed number of cases in the course of a year, and with what quality of those decisions, altogether with "work ethics". Argumentation in the paper is based on statistic of Prosecutor's Offices in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and it's evaluation. In conclusion, the Bosnia and Herzegovina is a state where a system of formal evaluation is applied, wherein the assessment is based on the scoring principle. The paper is based on a finding solution/constructive criticism for improvement of the current evaluation system Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Criminal Law Public Law Evaluation research |
| spellingShingle | Delić, Demirel Sistem normiranja rada tužilaca u Bosni i Hercegovini Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Criminal Law Public Law Evaluation research |
| title | Sistem normiranja rada tužilaca u Bosni i Hercegovini |
| title_auth | Sistem normiranja rada tužilaca u Bosni i Hercegovini |
| title_exact_search | Sistem normiranja rada tužilaca u Bosni i Hercegovini |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Sistem normiranja rada tužilaca u Bosni i Hercegovini |
| title_full | Sistem normiranja rada tužilaca u Bosni i Hercegovini Demirel Delić |
| title_fullStr | Sistem normiranja rada tužilaca u Bosni i Hercegovini Demirel Delić |
| title_full_unstemmed | Sistem normiranja rada tužilaca u Bosni i Hercegovini Demirel Delić |
| title_short | Sistem normiranja rada tužilaca u Bosni i Hercegovini |
| title_sort | sistem normiranja rada tuzilaca u bosni i hercegovini |
| topic | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Criminal Law Public Law Evaluation research |
| topic_facet | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Criminal Law Public Law Evaluation research |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT delicdemirel sistemnormiranjaradatuzilacaubosniihercegovini |