Mogućnost zaštite prava u postupku imenovanja sudija i tužilaca:
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | Bosnian |
| Published: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | BSB01 |
| Item Description: | This paper provides an analysis of the Law of High Judical and Prosecutorial Council, especially of the part concerning the possiblity of protection of the rights in the nomination process of judges and prosecutors. The author recognizes that there exists an imperfection of the Law because it does not contain provisions which would enable those candidates who applied for the position of a judge or a prosecutors, and werent elected, to have a legal remedy against the decision of the High Judical and Prosecutorial Council. In these cases, the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina also dismissed the appellants appeals by declaring that it had no jurisdicion to decide, on the grounds that the decisions of High Judical and Procesutorial Council do not have the character of verdicts as proposed in the article VI/3 b) of the Constitution of Bosnia and Hercegovina. The author of this paper advocates and suggests that the future amendment of the Law on Hhigh Judical and Prosecutorial Council should establish an effective mechanism of legal protection in the nomination process of juddges and prosecutors |
| Physical Description: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 9) |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048261091 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2014 |||| o||u| ||||||bos d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol572178 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334037373 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048261091 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a bos | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Pobrić, Nurko |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Mogućnost zaštite prava u postupku imenovanja sudija i tužilaca |c Nurko Pobrić |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2014 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2014 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 9) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a This paper provides an analysis of the Law of High Judical and Prosecutorial Council, especially of the part concerning the possiblity of protection of the rights in the nomination process of judges and prosecutors. The author recognizes that there exists an imperfection of the Law because it does not contain provisions which would enable those candidates who applied for the position of a judge or a prosecutors, and werent elected, to have a legal remedy against the decision of the High Judical and Prosecutorial Council. In these cases, the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina also dismissed the appellants appeals by declaring that it had no jurisdicion to decide, on the grounds that the decisions of High Judical and Procesutorial Council do not have the character of verdicts as proposed in the article VI/3 b) of the Constitution of Bosnia and Hercegovina. The author of this paper advocates and suggests that the future amendment of the Law on Hhigh Judical and Prosecutorial Council should establish an effective mechanism of legal protection in the nomination process of juddges and prosecutors | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Law | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641294 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=572178 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1804184064253493248 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Pobrić, Nurko |
| author_facet | Pobrić, Nurko |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Pobrić, Nurko |
| author_variant | n p np |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048261091 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol572178 (OCoLC)1334037373 (DE-599)BVBBV048261091 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02302nmm a2200373zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048261091</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2014 |||| o||u| ||||||bos d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol572178</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334037373</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048261091</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">bos</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pobrić, Nurko</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Mogućnost zaštite prava u postupku imenovanja sudija i tužilaca</subfield><subfield code="c">Nurko Pobrić</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 9)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper provides an analysis of the Law of High Judical and Prosecutorial Council, especially of the part concerning the possiblity of protection of the rights in the nomination process of judges and prosecutors. The author recognizes that there exists an imperfection of the Law because it does not contain provisions which would enable those candidates who applied for the position of a judge or a prosecutors, and werent elected, to have a legal remedy against the decision of the High Judical and Prosecutorial Council. In these cases, the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina also dismissed the appellants appeals by declaring that it had no jurisdicion to decide, on the grounds that the decisions of High Judical and Procesutorial Council do not have the character of verdicts as proposed in the article VI/3 b) of the Constitution of Bosnia and Hercegovina. The author of this paper advocates and suggests that the future amendment of the Law on Hhigh Judical and Prosecutorial Council should establish an effective mechanism of legal protection in the nomination process of juddges and prosecutors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641294</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=572178</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048261091 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:34Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:24Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | Bosnian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641294 |
| oclc_num | 1334037373 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 9) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publishDateSearch | 2014 |
| publishDateSort | 2014 |
| publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Pobrić, Nurko Verfasser aut Mogućnost zaštite prava u postupku imenovanja sudija i tužilaca Nurko Pobrić Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2014 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2014 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 9) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier This paper provides an analysis of the Law of High Judical and Prosecutorial Council, especially of the part concerning the possiblity of protection of the rights in the nomination process of judges and prosecutors. The author recognizes that there exists an imperfection of the Law because it does not contain provisions which would enable those candidates who applied for the position of a judge or a prosecutors, and werent elected, to have a legal remedy against the decision of the High Judical and Prosecutorial Council. In these cases, the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina also dismissed the appellants appeals by declaring that it had no jurisdicion to decide, on the grounds that the decisions of High Judical and Procesutorial Council do not have the character of verdicts as proposed in the article VI/3 b) of the Constitution of Bosnia and Hercegovina. The author of this paper advocates and suggests that the future amendment of the Law on Hhigh Judical and Prosecutorial Council should establish an effective mechanism of legal protection in the nomination process of juddges and prosecutors Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law |
| spellingShingle | Pobrić, Nurko Mogućnost zaštite prava u postupku imenovanja sudija i tužilaca Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law |
| title | Mogućnost zaštite prava u postupku imenovanja sudija i tužilaca |
| title_auth | Mogućnost zaštite prava u postupku imenovanja sudija i tužilaca |
| title_exact_search | Mogućnost zaštite prava u postupku imenovanja sudija i tužilaca |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Mogućnost zaštite prava u postupku imenovanja sudija i tužilaca |
| title_full | Mogućnost zaštite prava u postupku imenovanja sudija i tužilaca Nurko Pobrić |
| title_fullStr | Mogućnost zaštite prava u postupku imenovanja sudija i tužilaca Nurko Pobrić |
| title_full_unstemmed | Mogućnost zaštite prava u postupku imenovanja sudija i tužilaca Nurko Pobrić |
| title_short | Mogućnost zaštite prava u postupku imenovanja sudija i tužilaca |
| title_sort | mogucnost zastite prava u postupku imenovanja sudija i tuzilaca |
| topic | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law |
| topic_facet | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pobricnurko mogucnostzastitepravaupostupkuimenovanjasudijaituzilaca |