CSD Policy Brief No. 26, Organised Crime and Corruption, National Characteristics and Policies of the EU Member‐States:
Saved in:
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Sofia [Bulgaria]
Centăr za izsledvane na demokracijata
2010
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | BSB01 |
| Item Description: | MAIN POINTS ¾ Based on a statistical analysis of 14 indicators (measuring corruption, organized crime, the effectiveness of government, macro‐economic indicators and the grey economy), seven clusters of countries emerged. Starting from the cluster where the manifestation of corruption and organized crime was weakest, the clusters were: (1) Denmark, Finland and Sweden; (2) Austria, Belgium, Ireland, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain and the UK; (3) France; (4) Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Portugal; (5) Czech Republic, Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Malta and Slovakia; (6) Italy; and (7) Bulgaria, Poland and Romania. ¾ Political corruption is organised crime's most powerful tool and local level political and administrative authorities represent the most likely criminal groups's target. In the case of police corruption the main reasons why organised crime uses corruption are to obtain information on investigations, operations, or competitors, (FR, NL, UK) and protection for continued illegal activities. In the majority of Member States, organised crime targets the judiciary, particularly the courts, much less than the police or politicians. Corruption of customs officers mainly helps organised crime avoid detection of smuggled goods, avoid investigations. ¾ Among the recommendations addressed to the European Commission is undertaking steps to widen the information and analysis tools such as benchmarking indicators to measure the threats from organized crime and corruption, and to assess the impact of measures to curb these threats. Another recommendation is to develop detailed guidelines to encompass a broad range of criminal offenses under the definition of corruption in national Penal Codes. ¾ EU Member‐states are urged to further develop their institutional capacities in order to conduct impact evaluation of measures against organized crime and corruption, and to build public‐private partnerships to facilitate anti‐corruption cooperation |
| Physical Description: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 8) |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048259493 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2010 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol342639 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334040095 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048259493 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a CSD Policy Brief No. 26, Organised Crime and Corruption, National Characteristics and Policies of the EU Member‐States |c Author Not Specified |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sofia [Bulgaria] |b Centăr za izsledvane na demokracijata |c 2010 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2010 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 8) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a MAIN POINTS ¾ Based on a statistical analysis of 14 indicators (measuring corruption, organized crime, the effectiveness of government, macro‐economic indicators and the grey economy), seven clusters of countries emerged. Starting from the cluster where the manifestation of corruption and organized crime was weakest, the clusters were: (1) Denmark, Finland and Sweden; (2) Austria, Belgium, Ireland, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain and the UK; (3) France; (4) Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Portugal; (5) Czech Republic, Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Malta and Slovakia; (6) Italy; and (7) Bulgaria, Poland and Romania. ¾ Political corruption is organised crime's most powerful tool and local level political and administrative authorities represent the most likely criminal groups's target. | ||
| 500 | |a In the case of police corruption the main reasons why organised crime uses corruption are to obtain information on investigations, operations, or competitors, (FR, NL, UK) and protection for continued illegal activities. In the majority of Member States, organised crime targets the judiciary, particularly the courts, much less than the police or politicians. Corruption of customs officers mainly helps organised crime avoid detection of smuggled goods, avoid investigations. ¾ Among the recommendations addressed to the European Commission is undertaking steps to widen the information and analysis tools such as benchmarking indicators to measure the threats from organized crime and corruption, and to assess the impact of measures to curb these threats. Another recommendation is to develop detailed guidelines to encompass a broad range of criminal offenses under the definition of corruption in national Penal Codes. | ||
| 500 | |a ¾ EU Member‐states are urged to further develop their institutional capacities in order to conduct impact evaluation of measures against organized crime and corruption, and to build public‐private partnerships to facilitate anti‐corruption cooperation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Administration | |
| 650 | 4 | |a EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033639696 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=342639 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1804184062232887296 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048259493 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol342639 (OCoLC)1334040095 (DE-599)BVBBV048259493 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03192nmm a2200373zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048259493</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2010 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol342639</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334040095</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048259493</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">CSD Policy Brief No. 26, Organised Crime and Corruption, National Characteristics and Policies of the EU Member‐States</subfield><subfield code="c">Author Not Specified</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sofia [Bulgaria]</subfield><subfield code="b">Centăr za izsledvane na demokracijata</subfield><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 8)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN POINTS ¾ Based on a statistical analysis of 14 indicators (measuring corruption, organized crime, the effectiveness of government, macro‐economic indicators and the grey economy), seven clusters of countries emerged. Starting from the cluster where the manifestation of corruption and organized crime was weakest, the clusters were: (1) Denmark, Finland and Sweden; (2) Austria, Belgium, Ireland, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain and the UK; (3) France; (4) Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Portugal; (5) Czech Republic, Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Malta and Slovakia; (6) Italy; and (7) Bulgaria, Poland and Romania. ¾ Political corruption is organised crime's most powerful tool and local level political and administrative authorities represent the most likely criminal groups's target. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In the case of police corruption the main reasons why organised crime uses corruption are to obtain information on investigations, operations, or competitors, (FR, NL, UK) and protection for continued illegal activities. In the majority of Member States, organised crime targets the judiciary, particularly the courts, much less than the police or politicians. Corruption of customs officers mainly helps organised crime avoid detection of smuggled goods, avoid investigations. ¾ Among the recommendations addressed to the European Commission is undertaking steps to widen the information and analysis tools such as benchmarking indicators to measure the threats from organized crime and corruption, and to assess the impact of measures to curb these threats. Another recommendation is to develop detailed guidelines to encompass a broad range of criminal offenses under the definition of corruption in national Penal Codes. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a"> ¾ EU Member‐states are urged to further develop their institutional capacities in order to conduct impact evaluation of measures against organized crime and corruption, and to build public‐private partnerships to facilitate anti‐corruption cooperation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Administration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033639696</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=342639</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048259493 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:32Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:22Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033639696 |
| oclc_num | 1334040095 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 8) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2010 |
| publishDateSearch | 2010 |
| publishDateSort | 2010 |
| publisher | Centăr za izsledvane na demokracijata |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | CSD Policy Brief No. 26, Organised Crime and Corruption, National Characteristics and Policies of the EU Member‐States Author Not Specified Sofia [Bulgaria] Centăr za izsledvane na demokracijata 2010 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2010 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 8) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier MAIN POINTS ¾ Based on a statistical analysis of 14 indicators (measuring corruption, organized crime, the effectiveness of government, macro‐economic indicators and the grey economy), seven clusters of countries emerged. Starting from the cluster where the manifestation of corruption and organized crime was weakest, the clusters were: (1) Denmark, Finland and Sweden; (2) Austria, Belgium, Ireland, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain and the UK; (3) France; (4) Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Portugal; (5) Czech Republic, Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Malta and Slovakia; (6) Italy; and (7) Bulgaria, Poland and Romania. ¾ Political corruption is organised crime's most powerful tool and local level political and administrative authorities represent the most likely criminal groups's target. In the case of police corruption the main reasons why organised crime uses corruption are to obtain information on investigations, operations, or competitors, (FR, NL, UK) and protection for continued illegal activities. In the majority of Member States, organised crime targets the judiciary, particularly the courts, much less than the police or politicians. Corruption of customs officers mainly helps organised crime avoid detection of smuggled goods, avoid investigations. ¾ Among the recommendations addressed to the European Commission is undertaking steps to widen the information and analysis tools such as benchmarking indicators to measure the threats from organized crime and corruption, and to assess the impact of measures to curb these threats. Another recommendation is to develop detailed guidelines to encompass a broad range of criminal offenses under the definition of corruption in national Penal Codes. ¾ EU Member‐states are urged to further develop their institutional capacities in order to conduct impact evaluation of measures against organized crime and corruption, and to build public‐private partnerships to facilitate anti‐corruption cooperation Public Administration EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment |
| spellingShingle | CSD Policy Brief No. 26, Organised Crime and Corruption, National Characteristics and Policies of the EU Member‐States Public Administration EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment |
| title | CSD Policy Brief No. 26, Organised Crime and Corruption, National Characteristics and Policies of the EU Member‐States |
| title_auth | CSD Policy Brief No. 26, Organised Crime and Corruption, National Characteristics and Policies of the EU Member‐States |
| title_exact_search | CSD Policy Brief No. 26, Organised Crime and Corruption, National Characteristics and Policies of the EU Member‐States |
| title_exact_search_txtP | CSD Policy Brief No. 26, Organised Crime and Corruption, National Characteristics and Policies of the EU Member‐States |
| title_full | CSD Policy Brief No. 26, Organised Crime and Corruption, National Characteristics and Policies of the EU Member‐States Author Not Specified |
| title_fullStr | CSD Policy Brief No. 26, Organised Crime and Corruption, National Characteristics and Policies of the EU Member‐States Author Not Specified |
| title_full_unstemmed | CSD Policy Brief No. 26, Organised Crime and Corruption, National Characteristics and Policies of the EU Member‐States Author Not Specified |
| title_short | CSD Policy Brief No. 26, Organised Crime and Corruption, National Characteristics and Policies of the EU Member‐States |
| title_sort | csd policy brief no 26 organised crime and corruption national characteristics and policies of the eu member states |
| topic | Public Administration EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment |
| topic_facet | Public Administration EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment |