Assessing adults' skills on a global scale: A joint analysis of results from PIAAC and STEP
This paper illustrates similarities and differences between two international surveys that assess adults' skills: the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) and the Skills Towards Employment and Productivity (STEP) survey. In particular, the paper highlights th...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2020
|
| Series: | OECD Education Working Papers
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Volltext |
| Summary: | This paper illustrates similarities and differences between two international surveys that assess adults' skills: the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) and the Skills Towards Employment and Productivity (STEP) survey. In particular, the paper highlights the issues that can arise for researchers interested to jointly analyse the data from the two surveys and to compare their results. The paper finds that, in spite of the many similarities, important differences exist between PIAAC and STEP, both in the way the data are collected, and in the way the proficiency of respondents is estimated. These issues can indeed affect the cross-country comparability of results from the two surveys. There is instead little evidence that the literacy assessment used in the two surveys is not adequate to form a basis for a valid assessment of adults' proficiency on a global scale |
| Physical Description: | 1 Online-Ressource (54 Seiten) |
| DOI: | 10.1787/ae2f95d5-en |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047937069 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220413s2020 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/ae2f95d5-en |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-13-SOC)061244309 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1312706834 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047937069 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-384 |a DE-91 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-739 |a DE-355 |a DE-20 |a DE-1028 |a DE-1049 |a DE-188 |a DE-521 |a DE-861 |a DE-898 |a DE-92 |a DE-573 |a DE-19 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Keslair, François |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Assessing adults' skills on a global scale |b A joint analysis of results from PIAAC and STEP |c François Keslair and Marco Paccagnella |
| 264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2020 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (54 Seiten) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a OECD Education Working Papers | |
| 520 | |a This paper illustrates similarities and differences between two international surveys that assess adults' skills: the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) and the Skills Towards Employment and Productivity (STEP) survey. In particular, the paper highlights the issues that can arise for researchers interested to jointly analyse the data from the two surveys and to compare their results. The paper finds that, in spite of the many similarities, important differences exist between PIAAC and STEP, both in the way the data are collected, and in the way the proficiency of respondents is estimated. These issues can indeed affect the cross-country comparability of results from the two surveys. There is instead little evidence that the literacy assessment used in the two surveys is not adequate to form a basis for a valid assessment of adults' proficiency on a global scale | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Education | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Paccagnella, Marco |4 ctb | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/ae2f95d5-en |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033318563 | |
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1818806115461234688 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Keslair, François |
| author2 | Paccagnella, Marco |
| author2_role | ctb |
| author2_variant | m p mp |
| author_facet | Keslair, François Paccagnella, Marco |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Keslair, François |
| author_variant | f k fk |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047937069 |
| collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-13-SOC)061244309 (OCoLC)1312706834 (DE-599)BVBBV047937069 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1787/ae2f95d5-en |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047937069</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220413s2020 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/ae2f95d5-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-13-SOC)061244309</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1312706834</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047937069</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1028</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-861</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Keslair, François</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Assessing adults' skills on a global scale</subfield><subfield code="b">A joint analysis of results from PIAAC and STEP</subfield><subfield code="c">François Keslair and Marco Paccagnella</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (54 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Education Working Papers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper illustrates similarities and differences between two international surveys that assess adults' skills: the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) and the Skills Towards Employment and Productivity (STEP) survey. In particular, the paper highlights the issues that can arise for researchers interested to jointly analyse the data from the two surveys and to compare their results. The paper finds that, in spite of the many similarities, important differences exist between PIAAC and STEP, both in the way the data are collected, and in the way the proficiency of respondents is estimated. These issues can indeed affect the cross-country comparability of results from the two surveys. There is instead little evidence that the literacy assessment used in the two surveys is not adequate to form a basis for a valid assessment of adults' proficiency on a global scale</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Paccagnella, Marco</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/ae2f95d5-en</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033318563</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047937069 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:35:06Z |
| indexdate | 2024-12-18T19:04:38Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033318563 |
| oclc_num | 1312706834 |
| open_access_boolean | 1 |
| owner | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (54 Seiten) |
| psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSearch | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | OECD Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | OECD Education Working Papers |
| spelling | Keslair, François Verfasser aut Assessing adults' skills on a global scale A joint analysis of results from PIAAC and STEP François Keslair and Marco Paccagnella Paris OECD Publishing 2020 1 Online-Ressource (54 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier OECD Education Working Papers This paper illustrates similarities and differences between two international surveys that assess adults' skills: the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) and the Skills Towards Employment and Productivity (STEP) survey. In particular, the paper highlights the issues that can arise for researchers interested to jointly analyse the data from the two surveys and to compare their results. The paper finds that, in spite of the many similarities, important differences exist between PIAAC and STEP, both in the way the data are collected, and in the way the proficiency of respondents is estimated. These issues can indeed affect the cross-country comparability of results from the two surveys. There is instead little evidence that the literacy assessment used in the two surveys is not adequate to form a basis for a valid assessment of adults' proficiency on a global scale Education Paccagnella, Marco ctb https://doi.org/10.1787/ae2f95d5-en Verlag kostenfrei Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Keslair, François Assessing adults' skills on a global scale A joint analysis of results from PIAAC and STEP Education |
| title | Assessing adults' skills on a global scale A joint analysis of results from PIAAC and STEP |
| title_auth | Assessing adults' skills on a global scale A joint analysis of results from PIAAC and STEP |
| title_exact_search | Assessing adults' skills on a global scale A joint analysis of results from PIAAC and STEP |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Assessing adults' skills on a global scale A joint analysis of results from PIAAC and STEP |
| title_full | Assessing adults' skills on a global scale A joint analysis of results from PIAAC and STEP François Keslair and Marco Paccagnella |
| title_fullStr | Assessing adults' skills on a global scale A joint analysis of results from PIAAC and STEP François Keslair and Marco Paccagnella |
| title_full_unstemmed | Assessing adults' skills on a global scale A joint analysis of results from PIAAC and STEP François Keslair and Marco Paccagnella |
| title_short | Assessing adults' skills on a global scale |
| title_sort | assessing adults skills on a global scale a joint analysis of results from piaac and step |
| title_sub | A joint analysis of results from PIAAC and STEP |
| topic | Education |
| topic_facet | Education |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1787/ae2f95d5-en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT keslairfrancois assessingadultsskillsonaglobalscaleajointanalysisofresultsfrompiaacandstep AT paccagnellamarco assessingadultsskillsonaglobalscaleajointanalysisofresultsfrompiaacandstep |